Search

The mdx mouse is a model for human Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), an X-linked degenerative disease of skeletal muscle tissue characterized by the absence of the dystrophin protein. The mdx mice display a much milder phenotype than DMD patients. After the first week of life when all mdx muscles evolve like muscles of young DMD patients, mdx hindlimb muscles substantially compensate for the lack of dystrophin, whereas mdx diaphragm muscle becomes progressively affected by the disease. We used cDNA microarrays to compare the expression profile of 1,082 genes, previously selected by a subtractive method, in control and mdx hindlimb and diaphragm muscles at 12 time points over the first year of the mouse life. We determined that 1) the dystrophin gene defect induced marked expression remodeling of 112 genes encoding proteins implicated in diverse muscle cell functions and 2) two-thirds of the observed transcriptomal anomalies differed between adult mdx hindlimb and diaphragm muscles. Our results showed that neither mdx diaphram muscle nor mdx hindlimb muscles evolve entirely like the human DMD muscles. This finding should be taken under consideration for the interpretation of future experiments using mdx mice as a model for therapeutic assays. muscular dystrophy; mdx mice; complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarray; differential gene expression

Previous in vivo studies have shown that the rabbit progesterone receptor undergoes two phosphorylation reactions: one basal and a second one which is hormone-dependent. We report here on the presence and characteristics of a kinase activity found in receptor preparations highly purified by immunoaffinity chromatography. 1. This kinase activity is not due to the receptor molecule itself since the two proteins may be separated by several chromatographic and immunological methods. 2. The presence of the kinase in receptor preparations is not an artefact of the purification procedure. The kinase binds to the receptor as shown by coelution in immunoaffinity experiments and during various chromatographics. This interaction probably takes place in vivo and is not artefactually formed during solubilization of the receptor since the kinase also copurifies with receptors isolated from the uterine nuclei of progestina treated rabbits. 3. This enzyme may be classified as a casein kinase since it readily phosphorylates the latter substrate (Km ≈ 0.15 mg/mI) and is not regulated by cyclic nucleotides, Ca2+ and calmodulin or phospholipids. Its classifi- cation as a casein kinase I or II is difficult since on the one hand it is Inhibited by heparin, activated by polyamines and may use both ATP and GTP, but on the other hand it modifies only serine residues, and is not inhibited by heparin when the receptor itself is employed as a substrate. 4. The kinase which copurifies with the receptor does not mimic in vitro the effects of the hormone-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor observed in vivo: there is no enhancement of kinase activity by the hormone. and the phosphorylated receptor does not exhibit the characteristic "upshift" in its electrophoretic mobility. Thus either this kinase is not the enzyme responsible for the hormone-dependent receptor phosphorylation or, during purification, a factor has been lost which is necessary for retaining the hormone dependency of the reaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]