Search

We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial (German-Austrian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Study Group [AMLSG] 16-10) to evaluate midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT) and a 1-year midosta urin maintenance therapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) internal tandem duplication (ITD). Patients 18 to 70 years of age with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD-positive AML were eligible. Primary and key secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results were compared with a historical cohort of 415 patients treated on 5 prior AMLSG trials; statistical analysis was performed using a double-robust adjustment with propensity score weighting and covariate adjustment. Results were also compared with patients (18-59 years) treated on the placebo arm of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 10603/RATIFY trial. The trial accrued 440 patients (18-60 years, n = 312; 61-70 years, n = 128). In multivariate analysis, EFS was significantly in favor of patients treated within the AMLSG 16-10 trial compared with the AMLSG control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P < .001); both in younger (HR, 0.59; P < .001) and older patients (HR, 0.42; P < .001). Multivariate analysis also showed a significant beneficial effect on OS compared with the AMLSG control (HR, 0.57; P < .001) as well as to the CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial (HR, 0.71; P = .005). The treatment effect of midostaurin remained significant in sensitivity analysis including allogeneic HCT as a time-dependent covariate. Addition of midostaurin to chemotherapy was safe in younger and older patients. In comparison with historical controls, the addition of midostaurin to intensive therapy led to a significant improvement in outcome in younger and older patients with AML and FLT3-ITD. This trial is registered at clinicaltrialsregistry.eu as Eudra-CT number 2011-003168-63 and at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01477606.

Higher doses of cytarabine appear to improve long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in particular for younger patients. To this end, the optimal dosage of single agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy remains elusive. Here, we assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation after 7 + 3 induction on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. Patients below 65 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting. Six-hundred-forty-two patients received HiDAC consolidation with median dosage of median 17.6 (IQR, 16.5–18.0) g/m² for a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2–3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 5.9 (IQR, 5.7–8.6) g/m² for a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1–3). Both groups differed significantly in some important characteristics (age, sex, cytogenetic risk group, ECOG performance status, disease status, HCT-CI, number of induction cycles). After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, relapse-free survival after 2 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (55.3%) and IDAC-treated (55.6%) patients. Moreover, no significant differences in overall survival were observed after 2 years (84.7 vs. 80.6%). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%, p

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by complex molecular alterations and driver mutations. Elderly patients show increased frequencies of IDH mutations with high chemoresistance and relapse rates despite recent therapeutic advances. Besides being associated with global promoter hypermethylation, IDH1 mutation facilitated changes in 3D DNA-conformation by CTCF-anchor methylation and upregulated oncogene expression in glioma, correlating with poor prognosis. Here, we investigated the role of IDH1 p.R132H mutation in altering 3D DNA-architecture and subsequent oncogene activation in AML. Using public RNA-Seq data, we identified upregulation of tyrosine kinase PDGFRA in IDH1-mutant patients, correlating with poor prognosis. DNA methylation analysis identified CpG hypermethylation within a CTCF-anchor upstream of PDGFRA in IDH1-mutant patients. Increased PDGFRA expression, PDGFRA-CTCF methylation and decreased CTCF binding were confirmed in AML CRISPR cells with heterozygous IDH1 p.R132H mutation and upon exogenous 2-HG treatment. IDH1-mutant cells showed higher sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib, which was supported by reduced blast count in a patient with refractory IDH1-mutant AML after dasatinib treatment. Our data illustrate that IDH1 p.R132H mutation leads to CTCF hypermethylation, disrupting DNA-looping and insulation of PDGFRA, resulting in PDGFRA upregulation in IDH1-mutant AML. Treatment with dasatinib may offer a novel treatment strategy for IDH1-mutant AML.

Background: Trisomy 4 is a recurrent but rare cytogenetic abnormality reported in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The prognostic significance of this abnormality in AML patients is not clear. Prognosis of AML patients with trisomy 4 seems to be poor as compared to that of patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) may improve survival if applied early in first complete remission (CR). However, neither prospective clinical nor larger retrospective cohort studies are available to support these results from small series. Aims: To characterize AML patients with trisomy 4 and compare outcomes according to different treatment strategies. Methods: We retrospectively studied 123 AML patients with trisomy 4 (median age at diagnosis, 58 years; range, 16-76 years) treated between 2000 and 2019 within 2 large study groups. Standard statistical methods were applied. Results: Median white blood cell count at diagnosis was 4.8/nl (range, 0.4-255/nl) and platelets 46/nl (range, 2-330/nl). Type of AML was de novo in 97 (79%), secondary after myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm in 18 (15%), and therapy-related in 8 (6%) patients. Sixty-two (50%) patients were female. Cytogenetic analysis revealed trisomy 4 as the sole abnormality in 28 (23%), additional abnormalities in 95 (77%) patients, most frequently ≥3 (n=66) abnormalities, trisomy 8 (n=41), karyotypes characterized by trisomies only (n=21) and t(8;21) or inv(16) (CBF; n=10). A total of 98 patients (80%) had NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation testing. Of those, 21 (21%) and 15 (15%) harbored NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Only 2 (3%) of 72 patients were CEBPA double mutated. Data on response to intensive anthracycline-based induction therapy were available in 117 patients. Early death rate was 5% (n=6). CR was achieved in 68% (n=79) with 22 (19%) requiring an intensive salvage treatment cycle. Notably, patients with trisomy 4 as sole abnormality had a CR rate of 89% (n=25/28). There was no difference in the CR rate in FLT3-ITD positive (n=10/15) as compared to FLT3 wild type (n=56/83) patients (67% each, P=0.99). Univariable analysis revealed trisomy 4 as sole abnormality (OR, 5.76; P=0.007) and NPM1 (OR, 12.08; P=0.02) as favorable factors. An allo-HCT was performed in 40 (34%) patients, of whom 19 patients were transplanted in first CR after induction therapy. Nine patients achieved CR after salvage chemotherapy and went on to allo-HCT; another 12 patients received allo-HCT with active disease. Type of donor was matched-related in 8, matched-unrelated in 30, and unknown in 2 of the 40 patients, respectively. Median follow-up of the intensively treated cohort was 73 months (95%-CI, 36-91 months). Five-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 31% (95%-CI, 23-42%) and 27% (95%-CI, 18-42%). OS rates were significantly higher in patients with CBF leukemia or patients with trisomy 4 as compared to all other abnormalities (Figure 1; P Conclusions: Clinically, patients with trisomy 4 are very heterogeneous in particular with respect to cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. In our cohort, patients with trisomy 4 as a sole abnormality had a high CR rate and favorable clinical outcome. In the total cohort, allo-HCT did not improve RFS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Crysandt: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fransecky: Medac: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Martinez-Lopez: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Baldus: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Levis: Astellas and FujiFilm: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, FujiFilm, and Menarini: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Montesinos: Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Röllig: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schlenk: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hexal: Honoraria; Neovio Biotech: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding.

Summary Background Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who achieve a morphological complete remission can predict haematological relapse. In this prospective study, we aimed to determine whether MRD-guided pre-emptive treatment with azacitidine could prevent relapse in these patients. Methods The relapse prevention with azacitidine (RELAZA2) study is an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial done at nine university health centres in Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older with advanced MDS or AML, who had achieved a complete remission after conventional chemotherapy or allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation, were prospectively screened for MRD during 24 months from baseline by either quantitative PCR for mutant NPM1, leukaemia-specific fusion genes (DEK–NUP214, RUNX1–RUNX1T1, CBFb–MYH11), or analysis of donor-chimaerism in flow cytometry-sorted CD34-positive cells in patients who received allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. MRD-positive patients in confirmed complete remission received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously on days 1–7 of a 29-day cycle for 24 cycles. After six cycles, MRD status was reassessed and patients with major responses (MRD negativity) were eligible for a treatment de-escalation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were relapse-free and alive 6 months after the start of pre-emptive treatment. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClincialTrials.gov , number NCT01462578 , and finished recruitment on Aug 21, 2018. Findings Between Oct 10, 2011, and Aug 20, 2015, we screened 198 patients with advanced MDS (n=26) or AML (n=172), of whom 60 (30%) developed MRD during the 24-month screening period and 53 (88%) were eligible to start study treatment. 6 months after initiation of azacitidine, 31 (58%, 95% CI 44–72) of 53 patients were relapse-free and alive (p Interpretation Pre-emptive therapy with azacitidine can prevent or substantially delay haematological relapse in MRD-positive patients with MDS or AML who are at high risk of relapse. Our study also suggests that continuous MRD negativity during regular MRD monitoring might be prognostic for patient outcomes. Funding Celgene Pharma, Jose Carreras Leukaemia Foundation, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Foundation.

