Search

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a ventilation assist mode that delivers pressure in proportionality to electrical activity of the diaphragm (Eadi). Compared to pressure support ventilation (PS), it improves patient-ventilator synchrony and should allow a better expression of patient's intrinsic respiratory variability. We hypothesize that NAVA provides better matching in ventilator tidal volume (Vt) to patients inspiratory demand. 22 patients with acute respiratory failure, ventilated with PS were included in the study. A comparative study was carried out between PS and NAVA, with NAVA gain ensuring the same peak airway pressure as PS. Robust coefficients of variation (CVR) for Eadi and Vt were compared for each mode. The integral of Eadi (ʃEadi) was used to represent patient's inspiratory demand. To evaluate tidal volume and patient's demand matching, Range90 = 5-95 % range of the Vt/ʃEadi ratio was calculated, to normalize and compare differences in demand within and between patients and modes. In this study, peak Eadi and ʃEadi are correlated with median correlation of coefficients, R > 0.95. Median ʃEadi, Vt, neural inspiratory time (Ti_ ( Neural )), inspiratory time (Ti) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were similar in PS and NAVA. However, it was found that individual patients have higher or smaller ʃEadi, Vt, Ti_ ( Neural ), Ti and PIP. CVR analysis showed greater Vt variability for NAVA (p < 0.005). Range90 was lower for NAVA than PS for 21 of 22 patients. NAVA provided better matching of Vt to ʃEadi for 21 of 22 patients, and provided greater variability Vt. These results were achieved regardless of differences in ventilatory demand (Eadi) between patients and modes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Adjunctive therapies for sCAP are needed to further improve outcome. A systemic inhibitor of coagulation, tifacogin (recombinant human tissue factor pathway inhibitor) seemed to provide mortality benefit in the sCAP subgroup of a previous sepsis trial. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of adjunctive tifacogin on mortality in patients with sCAP. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm study was conducted from July 2005 to June 2008 at 188 centers in North and South America, Europe, South Africa, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Adults with sCAP were randomized to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h, tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h, or matching placebo over 96 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Severity-adjusted 28-day all-cause mortality. Of 2,138 randomized patients, 946, 238, and 918 received tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h, tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h, and placebo, respectively. Tifacogin 0.075 mg/kg/h was discontinued after the first interim analysis according to prespecified futility criterion. The 28-day all-cause mortality rates were similar between the 0.025 mg/kg/h (18%) and placebo groups (17.9%) (P = 0.56). Greater reduction in prothrombin fragment 1+2 and thrombin antithrombin complexes levels relative to baseline throughout the first 96 hours was found with tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h than with placebo. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were comparable between the tifacogin 0.025 mg/kg/h and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tifacogin showed no mortality benefit in patients with sCAP despite evidence of biologic activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: Myeloid-related protein-8 (MRP8) and MRP14 can form heterodimers that elicit a variety of inflammatory responses. We showed that MRP8/14 is a ligand for Toll-like receptor-4, and that mice deficient in MRP8/14 are protected against endotoxic shock-induced lethality. OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the extent of MRP8/14 release in patients with sepsis and/or peritonitis and in healthy humans exposed to LPS and (2) the contribution of MRP8/14 to the host response in murine abdominal sepsis. METHODS: MRP8/14 was measured in 51 patients with severe sepsis, 8 subjects after intravenous injection of LPS, and 17 patients with peritonitis. Host responses to sepsis were compared in mrp14 gene-deficient (and thereby MRP8/14-deficient) and wild-type mice intraperitoneally injected with Escherichia coli. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients with sepsis displayed elevated circulating MRP8/14 concentrations on both Days 0 and 3, and LPS injection resulted in systemic MRP8/14 release in healthy humans. In patients with peritonitis, MRP8/14 levels in abdominal fluid were more than 15-fold higher than in plasma. MRP14-deficient mice displayed improved defense against E. coli abdominal sepsis in an early phase, as indicated by diminished dissemination of the bacteria at 6 hours. In addition, MRP14-deficient mice demonstrated decreased systemic inflammation, as reflected by lower cytokine plasma concentrations, and less severe liver damage. CONCLUSIONS: Human sepsis and endotoxemia are associated with enhanced release of MRP8/14. In abdominal sepsis, MRP8/14 likely occurs primarily at the site of the infection, facilitating bacterial dissemination at an early phase and liver injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: The expression and release of tissue factor is a major trigger for the activation of coagulation in patients with sepsis. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) forms a complex with tissue factor and blood protease factors leading to inhibition of thrombin generation and fibrin formation.Objectives: To determine if administration of tifacogin (recombinant TFPI) provides mortality benefit in patients with severe sepsis and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and to assess tifacogin safety in severe sepsis, including patients with low INR.Design and Setting: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from March 21, 2000, through September 27, 2001, in 245 hospitals in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and Israel.Patients: The primary efficacy population consisted of 1754 patients (> or =18 years) with severe sepsis and a high INR (> or =1.2) randomly assigned to intravenous infusion of either tifacogin (0.025 mg/kg per hour for 96 hours, n = 880) or placebo (arginine citrate buffer, n = 874), and 201 patients with a low INR (<1.2) randomly assigned to receive the same dose of either tifacogin or placebo.Main Outcome Measure: All-cause 28-day mortality.Results: Overall mortality at 28 days in the tifacogin-treated group (n = 880) vs the placebo group (n = 874) for high INR was 34.2% vs 33.9%, respectively (P =.88, Pearson chi2 test; P =.75, logistic regression model). None of the protocol-specified secondary end points differed between the tifacogin vs placebo groups. An analysis on the first 722 patients demonstrated a mortality rate of 38.9% for placebo vs 29.1% for tifacogin (P =.006, Pearson chi2 test). Tifacogin significantly attenuated prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin:antithrombin complex levels (P<.001, 2-sample t test) in patients with high and low INR. Overall mortality was lower in the tifacogin response in patients with low INR (12%; n = 83) vs placebo (22.9%; n = 118) (P =.051, Pearson chi2 test; P =.03, logistic regression model). There was an increase in serious adverse events with bleeding in the tifacogin group in both cohorts (6.5% tifacogin and 4.8% placebo for high INR; 6.0% tifacogin and 3.3% placebo for low INR).Conclusions: Treatment with tifacogin had no effect on all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and high INR. Tifacogin administration was associated with an increase in risk of bleeding, irrespective of baseline INR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The airway epithelium (AE) fulfils multiple functions to maintain pulmonary homeostasis, among which ensuring adequate barrier function, cell differentiation and polarization, and actively transporting immunoglobulin A (IgA), the predominant mucosal immunoglobulin in the airway lumen, via the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR). Morphological changes of the airways have been reported in ARDS, while their detailed features, impact for mucosal immunity, and causative mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess epithelial alterations in the distal airways of patients with ARDS., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lung tissue samples from ARDS patients and controls to investigate and quantify structural and functional changes in the small airways, using multiplex fluorescence immunostaining and computer-assisted quantification on whole tissue sections. Additionally, we measured markers of mucosal immunity, IgA and pIgR, alongside with other epithelial markers, in the serum and the broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) prospectively collected from ARDS patients and controls., Results: Compared to controls, airways of ARDS were characterized by increased epithelial denudation (p = 0.0003) and diffuse epithelial infiltration by neutrophils (p = 0.0005). Quantitative evaluation of multiplex fluorescence immunostaining revealed a loss of ciliated cells (p = 0.0317) a trend towards decreased goblet cells (p = 0.056), and no change regarding cell progenitors (basal and club cells), indicating altered mucociliary differentiation. Increased epithelial permeability was also shown in ARDS with a significant decrease of tight (p < 0.0001) and adherens (p = 0.025) junctional proteins. Additionally, we observed a significant decrease of the expression of pIgR, (p < 0.0001), indicating impaired mucosal IgA immunity. Serum concentrations of secretory component (SC) and S-IgA were increased in ARDS (both p < 0.0001), along other lung-derived proteins (CC16, SP-D, sRAGE). However, their BALF concentrations remained unchanged, suggesting a spillover of airway and alveolar proteins through a damaged AE., Conclusion: The airway epithelium from patients with ARDS exhibits multifaceted alterations leading to altered mucociliary differentiation, compromised defense functions and increased permeability with pneumoproteinemia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Convalescent plasma (CP) reduced the mortality in COVID-19 induced ARDS (C-ARDS) patients treated in the CONFIDENT trial. As patients are immunologically heterogeneous, we hypothesized that clusters may differ in their treatment responses to CP., Methods: We measured 20 cytokines, chemokines and cell adhesion markers using a multiplex technique at the time of inclusion in the CONFIDENT trial in patients of centers having accepted to participate in this secondary study. We performed descriptive statistics, unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, and examined the association between the clusters and CP effect on day-28 mortality., Results: Of the 475 patients included in CONFIDENT, 391 (82%) were sampled, and 196/391 (50.1%) had been assigned to CP. We identified four sub-phenotypes representing 89 (22.8%), 178 (45.5%), 38 (9.7%), and 86 (22.0%) patients. The most contributing biomarkers in the principal component analysis were IL-1β, IL-12p70, IL-6, IFN-α, IL-17A, IFN-γ, IL-13, TFN-α, total IgG, and CXCL10. Sub-phenotype-1 displayed a lower immune response, sub-phenotype-2 a higher adaptive response, sub-phenotype-3 the highest innate antiviral, pro and anti-inflammatory response, and adhesion molecule activation, and sub-phenotype-4 a higher pro and anti-inflammatory response, migration protein and adhesion molecule activation. Sub-phenotype-2 and sub-phenotype-4 had higher severity at the time of inclusion. The effect of CP treatment on mortality appeared higher than standard care in each sub-phenotype, without heterogeneity between sub-phenotypes (p = 0.97)., Conclusion: In patients with C-ARDS, we identified 4 sub-phenotypes based on their immune response. These sub-phenotypes were associated with different clinical profiles. The response to CP was similar across the 4 sub-phenotypes., Trial Registration: Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Liège CE 2020/239., Clinicaltrials: gov NCT04558476. Registered 2020-09-11, https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov/study/NCT04558476 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have immune regulatory properties that may ameliorate pathophysiological processes in sepsis. We determined the effect of allogeneic adipose-derived MSCs (Cx611) on the host response during sepsis due to community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) by measuring 29 plasma biomarkers and blood transcriptomes at six time points in 82 patients randomised to two intravenous infusions of Cx611 or placebo. Cx611 treatment enhanced several endothelial cell and procoagulant response plasma biomarkers, and led to increased expression of pathways related to innate immunity, haemostasis and apoptosis. Cx611 infusion in sepsis due to CABP is associated with broad host response alterations., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DVO, KJG and EL are employed by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, which produces Cx611., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Evaluate the safety profile of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (eASC) for the treatment of severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)., Materials and Methods: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a trial. Patients with severe CABP were enrolled to receive intravenous infusions of Cx611 or placebo. The primary objective was safety including hypersensitivity reactions, thromboembolic events, and immunological responses to Cx611. The secondary endpoints included the clinical cure rate, ventilation-free days, and overall survival (Day 90)., Results: Eighty-three patients were randomized and received infusions (Cx611: n = 42]; placebo: n = 41]. The mean age was similar (Cx611: 61.1 [11.2] years; placebo: 63.4 [10.4] years). The number of AEs and treatment-emergent AEs were similar (243; 184 and 2; 1) in Cx611 and placebo respectively. Hypersensitivity reactions or thromboembolic events were similar (Cx611: n = 9; placebo: n = 12). Each study arm had similar anti-HLA antibody/DSA levels at Day 90. The clinical cure rate (Cx611: 86.7%; placebo: 93.8%), mean number of ventilator-free days (Cx611: 12.2 [10.29] days; placebo: 15.4 [10.75] days), and overall survival (Cx611: 71.5%; placebo: 77.0%) did not differ between study arms., Conclusion: Cx611 was well tolerated in severe CABP. These data provide insights for future stem cell clinical study designs, endpoints and sample size calculation., Trial Registration: NCT03158727 (retrospectively registered: May 09, 2017). Full study protocol: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/27/NCT03158727/Prot&#95;000.pdf., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PFL has received honorarium from Takeda for blinded adjudication activities related to the SEPCELL trial and received consulting fees with Inotrem and Adrenomed. MSG has received honorarium from Takeda for blinded adjudication activities related to the SEPCELL trial. TvDP has received honorarium from Takeda for blinded adjudication activities related to the SEPCELL trial and received consulting fees from Pluristem outside the trial (both paid to Amsterdam UMC). XW was part of the clinical coordinating center located at Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, which assessed all patients' eligibility. FMS declares no conflict of interest. GH has received speaking fees and travel expenses from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. RF has received consulting fees with Grifols, MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, Gilead, Baxter, GSK, Menarini, and Boehringer outside the trial. JC has no conflict of interest. KAC and AS were salaried employees of Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA at the time of the study. BZ is a salaried employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA. EL and OdlR are salaried employees of Takeda Madrid, Cell Therapy Technology Center, Tres Cantos, Spain. BF has received honorarium from Takeda for blinded adjudication activities related to the SEPCELL trial and consulting fees with Aridis, Enlivex, Inotrem, AM-Pharma, and GSK outside the trial., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cerebral ventriculitis might be caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including ESBL producers. Temocillin may be a useful treatment option in this scenario; however, no consistent data are available regarding its penetration into the CSF., Objectives: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of