Search

This paper addresses disparities in reperfusion therapy, particularly primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), for elderly patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite proven benefits, our center’s data reveals a stark contrast in PCI rates between younger and older patients, leading to significantly higher mortality among the elderly. Rooted in concerns about comorbidities, the reluctance to administer PCI prompts ethical questions and necessitates a critical examination of age-based clinical decision-making. The paper advocates for optimized AMI management protocols, emphasizing an individualized approach and evidence-based guidelines. Recognizing challenges in accurate AMI diagnosis in the elderly, educational initiatives target healthcare professionals and the population, disseminating information about symptoms and treatment benefits. To combat age-related stereotypes, digital tools like virtual consultations and telemedicine enhance accessibility to information. The paper proposes policy initiatives prioritizing clinical condition over age in treatment decisions, ensuring equitable care. In conclusion, urgent action is required to bridge the gap in reperfusion therapy for elderly AMI patients. By fostering inclusivity, implementing education, and advocating policy changes, we aim to ensure every patient, irrespective of age, receives timely and appropriate life-saving interventions.