BackgroundOverall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after five years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial.Methods/DesignThis is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4 and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7+3 schedule with cytarabine 200mg/m² continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60mg/m² days 1, 2 and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1g/m², bi-daily, days 1,2,3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04093505; EudraCT Number: 2019-003913-32.TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: October 30, 2018

Trials 22(1), 765 (2021). doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w, Published by BioMed Central, London

Background Venetoclax (VEN)-based combination therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has been approved for first-line treatment in patients ineligible for intensive treatment based on two randomized trials. There is some evidence for efficacy also in the in relapsed/ refractory setting (R/R), but comparative controlled data is lacking. Here, we report our experience of VEN-Azacitidine (AZA) in R/R AML salvage treatment and bridge to allogeneic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in fit patients compared to historical data from the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03188874). Design/Methods We analyzed all patients with R/R AML after initial intensive therapy, who started VEN-AZA salvage treatment at the University Hospital Heidelberg, between October 2018 and October 2020. Patients, who were bridged to allo-HCT were compared in a multivariable analysis to data of R/R AML patients from the SAL registry receiving an allo-HCT. Results: A total of 26 patients (median age 60 years, range 23 to 79) were included. All patients initially received intensive therapy, 16 patients (62%) had been refractory to intensive induction therapy with DA (daunorubicin, cytarabine) (11 patients)/ CPX-351 (2 patients) or to an intensive salvage therapy regime with HAM (2 patients)/ Cytarabin-Bortezomib (1 patient). Ten patients (38%) had morphologic (7 patients) or molecular relapse (3 patients) after intensive first line therapy. The distribution of AML according to WHO-2016 classification was n=10 recurrent genetic abnormalities (n= 7, mutated NPM1; n=1, biallelic CEBPA mutations; n=1, mutated RUNX1; n=1, CBFB-MYH11), n=10 AML with MRC, n=6 AML NOS. According to the 2017 ELN classification, 9 patients (34,5%) had low risk, 8 (31%) intermediate risk and 9 (34,5%) adverse risk disease. All patients received AZA 75mg/m² for 7 days combined with VEN 400mg/day after initial ramp up or a reduced dose of 100mg/day in case of co-medication with azoles in 28 days cycles. Best response was CR/CRi in 58% (n=15), PR in 23% (n=6) patients. Day 30-mortality was 0%, day 60-mortality was 4% (n=1). Allo-HCT was performed in 20 patients (77%). Pre-Allo-HCT remission status was CR/CRi in 11 (55%), PR in 4 (20%) patients and MLFS in 1 patient and 4 patients had active disease (n=3, relapse after achieving CR/CRi on VEN-AZA, n=1 refractory to VEN-AZA.). At the time of analysis 15 (75%) of the 20 bridged patients were alive and 11 (55%) are still in CR resulting in a median relapse-free survival in bridged patients of 406 days, whereas all patients not proceeding to allo-HCT died after a median of 139 days. In total, 63 patients with R/R AML were identified in the SAL-registry proceeding to allo-HCT with non VEN-based salvage attempt. Pre-Allo-HCT remission status was CR/CRi in 18 (28%), PR in 15 (24%), unknown in 13 patients (21%) and 17 (27%) patients had active disease (n=9 relapsed, n=8 refractory). Patients of the SAL registry were younger (median, 55 years; range, 22-75 years) and more patients were ELN-int (low risk, 32%, n=20; int, 52%, n=33, adv, 16%, n=10). Median follow-up in the VEN-AZA and the SAL cohorts were 1.4 years and 4.6 years, respectively. Cox-regression modeling of survival measured from the date of being refractory/relapsed revealed a non-significant effect of the cohorts favoring the VEN-AZA salvage therapy (HR, 0.87, p=0.73). However, stratified univariable survival analysis revealed in trend better survival (p=0.10) in the VEN-AZA compared to the SAL cohort with 77% (95%-CI, 62-95%) and 74% (95%-CI, 57-97%) as well as 84% (95%-CI, 76-94%) and 52% (95-CI, 41-68%) 1- and 2-years survival, respectively. Conclusion: Our data confirms the efficacy of VEN-AZA in patients with R/R AML and underlines its potential as an effective strategy for bridging to successful allo-HCT. Disclosures Unglaub: JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Schlenk: Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovio Biotech: Honoraria; Hexal: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria. Middeke: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Glycostem: Consultancy; UCB: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: GSK: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Crysandt: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria. Fransecky: Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Seggewiss-Bernhardt: Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ipsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EusaPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Baldus: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Dreger: Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Müller-Tidow: Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Sauer: Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: off-label use of Venetoclax-based combination therapy in relapsed or refractory AML

In fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), immediate treatment start is recommended due to the poor prognosis of untreated acute leukemia. We explored the relationship between time from diagnosis to treatment start (TDT) and prognosis in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia–Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. All registered non–acute promyelocytic leukemia patients with intensive induction treatment and a minimum 12 months of follow-up were selected (n = 2263). We analyzed influence of TDT on remission, early death, and overall survival (OS) in univariable analyses for each day of treatment delay, in groups of 0 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and >15 days of TDT, adjusted for influence of established prognostic variables on outcomes. Median TDT was 3 days (interquartile range, 2-7). Unadjusted 2-year OS rates, stratified by TDT of 0 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and >15 days, were 51%, 48%, 44%, and 50% (P = .211). In multivariable Cox regression analysis accounting for established prognostic variables, the TDT hazard ratio as a continuous variable was 1.00 (P = .617). In OS analyses, separately stratified for age ≤60 and >60 years and for high vs lower initial white blood cell count, no significant differences between TDT groups were observed. Our study suggests that TDT is not related to survival. As stratification in intensive first-line AML treatment evolves, TDT data suggest that it may be a feasible approach to wait for genetic and other laboratory test results so that clinically stable patients are assigned the best available treatment option. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03188874.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by a high relapse rate, indicating insufficient clearance of leukemia-initiating cells. Depending on genetic risk stratification, consolidating chemotherapy proves to significantly reduce the risk of relapse. In particular, in younger AML patients higher dosage of cytarabine appears to improve long-term outcome, while there is no apparent benefit of multiagent combination, compared to cytarabine monotherapy. However, to this end the optimal dosage of single agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy after 7+3 remission induction remains elusive. Methods: Here, we retrospectively assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. Patients below 65 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020 with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting. Results: 642 patients received HiDAC consolidation with a median dosage of 5794.88 (IQR, 4745.48-5971.56) mg/m 2/d with a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2-3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 1946.16 (IQR, 1869.51-2469.15) mg/m 2/d with a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1-3). IDAC-treated patients showed in average a higher age (median (IQR) 58.5 (49-62) years vs. 50 (41-56) years) and more comorbidities with 43.8% having an HCT-CI score of 2-4, compared to 22.3% among HiDAC-treated patients. Alongside, significantly more secondary (5.1% vs. 3.1%) and therapy-related (12.4% vs. 4.1%) AML as well as more adverse (14.5% vs. 6.5%) and less favorable (40.6% vs. 56%) genetic risk features according to ELN 2017 risk classification were found among IDAC-treated patients. After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, overall survival after 5 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (71.1 %) and IDAC-treated (67.7%) patients. Moreover, no significant differences in relapse-free survival were observed after 5 years (47.4 vs. 45.2%). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%) while significantly more HiDAC-treated patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapse (30.8 vs. 20.2%). Censoring for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission revealed no significant survival difference with regard to cytarabine dosage. Considering only ELN favorable risk AML patients, there was no difference in 5-years overall (80.5% vs. 83.9%) nor relapse-free (57.7% vs. 56.8%) survival. Of note, significantly more patients treated with HiDAC suffered from ≥3 CTCAE infectious complications (56.7 vs. 44.1%), which was more striking in patients above 50 years of age. The rate of other ≥3 CTCAE non-hematological toxicities and secondary malignancies was comparable in both treatment groups. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests no significant benefit of high dose cytarabine compared to intermediate dosages in consolidation for AML patients under 65 years of age, independent of ELN risk group. Disclosures Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brummendorf: Takepart Media: Honoraria; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers: Research Funding. Fransecky: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Held: MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Acortech Biopharma: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Baldus: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Mueller-Tidow: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy, Research Funding.