temocillin in plasma and CSF and to determine the probability for different simulated dosing regimens to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets in the CSF., Methods: Ten post-neurosurgical critically ill adult patients requiring continuous drainage of CSF were included in this monocentric, prospective, open-label, non-randomized study. They received 2 g loading dose temocillin over 30 min IV infusion, followed by a 6 g continuous infusion over 24 h. Total and unbound concentrations were measured in plasma (n = 88 and 86) and CSF (n = 88 and 88) samples and used to build a population PK model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the PTA at 100% Css>MIC (steady state concentration above the MIC) in CSF., Results: All patients were infected with Enterobacterales with temocillin MICs ≤8 mg/L. The median (min-max) temocillin penetration in CSF was 12.1% (4.3-25.5) at steady state. Temocillin unbound plasma pharmacokinetics were best described by a one-compartment model. PTA for the applied dosing regimen was >90% for bacteria with MIC ≤ 4 mg/L., Conclusions: The currently approved dose of 6 g by continuous infusion may be adequate for the treatment of ventriculitis by Enterobacterales with MIC ≤ 4 mg/L if considering 100% Css>MIC as the PK/PD target to reach. Higher maintenance doses could help covering higher MICs, but their safety would need to be assessed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Molecular diagnostic testing is assumed to enable fast respiratory pathogen identification and contribute to improved pneumonia management. We set up a prospective clinical trial at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit including adult patients suspected of severe pneumonia from whom a lower respiratory tract sample could be obtained. During control periods (CPs), routine testing was performed, and during intervention periods (IPs), this testing was completed with the FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus test (FA-PNEU) executed 24/7. The main objective was to measure the impact of FA-PNEU results in terms of reduced time to targeted antimicrobial treatment administration. Over a 10-month period, analysis was performed on 35 CP and 50 IP patients. The median time to targeted antimicrobial treatment administration was reduced to 4.3 h in IPs compared to 26.4 h in CPs, with 54% of IP patients having FA-PNEU results that led to a treatment modification, of which all but one were targeted. Modifications included 10 (37%) de-escalations, 7 (25.9%) escalations, 3 (11.1%) regimen switches, and 7 (25.9%) complete antimicrobial discontinuations. FA-PNEU results were available with a 42.3 h gain compared to routine identification. This prospective study confirmed retrospective data demonstrating the benefit of FA-PNEU testing in severe pneumonia management of critically ill patients through improved antimicrobial use.

Background: The administration technique for inhaled drug delivery during invasive ventilation remains debated. This study aimed to compare in vivo and in vitro the deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated through four configurations during invasive ventilation, including setups optimizing drug delivery., Methods: Thirty-one intubated postoperative neurosurgery patients with healthy lungs were randomly assigned to four configurations of aerosol delivery using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer and specific ventilator settings: (1) a specific circuit for aerosol therapy (SCAT) with the nebulizer placed at 30 cm of the wye, (2) a heated-humidified circuit switched off 30 min before the nebulization or (3) left on with the nebulizer at the inlet of the heated-humidifier, (4) a conventional circuit with the nebulizer placed between the heat and moisture exchanger filter and the endotracheal tube. Aerosol deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy., Results: A two to three times greater lung delivery was measured in the SCAT group, reaching 19.7% (14.0-24.5) of the nominal dose in comparison to the three other groups (p < 0.01). Around 50 to 60% of lung doses reached the outer region of both lungs in all groups. Drug doses in inner and outer lung regions were significantly increased in the SCAT group (p < 0.01), except for the outer right lung region in the fourth group due to preferential drug trickling from the endotracheal tube and the trachea to the right bronchi. Similar lung delivery was observed whether the heated humidifier was switched off or left on. Inhaled doses measured in vitro correlated with lung doses (R = 0.768, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Optimizing the administration technique enables a significant increase in inhaled drug delivery to the lungs, including peripheral airways. Before adapting mechanical ventilation, studies are required to continue this optimization and to assess its impact on drug delivery and patient outcome in comparison to more usual settings., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Passive immunization with plasma collected from convalescent patients has been regularly used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Minimal data are available regarding the use of convalescent plasma in patients with Covid-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)., Methods: In this open-label trial, we randomly assigned adult patients with Covid-19-induced ARDS who had been receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 5 days in a 1:1 ratio to receive either convalescent plasma with a neutralizing antibody titer of at least 1:320 or standard care alone. Randomization was stratified according to the time from tracheal intubation to inclusion. The primary outcome was death by day 28., Results: A total of 475 patients underwent randomization from September 2020 through March 2022. Overall, 237 patients were assigned to receive convalescent plasma and 238 to receive standard care. Owing to a shortage of convalescent plasma, a neutralizing antibody titer of 1:160 was administered to 17.7% of the patients in the convalescent-plasma group. Glucocorticoids were administered to 466 patients (98.1%). At day 28, mortality was 35.4% in the convalescent-plasma group and 45.0% in the standard-care group (P = 0.03). In a prespecified analysis, this effect was observed mainly in patients who underwent randomization 48 hours or less after the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Serious adverse events did not differ substantially between the two groups., Conclusions: The administration of plasma collected from convalescent donors with a neutralizing antibody titer of at least 1:160 to patients with Covid-19-induced ARDS within 5 days after the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation significantly reduced mortality at day 28. This effect was mainly observed in patients who underwent randomization 48 hours or less after ventilation initiation. (Funded by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04558476.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Activation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) pathway is associated with septic shock outcomes. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway in patients with activated TREM-1 might improve survival. Soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1), a potential mechanism-based biomarker, might facilitate enrichment of patient selection in clinical trials of nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator. In this phase 2b trial, we aimed to confirm the hypothesis that TREM1 inhibition might improve outcomes in patients with septic shock., Methods: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial assessed the efficacy and safety of two different doses of nangibotide compared with placebo, and aimed to identify the optimum treatment population, in patients across 42 hospitals with medical, surgical, or mixed intensive care units (ICUs) in seven countries. Non-COVID-19 patients (18-85 years) meeting the standard definition of septic shock, with documented or suspected infection (lung, abdominal, or urinary [in patients ≥65 years]), were eligible within 24 h of vasopressor initiation for the treatment of septic shock. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to intravenous nangibotide 0·3 mg/kg per h (low-dose group), nangibotide 1·0 mg/kg per h (high-dose group), or matched placebo, using a computer-generated block randomisation scheme (block size 3). