Search

Background and purpose: The EMBRACE II study combines state-of-the-art Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in cervix cancer with an advanced protocol for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) which specifies target volume selection, contouring and treatment planning. In EMBRACE II, well-defined EBRT is an integral part of the overall treatment strategy with the primary aim of improving nodal control and reducing morbidity. The EMBRACE II EBRT planning concept is based on improved conformality through relaxed coverage criteria for all target volumes. For boosting of lymph nodes, a simultaneous integrated boost and coverage probability planning is applied. Before entering EMBRACE II, institutes had to go through accreditation. Material and methods: As part of accreditation, a treatment planning dummy-run included educational blocks and submission of an examination case provided by the study coordinators. Seventy-one centers submitted 123 EBRT dose distributions. Replanning was required if hard constraints were violated or planning concepts were not fully accomplished. Dosimetric parameters of original and revised plans were compared. Results: Only 11 plans violated hard constraints. Twenty-seven centers passed after first submission. 27 needed one and 13 centers needed more revisions. The most common reasons for revisions were low conformality, relatively high OAR doses or insufficient lymph node coverage reduction. Individual feedback on planning concepts improved plan quality considerably, resulting in a median body V43Gy reduction of 158 cm 3 from first plan submission to approved plan. Conclusion: A dummy-run as applied in EMBRACE II, consisting of training and examination cases enabled us to test institutes’ treatment planning capabilities, and improve plan quality.

Background: The concept of the use of MRI for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer was introduced 20 years ago. Here, we report on EMBRACE-I, which aimed to evaluate local tumour control and morbidity after chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT. Methods: EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. Data from patients from 24 centres in Europe, Asia, and North America were prospectively collected. The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years, with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB–IVA disease or FIGO stage IVB disease restricted to paraaortic lymph metastasis below the L1–L2 interspace, suitable for curative treatment. Treatment consisted of chemoradiotherapy (weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2, 5–6 cycles, 1 day per cycle, plus 45–50 Gy external-beam radiotherapy delivered in 1·8–2 Gy fractions) followed by MRI-based IGABT. The MRI-based IGABT target volume definition and dose reporting was according to Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie European Society for Radiation Oncology recommendations. IGABT dose prescription was open according to institutional practice. Local control and late morbidity were selected as primary endpoints in all patients available for analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00920920. Findings: Patient accrual began on July 30, 2008, and closed on Dec 29, 2015. A total of 1416 patients were registered in the database. After exclusion for not meeting patient selection criteria before treatment, being registered but not entered in the database, meeting the exclusion criteria, and being falsely excluded, data from 1341 patients were available for analysis of disease and data from 1251 patients were available for assessment of morbidity outcome. MRI-based IGABT including dose optimisation was done in 1317 (98·2%) of 1341 patients. Median high-risk clinical target volume was 28 cm3 (IQR 20–40) and median minimal dose to 90% of the clinical target volume (D90%) was 90 Gy (IQR 85–94) equi-effective dose in 2 Gy per fraction. At a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 20–64), actuarial overall 5-year local control was 92% (95% CI 90–93). Actuarial cumulative 5-year incidence of grade 3–5 morbidity was 6·8% (95% CI 5·4–8·6) for genitourinary events, 8·5% (6·9–10·6) for gastrointestinal events, 5·7% (4·3–7·6) for vaginal events, and 3·2% (2·2–4·5) for fistulae. Interpretation: Chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT result in effective and stable long-term local control across all stages of locally advanced cervical cancer, with a limited severe morbidity per organ. These results represent a positive breakthrough in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, which might be used as a benchmark for clinical practice and all future studies. Funding: Medical University of Vienna, Aarhus University Hospital, Elekta AB, and Varian Medical Systems. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Graphical abstract, Highlights • Image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is changing clinical practice. • The EMBRACE studies benchmark IGABT in cervix cancer. • A multi-parametric dose prescription protocol is being validated in EMBRACE II. • EMBRACE II is hypothesised to improve outcome: disease, morbidity, quality of life., The publication of the GEC-ESTRO recommendations one decade ago was a significant step forward for reaching international consensus on adaptive target definition and dose reporting in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Since then, IGABT has been spreading, particularly in Europe, North America and Asia, and the guidelines have proved their broad acceptance and applicability in clinical practice. However, a unified approach to volume contouring and reporting does not imply a unified administration of treatment, and currently both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and IGABT are delivered using a large variety of techniques and prescription/fractionation schedules. With IGABT, local control is excellent in limited and well-responding tumours. The major challenges are currently loco-regional control in advanced tumours, treatment-related morbidity, and distant metastatic disease. Emerging evidence from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I studies has demonstrated that clinical outcome is related to dose prescription and technique. The next logical step is to demonstrate excellent clinical outcome with the most advanced EBRT and brachytherapy techniques based on an evidence-based prospective dose and volume prescription protocol. The EMBRACE II study is an interventional and observational multicentre study which aims to benchmark a high level of local, nodal and systemic control while limiting morbidity, using state of the art treatment including an advanced target volume selection and contouring protocol for EBRT and brachytherapy, a multi-parametric brachytherapy dose prescription protocol (clinical validation of dose constraints), and use of advanced EBRT (IMRT and IGRT) and brachytherapy (IC/IS) techniques (clinical validation). The study also incorporates translational research including imaging and tissue biomarkers.

Purpose/Objective(s): To investigate the patterns of nodal failure in patients enrolled in the international multicentre EMBRACE study.Materials/Methods: Nodal disease at diagnosis (N-, N+) and nodal failure were analysed per region (NF) (pelvic (parametrial, common iliac, internal/external iliac), inguinal and para-aortic (PAO)) in 1338 patients. Treatment consisted of chemo-radiation and MRI guided brachytherapy. PAO radiotherapy and/or nodal boost was left to the treating centre. At time of diagnosis 52% of patients had pathologic nodes. Frequency analyses were performed in relation to patient, primary tumour and nodal disease characteristics, and treatment related factors.Results: Median follow up was 34 months and 83% of NF occurred within 24 months. At diagnosis 99% of the N+ patients had pathologic nodes in the pelvis and 14% in the PAO. NFpelvic and NFPAO were reported in 55% and 68% of patients with NF, respectively. Overall NF was reported in 152 patients (11%); 7 and 16% for N- and N+ patients. Of the patients with NF, 41% were located outside the elective target (39% PAO), 40% inside and 35% inside the nodal boost target. Twelve percent of N+ patients that received a nodal boost had a NF inside the nodal boost target.Conclusion: Within the EMBRACE study cohort the overall number of patients developing nodal failure is low, significantly lower for N- compared to N+ patients. Pathological nodes at diagnosis are mainly located in the pelvis, whereas nodal failures are more often reported in the PAO region. About 40% of all nodal failures were reported outside the treatment targets. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Background/purpose To identify risk factors for vaginal stenosis and to establish a dose–effect relationship for image-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Materials/Methods Patients from the ongoing EMBRACE study with prospectively assessed morbidity (CTCAEv3.0) at baseline and at least one follow-up were selected. Patient-, disease- and treatment characteristics were tested as risk factors for vaginal stenosis G ⩾ 2 in univariate and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) and a dose–effect curve was deduced from the estimates. The ICRU rectum point was used to derive the recto-vaginal reference point dose. Results In 630 patients included (median follow-up 24 months), 2-year actuarial estimate for vaginal stenosis G ⩾ 2 was 21%. Recto-vaginal reference point dose (HR = 1.025, p = 0.029), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose >45 Gy/25 fractions (HR = 1.770, p = 0.056) and tumor extension in the vagina (HR = 2.259, p ⩽ 0.001) were risk factors for vaginal stenosis, adjusted for center reporting effects. Based on the model curve, the risk was 20% at 65 Gy, 27% at 75 Gy and 34% at 85 Gy (recto-vaginal reference point dose). Conclusion Keeping the EBRT dose at 45 Gy/25 fractions and decreasing the dose contribution of brachytherapy to the vagina decrease the risk of stenosis. A planning aim of ⩽65 Gy EQD2 (EBRT + brachytherapy dose) to the recto-vaginal reference point is therefore proposed.

Background:: Despite significant advances in the screening, detection, and treatment of preinvasive cervical lesions, invasive cervical cancer is the fifth most common cancer in European women. There are large disparities in Europe and worldwide in the incidence, management, and mortality of cervical cancer. Objective:: The European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines in order to improve the quality of care for women with cervical cancer across Europe and worldwide. Methods:: The ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of cervical cancer (23 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence based, the current literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 159 international reviewers, selected through ESGO/ESTRO/ESP and including patient representatives. Results:: The guidelines cover comprehensively staging, management, and follow-up for patients with cervical cancer. Management includes fertility sparing treatment; stage T1a, T1b1/T2a1, clinically occult cervical cancer diagnosed after simple hysterectomy; early and locally advanced cervical cancer; primary distant metastatic disease; cervical cancer in pregnancy; and recurrent disease. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are defined. © 2018, European Society for Gynaecological Oncology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Pathology. Published by Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg.

Two corrections were made to the above publication following its original online publication on 4th May 2018. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Regrettably, the author metadata used for the previous correction (doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2380-7) contained an error in the tagging of W. Glenn McCluggage’s name; this has been corrected. No further adjustments have been made to the Correction, or the original Guideline paper (doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2362-9). © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.