BACKGROUND: Midostaurin is a first-generation, type I multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with inhibitory activity against FLT3-ITD and -TKD mutations. Midostaurin is approved by FDA and EMA in combination with intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adult patients with AML exhibiting an activating FLT3 mutation; the EMA label also includes single-agent maintenance therapy following consolidation chemotherapy. We conducted a phase-II trial (AMLSG 16-10) to evaluate midostaurin with induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT) and a one-year midostaurin maintenance therapy in younger and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD). METHODS: Patients 18 to 70 years of age with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD-positive AML were eligible. Primary and key secondary endpoints were event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); results were compared to those of a historical control cohort of 415 patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Statistical analysis was performed using a double-robust adjustment with propensity score weighting and covariate adjustment. Major differences in trial design compared to the pivotal CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial were: i) only AML with FLT3-ITD were eligible; ii) AML with FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations (only) and core-binding factor AML were not eligible; iii) older patients 60-70 years of age were eligible; iv) all patients were assigned to allogeneic HCT; v) a one-year maintenance treatment with midostaurin was included also after allogeneic HCT; vi) a continuous dosing schedule of midostaurin was applied with the aim to achieve a better target inhibition. Results: The trial accrued 440 patients, including 312 younger (18-60 yrs) and 128 older (61-70 yrs) patients. Complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery rate, median EFS and OS of the 440 patients were 74.9%, 13.6 and 36.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis of EFS showed a highly significant hazard reduction for an event for patients treated within AMLSG 16-10 trial compared to the historical controls (HR 0.55; 95%-confidence interval [CI], 0.47, 0.65; P Conclusions: In comparison to a historical control cohort, the addition of midostaurin to intensive therapy led to a significant improvement in EFS and OS in both younger and older adult patients with AML and FLT3-ITD. Figure: Survival distribution for the primary endpoint event-free survival (EFS) and key secondary endpoint overall survival (OS) according to study population and age group. A EFS by cohort and age group (≤60 versus >60 years) B OS by cohort and age group (≤60 versus >60 years) Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Döhner: Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GEMoaB: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Berlin-Chemie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedicals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ulm University Hospital: Current Employment. Fiedler: Servier: Consultancy, Other: Meeting attendance, Preparation of information material; Stemline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sanyko: Consultancy, Other: Meeting attendance, Preparation of information material; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Meeting attendance, Preparation of information material; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad/Incyte: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Meeting attendance, Preparation of information material, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Meeting attendance, Preparation of information material. Wulf: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Salih: BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Synimmune GmbH: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Lübbert: Imago BioSciences: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Syros: Honoraria; Aristopharm: Research Funding; Cheplapharm: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Hexal: Honoraria; Astex: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Kühn: Abbvie: Honoraria; Kura Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Schroeder: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Salwender: Oncopeptides: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Chugai: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Pfizer: Honoraria. Götze: Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westermann: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stem Cell Line: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria. Fransecky: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria. Mayer: Novartis: Other: Travel support; Celgene: Other: Travel support; Roche: Other: Travel support; Amgen: Other: Travel support; BMS: Other: Travel support; Pfizer: Other: Travel support; Jazz: Other: Travel support; Astellas: Other: Travel support. Hertenstein: Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Tischler: AstraZeneca: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Other: Travel support; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support. Paschka: Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astex: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; BMS: Other, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Other; Takeda: Other. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Heuser: Tolremo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Pharma AG: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schlenk: Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Hexal: Honoraria; Neovio Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria. Bullinger: Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb / Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Döhner: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Agios: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Ganser: Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Midostaurin as single-agent maintenance therapy following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Background In newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 mutations (FLT3-mut), the tyrosine kinase inhibitor midostaurin (MIDO) in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) is considered standard of care (SoC). Subgroup analyses from the ALFA 0701 trial indicate that the addition of the conjugated CD33 antibody gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to IC increases efficacy in the FLT3-ITD subgroup of patients (pts), providing a rationale for the combined use of MIDO plus GO with IC in newly diagnosed FLT3-mut AML. On the other hand, there is evidence that the subgroup of core-binding factor (CBF) AML benefits from the inhibition of the tyrosine kinase KIT with respect to survival end points. In this respect, MIDO is a more powerful KIT inhibitor as compared to dasatinib which has been applied in previous studies. While the combination of IC plus GO in induction treatment is considered SoC in patients with CBF AML the addition of MIDO to SoC seems promising to further improve treatment outcomes in the CBF subgroup. We therefore set up the clinical trial MOSAIC composed of a phase-I part to prospectively assess the feasibility of combining MIDO plus GO with IC (MODULE), followed by a randomized phase-II part evaluating the benefit of adding GO to SoC in FLT3-mut AML (MAGMA) and of adding MIDO to SoC in CBF AML (MAGNOLIA). Here, we report the results of the phase-I part (MODULE). Methods MODULE is a dose escalation phase-I trial following a 3+3 design. Eligibility criteria include newly diagnosed AML harboring either FLT3 or CBF mutations, and fitness for IC. Standard 7+3 IC using cytarabine 200 mg/m 2 continuous infusion over 7 days plus daunorubicin 60 mg/m 2 on 3 days was combined with increasing doses of MIDO and GO in three dose levels: 1 st dose level (GO 3 mg/m 2 i.v. QD on day 1+4 plus 25 mg MIDO p.o. BID days 8-21); 2 nd dose level (GO 3 mg/m 2 i.v. QD on day 1+4 plus 50 mg MIDO p.o. BID days 8-21); 3 rd dose level (GO 3 mg/m 2 i.v. QD on day 1+4+7 plus 50 mg MIDO p.o. BID days 8-21). Based on the 3+3 design, each dose cohort consisted of three but maximal six pts. The protocol predefined the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) as reached if ≤2 dose-limiting toxicity events (DLTs) would occur in maximum six evaluable pts who received ≥80% of the planned study therapy. Results From September 2020 to July 2021, 11 pts were enrolled. In the 1 st dose level, three pts completed the regular study period without DLT, whereas treatment had to be discontinued in one patient on day 6 before commencement of MIDO due to infusion related reaction CTC grade 4. This patient was subsequently replaced. In the 2 nd dose level, one of three enrolled pts experienced neutropenic colitis CTC grade 3 on day 14 of treatment, which was classified as DLT. The colitis fully recovered by day 27 after commencement of treatment. As a result of the DLT, the dose cohort was subsequently extended by three additional pts. Of those, one patient developed signs of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) CTC grade 3 starting on day 13 of treatment. SOS was classified as DLT. The patient was treated with defibrotide and supportive care until recovery on day 28. Another patient had to discontinue treatment on day 14 due to inability of swallowing MIDO. This patient was replaced as the target dose of MIDO was not reached. As predefined in the study protocol, the occurrence of 2 DLTs in six evaluable pts precluded further dose escalation to the 3 rd dose level and defined the 2 nd dose level as safe and feasible. A total number of 5 serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed among all 11 pts who completed the DLT evaluation period: infusion related reaction, colitis, parvo-B19 infection, prolonged neutropenia CTC grade 4, and SOS. An unexpected increase in frequency of common AML adverse events was not observed. The 30-day mortality among all enrolled pts was 0%. After blood count recovery, remission assessment showed complete remission (CR) in 7 pts, CR with incomplete hematologic/platelet recovery (CRi/CRp) in 3 pts and primary refractory disease in one patient. Conclusion GO standard dose on days 1 + 4 and MIDO standard dose on days 8-21 of induction treatment is defined as MTD which can be safely combined with standard IC in newly diagnosed AML. In the phase-I cohort of the MOSAIC trial, CR/CRi/CRp rates of 91% were reached. Based on the results of this dose finding trial the MTD of combined MIDO and GO will be defined as phase-II dose for the randomized phase-II studies in CBF and FLT-mut AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Röllig: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria. Baldus: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Wermke: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy that is treated in medically fit patients with intensive induction chemotherapy (IT) and postremission therapy to achieve a complete and long-term remission. The incidence of obesity in the general population is steadily increasing and has been identified as a major risk factor for all-cause mortality. Despite previous studies assessing the role of obesity in AML patients undergoing IT, there is an ongoing debate on the impact of obesity on patient outcome as well as the optimal dosing strategy in obese AML patients. We conducted a retrospective registry study assessing 1677 AML patients who were treated with IT for newly diagnosed AML. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) while event-free survival (EFS), the rate of first complete remission (CR1), relapse/refractory disease and non-relapse/refractory-related mortality (NRRrM), treatment-related toxicities, patient comorbidities and chemotherapy dosing strategies were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Obese patients (body mass index, BMI ≥ 30) displayed a significant inferior median OS (29.44 vs. 47.94 months, p = 0.015) without a significant difference in median EFS (7.8 vs. 9.89 months, p = 0.3) compared to non-obese patients (BMI < 30). The cumulative incidence (CI) of NRRrM was significantly increased in obese patients compared to non-obese patients while no differences could be observed regarding the CI of relapsed or refractory disease. Obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for death (HR 1.27, [95% CI 1.07-1.51], p = 0.005) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. When the cohort was stratified by age (≥/< 60 years), the difference in OS as well as the significantly increased CI of NRRrM was only observed in patients ≥ 60 years. Notably, obese patients demonstrated higher rates of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities regardless of their age. No disparities for OS, EFS, CR1 rate or treatment-related toxicities were observed when the entire study population was stratified for the used dosing strategy (dose calculation using total body weight, idealized body weight, adjusted idealized body weight or capped at body surface area of 2 m 2). In conclusion, the present study identifies obesity as a major independent risk factor for worse overall survival and increased CI of non-relapse/refractory-related mortality in older (≥60 years) AML patients undergoing curative IT. These findings may be most likely attributed to obesity related comorbidities and not to dose adaption of chemotherapy in obese AML patients. Disclosures Schliemann: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fransecky: Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Burchert: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Crysandt: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Müller-Tidow: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Platzbecker: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria. Baldus: Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria.

