Search

Your search keyword '"Lavallee, Danielle C."' showing total 309 results
Start Over Author "Lavallee, Danielle C."
309 results on '"Lavallee, Danielle C."'

2. Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis

Author

Thompson, Callie M, Voldal, Emily C, Davidson, Giana H, Sanchez, Sabrina E, Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Victory, Jesse, Guiden, Mary, Bizzell, Bonnie, Glaser, Jacob, Hults, Christopher, Price, Thea P, Siparsky, Nicole, Ohe, Kristin, Mandell, Katherine A, DeUgarte, Daniel A, Kaji, Amy H, Uribe, Lisandra, Kao, Lillian S, Mueck, Krislynn M, Farjah, Farhood, Self, Wesley H, Clark, Sunday, Drake, F Thurston, Fischkoff, Katherine, Minko, Elizaveta, Cuschieri, Joseph, Faine, Brett, Skeete, Dionne A, Dhanani, Naila, Liang, Mike K, Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A, Fannon, Erin, Kessler, Larry G, Comstock, Bryan A, Heagerty, Patrick J, Monsell, Sarah E, Lawrence, Sarah O, Flum, David R, Lavallee, Danielle C, Parsons, Charles, Shapiro, Nathan I, Odom, Stephen R, Cooper, Randall, Tichter, Aleksandr, Hayward, Alyssa, Johnson, Jeffrey, Patton, Joe H, Hayes, Lillian Adrianna, Evans, Heather L, Arif, Hikmatullah, Hennessey, Laura, Fairfield, Cathy, Lew, Debbie, Bernardi, Karla, Olavarria, Oscar, Marquez, Stephanie, Ko, Tien C, McGrane, Karen, Sohn, Vance, Jones, Alan E, Patki, Deepti, Kutcher, Matthew E, Peacock, Rebekah K, Chung, Bruce, Carter, Damien W, MacKenzie, David, Burris, Debra, Mack, Joseph, Gerry, Terilee, Maggi, Jason, Pierce, Kristyn, Melis, Marcovalerio, Abouzeid, Mohamad, Shah, Paresh, Sinha, Prashant, Chiang, William, Rushing, Amy, Wisler, Jon, Steinberg, Steven, Tudor, Brandon, Foster, Careen S, Schaetzel, Shaina M, Morgan, Dayna, Tschirhart, John, Wallick, Julie, Martinez, Ryan, Wells, Sean, Ferrigno, Lisa, Salzberg, Matthew, Putnam, Brant, Kim, Dennis, Howell, Erin C, Spence, Lara H, Fleischman, Ross, Saltzman, Darin, Mireles, Debbie, Chen, Formosa, Moran, Gregory J, and Pathmarajah, Kavitha

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Clinical Sciences, Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Comparative Effectiveness Research, patient-reported outcomes, appendicitis, appendectomy, antibiotics, sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy, Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative:, Medical and Health Sciences, Surgery, Clinical sciences
Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.Summary background dataThe Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.MethodsWe focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.ResultsThe pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.ConclusionsOverall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.

Published
2023

6. A Video-Based Consent Tool: Development and Effect of Risk–Benefit Framing on Intention to Randomize

Author

Lois, Alex, Kohler, Jonathan E., Monsell, Sarah E., Pullar, Kelsey M., Victory, Jesse, Odom, Stephen R., Fischkoff, Katherine, Kaji, Amy H., Evans, Heather L., Sohn, Vance, Kao, Lillian S., Dodwad, Shah-Jahan, Ehlers, Anne P., Alam, Hasan B., Park, Pauline K., Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A., Siparsky, Nicole, Price, Thea P., Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Chiang, William, Salzberg, Matthew, Jones, Alan, Kutcher, Matthew E., Liang, Mike K., Thompson, Callie M., Self, Wesley H., Bizzell, Bonnie, Comstock, Bryan A., Lavallee, Danielle C., Flum, David R., Fannon, Erin, Kessler, Larry G., Heagerty, Patrick J., Lawrence, Sarah O., Pham, Tam N., and Davidson, Giana H.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial: a protocol for the pragmatic randomised study of appendicitis treatment

