Search

DOC- 25K, Supplementary Tables 1-6

Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Figure 1. "Phase 2-Eligible" Population. Supplementary Figure 2. ALKA-372-001 and STARTRK-1 Dosing Regimens.

Cancer patients may be at high risk of infection and poor outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2. Analyzing their prognosis, examining the effects of baseline characteristics and systemic anti-cancer active therapy (SACT) are critical to their management through the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. The AIOM-L CORONA was a multicenter, observational, ambispective, cohort study, with the intended participation of 26 centers in the Lombardy region (Italy). A total of 231 cases were included between March and September 2020. The median age was 68 years, 151 patients (62.2%) were receiving SACT, mostly chemotherapy. During a median follow-up of 138 days (range 12–218), 93 events occurred. Age ≥60 years, metastatic dissemination, dyspnea, desaturation, and interstitial pneumonia were all independent mortality predictors. Overall SACT had a neutral effect (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.83, 95%Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.32–2.15), however, metastatic patients receiving SACT were less likely to die as compared to untreated counterparts, after adjusting for other confounding variables (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.11–0.51, p &lt, 0.001). Among cancer patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, those with metastases were most at risk of death, especially in the absence of SACT. During the ongoing pandemic, these vulnerable patients should avoid exposure to SARS-CoV-2, while treatment adjustments and prioritizing vaccination are being considered according to international recommendations.

Entrectinib, a potent oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, was evaluated in two phase I studies in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease. Here, we summarize the overall safety and report the antitumor activity of entrectinib in a cohort of patients with tumors harboring NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, or ALK gene fusions, naïve to prior TKI treatment targeting the specific gene, and who were treated at doses that achieved therapeutic exposures consistent with the recommended phase II dose. Entrectinib was well tolerated, with predominantly Grades 1/2 adverse events that were reversible with dose modification. Responses were observed in non–small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, mammary analogue secretory carcinoma, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, as early as 4 weeks after starting treatment and lasting as long as >2 years. Notably, a complete CNS response was achieved in a patient with SQSTM1–NTRK1-rearranged lung cancer.Significance: Gene fusions of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, and ALK (encoding TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK, respectively) lead to constitutive activation of oncogenic pathways. Entrectinib was shown to be well tolerated and active against those gene fusions in solid tumors, including in patients with primary or secondary CNS disease. Cancer Discov; 7(4); 400–9. ©2017 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 339

Oxaliplatin immune-induced syndrome (OIIS) is an uncommon, potentially life-threatening, side effect associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The present study reports 5 original cases of OIIS and systematically reviewed the available published cases. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical archives of the Niguarda Cancer Center from 2009 to 2015 and conducted a search for OIIS using the PubMed database, followed by deeper investigation of the references of the recorded studies. We pooled our series with other reported cases for systematic review in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement using only English language as the selection criterion. A total of 61 OIIS cases were analyzed, the largest series reported to date. Of the 61 patients, 56 (91.8%) had received oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer. In 32 of the 61 patients (52.5%), OIIS was associated with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and in 4 (6.6%) with grade 4 anemia. OIIS was fatal in 4 patients. In 49 patients, oxaliplatin-induced immune system activation was tested using the Coombs test or by detection of antiplatelet antibodies and was positive in 87.7% of the patients. The average number of oxaliplatin cycles until the onset of OIIS was 16.7, and the number was significantly lower when oxaliplatin was administered as a rechallenge after a period of vacancy of treatment with this agent (4.6 cycles as rechallenge vs. 13.6 as first-time exposure; P < .00001). OIIS is triggered by cumulative administration of oxaliplatin, characteristically with a threefold earlier onset when the drug is administered as a rechallenge. Prompt identification of OIIS can be expected to reduce the risk of iatrogenic morbidity and mortality.