Background In a recent phase-III trial CPX-351 (Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA), a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown higher remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients aged 60 to 75 years with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related AML (t-AML) in comparison to conventional 7+3 regimen. Based on this CPX-351 has been approved in the USA 2017 and in Europe 2018 for adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. Still, several issues such as age ( Design/Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we collected data on baseline characteristics, treatment details including allo-HCT and outcome from patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML, who were treated with CPX-351 according to the EMA label between 2018 and 2020 in 25 German centers participating in the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL), German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Results: A total of 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26 to 80) with t-AML (29%) or AML-MRC (70%) including 46 patients (24%) Conclusion: The results from this real-world analysis confirm CPX-351 as an efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients bridging to facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with encouraging outcome after transplantation. Disclosures Röllig: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Unglaub: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy. Vucinic: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Holderried: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support. Heuser: Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tolremo: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Goetze: Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios and Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Germing: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background: Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients (pts) with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who achieve complete remission (CR) can predict hematological relapse. Recently published data from the first cohort of the RELAZA2-trial have shown that pre-emptive therapy with azacitidine (AZA) can prevent or substantially delay an overt relapse in MRD-positive pts with MDS or AML (Platzbecker et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018). Aims: To evaluate outcome of the entire patient cohort of the RELAZA2-trial and determine whether MRD-guided pre-emptive AZA treatment could prevent relapse in molecularly defined cohorts. Methods: Between 12/2011 and 07/2018 380 pts with advanced MDS or AML, who had achieved CR after conventional chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) were prospectively screened for MRD in monthly intervals either in bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB). A total of 94 pts (AML, n=83; MDS, n=11) became MRD positive during 24 months from baseline by either quantitative PCR (qPCR) or analysis of CD34+ donor-chimerism and entered the treatment phase. Preemptive MRD-triggered treatment consisted of AZA 75 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously on days 1-7 of a 29-day cycle for up to 24 cycles. After six cycles, MRD status was reassessed and pts with MRD negativity were eligible for treatment de-escalation. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) six months after start of pre-emptive treatment. For mutational analysis next generation sequencing (NGS) with a panel of 54 genes was performed (Illumina Trusight Myeloid). Results: Median age was 60 yrs (range: 22-80 yrs); 52 (55%) of the pts were female. Prior therapy consisted of chemotherapy in 42 (45%) and allo-HCT in 52 (55%) of the pts. Cytogenetics could be analyzed in 93 (99%) of the 94 pts. Risk categorization according to ELN 2017 was favorable in 30 (37%), intermediate in 31 (38%) and adverse in 21 (26%) of the AML pts, respectively. Type of MDS was advanced in all 11 pts and all were previously transplanted. Fifty-two (61%) of 85 pts with available NPM1 status were positive. NGS on 64 (68%) pts with available DNA at the time of first diagnosis revealed additional mutations in DNMT3A (n=25), TET2 (n=15), FLT3-ITD (n=12), IDH1 (n=9), FLT3-TKD (n=8), ASXL1, NRAS, TP53 (n=7, each), IDH2 (n=6), PTPN11, WT1 (n=5, each), GATA2, U2AF1 (n=4, each), CBL (n=3), CEBPA, CSFR3, CUX1, EZH2, KIT, RAD21, RUNX1, SF3B, STAG2, ZRSR2 (n=2, each), and KRAS (n=1). MRD data were correlated with outcome in 45 pts for NPM1, in 3 for RUNX1-RUNX1T1, whereas CD34-donor-chimerism was analyzed in 39 pts (missing, n=7). There was a significant faster and deeper decline of MRD in PB as compared to BM (P=0.03). The same held true with regard to the increase of donor-chimerism, which was achieved faster in PB as compared to BM (P=0.05). Secondary molecular abnormalities (MAs) had no impact on MRD response as measured by qPCR, which was also true if MAs were categorized functionally. Similarly, additional chromosomal abnormalities had no impact on MRD response in both MRD methods. However, in pts with measurement of donor-chimerism ASXL1 mutations were a negative factor for MRD response (P Conclusions: AZA as a pre-emptive therapy was effective in delaying hematological relapse of advanced MDS or AML pts, regardless of the underlying genetic signature. Based on these encouraging results, intensifying treatment with AZA in combination with pembrolizumab is currently investigated as MRD-guided treatment in NPM1 positive AML (PEMAZA; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03769532). Disclosures Wolf: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bug:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eurocept: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Jazz: Honoraria; Neovii: Other: Travel; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Sanofi: Other: Travel. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Stelljes:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Subklewe:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Haenel:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer: Honoraria. Rollig:Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller-Tidow:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; BiolineRx: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Other: Co-owner and CEO. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label: treatment with azacitidine to prevent or substantially delay an overt relapse in MRD-positive patients with MDS or AML

