Search

Establishing the prevalence and determinants of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) in nursing homes. Cross-sectional, observational study. Patients 18-65 years old with ABI in special care units in Dutch nursing homes. Nursing homes were recruited through the national expertise network for patients with severe ABI, regional brain injury teams, and by searching the Internet. Patient characteristics were collected through digital questionnaires. NPS were assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), cognition with the Mini-Mental State Examination, and activities of daily living with the Disability Rating Scale. Psychotropic drug use (PDU) was retrieved from the electronic prescription system. Individual NPS were clustered. Associations between determinants and NPS were examined using multilevel multivariate linear regression models. In a population of 118 patients from 12 nursing homes, 73.7% had 1 or more clinically relevant NPS and 81.3% 1 or more agitated behaviors. The most common NPS were agitation, in particular aberrant motor behavior (24.6%), repetitious sentences/questions (35.5%), and constant requests for attention (34.6%), verbal (33.6%) and physical (50.5%) aggression, and irritability (28.0%). Male patients were more likely to display hyperactivity. Being married was associated with less verbally agitated behavior and pain was associated with a higher CMAI total score. PDU increased the likelihood of a higher NPI-NH total score. NPS are common in patients with ABI ≤65 years of age residing in nursing homes. This is a first step to fill in the knowledge gap concerning NPS in this population. An increasing number of patients with severe ABI may survive the acute phase and will reside many years in nursing homes. It is important to shed more light on these NPS, with regard to course, magnitude, and severity, to ultimately develop appropriate care for this vulnerable group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The aim of prescribing medication in palliative end-of-life care should be symptom control. Data are lacking regarding the prescription of medication at the end of life. Aim To investigate the prescription of medication in patients at the end of life in palliative care facilities. Design, setting, and participants An observational multicenter study in 7 inpatient palliative care facilities. Participants were adults with an estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months. The study was conducted from February 1, 2012, to January 1, 2013. Results A total of 155 patients were enrolled. On average, patients were prescribed 6.1 drugs at the moment of admission and 4.6 drugs on the day of death. The prescription of analgesics, psycholeptics, and drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorders increased from admission until death. In general, these are drug classes prescribed for symptom control. All other drug classes decreased between admission and the day of death, including different drug classes for the treatment of comorbid disease, such as anticoagulants, beta-blocking agents, drugs used in diabetes, and lipid-modifying agents. Conclusions and relevance A reduction in the total amount of medication is seen between admission and death in the palliative care facilities. Although there is an increase in prescribed symptom-specific medication and a reduction in medication prescribed for comorbid disease, there are still patients dying with medication not used for symptom control. This increases pill burden and indicates that physicians need to develop guidelines and educational programs for decreasing medication for comorbidities at the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• AM represents the far end in the spectrum of disorders of diminished motivation. • AM is caused by damage to several components of the frontal-subcortical system. • Damage results in loss of dopaminergic input: an 'energizing factor' for motivation. • AM is the result of an imbalance between execution and inhibition of behavior. • Treatment depends on the affected brain structures and neurotransmitter systems. Akinetic mutism (AM) is a rare neurological disorder characterized by the presence of an intact level of consciousness and sensorimotor capacity, but with a simultaneous decrease in goal-directed behavior and emotions. Patients are in a wakeful state of profound apathy, seemingly indifferent to pain, thirst, or hunger. It represents the far end within the spectrum of disorders of diminished motivation. In recent years, more has become known about the functional roles of neurocircuits and neurotransmitters associated with human motivational behavior. More specific, there is an increasing body of behavioral evidence that links specific damage of functional frontal-subcortical organization to the occurrence of distinct neurological deficits. In this review, we combine evidence from lesion studies and neurophysiological evidence in animals, imaging studies in humans, and clinical investigations in patients with AM to form an integrative theory of its pathophysiology. Moreover, the specific pharmacological interventions that have been used to treat AM and their rationales are reviewed, providing a comprehensive overview for use in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) open their eyes spontaneously, but show only reflexive behavior. Although VS/UWS is one of the worst possible outcomes of acquired brain injury, its prevalence is largely unknown. This study's objective was to map the total population of hospitalized and institutionalized patients in VS/UWS in the Netherlands: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. Methods Nationwide point prevalence study on patients in VS/UWS at least 1 month after acute brain injury in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, institutions for people with intellectual disability, and hospices; diagnosis verification by a researcher using the Coma Recovery Scale-revised (CRS-r); gathering of demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. Results We identified 33 patients in VS/UWS, 24 of whose diagnoses could be verified. Patients were on average 51 years old with a mean duration of VS/UWS of 5 years. The main etiology was hypoxia sustained during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. More than 50% of patients had not received rehabilitation services. Most were given life-sustaining treatment beyond internationally accepted prognostic boundaries regarding recovery of consciousness. Seventeen (39%) of 41 patients presumed to be in VS/UWS were found to be at least minimally conscious. Conclusions Results translate to a prevalence of 0.1 to 0.2 hospitalized and institutionalized VS/UWS patients per 100,000 members of the general population. This small figure may be related to the legal option to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. On the other hand, this study shows that in certain cases, physicians continue life-prolonging treatment for up to 25 years. Patients have poor access to rehabilitation and are at substantial risk for misdiagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) are considered to be among the most severe outcomes after acquired brain injury. Medical care for these patients is mainly focused on minimizing complications, given that treatment options for patients with unresponsive wakefulness or minimal consciousness remain scarce. The complication rate in patients with DOC is high, both in the acute hospital setting, as in the rehabilitation or long-term care phase. Hydrocephalus is one of these well-known complications and usually develops quickly after acute changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation after different types of brain damage. However, hydrocephalus may also develop with a significant delay, weeks, or even months after the initial injury, reducing the potential for natural recovery of consciousness. In this phase, hydrocephalus is likely to be missed in DOC patients, given that their limited behavioral responsiveness camouflages the classic signs of increased intracranial pressure or secondary normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Moreover, the development of late-onset hydrocephalus may exceed the period of regular outpatient follow-up. Several controversies remain about the diagnosis of clinical hydrocephalus in patients with ventricular enlargement after severe brain injury. In this article, we discuss both the difficulties in diagnosis and dilemmas in the treatment of CSF disorders in patients with prolonged DOC and review evidence from the literature to advance an active surveillance protocol for the detection of this late, but treatable, complication. Moreover, we advocate a low threshold for CSF diversion when hydrocephalus is suspected, even months or years after brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Little is known about the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and psychotropic drug use (PDU) in patients below the age of 65 years with acquired brain injury (ABI) in long-term care. The objective of this study was to review the literature about the prevalence of NPS and PDU. Methods: A systematic literature search of English, Dutch and German articles in Pubmed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL was performed with the use of MeSH and free-text terms. Results: Six articles met the inclusion criteria. The place of residence was mainly a nursing home and most studies were conducted in a population of patients with traumatic brain injury. Sample sizes varied from 40 to 26,472 residents and NPS were assessed with different assessment instruments. Depressive symptoms were most common with a prevalence ranging from 13.9% to 39.3%. Two studies reported PDU in which tranquillizers (59%) were the most prevalent psychotropic drugs followed by anticonvulsants (35%) and antidepressants (26-34%). Conclusions: Patients with ABI experience lifelong consequences, regardless the cause of ABI, that have a high impact on them and their surroundings. More insight into the magnitude of NPS and PDU, through prevalence studies, is necessary to achieve suitable provision of care for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]