Search

Multiple groups have reported on the usefulness of ablating in atrial regions exhibiting abnormal electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF). Still, previous studies have suggested that ablation outcomes are highly operator- and center-dependent. This study sought to evaluate a novel machine learning software algorithm named VX1 (Volta Medical), trained to adjudicate multipolar electrogram dispersion.This study was a prospective, multicentric, nonrandomized study conducted to assess the feasibility of generating VX1 dispersion maps. In 85 patients, 8 centers, and 17 operators, we compared the acute and long-term outcomes after ablation in regions exhibiting dispersion between primary and satellite centers. We also compared outcomes to a control group in which dispersion-guided ablation was performed visually by trained operators.The study population included 29% of long-standing persistent AF. AF termination occurred in 92% and 83% of the patients in primary and satellite centers, respectively, p = 0.31. The average rate of freedom from documented AF, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), was 86% after a single procedure, and 89% after an average of 1.3 procedures per patient (p = 0.4). The rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia, with or without AADs, was 54% and 73% after a single or an average of 1.3 procedures per patient, respectively (p 0.001). No statistically significant differences between outcomes of the primary versus satellite centers were observed for one (p = 0.8) or multiple procedures (p = 0.4), or between outcomes of the entire study population versus the control group (p 0.2). Interestingly, intraprocedural AF termination and type of recurrent arrhythmia (i.e., AF vs. AT) appear to be predictors of the subsequent clinical course.VX1, an expertise-based artificial intelligence software solution, allowed for robust center-to-center standardization of acute and long-term ablation outcomes after electrogram-based ablation.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Highly localized impedance (LI) measurements in combination with a catheter-tissue contact force (CF) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation may improve tissue characterization and lesion prediction during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Purpose This analysis explores the relationship between LI parameters, ablation spot locations and procedural success during ablation of PVs in a large population of consecutive AF patients. Methods Two-hundred twelve consecutive patients from 16 European centers undergoing de novo AF radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation with a novel open-irrigated tip catheter enabled by CF and LI measurement capabilities (Stablepoint) were included. Ablation was guided by the magnitude and time-course of LI drop during RF delivery. The interlesion distance between each ablation spot was set ≤6 mm. First pass isolation (FPI) was defined as successful PVI at or before completion of the first encircling lesion set regardless of visual gaps. Procedural endpoint was the achievement of the PVI as assessed by entrance and exit block. Data are reported as mean±SD. Results A total of 13891 ablation spots performed around PVs were analyzed (baseline LI=161.2±19 Ω; LI drop=21.9±9 Ω; LI drop rate=3.1±2 Ω/s; RF Delivery time=9.2±4 s; CF=12.5±7 g). LI drop was predicted by baseline LI (r=0.56, 95%CI:0.55 to 0.57, p20Ω (Sensitivity=56.8%, Specificity=93.2%, PPV=99.7%, Area under the ROC curve=0.7841, p21Ω at anterior sites and >18Ω at posterior sites. No steam pops or complications were reported during the procedures. All PVs were successfully isolated in all study patients Conclusions In a large, international population of consecutive de novo AF cases, an ablation strategy guided by LI and CF information results in a very high first pass isolation rate. LI drop is predictive of PV segment isolation. A regional approach to RF ablation guided by LI information may be useful in patients with AF.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Novel radiofrequency (RF) ablation technology permits local impedance (LI) assessment, enabling increased knowledge of the underlying tissue’s properties. In addition, LI can provide details on catheter tip contact and extent/effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) delivery. To date, the extent to which left atrial (LA) tissue characterization by LI can guide RF ablation has not yet been explored. Purpose We aimed to assess LI capabilities of predicting RF ablation success in consecutive AF cases with different underlying cardiac tissue characteristics. Methods Two-hundred twelve consecutive patients undergoing de novo AF ablation at 16 European centers were included in the CHARISMA registry. A novel ablation catheter (Stablepoint) with dedicated algorithm (DirectSense) was used to measure LI at the distal electrode. Each ablation point was characterized in terms of RF delivery time, baseline LI and LI drop during ablation according to different atrial substrates: normal-voltage (NV, >0.5mV), intermediate-voltage (IV, 0.1-0.5mV) and low-voltage tissue (LV, Results Atrial substrate was analyzed at 11405 (82%) sites with complete high-quality data. Ablation spots were more frequently deployed in NV areas (n=6714, 58.9%) than in areas of IV (n=4065, 35.6%) or LV (n=625, 5.5%). Both baseline LI (163.8±19Ω) and LI drop (23.0±9Ω) were higher in NV areas than in IV areas (baseline LI: 159.4±18Ω, p20Ω for NV areas (Sensitivity=62.5%, Specificity=91.5%, PPV=99.6%, Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.7896, p18Ω for IV and LV areas (Sensitivity=57.7%, Specificity=94.6%, PPV=99.8%, AUC=0.8008, p Conclusion LI drop during ablation significantly differs according to atrial substrates. These findings suggest that a tailored AF ablation strategy taking into account the underling LA substrate may be useful.