Introduction: In T-ALL, in contrast to BCP-ALL, molecular subgroups are less well defined. Molecular subgroups are based on aberrant expression of oncogenes often resting upon structural aberrations (chromosomal translocation, copy number variations, point mutations). So far, comprehensive studies on molecular subgroups have been predominantly performed in pediatric patients. The clinical relevance of molecular characteristics is not taken into account for risk stratification and targeted therapeutic options for T-ALL patients are limited. Risk stratification is mainly based on immunophenotype and MRD response. Thus, in the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL) protocols early and mature T-ALL and molecular failure after first consolidation are high risk features. Whole RNA transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) enables molecular subgroup allocation profiles with potential prognostic relevance. Herein, we investigated a large cohort of 161 adult T-ALL patients with RNAseq for molecular subgroups and their clinical implication. Patients and methods : RNAseq data (Illumina HiSeq 4000, 100 or 125 bp paired-end, average read count ~30 million reads/sample) were generated from 161 adult T-ALL patients from diagnostic bone marrow samples. For 84 of these T-ALL patients, we additionally investigated DNA methylation using Infinium 450k methylation bead arrays and mutation status using deep targeted DNA sequencing with a gene panel consisting of 206 genes (HiSeq 1500, 100 bp paired-end, average ~800 reads/bp). All patients were treated likewise within pediatric inspired protocols of the GMALL. Clinical follow up and outcome data were available for 129 patients aged between 18 and 55 years. Results: Based on oncogene expression, we could assign molecular subgroups to 160 out of the 161 T-ALL patients: HOXA: n=37 (23%), TLX1: n=37 (23%), TAL/LMO: n=33 (20%), LYL1/LMO2: n=31 (19%), TLX3: n=17 (11%) , NKX2-1: n=4 (2%), TAL2: n=1 (1%). Among others, gene fusion events incorporating TAL1 (n=16), HOXA (n=6), TLX1 (n=14), TLX3 (n=2) and NKX2 (n=2) were detected as underlying mechanisms. Age distribution revealed more TAL/LMO in the younger population (16-25 years: 35% versus >35 years: 3%; p=0.001) and more LYL1/LMO2 and HOXA in the older patients (16-25 years: 23% vs. >35 years: 40%; n.s.). DNA methylation analyses for 84 of the 161 patients support the molecular classification with four distinct subgroups demonstrating a homogenous methylation profile for the TLX1 driven subgroup (methylation cluster M3, n=30). In contrast, methylation cluster M2 (n=21) showed a hypomethylation in CpG islands and comprises the majority of TAL/LMO positive cases (19/21) including all samples with STIL-TAL1 fusions. M1 (n=25) and M4 (n=7) clusters comprised TLX3 (mainly cluster M1, 8/10), HOXA and LYL1/LMO2 cases. Mutation analysis showed a high rate of NOTCH1 (n=71%) mutations in the TLX1 subgroup and an increased rate of mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway (n=29%) and epigenetic regulators (n=50%) in HOXA and LYL1/LMO2 subgroups. Regarding clinical outcome, 126 out of 129 (98%) patients achieved a morphologically complete remission (CR), two patients failed CR, one patient died during induction therapy. Regarding MRD response, 12% of the investigated T-ALL patients showed a molecular failure after consolidation. Noteworthy, we found a molecular CR for 28/30 (93%) patients in the TLX1 subgroup, but only 11/19 (58%) respectively 2/6 (33%) in the HOXA and the LYL1/LMO2 subgroup. This finding results in exceptional five year-overall survival (5y-OS) of 93% in TLX1 patients. Together with the NKX2-1 subgroup (n=4, with 100% 5y-OS), these patients build a prognostically favourable risk group in the overall cohort (94% 5y-OS versus 76% in TAL-LMO patients versus 62% in all other subgroups, p=0.007). This result could not only be found in the overall cohort, but also within the already good risk subgroup of thymic T-ALL patients (93% vs. 75%, p=0.02). Conclusion: This is to our knowledge the largest cohort of adult T-ALL patients characterized by RNAseq on molecular level. Our findings point towards an age dependent distribution of molecular subgroups contributing to age-dependent outcome differences. Patients with TLX1 reveal a molecular subgroup with extraordinary good prognosis. Within thymic T-ALL, the subgroup of patients without TLX1 (~53%) has an inferior but still good prognosis. Disclosures Fiedler: Gilead: Other: support for meeting attendance; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: support for meeting attendance; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD/Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: support for meeting attendance, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: support for meeting attendance. Alakel:Pfizer: Consultancy. Schwartz:AMGEN: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; Novartis: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees and non-financial support; Pfizer: Other: personal fees ; BTG Intl Inc: Other: personal fees ; Gilead Sciences: Other: personal fees and non-financial support ; MSD Sharp & Dohme: Other: personal fees ; Basilea: Other: non-financial suppor. Müller-Tidow:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Speakers Bureau; BiolineRx: Research Funding. Brüggemann:Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Goekbuget:Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Erytech: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly is characterized by a distinct genetic and epigenetic landscape

Background In newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the general recommendation is to start treatment immediately after the diagnosis has been made. This paradigm is based both on the observation that untreated acute leukemia has a poor prognosis and on retrospective analyses demonstrating a shorter survival in younger AML patients (pts) in whom treatment was delayed by more than 5 days (Sekeres et al., 2009). A more recent single-center analysis came to a different conclusion, showing no prognostic effect for the time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT; Bertoli et al., 2013). We explored the relationship between TDT and prognosis on a large set of real-world data from the AML registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) and compared it to the published cohorts. Methods The SAL runs a transregional AML registry in 46 treatment centers across Germany (NCT03188874). All registered patients with an intensive induction treatment, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and no acute promyelocytic leukemia were selected (n=2,200). Treatment start was defined by the first day of cytarabine, whereas single agent hydroxyurea (HU) was labeled as pretreatment. We analyzed the influence of TDT on complete remission (CR), early death (ED) and overall survival (OS) in univariable analyses for each day of treatment delay, in groups of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and >15 days of TDT, and by using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method for data modelling. In order to adjust for the influence of established prognostic variables on the outcomes, we used multivariable regression models and propensity score weighting. The influence of HU pretreatment on outcomes was investigated by introducing an interaction term between TDT and the presence of HU pretreatment. Results The median age was 59 years (y) (IQR 50-68), the proportion of pts with favorable, intermediate and adverse genetic risk according to ELN was 27%, 53%, and 20%; >95% of pts received induction treatment with standard 7+3. HU pretreatment was administered in 4% of pts. The median TDT was 3 days (IQR 2-6). Descriptive statistics after grouping of pts showed the highest median age and the lowest proportion of NPM1 mutated and favorable risk in the TDT group 11-15. Of all pts, 79% achieved a CR/CRi; unadjusted CR rates for the patient groups with TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and >15 days were 80%, 77%, 74% and 76%, respectively (p=0.317). In multivariable analysis accounting for the influence of ELN risk, age, WBC, LDH, de novo versus secondary AML and ECOG, the OR for each additional day of TDT was 0.99 (95%-CI, 0.97-1.00; p=0.124). Four percent of pts died within the first 30 days from treatment start. The respective rates in the four TDT categories were 4.0%, 3.8%, 5.1% and 4.1% (p=0.960). In multivariable analysis, the OR for TDT was 1.01 (95%-CI, 0.98-1.05; p=0.549). After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-y OS of all pts was 51%. The unadjusted 2-y OS rates stratified by TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, >15 days were 52, 49, 46, and 51% (see Table 1 and Figure 1). The hazard ratio (HR) for each day of treatment delay was 1.00 (95%-CI; 0.99-1.01; p=0.317). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the HR for TDT as continuous variable was 1.00 (95%-CI, 0.99-1.01; p=0.689). When OS was analyzed separately stratified for age ≤60 and >60 ys and for high versus lower initial WBC defined by a threshold of 50 x 109/L, no significant differences between TDT groups were observed. Multivariable models using TDT as a grouped variable or with RCS did not provide evidence for a significant influence of TDT on outcomes. Propensity score matching of pts in the four TDT groups did not reveal an influence on outcomes. The use of HU was not associated with CR, ED nor OS. Conclusion Our study on 2,200 newly diagnosed registry pts receiving consistent intensive induction with standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) suggests that TDT is not related to response or survival, neither in younger nor in older pts. Despite multivariable analyses, a bias towards longer TDT intervals in pts judged to be clinically stable by the treating physician cannot be excluded entirely. As treatment stratification in intensive first-line treatment of AML evolves, the TDT data suggests that it may be a safe and reasonable approach to wait for genetic and other laboratory test results in order to assign clinically stable pts to the best available treatment option before the start of intensive treatment. Disclosures Krämer: Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board. Jost:Daiichi: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Brümmendorf:Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Ariad: Consultancy. Krause:Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel. Scholl:Novartis: Other: Project funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Kiani:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeke:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Stoelzel:JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background GATA3 is pivotal for the development of T lymphocytes. While its effects in later stages of T cell differentiation are well recognized, the role of GATA3 in the generation of early T cell precursors (ETP) has only recently been explored. As aberrant GATA3 mRNA expression has been linked to cancerogenesis, we investigated the role of GATA3 in early T cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL). Methods We analyzed GATA3 mRNA expression by RT-PCR (n = 182) in adult patients with T-ALL. Of these, we identified 70 of 182 patients with ETP-ALL by immunophenotyping. DNA methylation was assessed genome wide (Illumina Infinium® HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform) in 12 patients and GATA3-specifically by pyrosequencing in 70 patients with ETP-ALL. The mutational landscape of ETP-ALL with respect to GATA3 expression was investigated in 18 patients and validated by Sanger sequencing in 65 patients with ETP-ALL. Gene expression profiles (Affymetrix Human genome U133 Plus 2.0) of an independent cohort of adult T-ALL (n = 83) were used to identify ETP-ALL and investigate GATA3low and GATA3high expressing T-ALL patients. In addition, the ETP-ALL cell line PER-117 was investigated for cytotoxicity, apoptosis, GATA3 mRNA expression, DNA methylation, and global gene expression before and after treatment with decitabine. Results In our cohort of 70 ETP-ALL patients, 33 % (23/70) lacked GATA3 expression and were thus defined as GATA3low. DNA methylation analysis revealed a high degree of GATA3 CpG island methylation in GATA3low compared with GATA3high ETP-ALL patients (mean 46 vs. 21 %, p

We hereby report a case of acute myeloid leukemia with translocation t(2;3) and involvement of the ectopic virus integration site-1 (EVI1) gene. Like most other 3q26-related disorders reported thus far, we describe a phenotype with elevated platelet counts and dysmegakaryopoesis. The clinical course of our patient was complicated by symptomatic thrombophilia and chemoresistance. In addition, our case exhibited FLT3 (Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3) internal tandem duplication. Although anagrelide was successful in controlling elevated platelet counts, allogeneic stem cell transplantation failed to overcome chemoresistance due to simultaneous graft-versus-host-disease and relapse of acute myeloid leukemia. Given the dismal outcome of our case and previously reported cases, we propagate the implementation of targeted therapies to newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia t(2;3). Preclinical models indicate drugs that plausibly target the EVI1-related molecular vulnerability as candidates for basket trials. Anagrelide exhibited a hopeful signal of activity in 3q26-related thrombocytosis and should be evaluated for implementation as supportive care.

