Search

Immunocompromised patients with B-cell deficiencies are at risk for prolonged symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We describe 4 patients treated for B-cell malignancies with B-cell-depleting therapies who developed persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and had resolution of symptoms following an extended course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Background Most antibiotics are prescribed outside of the hospital, and up to 50% are unnecessary or inappropriate. Studies of ambulatory stewardship interventions have primarily targeted respiratory infections. We investigated the impact of an electronic medical record (EMR)-embedded clinical decision support tool on antibiotic duration for outpatient pediatric skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). Methods Institutional SSTI treatment guidelines for pediatric and adult patients were developed in 7/2019, followed in 5/2020 by dedicated education for primary care pediatricians. In 12/2020, a SmartSet (EMR-embedded tool with a templated progress note and antibiotic guidance) was created for pediatrics only. In this quasi-experimental pre-post study, we included adult and pediatric patients who were prescribed antibiotics for SSTI at a primary care or surgery clinic (in person, virtual, or phone) from 7/2019 to 12/2021. Inappropriate pediatric antibiotic duration ( >7 days) was compared pre- and post-intervention with interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of aggregate quarterly data. The trend in adult antibiotic duration was modeled with linear regression. Results We included 3,786 (948 pediatric and 2,838 adult) pre-intervention and 2,122 (469 pediatric and 1,653 adult) post-intervention visits. Pre-intervention, the percentage of inappropriate duration for pediatric patients was decreasing 1.6 percentage points per quarter (p < 0.01). After SmartSet implementation, there was an immediate decrease of 10.3 percentage points (p < 0.01), a relative decrease of 40% from the modeled percentage just prior to intervention (Figure 1). Inappropriate antibiotic duration for adults averaged 22.9% over the same period and did not change (p = 0.88). Figure 1Figure 1. Raw and modeled percentages of inappropriate antibiotic duration for skin and soft tissue infection before (quarters -6 to 0, encompassing Q3 2019 through Q4 2020) and after (quarters 0 to 4, encompassing Q1 2021 through Q4 2021) implementation of an EMR-embedded clinical decision support tool for pediatric patients. Time is represented in 3-month intervals, with quarter 0 being indicating the intervention at the end of December 2020. Conclusion Following guideline implementation and education, inappropriate antibiotic duration for ambulatory pediatric SSTI declined only modestly. An EMR-embedded clinical decision support tool was associated with an additional relative decrease of 40% in inappropriate antibiotic duration. In the same health system with comparable adult SSTI guidelines, the percentage of inappropriate antibiotic duration for adults was unchanged, suggesting timely EMR nudges can provide additional benefit over guidelines alone. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Hospitalized patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) are commonly stable upon admission and lack signs of sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, critical limb ischemia, or bacteremia. Patients are admitted for key components of DFI care: non-urgent procedures for source control; radiographic imaging; cultures; consultation with infectious diseases (ID), podiatry, or vascular surgery; and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) access. We aimed to identify the proportion of patients with low acuity DFI who were hospitalized and to characterize potential barriers to outpatient management. Methods Between 2020 and 2021, data from the medical record were abstracted for adult patients admitted to Michigan Medicine with an ICD-10 admission diagnosis of DFI. Patients were categorized into low and high acuity cohorts. High acuity was defined as sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, critical limb ischemia, or bacteremia. Low acuity was defined as clinical stability (≤ 1 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria) and without high acuity criteria. The primary outcome was the prevalence of low acuity DFIs admitted to the hospital, duration of hospitalization, and associated costs. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, DFI recurrence, DFI readmission, and time from clinical stability to completion of DFI care (non-urgent procedures; radiographic imaging; cultures; consultation to ID, podiatry, or vascular surgery; and PICC access). Results Of 64 hospitalized DFI patients, 37 (58%) were low acuity and 27 (42%) high acuity. All low acuity patients were clinically stable on admission with a median hospitalization length of 6.3 days. Figure 1 shows the time to completion of key components of DFI care from clinical stability. Low acuity group had DFI recurrence of 5.4%; readmission with DFI of 10.8%; and all-cause mortality of 5.4%. The median hospitalization cost for low-acuity DFI was $55,500 per patient. Conclusion More than half of hospitalized DFI patients are low acuity, and could have avoided hospitalization. These patients had a median hospitalization length of 6.3 days and total cost of $55,500. Developing a coordinated process to manage low acuity patients outpatient may avoid unnecessary hospitalizations and reduce healthcare cost. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Up to one-third of hospitalized patients treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) have asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Both diagnostic (avoiding inappropriate urine cultures) and antibiotic stewardship (reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in asymptomatic patients) have been proposed to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use for ASB. However, it's unclear which method is most effective. Methods The Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium aimed to improve antibiotic use and outcomes of hospitalized patients with a positive urine culture between 7/1/2017—3/31/2020 (see Table 1 for patient characteristics) by benchmarking performance across 46 Michigan hospitals, sharing best practices, and implementing pay-for-performance metrics related to unnecessary treatment of ASB (see Figure 1). Using logistic regression models controlling for hospital clustering, we assessed change over time in percentage of hospitalized patients treated for UTI who had ASB (i.e., had no documented signs or symptoms of UTI) and hospital characteristics associated with baseline or change in unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. We then estimated the percentage of avoided ASB treatment attributable to diagnostic (decrease in urine cultures ordered on asymptomatic patients) vs. antibiotic stewardship (decrease duration or avoidance of antibiotic treatment). Results Across 46 hospitals, there were 15,493 patients with a positive urine culture. Of 13,805 patients treated for a UTI, 23.2% (3,197) had ASB. The percentage of patients treated for UTI who had ASB declined over time from 29.0% (95% CI: 26.1%, 32.0%) to 16.9% (95% CI: 14.2%, 20.1%; aOR 0.94 per quarter, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96; Figure 1) with hospitals not belonging to a larger healthcare system having the largest decrease over time (Table 2). Neither the proportion of patients with ASB who were treated with antibiotics (P=0.07) nor the duration of therapy for ASB changed over time (P=0.09); thus, nearly all avoided antibiotic therapy for ASB appeared due to diagnostic stewardship. Conclusions Across 46 hospitals, there was a decrease over time in unnecessary treatment for ASB with independent hospitals improving most. Diagnostic stewardship appeared responsible for nearly all improvement. Disclosures Payal K. Patel, MD, MPH, Qiagen: Honoraria.

Background In 10/2019, revised ATS/IDSA community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines removed healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), expanding patients eligible for a 5-day antibiotic course. Using data from 46 hospitals in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, we quantified the impact of removing HCAP on antibiotic duration for CAP. Methods From 11/2017 to 1/2022, data were abstracted from medical records of adult non-ICU medical patients admitted with pneumonia. Our primary outcome was percentage of patients who received 5-days of antibiotics out of those who, under the new CAP guidelines would be eligible for 5-days (including patients defined as HCAP prior to the 2019 guideline) [Table 1]. We evaluated using Chi-square, if the effect of the guidelines differed for patients defined as CAP based on the 2007 CAP guideline (pCAP) vs. HCAP. To assess the effect of the new guideline on 5-day therapy, we used segmented logistic regression accounting for hospital level clustering to look at changes at baseline and overtime before and after 10/2019. Results When applying the 2019 CAP definition to 34,810 patients admitted with pneumonia over the entire period, 41.2% (N=14,358) of patients were eligible for 5-day duration. Applying pre-2019 categorization to the entire period, 46.4% of pCAP (N=10,565/22,757) and 31.5% of HCAP (N=3793/12,053) were eligible for 5-day duration. Of those 5-day eligible, 34.4% (N=4,936) received 5 days (pCAP 35.5% N=3750; HCAP 31.2% N=1186, P< .001). Before 10/2019, 29.5% (N=2,018) of patients with pCAP who were eligible received 5 days vs 23.6% (N=548) of HCAP (P< .001). Post 10/2019, 46.5% (N=1,732) of patients with pCAP eligible received 5 days vs 43.5% (N=638) of HCAP (P=0.049). The improvement rate in 5-day therapy decreased after 10/2019, with similar decrements for both pCAP and HCAP [Figure 1]. Conclusion Among patients hospitalized with pneumonia, two thirds received an excess antibiotic duration, with similar proportions for pCAP and HCAP. Prior to the new guidelines, the 5-day treatment rate was improving for HCAP and pCAP. However, the rate of improvement decreased after 10/2019 for both pCAP and HCAP, suggesting the 2019 guidelines did not have an added effect on improving antibiotic duration. Disclosures Valerie Vaughn, MD, MSc, Thermo Fisher Scientific: Honoraria.

Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common cause for hospitalization and antibiotic overuse. We aimed to improve antibiotic duration for CAP across 41 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium (HMS). Methods This prospective collaborative quality initiative included patients hospitalized with uncomplicated CAP who qualified for a 5-day antibiotic duration. Between 23 February 2017 and 5 February 2020, HMS targeted appropriate 5-day antibiotic treatment through benchmarking, sharing best practices, and pay-for-performance incentives. Changes in outcomes, including appropriate receipt of 5 ± 1–day antibiotic treatment and 30-day postdischarge composite adverse events (ie, deaths, readmissions, urgent visits, and antibiotic-associated adverse events), were assessed over time (per 3-month quarter), using logistic regression and controlling for hospital clustering. Results A total of 41 hospitals and 6553 patients were included. The percentage of patients treated with an appropriate 5 ± 1–day duration increased from 22.1% (predicted probability, 20.9% [95% confidence interval: 17.2%–25.0%]) to 45.9% (predicted probability, 43.9% [36.8%–51.2%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per quarter, 1.10 [1.07–1.14]). Thirty-day composite adverse events occurred in 18.5% of patients (1166 of 6319) and decreased over time (aOR per quarter, 0.98 [95% confidence interval: .96–.99]) owing to a decrease in antibiotic-associated adverse events (aOR per quarter, 0.91 [.87–.95]). Conclusions Across diverse hospitals, HMS participation was associated with more appropriate use of short-course therapy and fewer adverse events in hospitalized patients with uncomplicated CAP. Establishment of national or regional collaborative quality initiatives with data collection and benchmarking, sharing of best practices, and pay-for-performance incentives may improve antibiotic use and outcomes for patients hospitalized with uncomplicated CAP.

Of 100 patients discharged from short-stay units (SSUs) with antibiotics, 47 had a skin and soft-tissue infection, 22 had pneumonia, and 21 had a urinary tract infection. Among all discharge antibiotic prescriptions, 78% involved antibiotic overuse, most commonly excess duration (54 of 100) and guideline discordant selection (44 of 100).

Background:We sought to determine the incidence of community-onset and hospital-acquired coinfection in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to evaluate associated predictors and outcomes.Methods:In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to August 2020 across 38 Michigan hospitals, we assessed prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of community-onset and hospital-acquired coinfections. In-hospital and 60-day mortality, readmission, discharge to long-term care facility (LTCF), and mechanical ventilation duration were assessed for patients with versus without coinfection.Results:Of 2,205 patients with COVID-19, 141 (6.4%) had a coinfection: 3.0% community onset and 3.4% hospital acquired. Of patients without coinfection, 64.9% received antibiotics. Community-onset coinfection predictors included admission from an LTCF (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 2.34–6.76; P < .001) and admission to intensive care (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.87–6.55; P < .001). Hospital-acquired coinfection predictors included fever (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.15–5.27; P = .02) and advanced respiratory support (OR, 40.72; 95% CI, 13.49–122.93; P < .001). Patients with (vs without) community-onset coinfection had longer mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.67–6.56; P = .001) and higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.06–3.40; P = .03) and 60-day mortality (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05–3.29; P = .03). Patients with (vs without) hospital-acquired coinfection had higher discharge to LTCF (OR, 8.48; 95% CI, 3.30–21.76; P < .001), in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.37–7.33; P ≤ .001), and 60-day mortality (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.11–6.33; P ≤ .001).Conclusion:Despite community-onset and hospital-acquired coinfection being uncommon, most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 received antibiotics. Admission from LTCF and to ICU were associated with increased risk of community-onset coinfection. Future studies should prospectively validate predictors of COVID-19 coinfection to facilitate the reduction of antibiotic use.

Background Antibiotics are commonly prescribed to patients as they leave the hospital. We aimed to create a comprehensive metric to characterize antibiotic overuse after discharge among hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or urinary tract infection (UTI), and to determine whether overuse varied across hospitals and conditions. Methods In a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or UTI in 46 hospitals between 1 July 2017–30 July 2019, we quantified the proportion of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse, defined as unnecessary antibiotic use, excess antibiotic duration, or suboptimal fluoroquinolone use. Using linear regression, we assessed hospital-level associations between antibiotic overuse after discharge in patients treated for pneumonia versus a UTI. Results Of 21 825 patients treated for infection (12 445 with pneumonia; 9380 with a UTI), nearly half (49.1%) had antibiotic overuse after discharge (56.9% with pneumonia; 38.7% with a UTI). For pneumonia, 63.1% of overuse days after discharge were due to excess duration; for UTIs, 43.9% were due to treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The percentage of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse varied 5-fold among hospitals (from 15.9% [95% confidence interval, 8.7%–24.6%] to 80.6% [95% confidence interval, 69.4%–88.1%]) and was strongly correlated between conditions (regression coefficient = 0.85; P < .001). Conclusions Antibiotic overuse after discharge was common and varied widely between hospitals. Antibiotic overuse after discharge was associated between conditions, suggesting that the prescribing culture, physician behavior, or organizational processes contribute to overprescribing at discharge. Multifaceted efforts focusing on all 3 types of overuse and multiple conditions should be considered to improve antibiotic prescribing at discharge., Of 21 825 hospitalized patients with pneumonia or urinary tract infection in 46 hospitals, half (49.1%) had antibiotic overuse after discharge. Overuse varied 5-fold among hospitals (15.9%–80.6%) and was correlated between conditions. To improve prescribing, stewardship should include care transitions.

Objective:To evaluate whether incorporating mandatory prior authorization for Clostridioides difficile testing into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow could reduce testing in patients with alternative etiologies for diarrhea.Design:Single center, quasi-experimental before-and-after study.Setting:Tertiary-care, academic medical center in Ann Arbor, Michigan.Patients:Adult and pediatric patients admitted between September 11, 2019 and December 10, 2019 were included if they had an order placed for 1 of the following: (1) C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in patients hospitalized >72 hours and received laxatives, oral contrast, or initiated tube feeds within the prior 48 hours, (2) repeat molecular multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIPAN) testing, or (3) GIPAN testing in patients hospitalized >72 hours.Intervention:A best-practice alert prompting prior authorization by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for EIA or GIPAN testing was implemented. Approval required the provider to page the ASP pharmacist and discuss rationale for testing. The provider could not proceed with the order if ASP approval was not obtained.Results:An average of 2.5 requests per day were received over the 3-month intervention period. The weekly rate of EIA and GIPAN orders per 1,000 patient days decreased significantly from 6.05 ± 0.94 to 4.87 ± 0.78 (IRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56–0.93; P = .010) and from 1.72 ± 0.37 to 0.89 ± 0.29 (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37–0.77; P = .001), respectively.Conclusions:We identified an efficient, effective C. difficile and GIPAN diagnostic stewardship approval model.

Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines defines febrile neutropenia (FN) patients as high risk, if they have an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤100 cells/µL anticipated to last7 days. However, data evaluating the clinical significance of the depth and duration of neutropenia are limited.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric oncology patients presenting with FN to examine whether the effects of the depth and duration of neutropenia prior to presentation were predictive of blood stream infection (BSI), invasive fungal disease (IFD), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission or length of stay.A total of 585 FN episodes (FNEs) were identified in 265 patients. ANC at the time of presentation was100 in 411 (70%), 100-500 in 119 (20%), and500 cells/μL with subsequent decline to500 cells/μL in the next 48 hours in 55 (10%) of FNEs. In the group with ANC500 with subsequent decline in 48 hours, rates of IFD and BSI were higher when compared with ANC100 cells/μL [odds ratio (OR) = 5.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-29.6] and (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 01.02-5.4), and patients in this group were more likely to be admitted to the PICU (OR= 5.1, 95% CI: 1.134-19.46). No difference in outcomes was identified when the groups of ANC100 and ANC of 100-500 cells/μL were compared. Neutropenia7 days prior to FNE was an independent risk factor for BSI (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.55-5.35 and increased length of stay.Clinicians should not be reassured when patients present with FN and initial ANC500 cells/mL after recent chemotherapy if continued decline is expected as patients in this group are at high risk of IFD, BSI and PICU admission.

