1. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate
- Author
-
Ling Xiu Ngui, Ing Ping Tang, Zhun Wieng Lai, and Narayanan Prepageran
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Distortion product ,Hearing loss ,Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ,Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ,Otoacoustic emission ,Audiology ,Congenital hearing loss ,Hearing screening ,03 medical and health sciences ,Neonatal Screening ,0302 clinical medicine ,030225 pediatrics ,Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,False Positive Reactions ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,business.industry ,Infant, Newborn ,General Medicine ,Audiometry, Evoked Response ,Auditory brainstem response ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Automated auditory brainstem response ,Female ,False positive rate ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Hospitals, High-Volume - Abstract
Congenital hearing loss is one of the commonest congenital anomalies. Neonatal hearing screening aims to detect congenital hearing loss early and provide prompt intervention for better speech and language development. The two recommended methods for neonatal hearing screening are otoacoustic emission (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR).To study the effectiveness of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) as first screening tool among non-risk newborns in a hospital with high delivery rate.A total of 722 non-risk newborns (1444 ears) were screened with both DPOAE and AABR prior to discharge within one month. Babies who failed AABR were rescreened with AABR ± diagnostic auditory brainstem response tests within one month of age.The pass rate for AABR (67.9%) was higher than DPOAE (50.1%). Both DPOAE and AABR pass rates improved significantly with increasing age (p-value0.001). The highest pass rate for both DPOAE and AABR were between the age of 36-48 h, 73.1% and 84.2% respectively. The mean testing time for AABR (13.54 min ± 7.47) was significantly longer than DPOAE (3.52 min ± 1.87), with a p-value of0.001.OAE test is faster and easier than AABR, but with higher false positive rate. The most ideal hearing screening protocol should be tailored according to different centre.
- Published
- 2019