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) is a Parkinson’s disease (PD)-related protein involved in sporadic and familial cases of the disease. Lrrk2 is a kinase and may be involved in intracellular signaling pathways. We established a neural stem cell (NSC)-based model system for Lrrk2-associated PD. We investigated its physiological and pathophysiological expression in human and mouse brain and NSCs using different antibodies defining dopaminergic NSCs as a relevant cells population to study Lrrk2 dysfunction. Using small interfering RNA duplexes targeting Lrrk2 in fetal mouse NSCs, we observed higher Tyrosine hydroxylase ( Th ) mRNA levels. Conversely, when overexpressing human LRRK2 in fetal mouse NSCs, Th , mRNA levels were reduced. Interestingly, in mutant LRRK2 overexpression Map2 and Kif3A mRNA levels were reduced. In conclusion, we demonstrate that overexpressing LRRK2 in neural stem cells results in a cell culture model for LRRK2-mediated PD. Lrrk2 is conversely linked to Th expression and expression of microtubule genes, implicating a role in the pathomechanism towards dopaminergic neurodegeneration.

Technological advances allowing high throughput analyses across numerous cancer tissues have allowed much progress in understanding complex cellular signaling. In the future, the genetic landscape in cancer may have more clinical relevance than diagnosis based on tumor origin. This progress has emphasized PI3K/AKT/mTOR, among others, as a central signaling center of cancer development due to its governing control in cellular growth, survival, and metabolism. The discovery of high frequencies of mutations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in different cancer entities has sparked interest to inhibit elements of this pathway. In acute leukemia pharmacological interruption has yet to achieve desirable efficacy as targetable downstream mutations in PI3K/AKT/mTOR are absent. Nevertheless, mutations in membrane-associated genes upstream of PI3K/AKT/mTOR are frequent in acute leukemia and are associated with aberrant activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR thus providing a good rationale for further exploration. This review attempts to summarize key findings leading to aberrant activation and to reflect on both promises and challenges of targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR in acute leukemia. Our emphasis lies on the insights gained through high-throughput data acquisition that open up new avenues for identifying specific subgroups of acute leukemia as ideal candidates for PI3K/AKT/mTOR targeted therapy.

Background: Risk stratification, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), and implementation of novel therapeutic agents have improved outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but survival of adult patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains unsatisfactory. Thus, novel molecular insights and therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Methods: We studied the impact of B-cell CLL/lymphoma 11b (BCL11b), a key regulator in normal T-cell development, in T-ALL patients enrolled into the German Multicenter Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group trials (GMALL; n = 169). The mutational status (exon 4) of BCL11b was analyzed by Sanger sequencing and mRNA expression levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. In addition gene expression profiles generated on the Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (affymetrix) were used to investigate BCL11b low and high expressing T-ALL patients. Results: We demonstrate that BCL11b is aberrantly expressed in T-ALL and gene expression profiles reveal an association of low BCL11b expression with up-regulation of immature markers. T-ALL patients characterized by low BCL11b expression exhibit an adverse prognosis [5-year overall survival (OS): low 35% (n = 40) vs. high 53% (n = 129), P = 0.02]. Within the standard risk group of thymic T-ALL (n = 102), low BCL11b expression identified patients with an unexpected poor outcome compared to those with high expression (5-year OS: 20%, n = 18 versus 62%, n = 84, P

DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A) mutations is one of the most frequent somatic mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although DNMT3A mutations have been studied extensively, influence of mutations on AML prognosis and their role on the pathogenesis of AML remains not completely clear. Little is known about the significance of mutations burden in the time of diagnosis on the clinical and prognostic features of AML. Recently discovered persistence of DNMT3A mutations in complete remission after standard therapy indicates the presence of mutation in early pre-leukemic stem cells. In this aspect, it would be essential to analyze the existence of DNMT3A-positive cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Using quantitative PCR, we analyzed mutations burden in diagnostic samples obtained from 65 AML patients with DNMT3A mutation. Then follow up samples were analyzed repeatedly, after induction, consolidation therapy, and after alloSCT with a mean follow-up of 33 months. Using well-established markers of minimal residual disease and donor engraftment, we monitored DNMT3A stability during complete molecular remission (CMR). In addition, we analyzed the combination of DNMT3A mutation with others mutations, such as FLT3, NPM1, IDH1, IDH,and others, at the time of diagnosis, as well as in relapse of AML. Finally, we analyzed the prognostic impact of DNMT3A mutations depending on the distinct combination of mutations with other genetic markers. For this, 150 matched-pairs AML patients without DNMT3A mutation were analyzed. We have found considerable variation of mutations burden (from 1% till 90%) in diagnostic samples. Although, the prognostic impact of mutations burden in diagnostic samples have not been verify, we have found a significant associations of higher mutations burden with M4/M5 FAB variant of AML (p=0,04) and presence of NPM1 mutation (p=0,023). Persistence of DNMT3A mutations in CMR after standard chemotherapy was found in all patients. The loss of correlation between DNMT3A and others could be explained by sub-clone architecture and clonal evolution of AML. After alloSCT, DNMT3A mutations were not discovered in patients with CMR and complete donor chimerism. This data suggests the removal of leukemic stem cells after alloSCT and indicate the importance of alloSCT for high risk AML patients. In relapse of leukemia, all samples showed an increasing of DNMT3A mutated alleles. In addition, matched-pairs analysis suggests that DNMT3A, particularly when accompanied by FLT3-ITD, is a significant prognostic factor for inferior outcome, even after alloSCT. We conclude that long-term quantitative monitoring of DNMT3A mutations could provide additional prognostic information and could explain the role of mutations in development and progression of AML. Disclosures Pezzutto: Cellgene, Novartis, Roche, Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Approximately 5% of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases are associated with balanced translocations of chromosome 11q23, and AML with t(9;11)(p22;q23) is recognized as a distinct entity by the WHO Classification. Similarly, the presence of t(4;11)(q21;q23), which accounts for 8-10% of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in patients over the age of 20 years, defines a distinct entity termed "B-lymphoblastic leukemia with t(v;11q23)" according to the WHO Classification. On the molecular level, t(11q23) result in fusion of the KMT2A (also called MLL) gene, which encodes a histone 3 lysine 4 methyltransferase, to a broad spectrum of more than 70 partner genes. The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory KMT2A-rearranged leukemia is very poor, and new treatment approaches are needed. Using in vitro and in vivo experimental models, we previously identified cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) as a potential therapeutic target in KMT2A-rearranged leukemias (Placke et al. Blood. 2014;124:13-23). Aims: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in KMT2A-rearranged AML and ALL within a genotype-guided clinical trial (AMLSG 23-14; ClinicalTrials gov. Identifier NCT02310243). Methods: Patients with KMT2A-rearranged leukemia, either relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed but ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, are enrolled. The study is a phase Ib/IIa trial with a safety/tolerability part in the phase Ib using the standard palbociclib dose of 125 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. Based on a 3+3 modified Fibonacci design, a dose deescalation to 100 mg and 75 mg in case of toxicity is possible in sequential cohorts. If no or only one limiting toxicity is observed among 6 patients at one dose level, this dose level will be taken forward to the phase IIa expansion part of the study. Limiting toxicities are defined as toxicities attributable to palbociclib, expected or unexpected. The expansion part of the study is based on Simon's optimal 2-stage design with 18 patients and 43 patients in the 2 stages. Results: The phase Ib of the study has been completed with recruitment of 6 patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia (AML, n=3; treatment-related AML, n=2; ALL, n=1; refractory to intensive chemotherapy, n=2; relapse, n=4 [following allogeneic stem cell transplantation, n=3; following chemotherapy, n=1]). Cytogenetic results were as follows: t(9;11), n=3; t(6;11), n=1; t(11;19), n=1; t(4;11), n=1. The median white blood cell count (WBC) at study inclusion was 7.05 G/l (range, 0.9-61.0). To control hyperleukocytosis, 3 patients were treated with hydroxyurea during the first week of palbociclib and one patient with corticosteroids. No limiting toxicity occurred during the first 28-day cycle, the limiting-toxicity assessment period. White blood cell counts rapidly decreased after one week of palbociclib at a dose of 125 mg/day and remained low until week 3 (median, 1.6 G/l; range, 0.6-1.9). The median WBC after one week of drug holiday was 1.9 G/l (range, 1.3-7.3). Response assessment revealed one partial remission, 3 disease stabilizations, and 2 cases of progressive disease. Four patients completed further treatment cycles (median, 2; range 2-6), with one patient achieving a complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 2. This patient, a 76-year-old man with t(11;19)-positive de novo AML refractory to chemotherapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine, relapsed after cycle 6, and correlative laboratory studies are underway to determine potential resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: Palbociclib is well tolerated in patients with refractory/relapsed KMT2A-rearranged leukemia with no occurrence of limiting toxicities and has clinical activity in this prognostically unfavorable subset of AML/ALL. Therefore, the study will be taken forward to the efficacy part with accrual of further patients. In addition, the protocol is currently amended as a basket trial with inclusion of patients with locally advanced/metastatic chordoma based on preclinical evidence that CDK4/6 dependence represents a specific liability of chordoma cells that could be exploited for therapeutic benefit. Disclosures Lübbert: Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding. Schlenk:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) has been identified as high-risk subgroup of acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) with a high rate of FLT3-mutations in adults. To unravel the underlying pathomechanisms and the clinical course we assessed molecular alterations and clinical characteristics in a large cohort of ETP-ALL (n = 68) in comparison to non-ETP T-ALL adult patients. Interestingly, we found a high rate of FLT3-mutations in ETP-ALL samples (n = 24, 35%). Furthermore, FLT3 mutated ETP-ALL was characterized by a specific immunophenotype (CD2+/CD5-/CD13+/CD33-), a distinct gene expression pattern (aberrant expression of IGFBP7, WT1, GATA3) and mutational status (absence of NOTCH1 mutations and a low frequency, 21%, of clonal TCR rearrangements). The observed low GATA3 expression and high WT1 expression in combination with lack of NOTCH1 mutations and a low rate of TCR rearrangements point to a leukemic transformation at the pluripotent prothymocyte stage in FLT3 mutated ETP-ALL. The clinical outcome in ETP-ALL patients was poor, but encouraging in those patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (3-year OS: 74%). To further explore the efficacy of targeted therapies, we demonstrate that T-ALL cell lines transfected with FLT3 expression constructs were particularly sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In conclusion, FLT3 mutated ETP-ALL defines a molecular distinct stem cell like leukemic subtype. These data warrant clinical studies with the implementation of FLT3 inhibitors in addition to early allogeneic stem cell transplantation for this high risk subgroup. OA gold