Most studies of children with prolonged fever and neutropenia (PFN) have focused on invasive fungal disease (IFD) as the etiology of fever and not on other causes. Data are lacking regarding risk factors and adverse outcomes in pediatric cancer patients with PFN compared with those whose fevers resolve more rapidly. Retrospective medical record review was performed for all cancer patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) in the pediatric oncology unit at University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children’s Hospital from March 2009 to July 2016. Resolving febrile neutropenia (RFN), lasting less than 96 hours, and PFN episodes (≥ 96 hours) were compared to identify risk factors and outcomes associated with PFN. A total of 572 FN episodes were identified in 265 patients. PFN occurred in 119 (21%) FN episodes (50 patients) and RFN occurred in 453 (79%) FN episodes (215 patients). In multivariable analysis, autologous stem cell transplant (odds ratio [OR] 6.5, P 39°C at the time of presentation (OR 2.4, P

Background:Asynchronous virtual patient care is increasingly used; however, the effectiveness of virtually delivering guideline-concordant care in conjunction with antibiotic stewardship initiatives remains uncertain. We developed a bundled stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic use in E-visits for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).Methods:In this before-and-after study, adult patients who completed E-visits for “cough,” “flu,” or “sinus symptoms” at Michigan Medicine between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020, were included. Patient demographics, diagnoses, and antibiotic details were collected. The multifaceted intervention occurred over 6 months. Segmented linear regression was performed to estimate the effect of the intervention on appropriate antibiotic use for URTI diagnoses (defined as no antibiotic prescribed) and sinusitis (defined as guideline-concordant antibiotic selection and duration). Regression lines were fit to data before the bundled intervention (January 2019) and after the bundled intervention (May 2019).Results:In total, 5,151 E-visits were included. The intervention decreased the number of visits for flu, cough, or sinus symptoms prescribed antibiotics from 43.2% to 28.9% (P < .001). Guideline concordance of antibiotic prescriptions improved following the intervention: first-line amoxicillin-clavulanate rose from 37.9% of prescriptions to 66.1% of prescriptions (P < .001), second-line doxycycline rose from 13.8% to 22.7% (P < .001); and median duration of antibiotics decreased from 10 days to 5 days (P < .001).Conclusions:A multifaceted stewardship bundle for E-visits involving both changes in the EMR and audit and feedback improved guideline-concordant antibiotic use for URTIs. This approach can aid stewardship efforts in the ambulatory care setting with regard to telemedicine.

Background Strategies to optimize antibiotic prescribing at discharge are not well understood. Methods In fall 2019, we surveyed 39 Michigan hospitals on their antibiotic stewardship strategies. The association of reported strategies with discharge antibiotic overuse (unnecessary, excess, suboptimal fluoroquinolones) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI) was evaluated in 2 ways: (1) all strategies assumed equal weight and (2) strategies were weighted based on the ROAD (Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics at Discharge) Home Framework (ie, Tier 1—Critical infrastructure, Tier 2—Broad inpatient interventions, Tier 3—Discharge-specific strategies) with Tier 3 strategies receiving the highest weight. Results Between 1 July 2017 and 30 July 2019, 39 hospitals with 20 444 patients (56.5% CAP; 43.5% UTI) were included. Survey response was 100%. Hospitals reported a median (interquartile range [IQR]) 12 (9–14) of 34 possible stewardship strategies. On analyses of individual stewardship strategies, the Tier 3 intervention, review of antibiotics prior to discharge, was the only strategy consistently associated with lower antibiotic overuse at discharge (adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR] 0.543, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .335–.878). On multivariable analysis, weighting by ROAD Home tier predicted antibiotic overuse at discharge for both CAP and UTI. For diseases combined, having more weighted strategies was associated with lower antibiotic overuse at discharge (aIRR 0.957, 95% CI: .927–.987, per weighted intervention); discharge-specific stewardship strategies were associated with a 12.4% relative decrease in antibiotic overuse days at discharge. Conclusions The more stewardship strategies a hospital reported, the lower its antibiotic overuse at discharge. However, Tier 3, or discharge-specific strategies, appeared to have the largest effect on antibiotic prescribing at discharge.

ObjectiveTo describe patient characteristics, symptoms, patterns of care and outcomes for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Michigan.DesignMulticentre retrospective cohort study.Setting32 acute care hospitals in the state of Michigan.ParticipantsPatients discharged (16 March–11 May 2020) with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were identified. Trained abstractors collected demographic information on all patients and detailed clinical data on a subset of COVID-19-positive patients.Primary outcome measurementsPatient characteristics, treatment and outcomes including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mortality and venous thromboembolism within and across hospitals.ResultsDemographic-only data from 1593 COVID-19-positive and 1259 persons under investigation discharges were collected. Among 1024 cases with detailed data, the median age was 63 years; median body mass index was 30.6; and 51.4% were black. Cough, fever and shortness of breath were the top symptoms. 37.2% reported a known COVID-19 contact; 7.0% were healthcare workers; and 16.1% presented from congregated living facilities.During hospitalisation, 232 (22.7%) patients were treated in an intensive care unit (ICU); 558 (54.9%) in a ‘cohorted’ unit; 161 (15.7%) received mechanical ventilation; and 90 (8.8%) received high-flow nasal cannula. ICU patients more often received hydroxychloroquine (66% vs 46%), corticosteroids (34% vs 18%) and antibiotic therapy (92% vs 71%) than general ward patients (pAcross 14 hospitals, the proportion of patients admitted directly to an ICU ranged from 0% to 43.8%; mechanical ventilation on admission from 0% to 12.8%; mortality from 7.9% to 45.7%. Use of at least one COVID-19-specific therapy varied from 32% to 96.3% across sites.ConclusionsDuring the early days of the Michigan outbreak of COVID-19, patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes varied widely within and across hospitals.

Background:Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently used to deliver intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy after discharge from the hospital. Infectious disease (ID) physicians are often consulted prior to PICC placement, but whether their approval influences PICC appropriateness and complications is not known. Methods: Using data from the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium (HMS) on PICCs placed in critically ill and hospitalized medical patients between January 1, 2015, and July 26, 2019, we examined the association between ID physician approval of PICC insertion for IV antibiotics and device appropriateness and outcomes. Appropriateness was defined according to the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) as a composite measure of (1) avoiding PICC use for durations ≤5 days; (2) using single-lumen instead of multilumen catheters; and (3) avoiding PICC use in patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR>45 mL/min). The associations between ID approval of PICC use and odds of PICC-related complications (eg, deep vein thrombosis, central-line–associated bloodstream infection, and catheter occlusion) were also assessed. Multivariable models adjusting for patient severity of illness and hospital-level clustering were fit to both outcomes. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Results: Data from 36,594 patients who underwent PICC placement across 42 Michigan hospitals were included in the analysis. In total, 21,653 (55%) PICCs were placed for the indication of IV antibiotics; 14,935 (69%) of these had a documented ID consultation prior to placement, whereas 6,718 (31%) did not. Of the 14,935 PICCs with an ID consultation, 10,238 (69%) had ID approval documented prior to device placement (Fig. 1). Compared to no approval, PICCs approved by ID prior to insertion were more likely to be appropriate (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 3.28–3.77; P < .001). Specifically, approval was associated with higher single-lumen use (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 4.72–5.58; P < .001), less placement of PICCs with dwell times ≤ 5 days (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25–0.32; P < .001), and less frequent use in patients with chronic kidney disease (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73–0.87; P < .001). ID approval of PICCs prior to insertion was associated with a significantly lower odds of PICC-related complications (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51–0.64) (Table 1). Conclusions: ID approval of PICC use for IV antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients was associated with greater appropriateness and fewer complications. Policies aimed at ensuring ID review prior to PICC use may help improve patient and device safety.Funding: NoneDisclosures:Valerie M. Vaughn reports contract research for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the NIH, the SHEA, and the APIC. She also reports fees from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Speaker’s Bureau, the CDC, the Pew Research Trust, Sepsis Alliance, and The Hospital and Health System Association of Pennsylvania.