Background: Recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are mainly due to pulmonary vein reconnection. However, a growing number of patients have AF recurrences despite durable PVI. The optimal ablative strategy for these patients is unknown. We analyzed the impact of current ablation strategies in a large multicenter study. Methods: Patients undergoing a redo ablation for AF and presenting durable PVI were included. The freedom from atrial arrhythmia after pulmonary vein-based, linear-based, electrogram-based, and trigger-based ablation strategies were compared. Results: Between 2010 and 2020, 367 patients (67% men, 63±10 years, 44% paroxysmal) underwent a redo ablation for AF recurrences despite durable PVI at 39 centers. After durable PVI was confirmed, linear-based ablation was performed in 219 (60%) patients, electrogram-based ablation in 168 (45%) patients, trigger-based ablation in 101 (27%) patients, and pulmonary vein-based ablation in 56 (15%) patients. Seven patients (2%) did not undergo any additional ablation during the redo procedure. After 22±19 months of follow-up, 122 (33%) and 159 (43%) patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No significant difference in arrhythmia-free survival was observed between the different ablation strategies. Left atrial dilatation was the only independent factor associated with arrhythmia-free survival (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.13–2.23]; P =0.006). Conclusions: In patients with recurrent AF despite durable PVI, no ablation strategy used alone or in combination during the redo procedure appears to be superior in improving arrhythmia-free survival. Left atrial size is a significant predictor of ablation outcome in this population.

Purpose: Ablation index (AI) is a radiofrequency lesion quality marker. The AI value that allows effective and safe pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is still debated. We evaluated the incidence of acute and late PV reconnection (PVR) with different AI settings and its predictors. Methods: The Ablation Index Registry is a multicenter study that included patients with paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent first-time ablation. Each operator performed the ablation using his preferred ablation catheter (ThermoCool® SmartTouch or Surround Flow) and AI setting (380 posterior-500 anterior and 330 posterior-450 anterior). We divided the study population into two groups according to the AI setting used: group 1 (330–450) and group 2 (380–500). Incidence of acute PVR was validated within 30 min after PVI, whereas the incidence of late PVR was evaluated at repeat procedure. Results: Overall, 490 patients were divided into groups 1 (258) and 2 (232). There was no significant difference in the procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and rate of the first-pass PVI between the two study groups. Acute PVR was observed in 5.6% PVs. The rate of acute PVR was slightly higher in group 2 (64/943, 6.8%, PVs) than in group 1 (48/1045, 4.6% PVs, p = 0.04). Thirty patients (6%) underwent a repeat procedure and late PVR was observed in 57/116 (49%) PVs (number of reconnected PV per patient of 1.9 ± 1.6). A similar rate of late PVR was found in the two study groups. No predictors of acute and late PVR were found. Conclusion: Ablation with a lower range of AI is highly effective and is not associated with a higher rate of acute and late PVR. No predictors of PV reconnection were found.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Catheter ablation is frequently needed to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ARVC patients. Ablation aiming non-inducibility (NI) and late potential (LP) abolition has been shown to be effective1. Simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping demonstrate epicardial involvement in most VT2. However epicardial fat and vicinity of coronary artery may prevent effective epicardial ablation. Aims (a) evaluate endocardial-only ablation guided by epicardial late-potential recording (EA-ELP) to achieve LP abolition (LPA) and NI; (b) measure ablation-index(AI) values allowing epicardial LP suppression by endocardial ablation, as a surrogate for transmurality. Methods From 2019 to 2021 the authors (XW, EG) evaluated EA-ELP in ARVC patients patient referred for ablation. Our ablation protocol was previously described3. Endo and epicardial voltage mapping of the right ventricle (RV) were performed in sinus rhythm using 0.5-1.5 mV threshlods for endocardial scar and 0.5-1 mV for the epicardial. All LP were manually tagged. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed till S4 from the RV apex and other sites, all inducible tolerated VT were mapped. Endocardial ablation was performed with an irrigated tip catheter positioned in front of epi-LP recorded by a multi-electrode catheter aiming to eliminate or delay epi-LP as a surrogate for transmurality. For each lesion fulfilling the «transmurality criteria», the AI values were recorded. Remap was performed to validate LPA and NI was tested. Patient follow-up (FU) rely on telemonitoring in ICD-carriers and holter/exercise test for the others. Results 11 patients were enrolled (9M/2F, mean age 45 years), 9 for VT recurrence (3 redo) and 2 for de novo VT. The median ICD therapy before ablation was 5/patient (mean 1.7). The clinical VT originated from the RV outflow tract (RVOT) in 5 patients, peritricuspid (PT) in 2, RV free wall (RFW) in 4. Substrate were more extended in the epicardium compared to the endocardium: epi-LP and scar surfaces were 42.5 cm2/118 cm2 versus 24.5 cm2/25.5 cm2 for the endocardium. In one patient, additional epicardial lesion was necessary to achieve LPA. The mean ablation duration was 3377 s. Remap showed LPA in all patients and PVS was negative in all (not tested in one due to hemodynamic instability). One patient presented retrosternal hematoma after ablation with spontaneous favorable outcome. Endocardial AI values allowing epi-LP abolition were 595 for the inferior wall, 625 in the RVOT, 604 for PT and 639 for RFW. During a mean FU of 12 months (median 16.5 mths), only one patient had VT recurrence. Conclusion Based on this case-series, EA-ELP appeared as a safe and effective method to treat VT in ARVC. EA-ELP ablation allowed VT suppression in 91 % of patients after an mean FU of 12 mths. The RV endocardial AI needed to suppress epi-LP ranged was between 595-639 and could be used as surrogate for transmurality in ARVC.