Background Despite advances in precision oncology and immunotherapy of tumors, little progress has been made in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in recent years. Therefore, making the most of available therapies is a necessity. Several studies, based on the pulsatile behavior of RAS clones under EGFR blockade, investigated whether readministration of EGFR-targeted agents is effective beyond second line. Methods A systematic review of studies of retreatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies has been performed from January 2005 to December 2018 according to PRISMA criteria from PubMed, ESMO and ASCO meetings libraries and Clinicaltrial.gov. Efficacy has been evaluated as objective response rate and survival in available publications. In addition, type and incidence of side effects occurring during on anti-EGFR retreatment have been considered. Results 26 publications have been retrieved, of which 20 full-text articles and 6 abstracts and categorized as for the retreatment strategy into five groups: rechallenge (n = 10), reintroduction (n = 4), sequence (n = 5), dose escalation (n = 1) and mixed (n = 6). Data of efficacy displayed high heterogeneity across different strategies (objective response rate, ORR = 0.0–53.8%; disease control rate, DCR = 24.0–89.7%), with best results in the setting of rechallenge (ORR = 2.9–53.8%; DCR = 40.0–89.7%). Conclusions Rechallenge with anti-EGFR provides clinical benefit in molecularly selected mCRC patients beyond second line. Further ctDNA-guided studies comparing this option of treatment with current approved advanced line treatments are warranted.

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies have a poor prognosis. In this setting, recruitment into clinical trials is warranted, and studies driven by selection according to individual tumor molecular characteristics are expected to provide added value. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with mCRC refractory to or following failure of standard therapies who were enrolled into phase I/II clinical studies at the Niguarda Cancer Center based on the presence of a specific molecular profile expected to represent the target of susceptibility to the experimental drug(s). From June 2011 to May 2016, 2044 patients with mCRC underwent molecular screening. Eighty patients (3.9%) were enrolled in ad hoc studies; the median age was 60 years (range 36–86) and the median number of previous treatment lines was five (range 2–8). Molecular characteristics exploited within these studies were MGMT promoter hypermethylation (48.7%), HER2 amplification (28.8%), BRAF V600E mutation (20%), and novel gene fusions involving ALK or NTRK (2.5%). One patient (1%) had RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) complete response (CR), 13 patients (16.5%) experienced a partial response (PR), and 28 (35%) stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (range 2.63–3.83), with 24% of patients displaying PFS >5 months. Median growth modulation index (GMI) was 0.85 (range 0–15.61) and 32.5% of patients had GMI >1.33. KRAS exon 2 mutations were found in 38.5% of patients, and among the 78 patients with known KRAS status, those with wild-type tumors had longer PFS than those with mutated tumors (3.80 [95% CI 2.80–5.03] vs. 2.13 months [95% CI 1.77–2.87], respectively, p = 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.83 months (range 7.17–9.33) for all patients, and patients with KRAS wild-type tumors had longer OS than those with mutated tumors (7.83 [95% CI 7.33–10.80] vs. 7.18 months [95% CI 5.63–9.33], respectively, p = 0.06). This single-institution retrospective study indicates that in a heavily pretreated population approximately 4% of mCRC tumors display a potential actionable molecular context suitable for therapeutic intervention. Application of molecular selection is challenging but improves clinical outcome even in later lines of treatment.

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor among women worldwide and is the second cause of cancer-related mortality in the US. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) accounts for less than 10% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and about 30% of early breast cancer patients will develop recurrent, advanced, or metastatic disease. It remains an incurable illness and the primary goal of its management is palliative. Several agents are active for the fi rst-line treatment of MBC. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, represent the standard of care for the treatment of these patients. Among the various schedules, docetaxel can be administered weekly, achieving similar effi cacy results with lower toxicity compared with conventional schedules. Weekly docetaxel (25-40 mg/m 2 ) has been widely tested in several phase I and II studies both as a single agent and in multichemotherapy regimens, reaching overall response rates ranging from 26% and 86% or 20% and 73% with docetaxel alone or in combination, respectively, depending on doses, associations, and line of treatment. Overall, published data support the administration of weekly docetaxel for the treatment of MBC patients even if data from phase III randomized trials are still lacking.