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were grouped according to sTREM-1 concentrations at baseline (established from sepsis observational studies and from phase 2a change to data) into high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL). The primary outcome was the mean difference in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 5 in the low-dose and high-dose groups compared with placebo, measured in the predefined high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL) population and in the overall modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included all-cause 28-day mortality, safety, pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of the relationship between TREM-1 activation and treatment response. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-004827-36, and Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04055909., Findings: Between Nov 14, 2019, and April 11, 2022, of 402 patients screened, 355 were included in the main analysis (116 in the placebo group, 118 in the low-dose group, and 121 in the high-dose group). In the preliminary high sTREM-1 population (total 253 [71%] of 355; placebo 75 [65%] of 116; low-dose 90 [76%] of 118; high-dose 88 [73%] of 121), the mean difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 was 0·21 (95% CI -1·45 to 1·87, p=0·80) in the low-dose group and 1·39 (-0·28 to 3·06, p=0·104) in the high-dose group versus placebo. In the overall population, the difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 between the placebo group and low-dose group was 0·20 (-1·09 to 1·50; p=0·76),and between the placebo group and the high-dose group was 1·06 (-0·23 to 2·35, p=0·108). In the predefined high sTREM-1 cutoff population, 23 (31%) patients in the placebo group, 35 (39%) in the low-dose group, and 25 (28%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. In the overall population, 29 (25%) patients in the placebo, 38 (32%) in the low-dose, and 30 (25%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events (111 [96%] patients in the placebo group, 113 [96%] in the low-dose group, and 115 [95%] in the high-dose group) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (28 [24%], 26 [22%], and 31 [26%]) was similar between all three groups. High-dose nangibotide led to a clinically relevant improvement in SOFA score (of two points or more) from baseline to day 5 over placebo in those with higher cutoff concentrations (≥532 pg/mL) of sTREM-1 at baseline. Low dose nangibotide displayed a similar pattern with lower magnitude of effect across all cutoff values., Interpretation: This trial did not achieve the primary outcome of improvement in SOFA score at the predefined sTREM-1 value. Future studies are needed to confirm the benefit of nangibotide at higher concentrations of TREM-1 activation., Funding: Inotrem., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SL, MS-M, J-JG, MD, TH, and VC are employees of Inotrem. BF, ML, and P-FL are members of the steering committee. BF reports personal fees for consulting from Aridis, Enlivex, AM-Pharma, Combioxin, Nektar, GSK, and Inotrem outside of the submitted work. J-JG, MD, MS-M, SG, SL, and TH hold shares in Inotrem. J-PM reports payments for lectures and travel support from Fresenius and Roche and takes part in an advisory board with AM-Pharma, outside of the submitted work. JV reports sponsoring fees from Inotrem during the conduct of the study. MB reports grants from Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sygeforsikringen Danmark, and Svend Andersen Foundation, is the national coordinator for the REVIVAL study from AM-Pharma and is involved with the ESICM, outside of the submitted work. MD is designated as an inventor on a patent. P-FL reports consulting fees from Adrenomed and Inotrem outside of the submitted work. RF reports personal fees from Inotrem, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, Thermofisher, Menarini, Cytosorb, and Gilead, outside of the submitted work. SG reports consulting fees from Inotrem outside of the submitted work and is designated as an inventor on a patent related to Inotrem. SL reports personal fees from the UK COVID Therapeutics Advisory Panel and holds share in Critical Pressure outside of the submitted work. J-JG reports consulting fees from Inotrem during the conduct of the study and outside of the submitted work. CB, EM, IV, JL, J-MG, NA, NDS, TF, VH, VJ, and VP have no conflict of interests to report., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Activation of the TREM-1 pathway is associated with outcome in life threatening COVID-19. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway with nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator may improve survival in TREM-1 activated patients (identified using the biomarker sTREM-1)., Methods: Phase 2 double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing efficacy, safety, and optimum treatment population of nangibotide (1.0 mg/kg/h) compared to placebo. Patients aged 18-75 years were eligible within 7 days of SARS-CoV-2 documentation and within 48 h of the onset of invasive or non-invasive respiratory support because of COVID-19-related ARDS. Patients were included from September 2020 to April 2022, with a pause in recruitment between January and August 2021. Primary outcome was the improvement in clinical status defined by a seven-point ordinal scale in the overall population with a planned sensitivity analysis in the subgroup of patients with a sTREM-1 level above the median value at baseline (high sTREM-1 group). Secondary endpoints included safety and all-cause 28-day and day 60 mortality. The study was registered in EudraCT (2020-001504-42) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429334)., Findings: The study was stopped after 220 patients had been recruited. Of them, 219 were included in the mITT analysis. Nangibotide therapy was associated with an improved clinical status at day 28. Fifty-two (52.0%) of patients had improved in the placebo group compared to 77 (64.7%) of the nangibotide treated population, an odds ratio (95% CI) for improvement of 1.79 (1.02-3.14), p = 0.043. In the high sTREM-1 population, 18 (32.7%) of placebo patients had improved by day 28 compared to 26 (48.1%) of treated patients, an odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.17 (0.96-4.90), p = 0.063 was observed. In the overall population, 28 (28.0%) of placebo treated patients were not alive at the day 28 visit compared to 19 (16.0%) of nangibotide treated patients, an absolute improvement (95% CI) in all-cause mortality at day 28, adjusted for baseline clinical status of 12.1% (1.18-23.05). In the high sTREM-1 population (n = 109), 23 (41.8%) of patients in the placebo group and 12 (22.2%) of patients in the nangibotide group were not alive at day 28, an adjusted absolute reduction in mortality of 19.9% (2.78-36.98). The rate of treatment emergent adverse events was similar in both placebo and nangibotide treated patients., Interpretation: Whilst the study was stopped early due to low recruitment rate, the ESSENTIAL study demonstrated that TREM-1 modulation with nangibotide is safe in COVID-19, and results in a consistent pattern of improved clinical status and mortality compared to placebo. The relationship between sTREM-1 and both risk of death and treatment response merits further evaluation of nangibotide using precision medicine approaches in life threatening viral pneumonitis., Funding: The study was sponsored by Inotrem SA., Competing Interests: SL, MSM, JJG, MD, VC and ALLP are employees of Inotrem SA. BF, ML and PFL are members of the steering committee. BF reports personal fees for consulting from Aridis, Enlivex, AM-Pharma, and Inotrem outside the submitted work. JJG, MD, MSM, SG, SL and ALLP hold shares in Inotrem. MD, JJG, SG and MSM are designated as an inventor on patent(s) related to Inotrem. PFL reports consulting fees from Adrenomed and Inotrem outside the submitted work. SG and SL reports consulting fees from Inotrem outside the submitted work. SL is director and holds shares in Critical Pressure Ltd, and is designated as an inventor on a patent related to Critical Pressure Ltd, outside the submitted work. JJG reports consulting travelling support from Inotrem outside the submitted work. JH reports honoraria for lectures from Diagnostica Stago, Pfizer PFE France, Sanofi Aventis France, Inotrem, MSD, Octapharma and Shionogi outside the submitted wok. PA's institution received payment for the recruitment of patients in the study. JMG, CD, JPM, JPQ, JL, EM, JCL, CV, TF and JB have no conflict of interests to report., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Findings from preclinical studies and one pilot clinical trial suggest potential benefits of epidural analgesia in acute pancreatitis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia, in addition to usual care, in improving clinical outcomes of intensive care unit patients with acute pancreatitis., Methods: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial including adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis upon admission to the intensive care unit. