Search

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting antibody drug conjugate, previously showed longer relapse-free survival when combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, characterized by lower relapse risk as compared to other ELN risk groups, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as consolidation strategy. However, there are limited data on the impact of GO on the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization potential. We therefore retrospectively analyzed data from 54 AML patients with favorable-risk AML treated with (n = 17) or without (n = 37) GO during induction treatment. We observed no significant differences in the PBSC mobilization rate between patients treated with vs. without GO. The mobilization success in a first attempt directly following cycle 2 was 65% vs. 70% (p = 0.92); and the mobilization success in a subsequent second attempt after hematologic recovery and repeated stimulation procedure was 24% vs. 19% (p = 0.56). No significant impact on treatment outcome in terms of EFS (p = 0.31) or OS (p = 0.99) was observed. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of GO to induction regimens does not negatively impact PBSC mobilization in favorable-risk AML patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study comparing the stem cell mobilization potential in favorable-risk AML patients treated with vs. without GO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients can be treated with intensive induction therapy, followed by high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for consolidation and subsequent anti‐CD20 maintenance. For patients relapsing after bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, CAR T‐cell therapy became available in late 2020 fueling the interest in outcomes of relapsing MCL patients. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of MCL patients receiving HDCT/ASCT at our center between 2000 and 2021, thus, before availability of CAR‐T cells. We identified 97 MCL patients undergoing HDCT/ASCT in this period with a median follow‐up of 52 months. 43 (44%) patients ultimately relapsed, and 29 (30%) have died. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 48 months and overall survival (OS) was 202 months. Relapsing patients had a median PFS of only 28 months and median OS of 105 months. The OS of relapsing patients receiving BTK inhibitors was 148 versus 78 months in patients who never received BTK inhibitors (p = 0.1175). Even after HDCT/ASCT, a substantial proportion of MCL patients will relapse and ultimately die of the disease, emphasizing the need for new therapeutic options including CAR T‐cell treatment for this lymphoma subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Engraftment syndrome (ES) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at the time of neutrophil recovery may comprise fever, rash, pulmonary edema, or diarrhea. Usually, ES is easily manageable using corticosteroids but may prolong hospitalization. In two consecutive cohorts of subsequent patients with myeloma, lymphomas, and testicular/germ cell cancer, we assessed the benefit of corticosteroid use to prevent incidence and severity of ES following ASCT. Whereas Cohort A (82 patients) received no prophylactic corticosteroids, corticosteroids (4 mg dexamethasone oral daily) were started in Cohort B (60 patients) at day +9 until day +13 following ASCT. Steroid prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of ES (6/60; 10% vs. 33/82; 40%; p < 0.001). Hospitalization duration was longer in patients with ES than in patients without ES within both cohorts (in Cohort A: p = 0.007; and B: p = 0.011), but did not differ significantly between cohorts A and B. Finally, in Cohort A, there was a trend to an inferior 2‐year overall survival rate in patients without ES compared to patients with ES (p = 0.067), but definite conclusions are not yet allowed. Our results suggest that corticosteroid prophylaxis from days +9 to +13 following ASCT significantly reduces the risk of ES and shortens hospitalization duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reciprocal RUNX1 fusions are traditionally found in up to 10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, usually associated with a translocation (8;21)(q22;q22) corresponding to the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion gene. So far, alternative RUNX1 rearrangements have been reported only rarely in AML, and the few reports so far have focused on results based on cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction. Acknowledging the inherent limitations of these diagnostic techniques, the true incidence of rare RUNX1 rearrangements may be underestimated. In this report, we present two cases of adult AML, in which we detected rare RUNX1 rearrangements not by conventional cytogenetics but rather by next-generation panel sequencing. These include t(16;21)(q24;q22)/RUNX1-CBFA2T3 and t(7;21)(p22;q22)/RUNX1-USP42, respectively. In both patients the AML was therapy-related and associated with additional structural and numerical alterations thereby conferring bad prognosis. This is in line with previous reports on rare RUNX1 fusions in AML and emphasizes the clinical importance of their detection. In summary, our report not only confirms the clinical utility of NGS for diagnostics of rare reciprocal rearrangements in AML in a real-life scenario but also sheds light on the variety and complexity within AML. It further emphasizes the need for collection of additional cases for deepening insights on their clinical meaning as well as their frequency., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)