AML in the elderly has a very poor outcome. Despite advances in the characterization of molecular alterations in younger AML patients, comprehensive studies in elderly AML are still lacking to uncover their distinct underlying molecular alterations. In this project, we investigated genetic and epigenetic modifications to unravel the molecular background of this unfavorable disease. To capture a broad spectrum of relevant alterations in elderly AML, we performed genomic profiling by target enrichment of 555 candidate genes (mutated in cancer), followed by next generation sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq 1500 platform. Reads were mapped to NCBI hg19 RefSeq and SNV or INDELs were called if they were non-silent coding variations with a coverage of at least > 30x and a variant allele frequency higher than 20%. The mean coverage of the target sequence was 382±160x and 98±2% of the target sequence had a read depth of at least 30x. We applied this sequencing strategy on diagnostic bone marrow samples of 100 AML patients enrolled on the Studienallianz Leukämie (SAL) registry. This cohort was composed of patients 65 to 90 years old (median 72 years), 76% were classified as de novo AML, 19% as secondary AML, 5% as therapy-related AML. In addition, we investigated the DNA methylation profile for this cohort with an Illumina 450k methylation array to further characterize the heterogeneity of elderly AML. Overall, 817 mutations were detected in 292 of the 555 candidate genes, 80 of these genes were mutated in more than two patients. A median number of 7 genes were mutated per patient (range: 1 to 23). Several known mutations were identified with a particular high frequency: DNMT3A 33%, TET2 24%, SRSF2 23%, ASXL1 21%, RUNX1 18%, IDH1 17%, NPM1 15%, IDH2 and BCOR 10% each. We also identified novel aberrations (not previously reported in AML) that provide new insights into the specificity of this disease, including mutations in the PI3K/mTOR pathway (PIK3C2B, MTOR), DNA damage proteins (BRCA2, ERCC2, FANCC, PMS1) and histone modifiers (EP300, JARID2, NSD1, MYST3). When compared to younger AML (less than 65 years, TCGA cohort NEJM 2013), elderly AML showed significantly higher mutation rates in ASXL1 (21% vs 1%), TET2 (24% vs 7%), RUNX1 (18% vs 7%), BCOR (10% vs 1%) and BRCA2 (8% vs 0%). In addition, we found a high rate of mutations in splicing regulators affecting 38% of elderly AML patients (SRSF2 23%, U2AF1 6%, SF3B1 5%, DDX5 3%, ZRSR2 2%), similarly distributed between de novo and secondary AML. Notably, 15% of elderly AML patients had mutations in the DNA repair genes TP53, NBN, ATM, FANCA, FANCC, likely responsible for drug resistance and unfavorable outcome: patients with DNA repair mutations had a median survival of only 4 months, compared to 16 months for patients without these mutations (p=5.99e-5); variations in these DNA repair proteins predicted poor overall survival independently of the TP53 mutational status (p=0.004). To describe the molecular heterogeneity of the disease we included 152 genes (mutated in more than 1 patient) to build a reactome functional interaction network and identified 9 different network modules. The first most prominent module comprised 15 mutual exclusively mutated genes including DNMT3A and genes of the DNA repair pathway (p=0.013; purple network in figure). The second most distinct module included 12 genes also being altered in a mutually exclusive manner (p=4.9e-4): NPM1, RNA splicing and transport genes (green network in figure). Together the alterations from these two modules affected 88% of the patients and showed no significant overlap (mutual exclusivity test p=7.5e-4). These findings indicate that elderly AML is characterized by two distinct molecular patterns, with patients frequently having one of the two modules altered (mutual-exclusive mutation plot of the two modules in figure). In conclusion, elderly AML harbors a high frequency of molecular alterations in spliceosome components, epigenetic regulators and in DNA repair factors, the latter being associated with poor prognosis. The characterization of recurrent mutations may guide the development of new strategies to adapt treatment for older AML patients. In this regard, the molecular categorization of elderly AML into two groups (DNA repair or RNA processing deficient) underscores the distinct biology and the need for molecularly driven therapeutic approaches. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: Over the last years, genome and exome sequencing approaches have increased our knowledge of molecular alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, some important limitations still need to be addressed. First, insights into the spectrum of molecular alterations of patients with refractory AML are rare, partly due to the lack of remission samples as germline control. As these patients have a dismal prognosis, there remains an unmet need to improve therapeutic options and to identify druggable molecular lesions. Secondly, in AML patients achieving a complete remission (CR), preleukemic alterations may persist in CR and are underestimated in frequency and relevance. In this work, we investigated mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) as germline control to decipher the spectrum of molecular alterations in refractory patients with induction failure and to disclose preleukemic hits in patients achieving CR. Patients and methods : Bone marrow (BM) aspirates at initial diagnosis (ID) were obtained from 18 AML patients (9 pts with subsequent induction failure and 9 pts that achieved CR after first induction). MSC were expanded to passage 4 and defined as CD73+/CD105+/CD271+/low/CD45-/CD33- plastic-adherent cells. For all patients, BM hematopoietic cells (BM-HC; n=18) as well as MSC (n=18) were analysed at the time of first diagnosis. All samples (n=45) were analysed by exome sequencing on a HiSeq2500 (100 bp paired end) with four samples per lane. For variant calling, MSC were used as germline control. We demanded a variant allele frequency (VAF) of >20%, coverage of >30 reads and translational consequences. In germline samples, the VAF had to be < 5%. For patients achieving CR, BM-HC at CR were also studied (n=9). We repeated the analysis with CR BM-HC as germline control and compared the two results. For all patients, clinical as well as molecular characteristics were available. Results: We obtained an average coverage of 96 reads per base for the protein coding regions. 96% of the target region was covered at least 10-fold. The use of MSC as germline control allowed us to detect somatic mutations at initial diagnosis of refractory AML. In 9 refractory AML samples, we found 90 single nucleotide variants (SNV) and indels, which resulted in a median of 11 alterations per sample (range: 3-17). The spectrum of mutations showed an unexpectedly high rate of mutations in the spliceosome gene SRSF2 (3/9). Other recurrent mutations affected TET2 (2/9) and WT1 (2/9). Genes frequently mutated in non-selected AML were only present in one refractory patient (DNMT3A, RUNX1, IDH2, ASXL1, TP53, NRAS) or not found mutated (IDH1, KRAS). To uncover preleukemic alterations in AML patients achieving CR (n=9), we compared MSC and BM-HC at CR as germline controls. Using MSC as germline, we called 97 SNVs and indels (median: 11 per sample; range: 4-18) in the leukemic cells at ID. Thirty-three additional SNVs were called in the leukemic BM by using MSC as germline, whereas these would have been missed using BM-HC at CR as germline (median: 3 SNVs per sample, range: 0-7). These represent preleukemic hits persistent in CR with a VAF between 5% (lower bound) and 75%. Recurrently mutated genes included genes recently associated with clonal haematopoiesis in the elderly population: DNMT3A (3/9; VAF: 18%, 24%, 75%) and TET2 (2/9; VAF: 13%, 23%). In addition, mutations in ASXL1 (VAF: 