1. Reasons for and Outcomes of Open Abdominal Aortic Repair in the Endovascular Era.
- Author
-
Katsargyris A, Lenhardt Michael Florian C, Marques de Marino P, Botos B, and Verhoeven EL
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal diagnostic imaging, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal mortality, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal physiopathology, Aortic Rupture diagnostic imaging, Aortic Rupture mortality, Aortic Rupture physiopathology, Clinical Decision-Making, Elective Surgical Procedures, Female, Germany, Hospitals, High-Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Selection, Postoperative Complications etiology, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery, Aortic Rupture surgery, Vascular Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Vascular Surgical Procedures mortality
- Abstract
Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the treatment of choice for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Open aneurysm repair (OAR) is still being used in a number of patients for specific reasons. The aim of the present study was to investigate the reasons and perioperative outcomes of OAR in a high-volume endovascular center., Methods: All patients who underwent OAR in a single center institution during the period April 2010 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed., Results: During the study period, 222 patients underwent OAR. One hundred and forty-one (63.5%) patients underwent elective surgery, and eighty-one (36.5%) patients were treated acutely. The reasons for the decision to perform OAR instead of EVAR were as follows: anatomical in 89 (40.1%) cases, rupture in unstable patient in 57 (25.7%) cases, AAA with concomitant iliac arterial occlusive disease in 44 (19.8%) cases, previous EVAR with complications in 14 (6.3%) cases, large pararenal aneurysm considered risky to wait for a customized fenestrated stent graft in 7 (3.2%) cases, young patient age in 4 (1.8%) cases, the patient's preference in 3 (1.4%) cases, infected/mycotic AAA in 2 (0.9%) cases, and simultaneous OAR with colon cancer resection (n = 1, 0.5%) and renal transplantation (n = 1, n = 0.5). Thirty-day mortality in elective cases was 5% (7/141) and in acute cases 34.6% (28/81)., Conclusions: This study shows that OAR is still used for selected patients despite improvements in EVAR technology. The most common reason for OAR was an unsuitable anatomy for EVAR. Perioperative mortality of OAR both for acute and elective cases as observed in this study is in line with published outcomes of other centers., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF