Search

Background  Head and neck free flap reconstructions are complex procedures requiring extensive resources, and have the potential to be highly morbid. As such, it is imperative that they should be performed in an appropriate setting, optimizing outcomes while limiting morbidity. The aim of this study is to identify any disparities in the treatment outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction by a single surgeon in an academic versus a community hospital setting. Methods  A retrospective review of all patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction for any indication by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. All surgeries were performed at one of two hospitals: one academic medical center and one community hospital. Demographics and rates of partial or complete flap failure, medical complications, surgical complications, mortality, and other secondary outcomes were compared between the two settings. Results  Ninety-two patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction were included. Fifty-seven (62%) of free flap reconstructions were performed in the academic medical center, while 35 (38%) were performed in the community hospital. There were no significant differences in complete flap loss, either intraoperative or postoperative (p  = 0.5060), partial flap loss (p  = 0.5827), postoperative surgical complications (p  = 0.2930), or medical complications (p  = 0.7960) between groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% (n  = 0) at the university hospital as compared with 5.7% at the community hospital (p  = 0.0681). The mean operative time was 702.3 minutes at the university hospital and 606.3 minutes at the community hospital (p  = 0.0080). Conclusion  Head and neck free flap surgery can be performed safely in either an academic or a community setting, with no difference in primary outcomes of surgery. Preferential selection of either treatment setting should be based on consideration of patient needs and availability of auxiliary specialty services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to report the natural history, demographics, and mechanisms of requirement for additional surgery in patients undergoing flatfoot reconstruction for adult acquired flatfoot. A total of 321 consecutive patients undergoing flatfoot reconstruction over a 14-year period were included (2002-2016). All procedures were performed by a senior orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon at our institution. Demographic data, operative reports, clinic notes, and radiographs were available for review. Statistical analysis included calculation of relative risk (RR) ratios. The majority of patients were female (83.2%,) and most patients were overweight with a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 (56.4%). Patient comorbidities included diabetes (13.7%) and rheumatoid arthritis (3.7%). Additional surgery was required for 54 patients (16.8%). The most common reasons for additional surgery were the following: painful calcaneal hardware (57.4%), conversion to triple arthrodesis (16.7%), and wound healing complications (9.1%). An increased risk of need for additional surgery was associated with female gender (RR = 3.4; P = .0005), smoking status (RR = 1.9; P = .0081), and age (<60 years of age; RR = 1.8; P = .042). Although retrospective, the results provide insight into the natural history of this procedure. Clinicians may use these data to appropriately counsel patients who are at increased risk of requirement for additional surgery, such as smokers, women, and patients <60 years old, regarding treatment options.Levels of Evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is typically associated with poor prognosis. Although prophylactic antibiotics are sometimes given with the intent of limiting bacterial luminal load and translocation in patients with MVT, this approach has not been universally adopted. The aim of this study is to analyze whether utilizing antibiotics empirically in those with MVT improves patient outcomes and survival when compared to those who do not receive empiric antibiotics.Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted with MVT between 2002 and 2019 at a single academic institution was performed. Demographics and rates of mortality need for bowel resection, readmission, and Clostridium difficile (C. diff) infection were compared between patients treated with empiric antibiotics and patients not treated with antibiotics.Results: Eighty-three patients (mean age 64.5 years and 55.4% male) who were admitted for MVT were included. Empiric antibiotics were utilized in 53% (n = 44) of MVT patients while 47% (n = 39) received supportive treatment without empiric antibiotics. Death occurred in 4 patients treated with antibiotics and 6 patients treated without antibiotics (9.1% vs. 15.3%, P = .50). Readmissions occurred in 12 patients (27.3%) treated with antibiotics and 10 patients (25.6%) not treated with antibiotics (27.3% vs. 25.6%, P = .87). C. diff infection occurred in 6 patients treated with antibiotics and in no patients not treated with antibiotics (13.6% vs. 0%, P = .03).Conclusions: Empiric antibiotic usage may not improve rates of mortality or hospital readmission in patients with MVT and may unnecessarily expose patients to an increased risk of C. diff infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]