Background: Nearly half of hospitalized patients with bacteriuria or treated for pneumonia receive unnecessary antibiotics (noninfectious or nonbacterial syndrome such as asymptomatic bacteriuria), excess duration (antibiotics prescribed for longer than necessary), or avoidable fluoroquinolones (safer alternative available) at hospital discharge.1–3 However, whether antibiotic overuse at discharge varies between hospitals or is associated with patient outcomes remains unknown. Methods: From July 2017 to December 2018, trained abstractors at 46 Michigan hospitals collected detailed data on a sample of adult, non–intensive care, hospitalized patients with bacteriuria (positive urine culture with or without symptoms) or treated for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP; includes those with the disease formerly known as healthcare-associated pneumonia [HCAP]). Antibiotic prescriptions at discharge were assessed for antibiotic overuse using a previously described, guideline-based hierarchical algorithm.3 Here, we report the proportion of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse by the hospital. We also assessed hospital-level correlation (using Pearson’s correlation coefficient) between antibiotic overuse at discharge for patients with bacteriuria and patients treated for CAP. Finally, we assessed the association of antibiotic overuse at discharge with patient outcomes (mortality, readmission, emergency department visit, and antibiotic-associated adverse events) at 30 days using logit generalized estimating equations adjusted for patient characteristics and probability of treatment. Results: Of 17,081 patients (7,207 with bacteriuria; 9,874 treated for pneumonia), nearly half (42.2%) had antibiotic overuse at discharge (36.3% bacteriuria and 51.1% pneumonia). The percentage of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse varied 5-fold among hospitals from 14.7% (95% CI, 8.0%–25.3%) to 74.3% (95% CI, 64.2%–83.8%). Hospital rates of antibiotic overuse at discharge were strongly correlated between bacteriuria and CAP (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, 0.76; P ≤ .001) (Fig. 1). In adjusted analyses, antibiotic overuse at discharge was not associated with death, readmission, emergency department visit, or Clostridioides difficile infection. However, each day of overuse was associated with a 5% increase in the odds of patient-reported antibiotic-associated adverse events after discharge (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Antibiotic overuse at discharge was common, varied widely between hospitals, and was associated with patient harm. Furthermore, antibiotic overuse at discharge was strongly correlated between 2 disparate diseases, suggesting that prescribing culture or discharge processes—rather than disease-specific factors—contribute to overprescribing at discharge. Thus, discharge stewardship may be needed to target multiple diseases.Funding: This study was supported by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network.Disclosures: Valerie M. Vaughn reports contracted research for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, the Department of VA, the NIH, the SHEA, and the APIC. She also reports receipt of funds from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Speaker’s Bureau, the CDC, the Pew Research Trust, Sepsis Alliance, and the Hospital and Health System Association of Pennsylvania.

The US burden of acute skin infections is substantial. While Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. are the most common causes, gram-negative bacteria and mixed infections can occur in some settings. These mixed infections are more likely to result in inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy. Important challenges remain in diagnosing and treating acute skin infections.

Background Current literature has demonstrated the utility of the MRSA nasal screen as a de-escalation tool to decrease unnecessary anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy. However, data on the applicability of this test in patients with hematologic malignancy is lacking. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without history of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), with pneumonia and MRSA nasal screening with respiratory cultures obtained. The primary outcome was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA nasal screen for MRSA pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of the MRSA nasal screen and prevalence of MRSA pneumonia. Results Of 98 patients with AML and pneumonia, the prevalence of MRSA pneumonia was 4.1% with confirmed positive MRSA respiratory cultures observed in 4 patient cases. In patients with confirmed MRSA pneumonia, 3 had positive MRSA nasal screens while 1 had a false negative result, possibly due to a long lag time (21 days) between MRSA nasal screen and pneumonia diagnosis. Overall, the MRSA nasal screen demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98.9%. Conclusions Given the low prevalence, empiric use of anti-MRSA therapy in those AML and HCT patients with pneumonia may not be warranted in clinically stable patients. For patients in whom empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics are initiated, nasal screening for MRSA may be utilized to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients with AML with or without HCT.

To address appropriateness of antibiotic use, we implemented an electronic framework to evaluate antibiotic “never events” (NEs) at 2 medical centers. Patient-level vancomycin administration records were classified as NEs or non-NEs. The objective framework allowed capture of true-positive vancomycin NEs in one-third of patients identified by the electronic strategy.

Key Points Question Is approval by an infectious disease physician prior to placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for intravenous antimicrobials associated with appropriate device use or complications? Findings In this cohort study of 21 653 PICCs placed for intravenous antimicrobials in 42 hospitals, 47% of PICCs were placed with approval of an infectious disease physician. Compared with nonapproved PICCs, approved PICCs were more likely to be appropriately placed, and the patients less likely to experience complications. Meaning This cohort study suggests that infectious disease physician approval of PICCs prior to placement for intravenous antimicrobial therapy is associated with more appropriate device use and fewer complications., Importance Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently used to deliver intravenous antimicrobial therapy. However, inappropriate PICC use may lead to patient harm. Objective To evaluate whether infectious disease physician approval prior to PICC placement for intravenous antimicrobials is associated with more appropriate device use and fewer complications. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of 21 653 PICCs placed for a primary indication of intravenous antimicrobial therapy between January 1, 2015, and July 26, 2019, was conducted in 42 hospitals participating in a quality collaborative across Michigan among hospitalized medical patients. Main Outcomes and Measures Appropriateness of PICCs was defined according to the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters as a composite measure of (1) single-lumen catheter use, (2) avoiding use of PICCs for 5 days or less, and (3) avoiding use of PICCs for patients with chronic kidney disease (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate, This cohort study evaluates whether infectious disease physician approval prior to placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for intravenous antimicrobials is associated with more appropriate device use and fewer complications.

Background Antibacterials may be initiated out of concern for bacterial coinfection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We determined prevalence and predictors of empiric antibacterial therapy and community-onset bacterial coinfections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods A randomly sampled cohort of 1705 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in 38 Michigan hospitals between 3/13/2020 and 6/18/2020. Data were collected on early (within 2 days of hospitalization) empiric antibacterial therapy and community-onset bacterial coinfections (positive microbiologic test ≤3 days). Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used to assess predictors. Results Of 1705 patients with COVID-19, 56.6% were prescribed early empiric antibacterial therapy; 3.5% (59/1705) had a confirmed community-onset bacterial infection. Across hospitals, early empiric antibacterial use varied from 27% to 84%. Patients were more likely to receive early empiric antibacterial therapy if they were older (adjusted rate ratio [ARR]: 1.04 [1.00–1.08] per 10 years); had a lower body mass index (ARR: 0.99 [0.99–1.00] per kg/m2), more severe illness (eg, severe sepsis; ARR: 1.16 [1.07–1.27]), a lobar infiltrate (ARR: 1.21 [1.04–1.42]); or were admitted to a for-profit hospital (ARR: 1.30 [1.15–1.47]). Over time, COVID-19 test turnaround time (returned ≤1 day in March [54.2%, 461/850] vs April [85.2%, 628/737], P < .001) and empiric antibacterial use (ARR: 0.71 [0.63–0.81] April vs March) decreased. Conclusions The prevalence of confirmed community-onset bacterial coinfections was low. Despite this, half of patients received early empiric antibacterial therapy. Antibacterial use varied widely by hospital. Reducing COVID-19 test turnaround time and supporting stewardship could improve antibacterial use.

BackgroundSevere COVID-19 can manifest in rapid decompensation and respiratory failure with elevated inflammatory markers. This presentation is consistent with cytokine release syndrome in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, for which IL-6 blockade is approved treatment.MethodsWe assessed effectiveness and safety of IL-6 blockade with tocilizumab in a single-center cohort of patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The primary endpoint was survival probability post-intubation; secondary analyses included an ordinal illness severity scale integrating superinfections. Outcomes in patients who received tocilizumab compared to tocilizumab-untreated controls were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression with propensity score inverse probability weighting (IPTW).Findings154 patients were included, of whom 78 received tocilizumab and 76 did not. Median follow-up was 47 days (range 28-67). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although tocilizumab-treated patients were younger (mean 55 vs. 60 years), less likely to have chronic pulmonary disease (10% vs. 28%), and had lower D-dimer values at time of intubation (median 2.4 vs. 6.5 mg/dL). In IPTW-adjusted models, tocilizumab was associated with a 45% reduction in hazard of death [hazard ratio 0.55 (95% CI 0.33, 0.90)] and improved status on the ordinal outcome scale [odds ratio per 1-level increase: 0.59 (0.36, 0.95)]. Though tocilizumab was associated with an increased proportion of patients with superinfections (54% vs. 26%; pInterpretationIn this cohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased likelihood of death despite higher superinfection occurrence. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to confirm these findings.KEY POINTSQuestionCan therapy with the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab improve outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 illness requiring mechanical ventilation?FindingsIn this observational, controlled study of 154 patients, receipt of tocilizumab was associated with a 45% reduction in the hazard of death, despite twice the frequency of superinfection (54% vs 26%), both of which were statistically significant findings.MeaningTocilizumab therapy may improve survival in patients with COVID-19 illness requiring mechanical ventilation. These results can inform clinical practice pending the results of randomized clinical trials.

