Search

We present a near-real-time global gridded daily CO2 emissions dataset (GRACED) throughout 2021. GRACED provides gridded CO2 emissions at a 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution and 1-day temporal resolution from cement production and fossil fuel combustion over seven sectors, including industry, power, residential consumption, ground transportation, international aviation, domestic aviation, and international shipping. GRACED is prepared from the near-real-time daily national CO2 emissions estimates (Carbon Monitor), multi-source spatial activity data emissions and satellite NO2 data for time variations of those spatial activity data. GRACED provides the most timely overview of emissions distribution changes, which enables more accurate and timely identification of when and where fossil CO2 emissions have rebounded and decreased. Uncertainty analysis of GRACED gives a grid-level two-sigma uncertainty of value of ±19.9% in 2021, indicating the reliability of GRACED was not sacrificed for the sake of higher spatiotemporal resolution that GRACED provides. Continuing to update GRACED in a timely manner could help policymakers monitor energy and climate policies' effectiveness and make adjustments quickly.

Building on near-real-time and spatially explicit estimates of daily carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, here we present and analyze a new city-level dataset of fossil fuel and cement emissions, Carbon Monitor Cities, which provides daily estimates of emissions from January 2019 through December 2021 for 1500 cities in 46 countries, and disaggregates five sectors: power generation, residential (buildings), industry, ground transportation, and aviation. The goal of this dataset is to improve the timeliness and temporal resolution of city-level emission inventories and includes estimates for both functional urban areas and city administrative areas that are consistent with global and regional totals. Comparisons with other datasets (i.e. CEADs, MEIC, Vulcan, and CDP-ICLEI Track) were performed, and we estimate the overall annual uncertainty range to be ±21.7%. Carbon Monitor Cities is a near-real-time, city-level emission dataset that includes cities around the world, including the first estimates for many cities in low-income countries.

Quantifying atmospheric CO2 over long periods from space is crucial in understanding the carbon cycle's response to climate change. However, a single satellite offers limited spatiotemporal coverage, making comprehensive monitoring challenging. Moreover, biases among various satellite retrievals hinder their direct integration. This study proposed a machine learning framework for fusing the column‐averaged dry‐air mole fraction of CO2 (XCO2) retrievals from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and OCO‐2 satellites. The best model (R2 = 0.85) presented improved consistency of GOSAT retrievals by reducing 71.5% of the average monthly bias while using OCO‐2 retrievals as a benchmark, indicating the fusion data set's potential to enhance observation coverage. Incorporating the adjusted GOSAT XCO2 retrievals into the OCO‐2 data set added an average of 84.7 thousand observations annually, enhancing the yearly temporal coverage by 53.6% (from 14 to 21.5 days per grid). This method can be adapted to other satellites, maximizing satellite resources for a more robust carbon flux inversion. Plain Language Summary: CO2 sources and sinks are primarily regulated by anthropogenic emissions, photosynthesis and respiration on land and in the ocean, as well as by physical dissolution and carbonate chemistry with ocean circulation. The consistent long‐term quantification of atmospheric CO2 concentrations using satellite observations plays a pivotal role in understanding the response of global and regional carbon cycles to climate change. However, satellites have a revisit period, and factors like cloud and aerosol scattering impact the quality and quantity of their observations. A single satellite currently falls short of the demand to monitor global carbon sources and sinks, necessitating the integration of observations from various satellites to conduct carbon flux inversions. Different satellites come with distinct sampling patterns, instrument parameters, and retrieval algorithms, which leads to biases in their retrieval products. Our study, focusing on OCO‐2 and GOSAT, employs machine learning models to improve consistency between retrievals derived from these two satellites, thus generating a harmonized data set. The bias‐corrected GOSAT XCO2 retrievals exhibit high spatiotemporal consistency with OCO‐2 XCO2 retrievals, immensely enhancing the observational constraints for carbon flux inversions. This method holds promise for application to recently launched and future satellites, aiming to offer carbon flux inversions with amplified spatiotemporal observational constraints. Key Points: This study employs machine learning (ML) models to enhance XCO2 consistency between OCO‐2 and Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), reducing monthly inconsistency by 71.5%Integrating the OCO‐2 data set with GOSAT retrievals increased yearly observations by 56.2%Fusing satellite data through ML models can pave the way for improved carbon flux inversions in the future [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An improved divergence method has been developed to estimate annual methane (CH4) emissions from TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) observations. It has been applied to the period of 2018 to 2021 over the Middle East, where the orography is complicated, and the mean mixing ratio of methane (XCH4) might be affected by albedos or aerosols over some locations. To adapt to extreme changes of terrain over mountains or coasts, winds are used with their divergent part removed. A temporal filter is introduced to identify highly variable emissions and further exclude fake sources caused by retrieval artifacts. We compare our results to widely used bottom-up anthropogenic emission inventories: Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) and Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) over several regions representing various types of sources. The NOX emissions from EDGAR and Daily Emissions Constrained by Satellite Observations (DECSO), and the industrial heat sources identified by Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) are further used to better understand our resulting methane emissions. Our results indicate possibly large underestimations of methane emissions in metropolises like Tehran (up to 50 %) and Isfahan (up to 70 %) in Iran. The derived annual methane emissions from oil/gas production near the Caspian Sea in Turkmenistan are comparable to GEFI but more than two times higher than EDGAR and CEDS in 2019. Large discrepancies of distribution of methane sources in Riyadh and its surrounding areas are found between EDGAR, CEDS, GFEI and our emissions. The methane emission from oil/gas production in the east to Riyadh seems to be largely overestimated by EDGAR and CEDS, while our estimates, and also GFEI and DECSO NOX indicate much lower emissions from industry activities. On the other hand, regions like Iran, Iraq, and Oman are dominated by sources from oil and gas exploitation that probably includes more irregular releases of methane, with the result that our estimates, that include only invariable sources, are lower than the bottom-up emission inventories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]