Author

Davidson, Giana H, Flum, David R, Talan, David A, Kessler, Larry G, Lavallee, Danielle C, Bizzell, Bonnie J, Farjah, Farhood, Stewart, Skye D, Krishnadasan, Anusha, Carney, Erin E, Wolff, Erika M, Comstock, Bryan A, Monsell, Sarah E, Heagerty, Patrick J, Ehlers, Annie P, DeUgarte, Daniel A, Kaji, Amy H, Evans, Heather L, Yu, Julianna T, Mandell, Katherine A, Doten, Ian C, Clive, Kevin S, McGrane, Karen M, Tudor, Brandon C, Foster, Careen S, Saltzman, Darin J, Thirlby, Richard C, Lange, Erin O, Sabbatini, Amber K, and Moran, Gregory J

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Clinical Sciences, Patient Safety, Clinical Research, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, Acute Disease, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Appendectomy, Appendicitis, Humans, Linear Models, Quality of Life, Research Design, Treatment Outcome, United States, adult surgery, appendicitis, patient-centred research, treatment options, Public Health and Health Services, Other Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences, Psychology
Abstract

IntroductionSeveral European studies suggest that some patients with appendicitis can be treated safely with antibiotics. A portion of patients eventually undergo appendectomy within a year, with 10%-15% failing to respond in the initial period and a similar additional proportion with suspected recurrent episodes requiring appendectomy. Nearly all patients with appendicitis in the USA are still treated with surgery. A rigorous comparative effectiveness trial in the USA that is sufficiently large and pragmatic to incorporate usual variations in care and measures the patient experience is needed to determine whether antibiotics are as good as appendectomy.ObjectivesThe Comparing Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial for acute appendicitis aims to determine whether the antibiotic treatment strategy is non-inferior to appendectomy.Methods/analysisCODA is a randomised, pragmatic non-inferiority trial that aims to recruit 1552 English-speaking and Spanish-speaking adults with imaging-confirmed appendicitis. Participants are randomised to appendectomy or 10 days of antibiotics (including an option for complete outpatient therapy). A total of 500 patients who decline randomisation but consent to follow-up will be included in a parallel observational cohort. The primary analytic outcome is quality of life (measured by the EuroQol five dimension index) at 4 weeks. Clinical adverse events, rate of eventual appendectomy, decisional regret, return to work/school, work productivity and healthcare utilisation will be compared. Planned exploratory analyses will identify subpopulations that may have a differential risk of eventual appendectomy in the antibiotic treatment arm.Ethics and disseminationThis trial was approved by the University of Washington's Human Subjects Division. Results from this trial will be presented in international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT02800785.

Published
2017

12. Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial with an Observational Cohort

Author

Thompson, Callie M., Voldal, Emily C., Davidson, Giana H., Sanchez, Sabrina E., Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Victory, Jesse, Guiden, Mary, Bizzell, Bonnie, Glaser, Jacob, Hults, Christopher, Price, Thea P., Siparsky, Nicole, Ohe, Kristin, Mandell, Katherine A., DeUgarte, Daniel A., Kaji, Amy H., Uribe, Lisandra, Kao, Lillian S., Mueck, Krislynn M., Farjah, Farhood, Self, Wesley H., Clark, Sunday, Drake, F. Thurston, Fischkoff, Katherine, Minko, Elizaveta, Cuschieri, Joseph, Faine, Brett, Skeete, Dionne A., Dhanani, Naila, Liang, Mike K., Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A., Fannon, Erin, Kessler, Larry G., Comstock, Bryan A., Heagerty, Patrick J., Monsell, Sarah E., Lawrence, Sarah O., Flum, David R., and Lavallee, Danielle C.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals.

Author

Blakeney, Erin Abu-Rish, Chu, Frances, White, Andrew A., Smith Jr., G. Randy, Woodward, Kyla, Lavallee, Danielle C., Salas, Rachel Marie E., Beaird, Genevieve, Willgerodt, Mayumi A., Dang, Deborah, Dent, John M., Tanner, Elizabeth Ibby, Summerside, Nicole, Zierler, Brenda K., O'Brien, Kevin D., and Weiner, Bryan J.