To evaluate whether incorporating mandatory prior authorization for Clostridioides difficile testing into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow could reduce testing in patients with alternative etiologies for diarrhea.Single center, quasi-experimental before-and-after study.Tertiary-care, academic medical center in Ann Arbor, Michigan.Adult and pediatric patients admitted between September 11, 2019 and December 10, 2019 were included if they had an order placed for 1 of the following: (1) C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in patients hospitalized72 hours and received laxatives, oral contrast, or initiated tube feeds within the prior 48 hours, (2) repeat molecular multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIPAN) testing, or (3) GIPAN testing in patients hospitalized72 hours.A best-practice alert prompting prior authorization by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for EIA or GIPAN testing was implemented. Approval required the provider to page the ASP pharmacist and discuss rationale for testing. The provider could not proceed with the order if ASP approval was not obtained.An average of 2.5 requests per day were received over the 3-month intervention period. The weekly rate of EIA and GIPAN orders per 1,000 patient days decreased significantly from 6.05 ± 0.94 to 4.87 ± 0.78 (IRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.93; P = .010) and from 1.72 ± 0.37 to 0.89 ± 0.29 (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.77; P = .001), respectively.We identified an efficient, effective C. difficile and GIPAN diagnostic stewardship approval model.

In a 2016 survey of 46 Michigan hospitals, we identified four key needs for antibiotic stewardship: clinically-relevant antibiotic data, monitoring compliance, syndrome-specific interventions, and discharge stewardship. A stewardship initiative now addresses these needs within the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

There has been a worldwide increase in infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, a carbapenem antibiotic and novel boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor, is a fixed-dose combination product with potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae that are Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in two Phase III trials, Targeting Antibiotic Non-susceptible Gram-negative Organisms (TANGO)-I and TANGO-II. TANGO-I was a multicenter, international Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis. Among patients with complicated urinary tract infection and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam was determined to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam based on the composite outcome of symptom improvement or resolution and microbial eradication at the end of intravenous therapy. TANGO-II was a multicenter, international, Phase III, randomized, prospective, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam vs best available therapy for CRE infections. Treatment with meropenem-vaborbactam resulted in higher rates of clinical cure at the end of therapy (64.3%vs 33.3%, P=0.04). Additionally, 28-day all-cause mortality was 17.9% in the meropenem-vaborbactam group compared to 33.3% in the best available therapy group, a relative risk reduction of 46.5% (P=0.03). In addition to meropenem-vaborbactam, three other agents with activity against CRE are in late-stage development: imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. The data from Phase II and III studies will help to further define the role of these agents. Overall, the recent approval of meropenem-vaborbactam and the active pipeline for other agents with broad Gram-negative activity are encouraging developments on the CRE therapeutic front.

Background Asynchronous virtual patient care is growing in popularity; however, the effectiveness of virtually delivering guideline-concordant care in conjunction with antibiotic stewardship initiatives remains uncertain. We developed a bundled stewardship intervention aimed at improving antibiotic use in E-visits for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Methods In this pre-post study, adult patients who completed an E-visit for “cough,” “flu,” or “sinus symptoms” at Michigan Medicine between 1/1/2018 and 9/30/2020 were included. Patient demographics, diagnoses, and antibiotic details were collected. The multi-faceted intervention occurred over 6 months (Figure 1). We performed segmented linear regression to estimate the effect of the intervention on the level and trend of appropriate antibiotic use for URTI diagnosis (defined as no antibiotic prescribed) and sinusitis (defined as guideline-concordant antibiotic selection and duration). Regression lines were fit to data before (March 2019) and after (May 2019) the physician championing period. Results Among 5151 E-visits, the mean age was 46 years old, and most patients were female (71.3%, N=3674). 3405/5151 E-visits were for URTI. Inappropriate antibiotic use for URTI was stable in trend prior to the audit and feedback intervention (Figure 2), followed by a 12% (P-value = 0.01) decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use post-intervention. The trend in inappropriate antibiotic use continued to decrease after the intervention by 1.1%/month (P-value = 0.02) (Figure 2a). Of 2493/5151 E-visits specifically for sinus symptoms, guideline-concordant antibiotic use was low (intercept = 8%) pre-intervention (Figure 2b). Post-intervention, there was an estimated 47% increase (P-value < 0.001) in patients receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics. Solid line represents time of the webinar, dashed line represents time of modified questionnaire roll out and electronic medical record “nudges”, and shaded area is time of physician champion intervention. Guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for sinusitis included amoxicillin/clavulanate or doxycycline prescribed for a duration of 5-7 days Conclusion A multifaceted stewardship bundle for E-visits improved guideline-concordant antibiotic use for URTIs. Changes implemented in the EMR are most beneficial after a period of audit and feedback. This approach can aid stewardship efforts in the ambulatory care setting particularly with regards to telemedicine. Disclosures Tejal N. Gandhi, MD, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Lindsay A. Petty, MD, Nothing to disclose

Background Antibiotic therapy has no known benefit against COVID-19, but is often initiated out of concern for concomitant bacterial infection. We sought to determine how common early empiric antibiotic therapy and community-onset bacterial co-infections are in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods In this multi-center cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 discharged from 32 Michigan hospitals during the COVID-19 Michigan surge, we describe the use of early empiric antibiotic therapy (within the first two days) and prevalence of community-onset bacterial co-infection. Additionally, we assessed patient and hospital predictors of early empiric antibiotic using poison generalized estimating equation models. Results Between 3/10/2020 and 5/10/2020, data were collected on 951 COVID-19 PCR positive patients. Patient characteristics are described in Table 1. Nearly two thirds (62.4%, 593/951) of COVID-19 positive patients were prescribed early empiric antibiotic therapy, most of which (66.2%, 393/593) was directed at community-acquired pathogens. Across hospitals, the proportion of COVID-19 patients prescribed early empiric antibiotics varied from 40% to 90% (Figure 1). On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive early empiric antibiotic therapy if they were older (adjusted rate ratio [ARR]: 1.01 [1.00–1.01] per year), required respiratory support (e.g., low flow oxygen, ARR: 1.16 [1.04–1.29]), had signs of a bacterial infection (e.g., lobar infiltrate, ARR: 1.17 [1.02–1.34]), or were admitted to a for-profit hospital (ARR: 1.27 [1.11–1.45]); patients admitted later were less likely to receive empiric antibiotics (April vs. March, ARR: 0.72 [0.62–0.84], Table 2). Community-onset bacterial co-infections were identified in 4.5% (43/951) of COVID-19 positive patients (2.4% [23/951] positive blood culture; 1.9% [18/951] positive respiratory culture). Conclusion Despite low prevalence of community-onset bacterial co-infections, patients hospitalized with COVID-19 often received early empiric antibiotic therapy. Given the potential harms from unnecessary antibiotic use, including additional personal protective equipment to administer antibiotics, judicious antibiotic use is key in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Disclosures Tejal N. Gandhi, MD, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Grant/Research Support) Scott A. Flanders, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Research Grant or Support)Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Research Grant or Support)

