Search

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequently encountered familial tumor syndromes. NF1 patients are highly prone to have multiple nervous system tumors, and are also at increased risk for various nonnervous mesenchymal or neuroendocrine tumor developments. This is an NF1 patient who developed two different unusual tumors: an intramedullary anaplastic astrocytoma of the thoracic spine and myxoid liposarcoma of the lower limb. The family members were carefully investigated as per the NF1 diagnostic criteria. A strong cutaneous NF1 penetrance was found in 6 of the 14 family members in four successive generations, two of whom had NF1 and developed breast cancer and bilateral optic gliomas. The NF1 tumor syndrome highlights a wide-ranging tumor spectrum, and clinicians should keep an eye on tumor surveillance and encourage medical counseling, and long-term NF1 family follow-up is warranted for prophylactic warning.

Abstract. Perihippocampal failure is a rare clinical scenario in brain metastatic cancer patients following hippocampal-avoidance (HA) whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT). The clinical features have not been fully identified because clinical data on intracranial failure after HA-WBRT are limited. It is thus necessary to accumulate clinical data. We retrospectively analyzed cancer patients with brain metastases who were diagnosed between January 2014 and September 2020 at a regional referral hospital. The medical records of patients who underwent HA-WBRT were reviewed. The clinical features of intracranial recurrence were described. Dosimetry parameters were compared in terms of deviation from the recommended protocol of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Report 0933. Twenty-four eligible patients with brain metastases who underwent HA-WBRT were identified; 13 (54%) were male. Seventeen patients (71%) had lung cancer, 6 (25%) had breast cancer, and 1 (4%) had liver cancer. The median overall survival was 12 months. Three patients developed intracranial failure during clinical follow-up, and 2 relapsed with intracranial failure in the perihippocampal region at 13 and 22 months, respectively. The perihippocampal failure rate was about 8%. One patient with small cell lung cancer received HA-prophylactic cranial irradiation; the minimum and maximum doses to the hippocampi were 6.8 and 10.7 Gy, respectively. Another patient with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma received HA-WBRT; the minimum and maximum doses to the hippocampi were 5.4 and 10.6 Gy, respectively. We reported unusual cases of intracranial failure in the perihippocampal region following HA-WBRT. Perihippocampal failure could be attributed to an under-dose of radiation partially or be resulted from aggressiveness of cancer per se. Further research on this topic is encouraged.

Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) has the highest fatality rate among primary malignant brain tumors. GBMs with synchronous multiple foci (multiple GBMs) is rarely diagnosed in the clinical scenario. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics between multiple and single GBMs and to identify factors associated with the survival of GBM and evaluate their effects. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with primary GBM in a referral medical center in Taiwan who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2016. They were identified from the cancer registry database of the center and followed from the date of diagnosis to october 2018. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS), and the independent factors for survival were identified through Cox regressions. Results: A total of 48 patients were identified, of whom 44 GBM (92%) and 4 gliosarcoma (GSM) (8%). Preoperative images showed five (10%) patients had multiple brain lesions. GSM showed a high ratio of multiple lesions (50%) than patients with GBM (5%) (p = 0.05). Those with multiple lesions had significantly worse median OS of 8.2 months compared to patients with a single lesion (16 months, p = 0.03). We found that multiple GBMs was a predictor of worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.57, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.26–10.13) after adjusting for other significant predictor of radiotherapy (HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.23–0.96). Conclusion: Patients with multiple GBMs had worse survival compared to those with single GBM. GBM patients without post-operative radiotherapy were also a predictor of worse survival. Keywords: Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma, Multiple brain lesions, Radiotherapy, Survival

ObjectivesAdjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck cancers. The radiation field is correlated with the surgical field in the adjuvant radiotherapy setting; therefore, tailoring the irradiation field is reasonable.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers included in the cancer registry between 2015 and 2019 in the study hospital. Patients who underwent whole-neck irradiation (WNI) were compared with those who underwent lower-neck-sparing (LNS) irradiation.ResultsA total of 167 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers were included in the study. Cancer recurrence was recorded in 33% of the patients. The rate of recurrence of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer at neck level IV was 8%. The 2-year incidence of level IV recurrence was lower in the WNI group than in the LNS group (2% vs. 10%; p = 0.04). The 2-year disease-free survival rates were 75% and 63% in the WNI and LNS groups, respectively (p = 0.08).ConclusionThe rate of level IV recurrence was higher in the LNS group than in the WNI group. Trends of improvement in disease-free survival with lower-neck irradiation suggested that it is premature to consider LNS irradiation as daily practice in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary intracranial malignancy. Previous studies found incidence of GBM varies substantially by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and survival also varies by country, ethnicity, and treatment. Gliosarcoma (GSM) and giant cell glioblastoma (GC-GBM) are different histologic variants of GBM with distinct clinico-pathologic entities. We conducted a study to compare epidemiology, survival, and prognostic factors among the three.Methods: We identified GBM patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and followed them using the death registry. Survival was compared among conventional GBM and two histologic variants. The potential confounding factors evaluated in this study included registered year, age, sex, and treatment modality (resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy).Results: We enrolled 3,895 patients, including 3,732 (95.8%) with conventional GBM, 102 (2.6%) with GSM, and 61 (1.6%) with GC-GBM. GC-GBM patients had younger mean age at diagnosis (49.5 years) than conventional GBM patients (58.7 years) and GSM patients (61.3 years) (p < 0.01). The three groups had similar sex distributions (p = 0.29). GC-GBM had a longer median survival [18.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15.8–25.3 months] than conventional GBM (12.5, 95%CI: 12.0–13.0 months) and GSM (12.8, 95%CI: 9.2–16.2 months), and the differences in overall survival did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.08, log-rank test). In univariate analysis, GC-GBM had better survival than conventional GBM, but the hazard ratio (0.91) did not reach statistical significance (95%CI: 0.69–1.20) in the multivariate analysis. Young ages (≤ 40 years), female sex, resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were factors associated with better survival in overall GBMs. In subtype analyses, these factors remained statistically significant for conventional GBM, as well as radiotherapy for GSM.Conclusion: Our analysis found conventional GBM and its variants shared similar poor survival. Factors with age ≤ 40 years, female sex, resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis in conventional GBM patients.

Glioblastoma (GBM) has the highest fatality rate among primary malignant brain tumors and typically tends to recur locally just adjacent to the original tumor site following surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. We conducted a study to evaluate the survival outcomes between a standard dose (≤ 60 Gy) and moderate radiation dose escalation (>60 Gy), and to identify prognostic factors for GBM. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of primary GBM patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 in two referral hospitals in Taiwan. They were identified from the cancer registry database and followed up from the date of diagnosis to October 2018. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two dose groups, and independent factors for survival were analyzed through Cox proportional hazard model. We also affirmed the results using Cox regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach. From our cancer registry database, 142 GBM patients were identified, and 84 of them fit the inclusion criteria. Of the 84 patients, 52 (62%) were males. The radiation dose ranged from 50.0 Gy to 66.6 Gy, but their treatment volumes were similar to the others. Fifteen (18%) patients received an escalated dose boost >60.0 Gy. The escalated group had a longer median PFS (15.4 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.01 for log-rank test), and a longer median OS was also longer in the escalation group (33.8 vs. 12.5 months, p 70 (HR = 1.55), diagnosis after 2010 (HR = 1.42), and a larger radiation volume (≥ 250ml; HR = 0.81) were predictors of PFS. The escalated dose (HR = 0.47) and a larger radiation volume (HR = 0.76) were identified as predictors for better OS. Following detailed statistical analysis, a moderate radiation dose escalation (> 60 Gy) was found as an independent factor affecting OS in GBM patients. In conclusion, a moderate radiation dose escalation (> 60 Gy) was an independent predictor for longer OS in GBM patients. However, prospective studies including more patients with more information, such as molecular markers and completeness of resection, are needed to confirm our findings.