Subjects
TEAMS in the workplace, MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems, MEDICAL quality control, INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, EVIDENCE gaps, RESEARCH funding, CINAHL database, HOSPITAL patients, PATIENT care, HOSPITALS, HOSPITAL rounds, SYSTEMATIC reviews, MEDLINE, ROOMS, LITERATURE reviews, QUALITY assurance, HEALTH outcome assessment, ONLINE information services, PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems
Abstract

Poor communication within healthcare teams occurs commonly, contributing to inefficiency, medical errors, conflict, and other adverse outcomes. Interprofessional bedside rounds (IBR) are a promising model that brings two or more health professions together with patients and families as part of a consistent, team-based routine to share information and collaboratively arrive at a daily plan of care. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to investigate the breadth and quality of IBR literature to identify and describe gaps and opportunities for future research. We followed an adapted Arksey and O'Malley Framework and PRISMA scoping review guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase were systematically searched for key IBR words and concepts through June 2020. Seventy-nine articles met inclusion criteria and underwent data abstraction. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. Publications in this field have increased since 2014, and the majority of studies reported positive impacts of IBR implementation across an array of team, patient, and care quality/delivery outcomes. Despite the preponderance of positive findings, great heterogeneity, and a reliance on quantitative non-randomized study designs remain in the extant research. A growing number of interventions to improve safety, quality, and care experiences in hospital settings focus on redesigning daily inpatient rounds. Limited information on IBR characteristics and implementation strategies coupled with widespread variation in terminology, study quality, and design create challenges in assessing the effectiveness of models of rounds and optimal implementation strategies. This scoping review highlights the need for additional studies of rounding models, implementation strategies, and outcomes that facilitate comparative research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Health system use and outcomes of urgently triaged callers to a nurse-managed telephone service for provincial health information after initiation of supplemental virtual physician assessment: a descriptive study

Author

Ho, Kendall, primary, Abu-Laban, Riyad B., additional, Stewart, Kurtis, additional, Duncan, Ross, additional, Scheuermeyer, Frank X., additional, Hedden, Lindsay, additional, Lauscher, Helen Novak, additional, Sundhu, Sandra, additional, Chadha, Rina, additional, Christenson, Jim, additional, Grafstein, Eric, additional, Lavallee, Danielle C., additional, Purssell, Roy, additional, Tallon, John M., additional, Wood, Nancy, additional, and Bryan, Stirling, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Evaluation of an Experiential Training Program in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Research for Diverse Researcher Communities and Healthcare Organizations

Author

Buchwald, Dedra S., primary, Rogers, Megan H., additional, Rose, Barbara A., additional, Bresnahan, Brian W., additional, Devine, Beth, additional, LeResche, Linda, additional, Nelson, Lonnie A., additional, Patrick, Donald L., additional, Lavallee, Danielle C., additional, Garrison, Michelle M., additional, White, Andrew A., additional, and Kessler, Larry G., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)—Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial

Author

Jarvik, Jeffrey G., Comstock, Bryan A., James, Kathryn T., Avins, Andrew L., Bresnahan, Brian W., Deyo, Richard A., Luetmer, Patrick H., Friedly, Janna L., Meier, Eric N., Cherkin, Daniel C., Gold, Laura S., Rundell, Sean D., Halabi, Safwan S., Kallmes, David F., Tan, Katherine W., Turner, Judith A., Kessler, Larry G., Lavallee, Danielle C., Stephens, Kari A., and Heagerty, Patrick J.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Patient-centred outcomes of imaging tests: recommendations for patients, clinicians and researchers.

Author

Thompson, Matthew J., Zigman Suchsland, Monica, Hardy, Victoria, Lavallee, Danielle C., Lord, Sally, Devine, Emily Beth, Jarvik, Jeffrey G., Findlay, Steven, Trikalinos, Thomas A., Walter, Fiona M., Chou, Roger, Green, Beverly B., Wernli, Karen J., Fitzpatrick, Annette L., and Bossuyt, Patrick M.