Background Antibiotic use is commonly tracked electronically by antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Traditionally, evaluating the appropriateness of antibiotic use requires time- and labor-intensive manual review of each drug order. A drug-specific “appropriateness” algorithm applied electronically would improve the efficiency of ASPs. We thus created an antibiotic “never event” (NE) algorithm to evaluate vancomycin use, and sought to determine the performance characteristics of the electronic data capture strategy. Methods An antibiotic NE algorithm was developed to characterize vancomycin use (Figure) at a large academic institution (1/2016–8/2019). Patients were electronically classified according to the NE algorithm using data abstracted from their electronic health record. Type 1 NEs, defined as continued use of vancomycin after a vancomycin non-susceptible pathogen was identified, were the focus of this analysis. Type 1 NEs identified by automated data capture were reviewed manually for accuracy by either an infectious diseases (ID) physician or an ID pharmacist. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the electronic data capture was determined. Antibiotic Never Event (NE) Algorithm to Characterize Vancomycin Use Results A total of 38,774 unique cases of vancomycin use were available for screening. Of these, 0.6% (n=225) had a vancomycin non-susceptible pathogen identified, and 12.4% (28/225) were classified as a Type 1 NE by automated data capture. All 28 cases included vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (VRE). Upon manual review, 11 cases were determined to be true positives resulting in a PPV of 39.3%. Reasons for the 17 false positives are given in Table 1. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) due to VRE in scenarios where vancomycin was being appropriately used to treat a concomitant vancomycin-susceptible infection was the most common reason for false positivity, accounting for 64.7% of false positive cases. After removing urine culture source (n=15) from the algorithm, PPV improved to 53.8%. Conclusion An automated vancomycin NE algorithm identified 28 Type 1 NEs with a PPV of 39%. ASB was the most common cause of false positivity and removing urine culture as a source from the algorithm improved PPV. Future directions include evaluating Type 2 NEs (Figure) and prospective, real-time application of the algorithm. Disclosures Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Merck and Co. (Grant/Research Support)

Background: Clinicians often diagnose bacterial infections such as urinary tract infection (UTI) and pneumonia in patients who are asymptomatic or have nonbacterial causes of their symptoms. Misdiagnosis of infection leads to unnecessary antibiotic use and potentially delays correct diagnoses. Interventions to improve diagnosis often focus on infections separately. However, if misdiagnosis is linked, broader interventions to improve diagnosis may be more effective. Thus, we assessed whether misdiagnosis of UTI and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was correlated. Methods: From July 2017 to July 2019, abstractors at 46 Michigan hospitals collected data on a sample of adult, non–intensive care, hospitalized patients with bacteriuria (positive urine culture) or who were treated for presumed CAP (discharge diagnosis plus antibiotics). Patients with concomitant bacterial infections were excluded. Using a previously described method,1,2 patients were assessed for UTI or CAP based on symptoms, signs, and laboratory or radiology findings. Misdiagnosis of UTI was defined as patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treated with antibiotics number of patients with bacteriuria Misdiagnosis of CAP was defined as patients treated for presumed CAP who did not have CAP number of patients treated for presumed CAP. Hospital-level correlation was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between misdiagnosis of UTI and CAP. For patients with prescriber data (N = 3,293), we also assessed emergency department (ED)-level correlation. Results: Of 11,914 patients with bacteriuria, 31.9% (N = 3,796) had ASB. Of those, 2,973 of 3,796 (78.3%) received antibiotics. Of 14,085 patients treated for CAP, 1,602 (11.4%) did not have CAP. Incidence of misdiagnosis varied by hospital: those with high rates of misdiagnosis of UTI were more likely to have high rates of misdiagnosis of CAP (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, 0.58; P ≤ .001) (Fig. 1). Of 2,137 patients misdiagnosed with UTI, 1,159 (54.2%) had antibiotic treatment started in the ED; of those, 942 (81.3%) remained on antibiotics on day 3 of hospitalization. Of 1,156 patients misdiagnosed with CAP, 871 (75.3%) had antibiotic therapy started in the ED, and 789 of these 871 patients (90.6%) were still on antibiotics on day 3 of hospitalization. Hospitals with high rates of UTI misdiagnosis in the ED were more likely to have high rates of CAP misdiagnosis in the ED (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, 0.33; P ≤ .001). Conclusions: Misdiagnosis of 2 unrelated infections was moderately correlated by hospital and weakly correlated by hospital ED. Potential causes include differences in organizational culture (eg, low tolerance for diagnostic uncertainty, emergency department culture), organizational initiatives (eg, sepsis, stewardship), or coordination between emergency and hospital medicine. Additionally, antibiotics initiated in the ED were typically continued following admission, potentially reflecting diagnosis momentum.Funding: This work was supported by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network.Disclosures: Valerie M. Vaughn reports contract research for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the NIH, the SHEA, and the APIC. She also reports fees from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Speaker’s Bureau, the CDC, the Pew Research Trust, Sepsis Alliance, and The Hospital and Health System Association of Pennsylvania.

Background Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clinical trials, but its clinical significance is incompletely understood. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia who achieved clinical cure. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and death were compared between patients with persistent growth of the index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure). Results Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure. Prevalences of comorbidities, ventilator dependence, and severity of acute illness were similar between groups. Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher rates of recurrent pneumonia or death following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions, severity of acute illness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, intensive care unit placement, tracheostomy dependence, and immunocompromised status (90-day multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–2.35). This association was observed among patients with pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus (90-day multivariable adjusted OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.73–7.90). A trend was observed among pneumonias caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, but not Enterobacteriaceae or other pathogens. Conclusions Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associated with recurrent pneumonia or death among patients with bacterial pneumonia following clinical cure. Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to guide therapeutic interventions for patients with bacterial pneumonia.

Cobicistat is a pharmacokinetic booster in several fixed-dose combination products for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. As a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes, significant drug-drug interactions are expected between cobicistat and medications that are metabolized primarily through the CYP3A pathway, including calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., tacrolimus and cyclosporine). We describe a case of tacrolimus toxicity due to supratherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations when Stribild (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) was initiated for newly diagnosed HIV infection in a 50-year-old renal transplant recipient who was previously receiving a stable tacrolimus regimen. Drug-drug interaction via CYP3A inhibition was acknowledged, and weekly labs were ordered to allow for close monitoring of renal function and tacrolimus serum concentrations as recommended by Stribild prescribing information. The patient reported headache, insomnia, stomachache, and decreased urine output within 1 week of starting Stribild and was found to have acute kidney injury (serum creatinine [Scr ]concentration increasing from 1.5-2.3 mg/dl) and a serum tacrolimus concentration of 111.2 ng/ml at 1 week follow-up (goal trough level 4-6 ng/ml). Both tacrolimus and Stribild were withheld. In 15 days, the patient's tacrolimus serum concentration returned to goal. In the interim, he required twice/week clinic visits for laboratory assessments and an emergency department visit for management of hyperkalemia (potassium 6.5 mEq/L). Triumeq (abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine) was started about 4 weeks later after Scr returned to baseline, and his tacrolimus serum trough concentrations subsequently remained stable. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the extent, significance, and onset of cobicistat and tacrolimus drug-drug interaction in clinical practice. As more fixed-dose combination products including cobicistat as a pharmacokinetic booster come to market, clinicians should be reminded of its multitude of clinically significant drug-drug interactions.

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend collecting blood cultures for the first 3 days of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the clinically stable oncology patient with persistent fevers. Nonetheless, many physicians send daily blood cultures beyond 3 days, and the impact of that practice is uncertain. Procedure We reviewed pediatric FN episodes from July 2009 to May 2014 at University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital. For each positive culture, we determined if it was a pathogen or a contaminant. We reviewed episode and patient demographics to identify risk factors for subsequent positive blood cultures in the setting of an initially negative culture. Results We identified 381 episodes of FN in 162 patients. Of those, 87 had a positive blood culture on day 1 (21.0% incidence of bacteremia). Of 294 episodes with a negative blood culture on day 1, six (2.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–3.67) had a positive culture after day 3. Of those, three were pathogens (1.02%, 95%CI –0.14 to 2.18), and only one was found in a hemodynamically stable patient (0.34%, 95%CI –0.33 to 1.01) with new mucositis. In the other two patients, Escherichia coli was isolated from blood cultures after day 10 in the setting of significant hemodynamic changes. Risk factor analysis performed in stable patients yielded nonsignificant results. Conclusions Of 294 FN episodes with an initial negative blood culture, only one episode of bacteremia occurred without hemodynamic changes past day 3, supporting the IDSA guidelines to discontinue blood cultures in stable FN patients after day 3.

