Search

The use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers is of great agronomic, economic, and environmental importance. The present study was performed to evaluate carbon dioxide (CO2) flux of conventional and slow or ...

Field studies on soil ammonia (NH3) volatilization are restricted in many countries owing to the high costs commonly demanded for accurate quantification. We assessed the accuracy of a simple, open chamber design to capture NH3 under field conditions, as affected by different chamber placement schemes. Urea-15N was surface applied to lysimeters installed in the spaces between maize rows. Open chambers made from plastic bottles were installed on each lysimeter with variations in i) N rates (3, 8, 13, and 18 g m–2), ii) the height of the chamber above the soil surface (0, 5, and 10 mm), and iii) chamber relocation (static vs. dynamic). Reference lysimeters without chambers were used to measure NH3 losses by 15N-balance. Losses of NH3 -N accounted for more than 50% of the applied N. Relocation of the chambers had no impact on their NH3-trapping efficiencies, proving to be an unnecessary procedure. Variation in the height of the chambers above the soil surface affected the capture of NH3, but the results still maintained high linearity with the NH3 losses quantified by the reference method (R2 > 0.98). When the same placement scheme used in the introductory study describing the chamber was utilized (static and touching the soil surface), we found a trapping efficiency of 60%, which was very similar to that (57%) obtained in the previous study. Our results show that this simple, open chamber design can be used with satisfactory accuracy under field conditions, provided that simple, standardized procedures are warranted.

Measuring ammonia (NH3) volatilization from urea-fertilized soils is crucial for evaluation of practices that reduce gaseous nitrogen (N) losses in agriculture. The small area of chambers used for NH3 volatilization measurements compared with the size of field plots may cause significant errors if inadequate sampling strategies are adopted. Our aims were: i) to investigate the effect of using multiple open chambers on the variability in the measurement of NH3 volatilization in urea-amended field plots and ii) to define the critical period of NH3-N losses during which the concentration of sampling effort is capable of reducing uncertainty. The use of only one chamber covering 0.015% of the plot (51.84 m2) generates a value of NH3-N loss within an expected margin of error of 30% around the true mean. To reduce the error margin by half (15%), 3–7 chambers were required with a mean of 5 chambers per plot. Concentrating the sampling efforts in the first two weeks after urea application, which is usually the most critical period of N losses and associated errors, represents an efficient strategy to lessen uncertainty in the measurements of NH3 volatilization. This strategy enhances the power of detection of NH3-N loss abatement in field experiments using chambers.

The soybean crop in Brazil has been growing in area and productivity in recent years and the analysis of its energy efficiency is very important to guarantee the sustainability of the production system. Assessment of energy efficiency (EE) enables the evaluation of the sustainability of agrosystems, as well as decision-making regarding the reduction in production costs and negative environmental impacts. In this context, the objective of this study was to assess energy efficiency of soybean in different regions of Brazil. For this purpose, 29 areas of soybean across the major producing states were assessed. Energy inputs and outputs of agricultural operations and/or agricultural inputs were calculated by multiplying the amount used by their calorific value or energy coefficient at each stage of production. Energy efficiency was calculated as the ratio between the total output energy and the total input energy during the production process. For every MJ of energy consumed in the production of soybean crop, 6.1; 6.7; 7.1 and 7.2 MJ of energy were produced in the form of grain, respectively in the areas assessed in the Midwest, northeast, southeast and south regions of Brazil. Generally, the main energy expenditure on soybean cultivation in different regions of Brazil was with fertilizers, seeds and herbicides. The adverse weather conditions of the year / harvest evaluated in the south-central region of Brazil resulted in low soybean yields and consequently resulted in lower energy efficiency in these regions. The evaluation of energy efficiency in soybean crops to be representative must be carried out in different regions and edaphoclimatic conditions.

