Search

ObjectiveTo determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school workers in the setting of full in-person schooling and the highly transmissible Omicron variants of concern.DesignCross-sectional study among school staff, comparing to period-, age-, sex- and postal code-weighted data from Canadian blood donors from the same community.SettingThree large school districts in the greater Vancouver metropolitan area, British Columbia, Canada, with serology sampling done between January 26, 2022 and April 8, 2022.ParticipantsSchool staff actively working in the Vancouver, Richmond and Delta School Districts.Main outcome measureSARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence based on nucleocapsid (N)-protein testing, adjusted for the sensitivity and specificity of the assay.ResultsA majority (65.8%) of the 1845 school staff enrolled reported close contact with a COVID-19 case outside the household. Of those, about half reported close contact with a COVID-19 case at school either in a student (51.5%) or co-worker (54.9%). In a representative sample of 1620 (87.8%) school staff, the adjusted seroprevalence was 26.5% [95%CrI: 23.9 – 29.3%]. This compared to an age, sex and residency area-weighted seroprevalence of 32.4% [95%CrI: 30.6 – 34.5%] among 7164 blood donors.ConclusionDespite frequent COVID-19 exposures, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among the staff of three main school districts in the Vancouver metropolitan area was no greater than a reference group of blood donors, even after the emergence of the more transmissible Omicron variant.What is already known on this subject?Earlier studies indicate that COVID-19 infection rates are not increased among school staff at previous stages of the pandemic compared to the community, yet controversy remains whether this will remain true after the emergence of the highly transmissible Omicron variant.What this study adds?Despite frequent COVID-19 exposures, this study identified no detectable increase in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school staff working in three metro Vancouver public school districts after the first Omicron wave in British Columbia, compared to a reference group of blood donors from the same age, sex and community area.

ImportanceContact-tracing studies suggest minimal secondary transmission in schools. However, there are limited school data accounting for asymptomatic cases, particularly late in the 2020/21 school year, and in the context of uninterrupted in-person schooling and widespread community transmission.ObjectivesTo determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a sample of school staff, compared to the community, and to COVID-19 rates among all students and staff within the same school population.DesignIncident COVID-19 cases among students and school staff using public health data, with an embedded cross-sectional serosurvey among school staff sampled from February 10 to May 15, 2021, comparing to age, sex and geographic location-matched blood donors sampled in January 2021.SettingVancouver School District (British Columbia, Canada) from kindergarten to grade 12.ParticipantsActive school staff enrolled from February 3 to April 23, 2021.Main outcome measuresSARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a sample of school staff using spike (S)-based testing (unvaccinated staff) or N-based serology testing (vaccinated staff).ResultsThe incidence of COVID-19 cases among students attending in-person was 9.8 per 1,000 students during the 2020/21 school year (N = 47,280 students), and among staff was 13 per 1,000 since the beginning of the pandemic (N = 7,071 active school staff). In total, 1,689 school staff (64% elementary, 28% secondary, 8.3% school board staff or multiple grades) completed the questionnaire, 78.2% had classroom responsibilities, and spent a median of 17.6 hours in class per week [IQR: 5.0 – 25 hours]. Although 21.5% (363/1,686) reported close contact with a COVID-19 case, only 1.4% (24/1688) of the school staff reported having had a positive viral nucleic acid test. Of this group, five believed they acquired the infection at school. The adjusted seroprevalence in staff who gave blood (1,556/1,689, 92.1%) was 2.3% [95%CI: 1.6 – 3.2%] compared to 2.3% [95%CI: 1.7 – 3.0%] in blood donors.Conclusion and relevanceDespite high reported COVID-19 cases among students and staff, and frequent within-school exposures, we found no detectable increase in seroprevalence among school staff above the community seroprevalence. These findings corroborate claims that, with appropriate mitigation strategies, in-person schooling is not associated with significantly increased risk for school staff.Key PointsQuestionWhat was the prevalence of COVID-19 infections in school staff who maintained in-person schooling during the 2020/21 school year in Vancouver, British Columbia, and how does it compare to the risk of COVID-19 infection in the community.FindingsAs of March 4, 2021, the incidence of COVID-19 cases among school staff was 13 per 1,000 (N = 7,071 school staff) since the beginning of the pandemic. In a cross-sectional seroprevalence analysis from February 10 to May 15, 2021, the adjusted seroprevalence among a sample of school staff (N = 1,556) was 2.3% [95%CI: 1.6 – 3.2%], compared to 2.3% [95%CI: 1.7 – 3.0%] in 1:2 age, sex and geographical location (by postal code)-matched reference group of blood donors.MeaningWe found no detectable increase in seroprevalence among school staff above the community seroprevalence. These findings corroborate claims that, with appropriate mitigation strategies in place, in-person schooling is not associated with significantly higher risk for school staff.