Purpose To estimate the safety, activity, and impact on quality of life of a combination of gemcitabine and pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of a randomized two-stage phase II study. Patients and methods Patients in stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive either gemcitabine 1250mg/m 2 on day 1, and pemetrexed (Alimta) 500mg/m 2 followed by gemcitabine 1250mg/m 2 on day 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (GA arm), or paclitaxel 120mg/m 2 followed by gemcitabine 1000mg/m 2 , both given on days 1 and 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (PG arm). Results 105 (GA arm, 51; PG arm, 54) eligible patients (stage IV, 32 and 30, respectively) were enrolled into this study; thereafter, accrual was stopped due to first-stage analysis. The response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10–33%) in the GA arm, and 32% (95% CI, 20–46%) in the PG arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 (95% CI, 3.7–6.5) months in the GA arm, and 8.3 (95% CI, 5.9–10.7) months in the PG arm, while median overall survival was 10.5 (95% CI 7.1–13.9), and 13.3 (95% CI 11.7–14.9) months, respectively. Severe neutropenia (36% vs 22%), and febrile neutropenia (14% vs 7%) were more common with the GA regimen, while hair loss (52% vs 16%) and any grade peripheral neuropathy (31% vs 2%) occurred more frequently with PG regimen. Other severe side effects of GA regimen were diarrhoea (10%), liver enzyme derangement (10%), and fatigue (8%). Conclusion The GA regimen was tolerated and moderately active in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. However, this combination did not yield any advantage in comparison with the PG regimen, and does not deserve further evaluation.

Summary Background We previously found that dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and lapatinib led to inhibition of tumour growth in patient-derived xenografts of HER2 -amplified metastatic colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the antitumour activity of trastuzumab and lapatinib in patients with HER2-positive colorectal cancer. Methods HERACLES was a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial done at four Italian academic cancer centres. We enrolled adult patients with KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) wild-type and HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard of care (including cetuximab or panitumumab), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion. We defined HER2 positivity in tumour samples by use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation in accordance with our previously validated colorectal cancer-specific diagnostic criteria. Eligible patients received intravenous trastuzumab at 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg once per week, and oral lapatinib at 1000 mg per day until evidence of disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (defined as complete response or partial response), which was assessed by independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2012-002128-33. Findings Between Aug 27, 2012, and May 15, 2015, we screened 914 patients with KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer and identified 48 (5%) patients with HER2-positive tumours, although two died before enrolment. Of these patients, 27 were eligible for the trial. All were evaluable for response. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 15, 2015, with a median follow-up of 94 weeks (IQR 51–127), eight (30%, 95% CI 14–50) of 27 patients had achieved an objective response, with one patient (4%, 95% CI −3 to 11) achieving a complete response, and seven (26%, 95% CI 9–43) achieving partial responses; 12 (44%, 95% CI 25–63) patients had stable disease. Six (22%) of 27 patients had grade 3 adverse events, which consisted of fatigue in four patients, skin rash in one patient, and increased bilirubin concentration in one patient. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. We detected no drug-related serious adverse events. Interpretation The combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib is active and well tolerated in treatment-refractory patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. Funding Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC), Fondazione Oncologia Niguarda Onlus, and Roche.

Background Objective response to dacarbazine, the intravenous form of temozolomide (TMZ), in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is confined to tumors harboring O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation. We conducted a phase II study of TMZ enriched by MGMT hypermethylation in archival tumor (AT), exploring dynamic of this biomarker in baseline tumor (BT) biopsy and plasma (liquid biopsy). Patients and methods We screened 150 mCRC patients for MGMT hypermethylation with methylation-specific PCR on AT from FFPE specimens. Eligible patients (n = 29) underwent BT biopsy and then received TMZ 200 mg/m2 days 1–5 q28 until progression. A Fleming single-stage design was used to determine whether progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks would be ≥35% [H0 ≤ 15%, type I error=0.059 (one-sided), power=0.849]. Exploratory analyses included comparison between MGMT hypermethylation in AT and BT, and MGMT methylation testing by MethylBEAMing in solid (AT, BT) and LB with regard to tumor response. Results The PFS rate at 12 weeks was 10.3% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.9–24.6]. Objective response rate was 3.4% (90% CI 0.2–15.3), disease control rate 48.3% (90% CI 32.0–64.8), median OS 6.2 months (95% CI 3.8–7.6), and median PFS 2.6 months (95% CI 1.4–2.7). We observed the absence of MGMT hypermethylation in BT in 62.7% of tumors. Conclusion Treatment of mCRC with TMZ driven by MGMT promoter hypermethylation in AT samples did not provide meaningful PFS rate at 12 weeks. This biomarker changed from AT to BT, indicating that testing BT biopsy or plasma is needed for refined target selection.

Human breast cancer (BC) is characterized by a considerable clinical heterogeneity. Steroid hormone receptor expression and growth factor receptor expression have been considered suitable diagnostic and prognostic markers, whereas mutations of oncosuppressor and gatekeeper genes have been found associated with an increased risk for this malignancy. To evaluate the role that polymorphisms of genes involved in the regulation of inflammatory response might play in BC susceptibility, we investigated associations between cytokine functionally relevant polymorphisms in 84 BC patients compared to 110 age- and sex-matched controls. TNF-alpha (-308G/A), TGF-beta1 (+869C/T), IL-10 (-1117G/A; -854C/T; -627C/A), and IFN-gamma (874T/A) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified by sequence-specific primers (SSP)-PCR or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-PCR. Genotype or haplotype distributions for each polymorphisms were consistent with the HWE in these populations. We were unable to demonstrate differences in genotype or allele frequencies between patient and control groups. Data obtained in this study indicate that none of the cytokine SNPs studied is likely to have predisposing or protective effects on BC susceptibility. On the other hand, both positive and negative association with BC have been reported for some of the studied genotypes by different research groups. In conclusion, further studies involving larger numbers of subjects are required.

Background: HER2 amplification is found in 5% of RAS wild type (RASWT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L), but not treatment with either drug alone, led to remarkable inhibition of tumor growth in patient-derived tumorgrafts of HER2-amplified mCRC. CRC-specific criteria for HER2 positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) were defined retrospectively in 256 CRC paraffin embedded samples (HERACLES DGX criteria). The ensuing diagnostic algorithm was utilised to screen 1299 HER2-positive tumors for therapeutic targeting in patients in the HERACLES phase 2 trial. Methods: HERACLES was conducted at 4 Italian centres. Eligibility criteria were: RASWT exon 2, HER2 positivity, refractoriness to standard of care (including cetuximab or panitumumab), PS-ECOG < 1, and measurable. HER2 positivity was defined by IHC and ISH according to HERACLES DGX criteria. Patients (PTS) received T i.v. at 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly, and L p.o. at 1000 mg daily, until progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, assessed by independent central review. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety. The study was 85% powered to detect an objective response rate of >30% with a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 (EudraCT, number 2012-002128-33). Findings: Between August 27, 2012, and December 31, 2016, 69/1299 (5.3%) RASWT PTS were found HER2-positive. Of these, 33 were enrolled in HERACLES, and evaluable for response. At data cut-off (December 31, 2016), 10 (30.3%, 95% CI 17-47) of 33 heavily refractory PTS (median 5 prior regimens), achieved an objective response (2 complete and 8 a partial responses), 13 (39.3%, 95% CI 24-56) of 33 PTS had stable disease (SD) for a disease control rate of 70% (95% CI 52-82). Toxicity was mild with six (18%) of 33 PTS experiencing grade-3 side effects: fatigue (4), skin rash (1) elevated bilirubin (1). No drug-related SAEs were observed. Interpretation: HERACLES results prove that targeting HER2 is a successful therapeutic strategy in treatment-refractory HER2-positive mCRC patients, which can be easily implemented in clinical practice. Funding: Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC), Fondazione Oncologia Niguarda Onlus and Roche. Citation Format: Salvatore Siena, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Livio Trusolino, Cosimo Martino, Katia Bencardino, Sara Lonardi, Vittorina Zagonel, Francesco Leone, Erika Martinelli, Fortunato Ciardiello, Patrizia Racca, Alessio Amatu, Laura Palmeri, Emanuele Valtorta, Silvia Ghezzi, Angelo Vanzulli, Daniele Regge, Silvio Veronese, Alberto Bardelli, Silvia Marsoni. Final results of the HERACLES trial in HER2-amplified colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT005. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT005

We performed a bibliographic electronic search of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases on breast cancer in the elderly. In the adjuvant setting aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen with an acceptable profile of toxicity. In aged, poorer risk, patients adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible but organ function and comorbidities have to be considered. Adjuvant trastuzumab is also an option for the treatment of Her2 positive aged breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± HER2-targeted treatment is today a possible treatment for triple negative and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Older women are more likely than younger women to present with more advanced breast cancer. Hormone therapy is the treatment of choice for older women with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer until they develop resistance. When appropriate, polychemotherapy may be employed but unfortunately we have a lack of data on this matter. However, because fit women older than 70 years of age have similar results with chemotherapy as their younger counterparts most oncologists tend to propose this option to their patients. Trastuzumab has proven to be effective and well tolerated in elderly patients (older than 60-70 years), but caution is needed due to the risk of heart failure. Recently, an all-oral combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine demonstrated good acitivity and tolerability profile in patients older than 70 years. Nab-paclitaxel has shown a safer and more active profile compared with the q3w taxanes in such population. There is, therefore, an urgent need to study anticancer agents in the elderly within large randomized controlled trials.

Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is the end stage of any chronic liver disease. Cancer, a leading cause of death worldwide, is a growing global health issue. There are limited data in the literature on the incidence, prevalence and management of non-hepatic cancers (NHC) in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this brief review was to underline the main concerns, pitfalls and warnings regarding practice for these patients. Survival of patients with compensated cirrhosis is significantly longer than that of decompensated cirrhosis and patients with NHC and in Child-Pugh class C should not be candidates for cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is important before starting cytotoxic chemotherapy to assess the aetiology and stage of liver disease and to screen these patients for portal hypertension and fluid retention. During cytotoxic chemotherapy, the effectiveness of cancer treatment, as well the appearance of early signs of hepatic decompensation, must be thoroughly monitored. Future phase 3 trial designs in oncology should include a share of patients with compensated cirrhosis to obtain specific information in this setting. Identification of tests able to measure the global degree of hepatic impairment caused by cirrhosis could help in the management of this particular clinical situation.

Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) are not uncommon (about 18% of cases): although some patients have been reported as still living after 25 months, median survival after hormonal- or chemotherapy is 6-14 months. In recent years, new chemotherapy regimens and molecular targeted therapies have given medical oncologists reason to believe that metastatic disease can be eradicated, or at least controlled for prolonged periods. In an attempt to improve survival, consideration has also been given to loco-regional treatments such as hepatic resection and radio-frequency ablation, which have been associated with better outcomes in selected patients. This review considers the role of two loco-regional approaches in a multidisciplinary perspective in the treatment of single or multiple breast cancer metastases limited to the liver. An expanded role for hepatic resection and ablation is being investigated. We assessed available data in the literature to determine their role on survival outcomes. They suggest that loco-regional treatments might be of significant benefit in a selected group of women with BCLM, but the role of these local treatments in multimodality treatment of liver metastases remains controversial. It can generally be said that loco-regional treatments can improve overall survival, with no mortality and less than 20% morbidity in patients at low surgical risk; however, they should only be considered cytoreductive treatments and, as such, always need to be integrated with systemic therapy.

To estimate the safety, activity, and impact on quality of life of a combination of gemcitabine and pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of a randomized two-stage phase II study.Patients in stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 1, and pemetrexed (Alimta) 500 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (GA arm), or paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), both given on days 1 and 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (PG arm).105 (GA arm, 51; PG arm, 54) eligible patients (stage IV, 32 and 30, respectively) were enrolled into this study; thereafter, accrual was stopped due to first-stage analysis. The response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-33%) in the GA arm, and 32% (95% CI, 20-46%) in the PG arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 (95% CI, 3.7-6.5) months in the GA arm, and 8.3 (95% CI, 5.9-10.7) months in the PG arm, while median overall survival was 10.5 (95% CI 7.1-13.9), and 13.3 (95% CI 11.7-14.9) months, respectively. Severe neutropenia (36% vs 22%), and febrile neutropenia (14% vs 7%) were more common with the GA regimen, while hair loss (52% vs 16%) and any grade peripheral neuropathy (31% vs 2%) occurred more frequently with PG regimen. Other severe side effects of GA regimen were diarrhoea (10%), liver enzyme derangement (10%), and fatigue (8%).The GA regimen was tolerated and moderately active in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. However, this combination did not yield any advantage in comparison with the PG regimen, and does not deserve further evaluation.