Assessment of energy efficiency (EE) enables the evaluation of the sustainability of agrosystems, as well as decision-making regarding reduction in production costs and environmental pollution and even to increase production in a sustainable way. In this context, the objective of this study was to assess energy efficiency in maize in different regions of Brazil. For this purpose, 32 areas of maize crop distributed across the major producing states and regions were assessed. Energy inputs and outputs of agricultural operations and/or agricultural inputs were calculated by multiplying the amount used by their calorific value or energy coefficient at each stage of production. Energy efficiency was calculated as the ratio between the total output energy and the total input energy during the production process. For every megajoule (MJ) of energy consumed in the production of second-crop maize and first-crop maize seasons, 9.9 and 8.7 MJ respectively of renewable energy were produced in the form of grain. In both maize cropping seasons, most of the energy use was attributed to fertilizers, herbicides and fuel. To be representative the evaluation of energy efficiency of the maize crop should be performed in different Brazilian cultivation regions, as it will represent different edaphoclimatic and management conditions spread over the national territory within an agricultural year. A avaliação da eficiência energética (EE) pode evidenciar a sustentabilidade dos agrossistemas e a tomada de decisões relativas à redução dos custos de produção, poluição do ambiente e até mesmo aumento de produção de forma sustentável. Diante deste contexto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência energética na cultura do milho em diferentes regiões brasileiras. Para isso, foram avaliadas 32 áreas de milho distribuídas pelos principais estados das regiões produtoras desta cultura. As entradas e saídas de energia das operações agrícolas e/ou insumos utilizados foram calculadas pela multiplicação da quantidade utilizada pelo seu poder calorífico ou coeficiente energético em cada etapa de produção. A eficiência energética foi obtida pela razão entre a quantidade de energia total de saída e o consumo total de energia durante o processo produtivo. Para cada 1,0 MJ de energia consumida na produção de milho safrinha e safra, produziu-se respectivamente 9,9 e 8,7 MJ de energia renovável, na forma de grãos desta cultura. Os principais gastos energéticos foram com fertilizantes, herbicidas e combustível. A avaliação da eficiência energética na cultura do milho para ser bem representativa deve ser realizada em diferentes regiões brasileiras de cultivo, pois assim representará diferentes condições edafoclimáticas e de manejo espalhadas pelo território nacional dentro de um ano agrícola.

The main discoveries and advances in the development of industrial processes for the most commercially used phosphate fertilizers in the world (single superphosphate, triple superphosphate, monoammonium phosphate, and diammonium phosphate) occurred from 1830 to 1970, followed by improvements and investments to expand worldwide production capacity. A main opportunity now is aggregating new technologies to conventional phosphate fertilizers so they may become even more efficient in supplying P to plants, which involves research related to the technologies for reduction in soil P losses. Thus, some innovations and technologies have begun to be developed and marketed and continue in continual refinement and adoption in agriculture worldwide to reduce conversion of soluble P applied through conventional phosphate fertilizers into unavailable forms in the soil. This is the case of enhanced efficiency fertilizers, which includes groups of phosphate fertilizers with fixation inhibitors and the chemically modified, controlled-release, blends, multifunctional, and synergistic phosphate fertilizers. The technologies presented in detail in this paper were developed to improve the agronomic efficiency of phosphate fertilization in comparison with conventional fertilizers, with costs varying according to raw materials, production technologies, and distance from the consumer market. This synthesis expands knowledge regarding technologies in use, stimulating the development and application of technologies that increase nutrient efficiency, based on results obtained through suitable methods and equipment along with laboratory, greenhouse, and field results. Increased fertilization efficiency should always be linked with greater economic profitability and the lowest environmental impact, following the principles of sustainability and circular economy. The great challenge for innovation is transforming the knowledge generated regarding fertilizers present in patents and scientific publications into technologies appropriate for the fertilizer market and for adoption in agriculture.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the rooting of cuttings of Acalifa (Acalypha Wilkesiana) with different concentrations of indolbutyric acid (IBA). The matrix plant from which the cuttings were taken, is planted as a hedge and located at the biology institute of the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro in the city of Seropédica-RJ. The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 3x3 factorial, with three different concentrations of IBA (0, 1000 and 2000 mg L-1 or 0, 2000 and 4000 mg L-1 for 15 seconds) and three types of cuttings (herbaceous, semi-woody and woody), with three replications and ten cuttings per plot. The experiments were carried out at two different times, namely: autumn and winter / spring. The following were evaluated: percentage of live cuttings, rooted, with callus and sprouting, number of roots per cut, length of the largest root. Acalypha wilkesiana can be propagated by stem cuttings, whether woody, semi-woody or herbaceous cuttings. However, herbaceous cuttings have a lower percentage of survival and rooting. Also, is a species of easy rooting through cutting of stems, dispensing with the use of AIB. Stems collected in the autumn period yield greater efficiency and productivity in the propagation of cuttings by cuttings.