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a strategy combining thoracic epidural analgesia and usual care (intervention group) or a strategy of usual care alone (control group). The primary outcome was the number of ventilator-free days from randomization until day 30., Results: Between June 2014 and January 2019, 148 patients were enrolled, and 135 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 65 patients randomly assigned to the intervention group and 70 to the control group. The number of ventilator-free days did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (median [interquartile range], 30 days [15-30] and 30 days [18-30], respectively; median absolute difference of - 0.0 days, 95% CI - 3.3 to 3.3; p = 0.59). Epidural analgesia was significantly associated with longer duration of invasive ventilation (median [interquartile range], 14 days [5-28] versus 6 days [2-13], p = 0.02)., Conclusions: In a population of intensive care unit adults with acute pancreatitis and low requirement for intubation, this first multicenter randomized trial did not show the hypothesized benefit of epidural analgesia in addition to usual care. Safety of epidural analgesia in this setting requires further investigation., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02126332 , April 30, 2014., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Severe forms of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease are caused by an exaggerated systemic inflammatory response and subsequent inflammation-related coagulopathy. Anti-inflammatory treatment with low dose dexamethasone has been shown to reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy. However, the mechanisms of action of corticosteroids have not been extensively studied in critically ill patients in the context of COVID-19. Plasma biomarkers of inflammatory and immune responses, endothelial and platelet activation, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, and coagulopathy were compared between patients treated or not by systemic dexamethasone for severe forms of COVID-19. Dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced the inflammatory and lymphoid immune response in critical COVID-19 patients but had little effect on the myeloid immune response and no effect on endothelial activation, platelet activation, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, and coagulopathy. The benefits of low dose dexamethasone on outcome in critical COVID-19 can be partially explained by a modulation of the inflammatory response but not by reduction of coagulopathy. Future studies should explore the impact of combining dexamethasone with other immunomodulatory or anticoagulant drugs in severe COVID-19.

Introduction: Sepsis, the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is an endogenous detoxifying enzyme. A recombinant human ALP compound, ilofotase alfa, showed no safety or tolerability concerns in a phase 2 trial. Renal function improvement over 28 days was significantly greater in the ilofotase alfa group. Moreover, a significant relative reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality of >40% was observed. A follow-up trial has been designed to confirm these findings., Methods and Analysis: This is a phase 3, global, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential design trial in which patients are randomly assigned to either placebo or 1.6 mg/kg ilofotase alfa. Randomisation is stratified by baseline modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) score and trial site. The primary objective is to confirm the survival benefit with ilofotase alfa by demonstrating a reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis-associated AKI requiring vasopressors. A maximum of 1400 patients will be enrolled at ∼120 sites in Europe, North America, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. Up to four interim analyses will take place. Based on predefined decision rules, the trial may be stopped early for futility or for effectiveness. In addition, patients with COVID-19 disease and patients with 'moderate to severe' chronic kidney disease are analysed as 2 separate cohorts of 100 patients each. An independent Data Monitoring Committee evaluates safety data at prespecified intervals throughout the trial., Ethics and Dissemination: The trial is approved by relevant institutional review boards/independent ethics committees and is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, guidelines of Good Clinical Practice, Code of Federal Regulations and all other applicable regulations. Results of this study will determine the potential of ilofotase alfa to reduce mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated AKI and will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal., Trial Registration Number: EudraCT CT Number 2019-0046265-24. US IND Number 117 605 Pre-results., Clinicaltrials: gov number: NCT04411472., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PP received advisory board consultancy and travel reimbursements from AM-Pharma. DCA and CJD serve as advisory board consultants for AM-Pharma. JA, EvdB and JB are employees of AM-Pharma. RB, MB, KD, BF, JAK, P-FL, VP and PY received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM Pharma. KB worked as an employee of Berry Consultants KB and acted as a consultant to numerous pharmaceutical and device companies. KB is currently an employee of and holds stock in AstraZeneca. JC, ALK and SR are consultants to AM-Pharma. RF received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM Pharma and additional consulting reimbursements from BioMerieux, Baxter, Pfizer, MSD, Gilead, Shionogi, Grifols and Beckton Dickinson unrelated to the current study. MJ received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM Pharma, additional consulting reimbursement from Baxter and Gilead and grant support from Fresenius and Baxter, unrelated to the current study. KL received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM-Pharma, owns stock in Amgen and consultant for Biomerieux, Neumora, Seastar and BOA Medical. RLM received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM Pharma and additional consulting reimbursement from BioMerieux, Baxter, Nova Biomed, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Medtronic, Sanofi and Mallinckrodt, unrelated to the current study. PTM received Trial Steering Committee consultancy payments from AM-Pharma. Other consultancy payments: FAST Biomedical, Novartis, Renibus Therapeutics. MO received speaker honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, Biomerieux, Baxter and Gilead, and research funding from Fresenius Medical Care, Biomerieux, Baxter and LaJolla Pharma and advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM-Pharma. AZ received advisory board consultancy reimbursements from AM-Pharma. AZ has received consulting and/or lecture fees from Astute Medical/BioMerieux, Fresenius, Paion, Guard Therapeutics, and Baxter, unrelated to the current study. AZ has received grant support from Astute Medical/BioMerieux, Fresenius and Baxter, unrelated to the current study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: To investigate the possible influence of prolonged ketamine (K) or esketamine (ESK) infusion on the profile of liver cholestatic biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 infection., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 135 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS who received prolonged K or ESK infusion. They were compared to 15 COVID-19 ICU patients who did not receive K/ESK while being mechanically ventilated