Search

IntroductionMany challenges remain for long-term survival of renal allografts. Once-daily sirolimus (SRL) combined with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus (LER-TAC) may improve medication adherence and reduce the potential nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) compared with standard immunosuppression regimens, thus potentially improving long-term graft survival.MethodsThis retrospective, observational, single-center, propensity score matching (PSM) study compared conversion to SRL combined with low-dose ER-TAC and mycophenolic acid (MPA) combined with standard-dose TAC in kidney transplant recipients. After PSM, there were 56 patients in each group. Efficacy, safety, and medication adherence were evaluated over 12 months.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of graft and recipient survival and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (p = 1.000), and none of the recipients developed dnDSA after conversion. The mean eGFR improved in SRL + LER-TAC group after conversion compared to before conversion (51.12 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 56.97 ± 19.23 ml/min/1.73 m2, p

BackgroundWith the improvement of immunosuppressive regimens, the success rate and availability of ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (KT) have gradually increased. However, the management of immunosuppression protocols and complications associated with ABO-i KT is complex. Here, we report a clinical case of ABO-i living donor KT with allograft dysfunction caused by acute blood group antibody-dependent rejection triggered by human parvovirus B19 (B19V).Case reportThe ABO blood group of the recipient was O, and that of the donor was B. The recipient had high baseline anti-B antibody titers (IgM, 1:1024; IgG, 1:64). Before transplantation, he completed a desensitization protocol comprising plasma exchange, double-filtration plasmapheresis, and rituximab, which maintained a low blood group antibody level and resulted in successful transplantation. Two weeks after surgery, the recipient developed a B19V infection combined with acute T-cell-mediated rejection. After the anti-rejection regimen, acute rejection (AR) was successfully reversed, but B19V persisted. One week after AR stabilization, the patient experienced acute antibody-mediated rejection that was more severe and refractory, resulting in the loss of the transplanted kidney.ConclusionDesensitization combined with immunosuppressants can lead to overimmunosuppression and cause various infections. Infections could break the accommodation state of the patient, thereby inducing AR and resulting in the loss of the transplanted kidney.

Background: Despite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge. Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure. Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes. Methods: This study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes. Results: The prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.6%. The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.240, 95% CI: 1.136–1.353, p < 0.001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.145, 95% CI: 2.690–9.840, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence. There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.7 ± 8.7 vs. 25.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.010). Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.932, p = 0.001). The rates of graft loss (7.1% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.006) and rejection (12.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group. Conclusion: Longer time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication. Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge. Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure. Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes., Methods: This study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes., Results: The prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.6%. The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.240, 95% CI: 1.136-1.353, p < 0.001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.145, 95% CI: 2.690-9.840, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence. There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.7 ± 8.7 vs. 25.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.010). Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.932, p = 0.001). The rates of graft loss (7.1% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.006) and rejection (12.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group., Conclusion: Longer time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication. Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zhi-yu, Lin-rui, Chen-zhen, Ren-jie, Fei-hong, Song, Sheng and Wei-jie.)