Rice is the second-most produced cereal worldwide and actively contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane, especially under deepwater production. Assessments of energy efficiency (EE) and GHG emissions can indicate the sustainability level of agrosystems and support decisions related to the reduction of production costs and environmental pollution. This study aimed to assess both EE and GHG emissions in organic and conventional rice production in the Southern region of Brazil. For this study, eight rice fields were evaluated. Energy inputs and outputs were calculated by multiplying the production input amounts by their respective calorific values or energy coefficients at each stage of production. EE was determined using the ratio between the total energy output and the total energy consumed during the production process. GHG emissions were estimated using the principles of the lifecycle assessment methodology in addition to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommendations. Each 1.0 MJ consumed during the production of organic and conventional rice produced renewable energy averages of 10.5 MJ and 7.90 MJ, respectively, as grains. The primary energy expenses for organic rice were represented by seeds, fuel, tractors, and agricultural machinery and implements, and those for conventional rice were seeds, fuel, and fertilizers. Each kilogram of organic and conventional rice produced accounted for the emission of 0.21 and 0.32 kg of CO2eq, respectively, during the production cycles and delivery to the warehouse, with seeds, fuel, and fertilizers being the main sources of CO2eq emissions to the atmosphere.

The assessment of energy efficiency (EE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can highlight the sustainability of agro-systems and decision-making regarding reduction of production costs and environmental pollution. In this context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the EE and GHG emissions (CO2, CH4 e N2O) of a soybean crop under organic cultivation in different regions of Brazil in the agricultural year 2014-2015. For this, 19 soybean areas were evaluated. The inputs and outputs of the agricultural operations and / or inputs used were calculated by multiplying the quantity used by their calorific value or energy coefficient at each stage of production. The energy efficiency was obtained by the ratio between the amount of total output energy and the total energy consumption during the production process. In order to estimate GHG emissions, the principles of the life cycle assessment methodology and recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were applied. For each 1.0 MJ of energy consumed in the organic production of soybeans, an average of 7.9 MJ of renewable energy was produced in the form of grains of this crop. The main energy costs of growing these organic crops were with seeds, fuel and with tractors, machines and agricultural implements (TMI). For each 1 kg of organic grain produced from soybeans, 0.19 kg of CO2eq are emitted during their production and delivery cycles in the warehouse. The main sources of CO2eq emission to the atmosphere were the seeds, fuels and organic fertilizers.

O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar o consumo de nutrientes (CN) e exportação de nutrientes do campo através dos produtos colhidos (EN), visando estimar o balanço dos principais macronutrientes: nitrogênio (N), fósforo (P) e potássio (K) nos países da América Latina e Caribe (ALC). O balanço de nutrientes (BN) foi estimado pela quantidade de nutrientes que entra nos sistemas agrícolas pela adubação e fixação biológica de nitrogênio (FBN) em relação à quantidade que deixa o sistema pelos produtos colhidos, em cada um dos países da região. A região da ALC, com base em estatísticas oficiais correspondentes ao ano 2016, apresentou um balanço positivo de N, no entanto, em alguns países (Argentina, Bolívia e Paraguai) esse balanço foi negativo. A FBN é a principal fonte de N da agricultura latino-americana, respondendo por 62% (11,29 Mt N) do total de N (18,10 Mt N) que ingressa anualmente nos sistemas agrícolas. De um modo geral, o fornecimento de P via adubação na América Latina atenderam as exportações realizadas pelos produtos colhidos, com exceção dos países Argentina, Bolívia, Guatemala e México, os quais se utilizaram de reservas do solo para a nutrição das plantas. O K foi um dos nutrientes cuja aplicação não atende a demanda das culturas da região, apresentando balanços negativos em quase todos os países, exceto Brasil, Colômbia e Venezuela. Deve-se destacar que em muitos solos agrícolas na região, a disponibilidade de K ainda é alta. Os maiores cuidados com o uso de insumos, incluindo os fertilizantes, se dá com os cultivos de soja, milho, café, cana de açúcar e laranja, ficando o restante dependente da fertilidade natural dos solos, que em sua maioria já são pobres, colocando em risco a segurança alimentar.