Key Clinical Message Disseminated histoplasmosis and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis show overlapping features, which require careful contextual interpretation. Histopathologic evaluation can potentially rapidly identify cases of possible histoplasmosis. A high index of clinical suspicion, particularly in endemic areas and in a setting of immunosuppression, is critical to appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Background Contemporary strategies can be leveraged to predict antimicrobial overuse, yet little information is gained on the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed. Classifying appropriateness is complicated by the lack of a standard definition for appropriateness. Thus, we created and implemented a novel ‘antibiotic never event’ (NE) framework to systematically classify the most inappropriate usages of vancomycin and correlated these NE to abnormal consumption trends (i.e., antibiotic outbreaks). Methods Vancomycin use was categorized by an algorithm using data query from the electronic medical records. Extracted data included vancomycin use, relevant patient demographics, and microbiological data. Electronic classifications placed each vancomycin therapy into type 1 (use for non-susceptible organism after susceptibility finalization) or type 2 (use exceeding 48h after susceptibility report when a safe de-escalation is possible) NE. Patients were categorized as cases or controls (no NE) at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NM) and Henry Ford Hospital (HF) between January 2014 and October 2017. A manual chart review was performed. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPEC), PPV, and NPV were calculated for NE prediction. Vancomycin use was quantified during the same period. Linear models with prediction intervals (PI) were generated to identify potential outbreaks, which were linked to monthly NE counts defined as a binary factor. Results A total of 220 NE cases were electronically identified for vancomycin at NM (n = 197) and HF (n = 23). Random cases were matched 1:1 (NM = 200) and 1:5 (HF = 115) to controls for manual review. At NM and HF, 35 and 24 true positives were identified, respectively. Thus, overall SEN and SPEC were 93.7% and 75.1% and PPV and NPV were 45.7% and 98.1%, respectively. Linear models revealed 11 potential outbreak periods at HF and 5 at NM. A PI of 80% showed a combined SEN below 10% and SPEC above 90%, respectively. Conclusion The methodology was generalizable across two centers. In the pilot review, our method was highly sensitive and an effective screening tool for NE identification. Antibiotic consumption trends did not correlate with NE. In summary, the NE classification was sensitive in assessment of antibiotic appropriateness, whereas consumption alone does not predict NE. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Most patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can be safely treated with 5 days of antibiotics, but many are not. We determined whether a hospitalist-collaborative can reduce excess antibiotic duration in patients with CAP through partnership with antibiotic stewardship teams (AST), data feedback, pay-for-performance, and sharing best practices. Methods From April 2017 to October 2018, abstractors collected data (medical record, phone calls 30-days post-discharge) on adult, non-ICU patients hospitalized with CAP at 43 hospitals in Michigan. We used a guideline-based algorithm1 to determine appropriate antibiotic duration based on patient factors (e.g., clinical stability). All hospitals received a) quarterly reports on appropriate 5-day treatment rates (2016—current), b) best practice recommendations (2017—current) including toolkit and webinar (3/2018), and c) pay-for-performance based on 5-day CAP metric (2018—current). Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate change over time in a) proportion of patients with CAP eligible for 5-day treatment who received 5 ± 1 days and, after adjusting for patient factors and weighting by inverse probability of treatment, b) patient outcomes 30-days post-discharge. Results Of 6,229 patients hospitalized with CAP, 4,769 (76.6%) were eligible for 5-days of antibiotic treatment; 283 (5.9%) were excluded due to inability to determine antibiotic duration. Between April 2017 and October 2018, the proportion of patients eligible for a 5-day duration of antibiotic treatment who received 5 ± 1 days increased from 19.8% (181/914) to 30.9% (207/670; P = 0.01), a relative improvement of 56.1% (Figure 1). During this time period, there were no changes in 30-day post-discharge death, readmission, emergency room visit, Clostridioides difficile infection, or provider-documented antibiotic-associated adverse-events (Table 1). However, there was a decrease (3.3% to 1.7%, P = 0.03 for change over time; relative reduction: 48.5%) in patient-reported antibiotic-associated adverse events (Figure 2). Conclusion A hospitalist collaborative partnering with AST can safely reduce excess antibiotic duration and antibiotic-associated adverse-events in hospitalized patients with CAP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Background Fluoroquinolones increase the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection and antibiotic resistance, but are frequently used for hospitalized patients with bacteriuria. We assessed patterns and predictors of inappropriate fluoroquinolone (FQ) use among hospitalized patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and cystitis. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of non-ICU medicine patients with ASB or cystitis (complicated or uncomplicated) from January 2018 to March 2019 at 43 Michigan hospitals. Patients with concomitant infections, bacteremia, or pyelonephritis were excluded. Each day of FQ (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) use (inpatient and post discharge) was assessed for appropriateness. FQ use was inappropriate if: (A) ASB, (B) urine culture with an FQ-resistant bacteria, (C) a safer alternative empiric or definitive antibiotic (treatment ≥2 days after urine culture collection) based on disease severity, cultures, allergies, and renal function, or (D) excess duration (>7 days complicated cystitis; >3 days uncomplicated cystitis). Hospitals were also surveyed on existing stewardship (ASP) practices targeting FQ use. ASP practices associated with inappropriate FQ use were evaluated using logistic generalized estimated equation models adjusting for patient factors and hospital clustering. Results Of 4849 included patients with ASB (39.7%) or cystitis (60.3%), 21.9% (n = 1,061) received an FQ and 92.7% (n = 984) received a, FQ inappropriately (Figure 1). Of 5,465 FQ days of therapy (DOT), 90.7% (n = 4,959) were inappropriate. Definitive treatment of complicated cystitis led to the greatest proportion of inappropriate FQ DOTs (50.6%), followed by ASB (36.4%) (Table 1). Hospitals varied (Figure 2), but those with cascade reporting of antibiotic susceptibilities, urinary tract infection (UTI) treatment guideline or an ASP performing prospective audit and feedback on FQ use had lower inappropriate FQ treatment rates (Table 2). Conclusion Hospitalized patients with ASB and cystitis often receive an FQ. Most FQ use is inappropriate due to ASB treatment or FQ use for complicated cystitis despite the option of an alternative antibiotic. Prospective audit and feedback, UTI guidelines, and cascade reporting of antibiotic susceptibilities can be used by ASP to reduce inappropriate FQ use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Antibiotics prescribed at hospital discharge account for half of antibiotic use related to hospitalization for urinary tract infection or bacterial pneumonia. It is unclear how much antibiotic use at discharge represents overuse, and thus, could potentially be improved through antibiotic stewardship. Methods From July 2017 to December 2018, trained abstractors at 46 Michigan hospitals collected detailed data on a sample of adult, nonintensive care, hospitalized patients with bacteriuria or treated for community-acquired or healthcare-associated pneumonia (discharge diagnosis of pneumonia plus antibiotic treatment). Antibiotic prescriptions at discharge were assessed for overuse using a guideline-based hierarchical algorithm: evaluating first for unnecessary antibiotics (noninfectious/nonbacterial syndrome), then excess duration (antibiotics needed, but prescribed for longer than necessary), and finally avoidable fluoroquinolones (safer alternative antibiotic available) (Figure 1). For each disease state, descriptive results are shown with comparisons by t- or Fisher’s exact tests. Results Of 17,157 patients (7,283 with bacteriuria; 9,874 treated for pneumonia), 30.1% of patients with bacteriuria had asymptomatic bacteriuria and 11.4% of patients treated for pneumonia did not meet diagnostic criteria for pneumonia. The most common antibiotics prescribed at discharge were fluoroquinolones. Nearly half (43.6%) of patients had antibiotic overuse at discharge (33.8% bacteriuria, 50.9% pneumonia), with a median 4 days of overuse after discharge (Table 1). For bacteriuria, 45.0% of overuse days at discharge were due to unnecessary antibiotics; for pneumonia, 61.2% were due to excess antibiotic duration (Figure 2). Patients with community-acquired pneumonia and those with sepsis on admission had the highest rates of antibiotic overuse at discharge (Table 2). Conclusion In the largest assessment of antibiotics at discharge to-date, antibiotic overuse at discharge was extremely common. Specific targets for discharge stewardship vary by disease state. Notably, interventions may be more effective at reducing fluoroquinolone prescribing at discharge indirectly by stopping treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria and reducing excess duration in pneumonia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

A 48-year-old man with a history of well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus infection and squamous cell cancer at the base of the tongue in remission presented to the Infectious Diseases Clinic with a lesion on his left hand. He reported noticing the lesion approximately 2 months prior to presentation. It began as a small nodule that slowly increased in size and later developed a central area of skin breakdown. He did not recall any trauma from around the time he first noticed the lesion. He denied any pain or drainage.

