Search

C10H11ClN4O2, monoclinic, P21/c (no. 14), a = 12.7802(17) Å, b = 7.6211(12) Å, c = 12.0486(17) Å, β = 95.551(4)°, V = 1168.0(3) Å3, Z = 4, R gt(F) = 0.0562, wR ref(F 2) = 0.1172, T = 273(2) K.

C36H36N2 ${\mathrm{C}}_{36}{\mathrm{H}}_{36}{\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ O, orthorhombic, P212121 ${2}_{1}{2}_{1}{2}_{1}$ (no. 19), a = 11.849(2) Å, b = 14.373(3) Å, c = 17.183(3) Å, V = 2926.4(10) Å3 ${\mathrm{\mathring{\text{A}}}}^{3}$ , Z = 4, Rgt ${R}_{\mathrm{g}\mathrm{t}}$ (F) = 0.0514, w Rref ${R}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}$ (F2 ${F}^{2}$ ) = 0.1272, T = 296(2) K.

Two-dimensional Ce-MOFs nanosheets were successfully constructed by using ceric ammonium nitrate as metal salt and 1, 3, 5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene (H3BTB) as organic ligand, together with the use of acetic acid as modulator.Acetic acid modulator shows significant effects on the morphology and crystallinity of Ce-MOFs. Ce-MOFs microspheres synthesized without acetic acid as modulator (named Ce-BTB-H0) are composed of highly cross-linked small nanosheets with low crystallinity and surface areas. On the contrary, Ce-MOFs synthesized with acetic acid (named Ce-BTB-H60) consist of dispersed nanosheets, and show improved crystallinity and higher surface areas than that of Ce-BTB-H0. Using blue LED as light source and oxygen as oxidant, two-dimensional Ce-MOFs nanosheets enable decarboxylation oxygenation of a variety of substituted phenylacetic acid to their corresponding benzaldehydes and benzyl alcoholsunder irradiation of blue LED in oxygen atmosphere at room temperature.Moreover, Ce-BTB-H60nanosheets show better photocatalytic performance due to their higher crystallinity, larger specific surface area and improved dispersity than that of Ce-BTB-H0.

Background: The use of two or more drugs carries the potential risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which may result in adverse reactions. Some human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected patients who receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) may require general anesthesia with propofol (PRL) before undergoing surgical treatment. Both PRL and ART drugs may lead to neuronal dysfunction, which can be accompanied by energy metabolism disorders. Neurons take in glucose mainly through glucose transporter 3 (Glut3) which is specifically expressed on the cell membranes of neurons. However, to date, no study has examined whether the DDIs of PRL and ART drugs interfere with glucose metabolism and Glut3 expression in neurons. Methods: An in vitro model was constructed using the primary cultures of neurons. PRL and ART drugs (EFV, AZT, and 3TC), were added at different concentrations (low, medium, and high). The neurons were exposed to the drugs for 1, 4, 8, and 12 h. The optimal drug concentration and exposure time were selected. The cellular survival rate, glucose concentration, electrophysiology, and the expression of Glut3 were detected. Results: There were no significant changes in the cellular survival rates of the neurons that were exposed to both PRL and ART drugs at low concentrations for 1 h. However, the survival rates of the neurons decreased significantly as the drug concentrations and durations increased. The glucose concentration of the neurons that were exposed to both PRL and the ART drugs was significantly decreased. The glucose concentration of the neurons was not affected by any individual drug. The amplitude of the action potential and the expression of Glut3 were decreased in the neurons that were exposed to both PRL and ART drugs. Conclusions: The main adverse reactions induced by the DDIs between PRL and the ART drugs were decreased glucose metabolism and neuronal damage, which were caused by inhibiting the expression of Glut3. More importantly, we found that decreases in glucose metabolism predated neuronal damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

C10H11ClN4O2, monoclinic, P21/c (no. 14), a = 12.7802(17) Å, b = 7.6211(12) Å, c = 12.0486(17) Å, β = 95.551(4)°, V = 1168.0(3) Å3, Z = 4, Rgt(F) = 0.0562, wRref(F2) = 0.1172, T = 273(2) K. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electrochemical C–C and C–N coupling reactions with the conversion of abundant and inexpensive small molecules, such as CO2 and nitrogen‐containing species, are considered a promising route for increasing the value of CO2 reduction products. The development of high‐performance catalysts is the key to the both electrocatalytic reactions. In this review, we present a systematic summary of the reaction systems for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction, along with the coupling mechanisms of C–C and C–N bonds over outstanding electrocatalytic materials recently developed. The key intermediate species and reaction pathways related to the coupling as well as the catalyst‐structure relationship will be also discussed, aiming to provide insights and guidance for designing efficient CO2 reduction systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compared to the Haber–Bosch (H–B) process for ammonia synthesis with massive emission of greenhouse CO2 and necessary harsh reaction conditions, the electrocatalytic NO3− reduction (NO3RR) for ammonia synthesis under ambient temperature and pressure driven by renewable electricity has attracted great attention. NO3RR is also a promising route to construct nitrogen cycles utilizing NOx produced from industrial and agricultural operations. Cu‐based catalyst is one of the most promising platforms for this reaction. This perspective shows the latest understanding and research advances on the NO3RR by Cu‐based electrocatalysts. Through a deep analysis on the rate‐limiting step of NO3RR, the strategies of overcoming the deactivation and enhancing the performance of Cu‐based catalysts are discussed. The great significance of synergistic NOx and H activation in promoting the key kinetic step of electrocatalytic NO3RR by single‐atom, oxide, bimetallic of Cu on the catalytic reaction site construction with tunable adsorption of N‐containing intermediate and active H is stressed. Also, future challenges and perspectives toward coupling reaction of nitrate reduction catalyzed by Cu‐based catalysts are proposed. This perspective can move forward the future research on electrocatalytic NO3RR to ammonia synthesis over advanced Cu‐based electrocatalysts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]