Search

Aims: To revisit the data analysis used to inform National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG17 guidance for initiating basal insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (diabetes). Methods: We replicated the data, methodology and analysis used by NICE diabetes in the NG17 network meta‐analysis (NMA). We expanded this data cohort to a more contemporary data set (extended 2017 NMA) and restricted the studies included to improve the robustness of the data set (restricted 2017 NMA) and in a post hoc analysis, changed the index comparator from neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin twice daily to insulin detemir twice daily. Results: The absolute changes in HbA1c were similar to those reported in the NG17. However, all 95% credible intervals for change in HbA1c point estimates crossed the line of null effect, except for detemir twice daily (in the NICE and extended 2017 NMAs) and NPH four times daily. In the detemir twice‐daily centred post hoc analysis, the 95% credible intervals for change in HbA1c crossed the line of null effect for all basal therapies, except NPH. Conclusions: In NG17, comparisons of basal insulins were based solely on efficacy of glycaemic control. Many of the trials used in this analysis were treat‐to‐target, which minimize differences in HbA1c. In the NMAs, statistical significance was severely undermined by the wide credible intervals. Despite these limitations, point estimates of HbA1c were used to rank the insulins and formed the basis of NG17 guidance. This study queries whether such analyses should be used to make specific clinical recommendations. What's new?: This study found no significant differences in HbA1c reduction between twice‐daily detemir and modern basal insulin comparators in efficacy trials; the apparent wide variation in HbA1c undermines the statistical robustness and the clinical relevance of the recommendation in the current National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for type 1 diabetes in adults (NG17).The analyses highlight the importance of the quantity and quality of data used in network meta‐analyses to allow clinically meaningful recommendations.With the lack of differentiating evidence to support twice‐daily detemir as the basal insulin of choice for type 1 diabetes, selection of basal insulin should be personalized to individual needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To conduct an open‐label study to provide UK real‐world evidence regarding the use of insulin glargine 300 units/ml (U300) in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Methods: People with Type 1 diabetes who had been prescribed U300 ≥6 months before data collection and had HbA1c levels recorded within 3 months prior to U300 (baseline) were included. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to month 6 after U300 initiation. Other endpoints included number of documented hypoglycaemic and diabetic ketoacidosis episodes, and change in daily basal insulin dose. Results: A total of 298 people with Type 1 diabetes were included [mean age 42.1 years, mean HbA1c 79 mmol/mol (9.4%)]. After U300 initiation, the mean reduction in HbA1c from baseline to month 6 was –4 mmol/mol (–0.4%; P<0.001; n=188). The total daily basal insulin dose at 6 months was 1.3 units higher than at the time of U300 initiation (P<0.001; n=275) but was not significantly different from the prior basal insulin dose. There was no clinically significant difference in weight between baseline and month 6 [mean difference +0.7 kg, 95% CI –0.1, 1.5; P=0.084; n=115). During the 6 months before and after U300 initiation, severe hypoglycaemic episodes were documented for 6/298 and 4/298 participants. Diabetic ketoacidosis episodes requiring Accident and Emergency department visits or hospitalization were documented for 4/298 and 6/298 participants, before and after U300 initiation, respectively. Conclusions: In people with Type 1 diabetes, a change in basal insulin to U300 was associated with clinically and statistically significant HbA1c improvements, without significant changes in basal insulin dose and weight. Documented severe hypoglycaemia episodes and diabetic ketoacidosis requiring Accident and Emergency department visits or hospitalization were low and similar before and after U300 initiation. What's new?: This descriptive, retrospective study provides real‐world data on the use of a second‐generation basal insulin, insulin glargine 300 units/ml (U300), in Type 1 diabetes across the UK.Overall, participants who switched to U300 demonstrated improvements in HbA1c without significant changes in basal insulin dose and weight from baseline.The number of participants with documented severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis requiring Accident and Emergency department visits or hospitalization was low and similar prior to and after U300 initiation.Results from this real‐world study show that observations made in randomized controlled trials translate to people with Type 1 diabetes treated with U300 in clinical practice in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]