and 108 COVID-19 patients who did not receive mechanical ventilation nor K/ESK. The profile of the liver function tests was analysed in the groups., Results: Peak values of ALP, GGT and bilirubin were higher in the K/ESK group, but not for AST and ALT. Peak values of ALP were significantly higher among patients who underwent mechanical ventilation and who received K/ESK, compared with mechanically ventilated patients who did not receive K/ESK. There was a correlation between these peak values and the cumulative dose and duration of K/ESK therapy., Conclusions: Based on the observations of biliary anomalies in chronic ketamine abusers, prolonged exposure to ketamine sedation during mechanical ventilation may also be involved, in addition to viral infection causing secondary sclerosing cholangitis. The safety of prolonged ketamine sedation on the biliary tract requires further investigations., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: To highlight the importance of frailty assessment in thoracic surgery patients., Recent Findings: Frailty results from an accelerated loss of functional reserve associated with ageing and leads to increased vulnerability following surgery. It is a complex and multidimensional syndrome involving physiological and psychosocial systems. Frailty is a separate entity from comorbidities and disabilities. Frailty is associated with an increased risk of complications and a higher mortality rate after thoracic surgery. Patients can easily be screened for frailty and frail patients can benefit from further assessment of all areas of frailty secondarily. Prehabilitation and rehabilitation can help limit frailty-related complications after thoracic surgery., Summary: Frailty should be part of the routine preoperative evaluation for thoracic surgery. Frailty must be considered in assessing eligibility for surgery and in planning prehabilitation and rehabilitation if necessary., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase-3 (DPP3) is a protease involved in the degradation of several cardiovascular mediators. Adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) is a peptide essential for regulation of endothelial barrier function. In different shock-pathologies, both biomarkers are associated with disease severity, organ dysfunction and mortality. Associations with outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients are unknown. The objectives of the present study were to investigate associations of bio-ADM and "circulating DPP3" (cDPP3) with short-term outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients (n=80)., Methods: A multicentre prospective cohort study was performed. The primary end-point was 28-day mortality. Secondary end-points included different severities of acute kidney injury (AKI)., Results: cDPP3 levels were mainly associated with 28-day mortality; Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) of 0.69 (0.56-0.82, p=0.023), 0.77 (0.64-0.90, p<0.001) and 0.81 (0.65-0.96, p<0.001) at admission, day 3 and day 7, respectively. In contrast, bio-ADM levels were mainly associated with AKI, with AUROCs of 0.64 (0.51-0.77, p=0.048), 0.75 (0.64-0.86, p<0.001) and 0.83 (0.74-0.93, p<0.001) for day 1, 3 and 7, respectively. Interestingly, patients with high levels of both cDPP3 and bio-ADM at day 7 had an additionally increased risk of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 11.8; 95% CI 2.5-55.3, p<0.001)., Conclusions: cDPP3 and bio-ADM responses were associated with short-term mortality and AKI in critically ill COVID-19 patients, respectively. These findings suggest that treatment with specific antibodies modulating cDPP3 or bio-ADM-related pathways may improve outcome of COVID-19., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Analyses of samples was performed free of charge by the respective biomarker companies (Sphingotec for bio-ADM and 4TEEN4 for cDPP3). No additional funding was provided for the execution of this study. Both biomarker-companies had no role in the design of the study, its execution or analyses, interpretation of the data, or the decision to submit results. D. van Lier was invited to a meeting in Berlin by 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals GmbH. B. Deniau was invited to a meeting in Henningsdorf by 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals GmbH. K. Santos is employed by 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals, the company holding patent rights for the DPP3 assay. O. Hartmann is employed by Sphingotec GmbH, the company holding patent rights for the bio-ADM assay and a licence to commercialise the cDPP3 assay. E. Dudoignon, F. Depret and B. Plaud have nothing to declare. P-F. Laterre, A. Mebazaa and P. Pickkers received travel and consultancy reimbursements from 4TEEN4 and Sphingotec, the companies holding patent rights for the DPP3 and bio-ADM assays used in the study, respectively., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Purpose: Adrecizumab, a non-neutralizing antibody of adrenomedullin (ADM) was recently investigated regarding its potential to restore endothelial barrier function in septic shock patients with high plasma ADM levels. Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3), a protease involved in the degradation of several cardiovascular mediators, represents another biological pathway strongly associated with outcome in septic shock, although unrelated to ADM. Therefore, the prognosis of patients with elevated cDPP3 may not be influenced by Adrecizumab. Also, time until initiation of treatment may influence efficacy., Objective: To evaluate effects of cDPP3-based enrichment on treatment efficacy of Adrecizumab., Materials and Methods: Post-hoc analysis of AdrenOSS-2, a phase-II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled biomarker-guided trial of Adrecizumab., Results: Compared to the total study cohort [HR for 28-day mortality of 0.84 (95% CI 0.53;1.31), p = 0.439], therapeutic benefit of Adrecizumab tended to be more pronounced in the subgroup of 249 patients with low cDPP3 (<50 ng/mL); [HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.34;1.08), p = 0.085]. Median duration to study drug infusion was 8.5 h. In the subgroup of 129 patients with cDPP3 <50 ng/mL and an early start of treatment (<8.5 h after septic shock diagnosis) HR for 28-day mortality vs. placebo was 0.49 (95% CI 0.21-1.18), p = 0.105. In multivariate interaction analyses corrected for baseline disease severity, both cDPP3, as well as the cDPP3 * treatment interaction term were associated with a reduced HR for 28-day mortality in the Adrecizumab treated group; p = 0.015 for cDPP3 in univariate analysis, p = 0.025 for the interaction term between cDPP3 and treatment group. In contrast, treatment timing was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality in multivariate interaction analyses., Discussion: In septic shock patients with high ADM levels, a further post-hoc enrichment strategy based on cDPP3 may indicate (with all the caveats to be considered for post-hoc subgroup analyses) that therapeutic efficacy is most pronounced in patients with lower cDPP3 levels., Competing Interests: Authors DL, AP, and FA were invited to a meeting in Berlin by 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals GmbH. Author GM received travel and consultancy reimbursements from Adrenomed, 4TEEN4, and Sphingotec. Author P-FL received fees as a coordinator of the original trial’s clinical coordinating center. He also reports travel and consultancy reimbursements from Adrenomed, 4TEEN4, and Sphingotec. Author OH was employed by Sphingotec GmbH, the company holding patent rights for the bio-ADM assay and a license to commercialize the cDPP3 assay. Authors CK, JS, and JZ were employed by Adrenomed AG, the company holding patent rights for the Adrecizumab compound. Author KS was employed by 4TEEN4 Pharmaceuticals, the company holding patent rights for the cDPP3 assay. Author AB was the managing director of Sphingotec GmbH and holds shares in it. Author AM reports personal fees from Orion, Sanof, Adrenomed, Epygon, and Fire 1 and grants and personal fees from 4TEEN4, Abbott, Roche, and SphingoTec. Author PP received travel and consultancy reimbursement from Adrenomed, SphingoTec, 4TEEN4, AM-Pharma, Baxter, and EBI., (Copyright © 2022 van Lier, Picod, Marx, Laterre, Hartmann, Knothe, Azibani, Struck, Santos, Zimmerman, Bergmann, Mebazaa and Pickkers.)