Subjects
EVALUATION of medical care, PATIENT-centered care, DIAGNOSTIC imaging, RESEARCH funding
Abstract

Background Imaging tests are one of the most frequently used diagnostic modalities in healthcare, but the benefits of their direct impacts on clinical decisionmaking have been countered by concerns that they can be overused. Assessing the relative value of imaging tests has largely focused on measures of test accuracy, which overlooks more comprehensive benefits and risks of imaging tests, particularly their impact on patient-centred outcomes (PCOs). We present the findings of the Patient Reported Outcomes of Diagnostics (PROD) research study in response to a methodological gap in the area of diagnostic test comparative effectiveness research. Methods Over a 3-year period, the PROD Study engaged with multiple stakeholders to identify existing conceptual models related to PCOs for imaging testing, conducted primary research and evidence synthesis, and developed consensus recommendations to describe and categorise PCOs related to imaging testing. Results The PROD framework categorises PCOs from imaging studies within four main domains: information or knowledge yielded, physical impact, emotional outcomes and test burden. PCOs interact with each other and influence effects across domains, and can be modified by factors related to the patient, clinical situation, healthcare team and the testing environment. Conclusions Using PCOs to inform healthcare decisionmaking will require ways of collating and presenting information on PCOs in ways that can inform patient- provider decision-making, and developing methods to determine the relative importance of outcomes (including test accuracy) to one another. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis

Author

Davidson, Giana H., Monsell, Sarah E., Evans, Heather, Voldal, Emily C., Fannon, Erin, Lawrence, Sarah O., Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A., Bizzell, Bonnie, Heagerty, Patrick J., Comstock, Bryan A., Lavallee, Danielle C., Villegas, Cassandra, Winchell, Robert, Thompson, Callie M., Self, Wesley H., Kao, Lillian S., Dodwad, Shah-Jahan, Sabbatini, Amber K., Droullard, David, Machado-Aranda, David, Gibbons, Melinda Maggard, Kaji, Amy H., DeUgarte, Daniel A., Ferrigno, Lisa, Salzberg, Matthew, Mandell, Katherine A., Siparsky, Nicole, Price, Thea P., Raman, Anooradha, Corsa, Joshua, Wisler, Jon, Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Victory, Jesse, Jones, Alan, Kutcher, Matthew, McGrane, Karen, Holihan, Julie, Liang, Mike K., Cuschieri, Joseph, Johnson, Jeffrey, Fischkoff, Katherine, Drake, F. Thurston, Sanchez, Sabrina E., Odom, Stephen R., Kessler, Larry G., and Flum, David R.

Subjects
Treatment Outcome, Acute Disease, Appendectomy, Humans, Surgery, Appendicitis, Original Investigation, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: For adults with appendicitis, several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that antibiotics are an effective alternative to appendectomy. However, it remains unknown how the characteristics of patients in such trials compare with those of patients who select their treatment and whether outcomes differ. OBJECTIVE: To compare participants in the Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) randomized clinical trial (RCT) with a parallel cohort study of participants who declined randomization and self-selected treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The CODA trial was conducted in 25 US medical centers. Participants were enrolled between May 3, 2016, and February 5, 2020; all participants were eligible for at least 1 year of follow-up, with all follow-up ending in 2021. The randomized cohort included 1094 adults with appendicitis; the self-selection cohort included patients who declined participation in the randomized group, of whom 253 selected appendectomy and 257 selected antibiotics. In this secondary analysis, characteristics and outcomes in both self-selection and randomized cohorts are described with an exploratory analysis of cohort status and receipt of appendectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Appendectomy vs antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Characteristics among participants randomized to either appendectomy or antibiotics were compared with those of participants who selected their own treatment. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar across the self-selection cohort (510 patients; mean age, 35.8 years [95% CI, 34.5-37.1]; 218 female [43%; 95% CI, 39%-47%]) and the randomized group (1094 patients; mean age, 38.2 years [95% CI, 37.4-39.0]; 386 female [35%; 95% CI, 33%-38%]). Compared with the randomized group, those in the self-selection cohort were less often Spanish speaking (n = 99 [19%; 95% CI, 16%-23%] vs n = 336 [31%; 95% CI, 28%-34%]), reported more formal education (some college or more, n = 355 [72%; 95% CI, 68%-76%] vs n = 674 [63%; 95% CI, 60%-65%]), and more often had commercial insurance (n = 259 [53%; 95% CI, 48%-57%] vs n = 486 [45%; 95% CI, 42%-48%]). Most outcomes were similar between the self-selection and randomized cohorts. The number of patients undergoing appendectomy by 30 days was 38 (15.3%; 95% CI, 10.7%-19.7%) among those selecting antibiotics and 155 (19.2%; 95% CI, 15.9%-22.5%) in those who were randomized to antibiotics (difference, 3.9%; 95% CI, −1.7% to 9.5%). Differences in the rate of appendectomy were primarily observed in the non-appendicolith subgroup. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This secondary analysis of the CODA RCT found substantially similar outcomes across the randomized and self-selection cohorts, suggesting that the randomized trial results are generalizable to the community at large. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785