The Las Minas area corresponds to an exhumed geothermal system considered a proxy for the deep part of the nearby Los Humeros active geothermal system. The stratigraphic succession is made up of: Palaeozoic-Miocene granitoids, a thick Jurassic- Cretaceous carbonate succession, Neogene lava flows and volcano-sedimentary deposits. Linked to a Miocene magma intrusion, marble and skarn rock-volumes developed by contact metamorphism and geothermal fluid flow. Faults are arranged in SW- and NNW-striking systems. These controlled the morphological evolution and favored Neogene-Quaternary dyke emplacement. Faulting gave rise to a tectonic depression where lacustrine sediments and pyroclastics deposited. Skarn rocks are mainly located at fault intersections and along pre-existing discontinuities, suggesting the role of bedding and/or fractures in channeling deep fluids. Results give inputs for exploration at depth of Los Humeros geothermal system.

Background Ablation index (AI) is a new lesion quality marker that has been demonstrated to allow a high single-procedure arrhythmia-free survival in single-center studies. This prospective, multi-center study was designed to evaluate the reproducibility of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation guided by the AI. Methods A total of 490 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (80.4%) and persistent AF underwent first time PV isolation and were divided in four study groups according to operator's preference in choosing the ablation catheter (a contact force (ST) or contact force surround flow (STSF) catheter) and the AI setting (330-450 or 380-500 at anterior wall or posterior wall, respectively). Results At 12 months a high rate of freedom from AF recurrences was observed in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF (91% vs 83.3%; P = .039). There was no difference in the rate of AF recurrence among the four study groups (4.5% in group ST330-450, 12.2% in group ST 380-500, 14.9% in group STSF330-450, 9.4% in group STSF380-500; P = .083). Recurrence was also similar between patients treated with a ST (8%) or STSF catheter (12.1%; P = .2), and within patients targeting an AI settings of 330 to 450 (10.9%) or 380 to 500 (10.3%; P = .64). In patients with paroxysmal AF, there was no difference (P = .12) in the 1-year freedom from AF recurrence among 14 operators that performed ≥10 ablation procedure. Conclusions An ablation protocol respecting strict criteria for contiguity and quality lesion resulted in high rate of 1-year freedom from AF recurrence, irrespective of the ablation catheters, AI settings, and operator.

ObjectivesThe association between obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) is well-established. We aimed to evaluate the impact of index body mass index (BMI) on AF recurrence at 12 months following catheter ablation using propensity-weighted analysis. In addition, periprocedural complications and fluoroscopy details were examined to assess overall safety in relationship to increasing BMI ranges.MethodsBaseline, periprocedural and follow-up data were collected on consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation. There were no specific exclusion criteria. Patients were categorised according to baseline BMI in order to assess the outcomes for each category.ResultsAmong 3333 patients, 728 (21.8%) were classified as normal (BMI 2), 1537 (46.1%) as overweight (BMI 25.5–29.0 kg/m2) and 1068 (32.0%) as obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). Procedural duration and radiation dose were higher for overweight and obese patients compared with those with a normal BMI (p=0.002 and p2led to a 1.2-fold increased likelihood of experiencing recurrent AF at 12-months follow-up as compared with overweight patients (HR 1.223; 95% CI 1.047 to 1.429; p=0.011), while no significant correlation was found between overweight and normal BMI groups (HR 0.954; 95% CI 0.798 to 1.140; p=0.605) and obese versus normal BMI (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.965 to 1.412; p=0.112).ConclusionsPatients with a baseline BMI ≥30 kg/m2have a higher recurrence rate of AF following catheter ablation and therefore lifestyle modification to target obesity preprocedure should be considered in these patients.