Search

BackgroundWhereas several engineered nanomaterials are able to incite toxicological effects, the underlying molecular processes are understudied. And the varied physicochemical properties complicate toxicological predictions. Gene expression data allow us to study the cell-specific responses of individual genes, whereas their role in biological processes is harder to interpret. An overrepresentation analysis allows us to identify enriched biological processes and link the experimental data to these, but still prompt broad results which complicates the analysis of detailed toxicological processes. We demonstrated a targeted filtering approach to compare the cell-specific effects of two concentrations of the widely used nanomaterial titanium dioxide (TiO2) -nanobelts.MethodsWe compared public gene expression data generated by Tilton et al. from colon endothelium cells (Caco2), lung endothelium cells (SAE), and monocytic like cells (THP1) after 24-hour exposure to low (10 μg/ml) and high (100 μg/ml) concentrations of TiO2 -nanobelts. We used pathway enrichment analysis of the WikiPathways collection to identify cell and concentration-specific affected pathways. Gene sets from selected Gene Ontology terms (apoptosis, inflammation, DNA damage response and oxidative stress) highlighted pathways with a clear toxicity focus. Finally, pathway-gene networks were created to show the genetic overlap between the altered toxicity-related pathways.ResultsAll cell lines showed more differentially expressed genes after exposure to higher concentration, but our analysis found clear differences in affected molecular processes between the cell lines. Approximately half of the affected pathways are categorized with one of the selected toxicity-related processes. Caco2 cells show resilience to low and high concentrations. SAE cells display some cytotoxic response to the high concentration, while THP1 cells are already strongly affected at a low concentration. The networks show for up- and downregulation for the THP1 cells the most pathways. Additionally, the networks show gene overlap between almost all pathways for all conditions.ConclusionsThe approach allowed us to focus the analysis on affected cytotoxic processes and highlight cell-specific effects. The results showed that Caco2 cells are more resilient to TiO2 -nanobelts exposure compared to SAE cells, while THP1 cells were affected the most. The automated workflow can be easily adapted using other Gene Ontology terms focusing on other biological processes.

Data sharing and reuse are crucial to enhance scientific progress and maximize return of investments in science. Although attitudes are increasingly favorable, data reuse remains difficult due to lack of infrastructures, standards, and policies. The FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles aim to provide recommendations to increase data reuse. Because of the broad interpretation of the FAIR principles, maturity indicators are necessary to determine the FAIRness of a dataset. In this work, we propose a reproducible computational workflow to assess data FAIRness in the life sciences. Our implementation follows principles and guidelines recommended by the maturity indicator authoring group and integrates concepts from the literature. In addition, we propose a FAIR balloon plot to summarize and compare dataset FAIRness. We evaluated the feasibility of our method on three real use cases where researchers looked for six datasets to answer their scientific questions. We retrieved information from repositories (ArrayExpress, Gene Expression Omnibus, eNanoMapper, caNanoLab, NanoCommons and ChEMBL), a registry of repositories, and a searchable resource (Google Dataset Search) via application program interfaces (API) wherever possible. With our analysis, we found that the six datasets met the majority of the criteria defined by the maturity indicators, and we showed areas where improvements can easily be reached. We suggest that use of standard schema for metadata and the presence of specific attributes in registries of repositories could increase FAIRness of datasets.