A 26-year-old man with a history of Crohn’s disease in remission presented to the Medical Intensive Care Unit with diarrhea, hematuria, left-sided pulmonary infiltrates, transaminitis, and rapid-onset respiratory failure with acute kidney injury. The patient was well until 7 days prior to admission, when he developed severe non-bloody diarrhea. Three days prior, he presented to an emergency department and was sent home after rehydration with normal saline with a reportedly normal chest x-ray. Two days prior, he presented to his primary care provider with continued diarrhea and fever to 39.4 °C, and he was sent home with antidiarrheal medications. One day prior, he returned to the emergency department with chest tightness, shortness of breath, and cough productive of dark sputum. He was found to have radiographic findings consistent with pneumonia. He also reported dark urine and anorexia, but he denied nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, rash, or dysuria.

Background Ambulatory visits for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) have doubled over the past decade and are one of the most common reasons for infection-related visits to outpatient clinics. However, there is limited data evaluating antibiotic prescribing in this population. We aimed to assess the management of SSTIs in adult patients in order to target interventions to improve antibiotic utilization and optimize outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included patients within a large academic healthcare system presenting to 38 clinics. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of a SSTI (ICD-10 for cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, and local SSTIs) in 2016. The primary outcome was to evaluate prescriber compliance to institutional guidelines based on antibiotic selection and duration of therapy. Patient allergies and culture results were used when determining compliance to first-line (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cutaneous abscess, or cephalexin +/- trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cellulitis and local SSTIs) and second-line recommendations (doxycycline for cutaneous abscess, or clindamycin for cellulitis and local SSTIs). Duration of therapy of 5–7 days was considered compliant. Results A total of 2,170 adult encounters for the treatment of SSTIs were included; 1,588 with cellulitis, 413 with local infection and 169 with cutaneous abscess. The overall compliance rate for appropriate therapy, including drug selection and duration, was 64.9% (see Figure 1). Unnecessarily long duration of therapy resulted in an extra 1,637 days of antibiotic therapy. Compliance with drug selection occurred more frequently with physicians (40.3%) compared with residents (33.9%) and Advanced Practice Providers (APP) (25.1%). Conclusion Compliance with an institutional SSTI guideline for antibiotic selection and duration of therapy is suboptimal in outpatient clinics. Stewardship interventions for SSTIs should target both drug selection and duration, and APPs as an important provider group in outpatient settings. Figure 1. Compliance Stratified by Infection Type Infection type Overall Compliance Compliance with Drug Selection Compliance with Duration of Therapy Cutaneous abscess 29% 55% 57% Cellulitis 78% 82% 60% Local infection of skin/soft tissue 16% 85% 60% Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Broad-spectrum (BS) antibiotics directed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are commonly used for health-care associated pneumonia (HCAP) treatment. Many patients with HCAP do not have a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of antibiotic de-escalation on clinical outcomes in patients with HCAP without a microbiological diagnosis. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of adult, non-ICU, medical patients hospitalized with HCAP between January 2016 and February 2018 at 46 Michigan hospitals. Exclusions included extrapulmonary infection, severe immune suppression, or clinical instability on day 4. Included patients: (1) lacked any positive culture (blood/sputum); (2) started on empiric anti-P. aeruginosa and anti-MRSA therapy by hospital day 2; (3) switched to a narrow-spectrum (NS) regimen (no anti-P. aeruginosa or anti-MRSA coverage) or maintained on BS antibiotics (anti-P. aeruginosa ± anti-MRSA) by therapy day 4 (Figure 1). Mortality, readmission, Clostridium difficile infection, and adverse events from antibiotics were compared between the BS and NS groups. Data were analyzed using logistic generalized estimating equation models and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Of 363 patients with HCAP included, 73 (20%) were switched to an NS regimen. Of 290 patients maintained on anti-PSA BS regimens, 47.6% also continued anti-MRSA therapy. The median age was 72 (IQR, 61–81) and Charlson comorbidity index was 4 (IQR, 2–6) of the entire cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between BS and NS groups, except more patients had chronic kidney disease in the BS group. On multivariable analysis, no other baseline factors were found to be associated with use of BS antibiotics on day 4. Both total and IV antibiotic duration were longer in the BS group (10 vs. 8 days, P = 0.002, and 4 vs. 3 days, P < 0.001, respectively). On adjusted analysis, there were no differences in patient outcomes (Figure 2). Conclusion Among patients with HCAP started on empiric MRSA and PSA coverage without microbiological diagnosis, clinical outcomes were similar in patients switched to an NS antibiotic and those maintained on BS antibiotics. Our findings suggest a potential role for antimicrobial stewardship in promoting antibiotic de-escalation in this population. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background The optimal treatment duration for uncomplicated SAB (U-SAB) is unknown in patients with hematologic malignancies. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of antibiotic duration on outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies and U-SAB. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with hematologic malignancies and U-SAB treated with standard (2 weeks) or prolonged (>2 weeks) antibiotic therapy. U-SAB was defined as defervescence and culture clearance within 96 hours of index culture and the absence of: endocarditis, implanted prostheses, metastatic sites of infection, and bone/joint involvement. Patients with SAB therapy Results Of 89 included patients, 51% received a standard antibiotic duration for U-SAB. The median age of the entire cohort was 56 and majority was male (60%). Neutropenia was present at index culture in 53% of patients, and acute leukemia (48%) and lymphoma (26%) were the most common underlying malignancies. Other baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except more patients in the standard duration group had relapsed/refractory malignancy (51% vs. 25%, P = 0.016), central-line source (71% vs. 48%, P = 0.032), and antibiotic prophylaxis prior to index SAB (42% vs. 18%, P = 0.021). Median duration of treatment in the standard group was 15 days vs. 28 days in the prolonged duration group. No differences in global clinical cure and other clinical outcomes were seen between groups (Figure 1). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only relapsed/refractory malignancy was identified as an independent predictor of global clinical failure (odds ratio, OR, 9.43; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.17–76.9; P = 0.035). Duration of treatment was not associated with global clinical cure (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 0.51–16.7; P = 0.23). Conclusion No differences in clinical outcomes were seen in patients with active hematologic malignancies who received 2 weeks vs. >2 weeks of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of U-SAB, although confirmation of our findings in a larger study is warranted. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Each year in the United States, ~97 million outpatient visits result in the prescription of an antibiotic. However, there is limited data describing prescribing practices for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in outpatient clinics. We aimed to describe the prescribing patterns for UTIs among varied provider groups and clinic subspecialties, in order to improve targeted interventions to improve antibiotic use. Methods This retrospective study included patients from January 2016 through December 2016 within a large academic healthcare system presenting to 30 clinics, including family medicine, general medicine, urology, geriatric, and OB/GYN. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of a lower tract UTI (ICD-10 codes for acute cystitis (N30) and cystitis with or without hematuria (N30.90–91). Exclusions included pregnancy, prophylaxis prior to urology procedure, antibiotics not prescribed, or antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients were categorized as complicated vs. uncomplicated based on additional ICD-10 codes for uncontrolled diabetes, urinary obstruction, flank pain, renal failure, gender, and receiving immunosuppression. Additionally, patient allergies were evaluated to assess adherence to guidelines (Figure 1). The primary objective was to describe prescriber compliance with institutional UTI guidelines for both drug selection and duration. Results From 30 clinics, 1,488 patient encounters for UTI were included. The overall compliance rate was 9.5% for appropriate drug selection and duration of therapy, with appropriate drug selection (22.8%) being much lower than appropriate duration (84.9%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics included trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (31.8%), FQs (23.2%) and nitrofurantoin (21.7%). Compliance rates varied widely between prescriber types (Figure 2). Figure 1. Michigan medicine guidelines for empiric outpatient UTI treatment. Figure 2. Prescribing compliance stratified by prescriber type. Conclusion Management of UTIs in outpatient clinics is suboptimal, and would benefit from antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Stewardship efforts in outpatient clinics should target both appropriate drug selection and duration, and de-emphasize FQ use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.