It is well established that cancer arises in chronically inflamed tissue, and this is particularly notable in the gastrointestinal tract. Classic examples include Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer. Growing evidence suggests that these associations might be not casual findings. Focusing on individual cytokines has generated evidence that anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) may have a complex role in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. As an example, IL-10-deficient mice develop severe atrophic gastritis and a chronic enterocolitis, developing colorectal cancer similar to human inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia. TGF-beta1 is a multifunctional signaling molecule with a wide array of roles. Animal experiments suggest that TGF-beta1 plays a biphasic role in carcinogenesis by protecting against the early formation of benign epithelial growths, but promoting a significant stimulation of tumor growth invasion and metastasis during tumor progression. We assessed association of functional polymorphisms (-1082G/A; -592C/A) and TGF-beta1 (-509C/T; +869C/T) influencing the IL-10 production to colorectal cancer risk in a case-control study of 62 patients and 124 matched controls. No significant differences were observed among cancer patients and controls for IL-10 -1082G/A; -592C/A genotype frequencies. Evaluation of odds ratios (OR) for the TGF-beta1 +869C/T genotypes showed a significant increased risk for individuals bearing +869CC genotype compared to +869CT- and +869TT-positive individuals. These results suggest that the +869C allele, responsible for a Leu-->Pro substitution in the signal peptide sequence of the TGF-beta1 protein, may have a predisposing role in the development of colorectal cancer.

2517 Background: Entrectinib (formerly RXDX-101) is a potent and selective oral small molecule inhibitor of the TrkA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK kinases. Schedule A (fasted, 4d on/3d off for 3wks, 1 wk rest...

BACKGROUND. To date, the standard treatment for patients who have carcinoma of unknown primary site has not been established. METHODS. In this randomized Phase II study, 66 previously untreated patients (33 patients per arm) with carcinomas of unknown primary site received cisplatin (35 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) with either paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2), and all drugs were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Twenty-nine patients (44%) presented with ≥2 involved sites. The pathologic diagnosis was mainly adenocarcinoma (48 patients; 72.7%) and squamous carcinoma (7 patients; 10.6%). RESULTS. In the first arm, 16 patients (48.5%) experienced an objective response, and 9 patients (27.2%) had disease stabilization. In the vinorelbine-containing arm, 14 patients (42.3%) experienced an objective response, and 8 patients (24.2%) had disease stabilization. The median response duration and the median time to progression were similar in both treatment arms; the median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval, 7.11–12.09 months) for patients who received the cisplatin/gemcitabine/paclitaxel regimen and 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 6.61–20.59 months) for patients who received the vinorelbine combination. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in the paclitaxel-containing arm. CONCLUSIONS. Both combinations satisfied the 2-step design, demonstrating antitumor activity without relevant differences in response rates or response duration; however, the vinorelbine-containing regimen yielded superior results both in terms of overall survival (13.6 months vs 9.6 months) and in terms of treatment tolerability. Therefore, according to a pick the winner attitude, the combination of cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine may be considered in the design of future randomized, Phase III trials for patients with carcinomas of unknown primary site. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

Background Bladder cancer is one of the most common genitourinary cancer. 1/3 of patients presents with invasive disease. Radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for patients with muscle invasive disease: although local treatment can be curative, about 50% of patients will develop distant metastases. Optimal treatment for high risk patients includes local and perioperative systemic therapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Patients and methods We performed a review of clinical trials and metanalysis of adjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Results Data from single published trials of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) are not univocal, and several methodological problems were found. A recent meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from all eligible published and unpublished trials, found that adjuvant chemotherapy administration provides a significant survival and disease free survival advantage. Two large, multi-center, randomized trials are on-going to clarify the role of post-operative CT. Conclusions A trend in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy comes out from some of the trials reviewed by us and by the metanalysis performed by the ABC collaborative group. However it is not clear yet which patients might derive the maximum benefit from such an approach and which ones might be safety candidate to deferred treatment, on relapse. The incoming results of the EORTC trial and of the Italian trial which are currently comparing the value of early vs. deferred treatment of patients at higher risk of relapse will probably provide an adequate answer to this question. Outside clinical trials, the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy should be appropriately weighted versus the putative hazards and decision making appropriately tailored in the individual patients according to the aggressiveness of his/her disease and the presence of comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Mammaglobin is expressed mainly in mammary tissue, overexpressed in breast cancer (BC) and rarely in other tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of transcript MGB1 detection and to evaluate the role of MGB1 as potential clinical marker for the detection of disseminated cancer cells in the blood of BC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 23 BC tissues, 36 peripheral blood BC samples and 35 healthy peripheral blood samples was prospectively recruited to investigate MGB1 expression by means of a quantitative Real Time RT-PCR assay. RESULTS: MGB1 overexpression in tissue samples of BC patients is significantly associated only with high level of Ki67 (P