Published
2022

39. Creating a provincial post COVID ‐19 interdisciplinary clinical care network as a learning health system during the pandemic: Integrating clinical care and research

Author

Levin, Adeera, primary, Malbeuf, Michelle, additional, Hoens, Alison M, additional, Carlsten, Christopher, additional, Ryerson, Christopher J, additional, Cau, Alessandro, additional, Bryan, Stirling, additional, Robinson, Jaclyn, additional, Tarling, Tamsin, additional, Shum, Joanne, additional, and Lavallee, Danielle C, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial with an Observational Cohort.

Author

Thompson, Callie M, Thompson, Callie M, Voldal, Emily C, Davidson, Giana H, Sanchez, Sabrina E, Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Victory, Jesse, Guiden, Mary, Bizzell, Bonnie, Glaser, Jacob, Hults, Christopher, Price, Thea P, Siparsky, Nicole, Ohe, Kristin, Mandell, Katherine A, DeUgarte, Daniel A, Kaji, Amy H, Uribe, Lisandra, Kao, Lillian S, Mueck, Krislynn M, Farjah, Farhood, Self, Wesley H, Clark, Sunday, Drake, F Thurston, Fischkoff, Katherine, Minko, Elizaveta, Cuschieri, Joseph, Faine, Brett, Skeete, Dionne A, Dhanani, Naila, Liang, Mike K, Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A, Fannon, Erin, Kessler, Larry G, Comstock, Bryan A, Heagerty, Patrick J, Monsell, Sarah E, Lawrence, Sarah O, Flum, David R, Lavallee, Danielle C, Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative, Thompson, Callie M, Thompson, Callie M, Voldal, Emily C, Davidson, Giana H, Sanchez, Sabrina E, Ayoung-Chee, Patricia, Victory, Jesse, Guiden, Mary, Bizzell, Bonnie, Glaser, Jacob, Hults, Christopher, Price, Thea P, Siparsky, Nicole, Ohe, Kristin, Mandell, Katherine A, DeUgarte, Daniel A, Kaji, Amy H, Uribe, Lisandra, Kao, Lillian S, Mueck, Krislynn M, Farjah, Farhood, Self, Wesley H, Clark, Sunday, Drake, F Thurston, Fischkoff, Katherine, Minko, Elizaveta, Cuschieri, Joseph, Faine, Brett, Skeete, Dionne A, Dhanani, Naila, Liang, Mike K, Krishnadasan, Anusha, Talan, David A, Fannon, Erin, Kessler, Larry G, Comstock, Bryan A, Heagerty, Patrick J, Monsell, Sarah E, Lawrence, Sarah O, Flum, David R, Lavallee, Danielle C, and Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.Summary background dataThe Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.MethodsWe focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.ResultsThe pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.ConclusionsOverall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.

Published
2022

42. sj-docx-1-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. sj-docx-3-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. sj-docx-2-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. sj-docx-5-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-5-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. sj-docx-6-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-6-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

47. sj-docx-7-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-7-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. sj-docx-4-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 - Supplemental material for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care

Author

Antonio, Marcy G, Davis, Selena, Smith, Mindy, Burgener, Paul, Price, Morgan, Lavallee, Danielle C, Fletcher, Sarah, and Lau, Francis

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 200299 Cultural Studies not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, FOS: Clinical medicine, FOS: Political science, 150310 Organisation and Management Theory, Cardiology, 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified, FOS: Health sciences, 110306 Endocrinology, 110308 Geriatrics and Gerontology, 99999 Engineering not elsewhere classified, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Economics and business, 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other engineering and technologies, Sociology, 111708 Health and Community Services, Anthropology, 111702 Aged Health Care, 89999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified, FOS: Other humanities, 160512 Social Policy, 111299 Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified
Abstract

Supplemental material, sj-docx-4-dhj-10.1177_20552076221145420 for Advancing digital patient-centered measurement methods for team-based care by Marcy G Antonio, Selena Davis, Mindy Smith, Paul Burgener, Morgan Price, Danielle C Lavallee, Sarah Fletcher and Francis Lau in Digital Health

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results