14%), SRSF2 (VAF: 15%), and RUNX1 (VAF: 5%) persisted in at least one patient in CR. This unbiased approach also allowed us to identify lesions, which have not yet been associated with AML, but account for clonal events in remission. Candidates included genes linked to cancer like PROX1 (VAF: 5%), or ERBB2 (VAF: 35%), but also genes involved in NF-kB activation such as CARD8 (VAF: 30%), or NLRC3 (VAF: 10%). Conclusion: The use of MSC allows to unravel molecular lesions in refractory AML by exome sequencing. Refractory AML patients showed a high rate of mutations in the spliceosome gene SRSF2 that needs further investigations as potential therapeutic target for patients with treatment failure. Moreover, the comparison of two different germline controls (MSC and BM-HC in CR) allowed detecting persistent preleukemic alterations. In addition to known hits like in DNMT3A, TET2, or ASXL1, we systematically identified a broader spectrum of premalignant events that indicate clonal hematopoietic expansion and thereby may provide insights into leukemic transformation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction Although risk stratification, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and implementation of novel therapeutic agents have improved outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), survival in adult T-ALL patients still remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, new prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets are warranted. BCL11B, a key player in normal T-cell development, has recently gained interest due to its high mutation rate (9-16%) in T-ALL. We investigated the frequency of BCL11B mutations, expression levels and the prognostic value in a large uniformly treated cohort of adult T-ALL. Patients and methods We analyzed bone marrow (BM) samples of 201 adult T-ALL patients sent to the reference laboratory of the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL). BCL11B expression was determined in 195 patients by qRT-PCR, BCL11B mutations were assessed in 178 patients by Sanger sequencing of exon 4 (including all 6 zink finger [ZF] domains). Low expression of BCL11B was defined by expression levels in the lowest quartile (BCL11Blow), high expression by levels in the three remaining quartiles (BCL11Bhigh). Samples had previously been characterized for expression of BAALC, IGFBP7, MN1, WT1, GATA3, ERG as well as for the mutations status of NOTCH1, WT1, and TCR rearrangements. Clinical data were available for 169 patients enrolled on the GMALL trials. We generated BCL11B associated gene expression profiles (GEP) derived from an independent set of 86 T-ALL patients enrolled in the Microarrays Innovations in LEukemia multicenter study. Results BCL11B was aberrantly expressed in adult T-ALL with significantly higher expression levels in thymic compared to early T-ALL (0.6 vs. 0.3, P=0.01). Expression of genes associated with a prognostic impact (BAALC, IGFBP7, ERG) or/and T-cell stage dependent expression profile (GATA3, IGFBP7) showed that BCL11Blow (n=49) had higher MN1 (1.6 vs, 0.3, P=0.01), IGFBP7 (1.3 vs. 0.5, P=0.02), and lower GATA3 expression (2.1 vs. 5.7, P BCL11B mutations were found in 24 of the 178 (13.5 %) T-ALL patients. In 9 patients, mutations resulted in frame shifts, whereas the remaining, except for a single one, missense mutations were located in the ZF domains: three resulting in introduction of a stop codon. BCL11B mutations were enriched in the mature immunophenotype (thymic: 20%, mature: 8%, early: 3%, P=0.03). No differences were observed in mRNA levels for BAALC, IGFBP7, MN1, WT1, GATA3, ERG, but patients with BCL11B mutations were less frequently assigned to the BCL11Blow group compared to those with high expression (5% vs. 95%, P=0.02). Regarding the clinical characteristics, BCL11B mutations had no prognostic impact regarding OS, neither in the total T-ALL cohort (5-year OS: 56% vs. 48%, n.s.) nor in the thymic T-ALL subgroup (5-year OS: 65% vs. 51%, n.s). Conclusion Our data confirmingly show a high frequency of BCL11B mutations (13.5%) in the so far largest cohort of adult T-ALL patients. As loss of function mutations were restricted to functional ZF domains and recurrently occurred in thymic T-ALL, these data stress a potential pathogenetic role of BCL11B as T-cell specific transcription factor. Importantly, low expression was associated with poor prognosis; in particular in the standard risk group of thymic T-ALL, BCL11Blow is a novel marker that identifies patients with an unacceptable poor prognosis. These findings might help to improve risk stratification in a significant proportion of adult T-ALL patients, which fail to standard therapy despite the favourable immunophenotypic characteristics. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2389 Introduction The transcription factor GATA3 plays an important role in normal T cell development. Its role in mature T cells is well understood, but its function in earlier stages of T cell development remains unclear. Whereas GATA3 levels are precisely regulated for the T cell differentiation program, aberrant expression of GATA3 has been linked to tumorigenesis. Based on these observations, we investigated the role of GATA3 in Early Thymic Progenitor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ETP-ALL), a newly defined high-risk subgroup of T-ALL, characterized by a specific gene expression profile and distinct immunophenotype. Patients and Methods Eighty-six bone marrow samples from adult patients with newly diagnosed T-ALL, including ETP-ALL (n=17) enrolled into the German Multicenter Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GMALL) trials, were studied for GATA3 expression by oligonucleotide expression arrays (HG-U133 plus 2.0) within the Microarray Innovations in LEukemia study. We identified additional 71 ETP-ALL adult patients and 94 T-ALL patients enrolled on the GMALL protocol, in which GATA3 mRNA expression was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Combining ETP-ALL and T-ALL cases (n=165), we defined two GATA3 expression groups GATA3null and GATA3high based on a biological gap (GATA3 expression of 0.2). DNA methylation was analyzed in both T-ALL (n=11) and ETP-ALL (n=69) samples by pyrosequencing with primers designed to include seven CpG sites of Exon 2/Intron 3 of GATA3. Samples were grouped into GATA3 high vs. low methylation according to their mean methylation being below or above 40%. Results Based on gene expression arrays we observed a high proportion of ETP-ALL (11/17) that lacked GATA3 expression, whereas only a small fraction of the remaining T-ALL cases (3/69) had no GATA3 expression. These results were validated by RT-PCR in a larger cohort: 26% of ETP-ALL (19/71) were GATA3null, but only 2% of T-ALL (2/94) were in the GATA3null expression group. To explore the regulation of this specific expression pattern, epigenetic regulation of GATA3 was analyzed by pyrosequencing. While unselected T-ALL samples were hypomethylated (< 6% methylated CpG), ETP-ALL samples had a higher GATA3 methylation status (28% methylated CpG, p Conclusion ETP-ALL is a subgroup of adult T-ALL with a distinct molecular profile. Here we show that within ETP-ALL a separate molecular entity can be defined by GATA3 silencing due to DNA methylation. In-vitro studies showed that GATA3 expression can be restored by the use of demethylating agents. As loss of function mutations in DNMT3A correlate with low GATA3 methylation in ETP-ALL, a potential role of DNMT3A in the epigenetic silencing of GATA3 is suspected. So far, the number of targeted drugs available for T-ALL is limited. Therefore, incorporating demethylating agents may resolve the T-cell differentiation block in T-ALL by increasing GATA3 expression. Future work will explore downstream effects of GATA3 in acute leukemia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.