Background: Impact of in-ICU transfusion on long-term outcomes remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess in critical-care survivors the association between in-ICU red blood cells transfusion and 1-year mortality., Methods: FROG-ICU, a multicenter European study enrolling all-comers critical care patients was analyzed (n = 1551). Association between red blood cells transfusion administered in intensive care unit and 1-year mortality in critical care survivors was analyzed using an augmented inverse probability of treatment weighting-augmented inverse probability of censoring weighting method to control confounders., Results: Among the 1551 ICU-survivors, 42% received at least one unit of red blood cells while in intensive care unit. Patients in the transfusion group had greater severity scores than those in the no-transfusion group. According to unweighted analysis, 1-year post-critical care mortality was greater in the transfusion group compared to the no-transfusion group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% CI 1.45-2.16). Weighted analyses including 40 confounders, showed that transfusion remained associated with a higher risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.46)., Conclusions: Our results suggest a high incidence of in-ICU RBC transfusion and that in-ICU transfusion is associated with a higher 1-year mortality among in-ICU survivors. Trial registration ( NCT01367093 ; Registered 6 June 2011)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Temocillin plasma protein binding (PPB) in healthy individuals is reported to be ∼85% but had not been studied in patients., Objectives: To obtain normative data on temocillin PPB in patients in relation to infection and impact of co-medications widely used in ICU., Methods: Plasma was obtained from healthy individuals (Group #1), non-ICU patients with UTI (Group #2), ICU patients with suspected/confirmed ventriculitis (Group #3) or with sepsis/septic shock (Group #4). Total and unbound temocillin concentrations were measured in spiked samples from temocillin-naive donors (in vitro) or in plasma from temocillin-treated subjects (in vivo). The impact of diluting plasma, using pharmaceutical albumin, or adding drugs potentially competing for PPB was tested in spiked samples. Data were analysed using a modified Hill-Langmuir equation taking ligand depletion into account., Results: Temocillin PPB was saturable in all groups, both in vitro and in vivo. Maximal binding capacity (Bmax) was 1.2-2-fold lower in patients. At 20 and 200 mg/L (total concentrations), the unbound fraction reached 12%-29%, 23%-42% and 32%-52% in Groups #2, #3, #4. The unbound fraction was inversely correlated with albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Binding to albumin was 2-3-fold lower than in plasma and non-saturable. Drugs with high PPB but active at lower molar concentrations than temocillin caused minimal displacement, while fluconazole (low PPB but similar plasma concentrations to temocillin) increased up to 2-fold its unbound fraction., Conclusions: Temocillin PPB is saturable, 2-4-fold lowered in infected patients in relation to disease severity (ICU admission, hypoalbuminaemia, inflammation) and only partially reproducible with albumin. Competition with other drugs must be considered for therapeutic concentrations to be meaningful., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common critical illness syndrome with high morbidity and mortality. There are no proven pharmacological therapies for ARDS. The current definition of ARDS is based on shared clinical characteristics but does not capture the heterogeneity in clinical risk factors, imaging characteristics, physiology, timing of onset and trajectory, and biology of the syndrome. There is increasing interest within the ARDS clinical trialist community to design clinical trials that reduce heterogeneity in the trial population. This effort must be balanced with ongoing work to craft an inclusive, global definition of ARDS, with important implications for trial design. Ultimately, the two aims-to design trials that are applicable to the diverse global ARDS population while also advancing opportunities to identify targetable traits-should coexist. In this Personal View, we recommend two primary strategies to improve future ARDS trials: the development of new methods to target treatable traits in clinical trial populations, and improvements in the representativeness of ARDS trials, with the inclusion of global populations. We emphasise that these two strategies are complementary. We also discuss how a proposed expansion of the definition of ARDS could affect the future of clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SJ receives consulting fees from Drager, Fisher-Paykel, Medtronic, Mindray, and Baxter. NL receives grant funding from Guerbet. GL receives consulting fees from Abbott, Abiomed, and Baxter; and speaking fees from LivaNova. AM receives grants from 4TEEN4, Abbott, Roche, and Sphyngotec; and consulting fees from Orion, Roche, Adrenomed, and Fire1. AM participates on the data and safety monitoring board for Roche. LBW declares grants from Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, and CSL Behring, outside the submitted work; and consulting fees from Foresee, Merck, Citius Pharmaceuticals, Quark, and Boehringer Ingelheim. MAM declares grant support from Roche-Genentech for ARDS observational studies; and consulting income from Citius Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Gilead Pharmaceuticals, Plant Therapeutics, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are recommended for thromboprophylaxis in ICU patients but often fail to reach adequate peak anti-Xa activity., Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) route of administration of LMWH., Method: This was a prospective, monocentric, randomized trial. Patients were randomized to the IV route of administration with a 4-h infusion of nadroparin 3800 IU or to the SC route of administration. Randomization was stratified according to the need for vasopressor or not. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after the administration was started., Results: Sixty patients were included, of whom 30 were randomized to the IV group and 30 to the SC route. Pharmacokinetic profiles were significantly different. Mean peak anti-Xa activity was 0.38 IU/ml in the IV group vs 0.20 IU/ml in the SC group (p < 0.001). Trough values and AUC (0-24 h) were similar in both groups. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar whether patients received vasopressors or not., Conclusions: The IV route of administration with a 4-h infusion lead to a significantly higher peak anti-Xa activity without affecting trough value or the AUC (0-24 h). Whether the IV administration of LMWH might improve the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis requires further research., Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04982055, retrospectively registered 08 July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982055?cond=NCT04982055&draw=2&rank=1., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neutrophil extracellular traps’ (NETs’) formation is a mechanism of defense that neutrophils deploy as an alternative to phagocytosis, to constrain the spread of microorganisms. Aim: The aim was to evaluate biomarkers of NETs’ formation in a patient cohort admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) due to infection. Methods: Forty-six septic shock patients, 22 critical COVID-19 patients and 48 matched control subjects were recruited. Intact nucleosomes containing histone 3.1 (Nu.H3.1), or citrullinated histone H3R8 (Nu.Cit-H3R8), free citrullinated histone (Cit-H3), neutrophil elastase (NE) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were measured. Results: Significant differences in Nu.H3.1 and NE levels were observed between septic shock and critical COVID-19 subjects as well as with controls (p-values < 0.05). The normalization of nucleosome levels according to the neutrophil count improved the discrimination between septic shock and critical COVID-19 patients. The ratio of Nu.Cit-H3R8 to Nu.H3.1 allowed the determination of nucleosome citrullination degree, presumably by PAD4. Conclusions: H3.1 and Cit-H3R8 nucleosomes appear to be interesting markers of global cell death and neutrophil activation when combined. Nu.H3.1 permits the evaluation of disease severity and differs between septic shock and critical COVID-19 patients, reflecting two distinct potential pathological processes in these conditions., Competing Interests: Among the authors, M.H., L.R. and J.C. are employees of Belgian Volition SRL and L.M., C.D., C.B. and J.D. are employees of QUALIblood s.a. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

We investigated the performance of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/S. aureus skin and soft tissue (SSTI) quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay in SAATELLITE, a multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 study of suvratoxumab, a monoclonal antibody (MAb) targeting S. aureus alpha-toxin, for reducing the incidence of S. aureus pneumonia. The assay was used to detect methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA in lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples from mechanically ventilated patients. LRT culture results were compared with S. aureus protein A ( spa ) gene cycle threshold ( C T ) values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Youden index were used to determine the C T cutoff for best separation of culture-S. aureus-negative and S. aureus-positive patients. Of 720 screened subjects, 299 (41.5%) were S. aureus positive by qPCR, of whom 209 had culture data: 162 (77.5%) were S. aureus positive and 47 (22.5%) were S. aureus negative. Culture results were negatively affected by antibiotic use and cross-laboratory variability. An inverse linear correlation was observed between C T values and quantitative S. aureus culture results. A spa C T value of 29 (≈2 × 10 3 CFU/mL) served as the best cutoff for separation between culture-negative and culture-positive samples. The associated area under the ROC curve was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 90%). Suvratoxumab provided greater reduction in S. aureus pneumonia or death than placebo in subjects with low S. aureus load ( C T  ≥ 29; relative risk reduction [RRR], 50.0%; 90% CI, 2.7 to 74.4%) versus the total study population (RRR, 25.2%; 90% CI, -4.3 to 46.4%). The qPCR assay was easy to perform, sensitive, and standardized and provided better sensitivity than conventional culture for S. aureus detection. Quantitative PCR C T output correlated with suvratoxumab efficacy in reducing S. aureus pneumonia incidence or death in S. aureus-colonized, mechanically ventilated patients.