Non presente

Objectives: We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the clinical efficacy, toxicity, and dose intensity of a new weekly schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: We enrolled 58 patients, 52% of whom had received a previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The treatment schedule was: docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 56 for efficacy. Overall response rate was 64.3% with 16.1% of complete responses and 48.2% of partial responses. Median survival was 22.10 months (95% CI: 15.53–28.67) and median time to tumor progression was 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.71–16.49). The most common hematological toxicity was neutropenia (no febrile neutropenia), which occurred in 28 patients (48.3%) but grade 3–4 in only 8 patients (14%). Alopecia, the most common nonhematological toxicity, occurred in 20 (34.5%) patients, but only 5 patients (8.6%) experienced grade 3 alopecia. Conclusion: The activity of docetaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer is confirmed. The promising results of the employed schedule, in agreement with other published studies, need to be further confirmed within a phase III study.

The improved resolution power of electrophoretic fractionation of DNA in a wide range of molecular masses is demonstrated using an "up and down" application of voltage gradient gel electrophoresis (VGGE). This application also allows separation of different DNA fragments which are poorly fractionated in conventional electrophoresis.

Aim: RXDX-101 is a small molecule inhibitor of TrkA, TrkB, TrkC, ROS1 and ALK, with high potency and selectivity. RXDX-101 demonstrated potent pharmacological activity in preclinical studies and is potentially first-in-class against the Trk family of kinases. This study aims to determine MTD, PD, PK and anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced cancer and applicable molecular alterations. Methods: Phase 1 dose escalation in patients with advanced solid tumors. RXDX-101 was dosed orally once/day in a 4 day on, 3 day off schedule for 3 weeks, followed by a 7 day rest period, in continuous 28-day cycles. Minimum of 3 patients were enrolled at each dose level. Endpoints include safety, PK, and tumor response by RECIST. Results: 19 patients have been treated at 6 dose levels (100, 200, 400, 800,1200 and 1600 mg/m2). RXDX-101 has been well tolerated to date; the MTD has not been reached. No DLT has been seen at any dose level. The most common AEs (mainly grade 1-2) considered possibly treatment-related included asthenia, paresthesias, nausea and diarrhea. Possibly related grade 3/4 AEs include asthenia and increased lipase. No treatment-related SAEs were observed. A patient with colorectal carcinoma (TrkA+) has a PR and is in cycle 2. Two patients with NSCLC (1 ROS1 + ; 1 ALK+) have also achieved PRs. An additional patient with neuroblastoma (ALK+) has a PR and is currently in cycle 16. Two patients have had prolonged stabilization of their disease and remain on treatment: a patient with NSCLC (ALK+) in cycle 14 and a patient with pancreatic cancer (ROS1+) in cycle 11. PK analysis shows maximum concentrations of RXDX-101 were generally achieved within 2 to 4 hours following dosing and exposure increased in an approximate dose proportional manner up to doses of 800 mg/M2 with minimal accumulation following multiple doses. Mean terminal half-life was 21- 32 hours and steady state reached within 4 days. Conclusions: RXDX-101 has been well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Early responses in patients with 3 different relevant molecular alterations are promising. PK profile seems suitable for once daily dosing, which is being evaluated. A global phase I/II trial was recently initiated. Disclosure: F.G.M. De Braud: Consultant or Advisory Roles Novartis Compensated Bristol-Myers Squibb; ompensated Roche Compensated Stock Ownership No Honoraria No Research Funding Yes; E. Ardini: Senior Scientist, Nerviano Medical Sciences Employee Compensated; M. Martignoni: CLIOSS Employee, Clinical Leader Compensated; A. Isacchi: Director, Nerviano Medical Sciences Compensated Employee; P. Pearson: Consultant Role Ignyta, Inc. Compensated Stock Ownership Ignyta, Inc.; D. Luo: Ignyta, Inc. Employee Sr. Director, Clinical Operations Compensated; J.L. Freddo: Consultant Role; Member Board of Directors Ignyta, Inc. Compensated Stock Ownership, Ignyta, Inc. Yes; S. Siena: Consultant or Advisory Role Amgen Compensated Bayer Compensated Celgene Compensated Sanofi Compensated Roche Compensated; tock Ownership No Research Funding Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2502 Background: RXDX-101 is an oral small molecule inhibitor of TrkA, TrkB and TrkC, as well as ROS1 and ALK, with high potency and selectivity. RXDX-101 has demonstrated potent pharmacological ac...