Temocillin is active against Gram-negative bacteria, including many extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales. We studied its pharmacokinetics in plasma and ascitic fluid after intravenous administration of a loading dose of 2 g over 30 min, followed by continuous infusion of 6 g/24 h, to 19 critically-ill patients with septic shock associated with complicated intra-abdominal infection. We established a pharmacokinetic model describing unbound temocillin concentrations in plasma and ascitic fluid and performed Monte-Carlo simulations to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of unbound concentrations (100% fT > MIC, i.e., unbound concentrations remaining above the MIC during 100% of the time) for the applied and hypothetical dosing regimens. The temocillin AUC in ascitic fluid was 46% of the plasma AUC. Plasma unbound concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model, and an additional compartment was added to describe unbound concentration in ascitic fluid, with renal clearance as a covariate. Dosing simulations showed that 90% PTA was achieved in the plasma with the current dosing regimen for MIC ≤ 16 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint) but not in the ascitic fluid if renal clearance was ≥40 mL/min. Hypothetical dosing with a higher (a) loading dose or (b) infused dose allowed to reach target concentrations in ascitic fluid (a) more rapidly or (b) sustainably, but these simulations need to be evaluated in the clinics for safety and efficacy.

Unique challenges arise when conducting trials to evaluate therapies already in common clinical use, including difficulty enrolling patients owing to widespread open-label use of trial therapies and the need for large sample sizes to detect small but clinically meaningful treatment effects. Despite numerous successes in trials evaluating novel interventions such as vaccines, traditional explanatory trials have struggled to provide definitive answers to time-sensitive questions for acutely ill patients with COVID-19. Pragmatic trials, which can increase efficiency by allowing some or all trial procedures to be embedded into clinical care, are increasingly proposed as a means to evaluate therapies that are in common clinical use. In this Personal View, we use two concurrently conducted COVID-19 trials of hydroxychloroquine (the US ORCHID trial and the UK RECOVERY trial) to contrast the effects of explanatory and pragmatic trial designs on trial conduct, trial results, and the care of patients managed outside of clinical trials. In view of the potential advantages and disadvantages of explanatory and pragmatic trial designs, we make recommendations for their optimal use in the evaluation of therapies in the acute care setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMB reports personal fees from Hamilton for chairing a data safety and monitoring board (DSMB). EG reports grants and research contracts from Philips and Radiometer, consulting fees from Baxter, and speaker's fees from Edwards. MNG reports fees from Regeneron for DSMB participation; she has received support to attend board meetings for the American Thoracic Society. MOH reports fees from Elsevier for statistical peer review, from Berkeley Research Group, Pura Vida Investments, and Guidepoint Advisers for statistical consulting, and from the American Thoracic Society for contributions as a statistical editor of the Annals of the American Thoracic Society. SJ reports fees from Drager, Fisher-Paykel, Baxter, Medtronic, and Fresenius-Xenios for lectures and training courses for physicians and nurses. JCM reports consulting fees from Gilead, and travel support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. MAM reports research funding from Roche-Genentec; he has received fees from Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and Citius for DSMB participation. TWR reports personal fees from Sanofi for DSMB participation, and consulting fees and stock options from Cumberland Pharmaceuticals for contributions on a consultancy basis as Director of Medical Affairs. LBW has received research contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, and CSL Behring; she reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Quark, Citius, and Foresee; she has served on a data monitoring committee for the SIGNET trial and on DSMBs for the INVENT COVID and CounterCovid trials. WHS has received research funding from Endpoint Health and Merck; he reports personal consulting fees from Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Baxter; he has received personal fees for DSMB participation from BioAegis. SPC reports consulting fees from Vir Biotechnology. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

SARS-CoV-2 causes major disturbances in serum metabolite levels, associated with severity of the immune response. Despite the numerous advantages of urine for biomarker discovery, the potential association between urine metabolites and disease severity has not been investigated in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In a proof-of-concept study, we performed quantitative urine metabolomics in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and controls using LC-MS/MS. We assessed whether metabolites alterations were associated with COVID-19, disease severity, and inflammation. The study included 56 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (26 non-critical and 30 critical disease); 16 healthy controls; and 3 controls with proximal tubule dysfunction unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. Metabolomic profiling revealed a major urinary increase of tryptophan metabolites kynurenine (P < 0.001), 3-hydroxykynurenine (P < 0.001) and 3-hydroxyanthranilate (P < 0.001) in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Urine levels of kynurenines were associated with disease severity and systemic inflammation (kynurenine, r 0.43, P = 0.001; 3-hydroxykynurenine, r 0.44, P < 0.001). Increased urinary levels of neutral amino acids and imino acid proline were also common in COVID-19, suggesting specific transport defects. Urine metabolomics identified major alterations in the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway, consistent with changes in host metabolism during SARS-CoV-2 infection. The association between increased urinary levels of kynurenines, inflammation and COVID-19 severity supports further evaluation of these easily available biomarkers., (© 2022. The Author(s).)