Search

Relational ambivalence is conceptualized as having conflicting thoughts and feelings toward one’s partner or relationship. The current study explored how ambivalence about an ex-partner in a post-dissolution stage was associated with breakup distress as well as reconciliation. The moderating role of whether the relationship had previously cycled through breakups and renewals (on-off) or not (non-cyclical) was also examined. The 275 participants completed an initial survey following their most recent breakup (within the past 30 days) and up to five monthly surveys. Analyses showed cognitive and emotional ambivalence were associated with greater breakup distress and a greater likelihood of relationship renewal. Additionally, although cyclical partners had slightly greater emotional, but not cognitive, ambivalence toward their former partners, relationship type did not moderate the associations between ambivalence and breakup distress or reconciliation. The findings provide insights on how ambivalence could be incorporated into research on post-dissolution experiences.

Ample research suggests that uncertainty is a major concern for individuals undergoing genetic testing and for genetic mutation carriers, and that their management of uncertainty is largely influenced by healthcare providers, including genetic counselors (GCs). Indeed, uncertainty is inherent in genetic testing results. To help patients grapple with uncertainty, GCs need to effectively manage the uncertainty inherent in genetic testing and communicate it appropriately to patients. The present study aimed to identify GCs' strategies for managing uncertainty and communicating uncertainty to patients. Eighteen GCs participated in five focus group interviews, and the data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Findings indicated that GCs used three main strategies to manage uncertainty: becoming lifelong learners, normalizing uncertainty, and seeking social support. To communicate uncertainty to patients, GCs also used three different strategies: engaging in open and honest communication, adapting to patients' needs, and focusing on known information. The implications of these findings for uncertainty theories and for conceptual frameworks of GCs' clinical communication are discussed.

The current study explored whether individuals with certain relationship dispositions were more likely to be involved in on-again/off-again (on-off) relationships. A sample of 211 currently dating participants in either on-off or non-cyclical relationships completed an online survey about relationship dispositions (e.g., attachment, implicit beliefs) and positive and negative aspects of relational quality (e.g., satisfaction, commitment, disillusionment). Participants in on-off relationships did not differ from those in non-cyclical relationships with regard to relationship dispositions. Relationship type, however, moderated certain associations between relationship dispositions and relationship qualities showing that the dispositions played a weaker role in relational quality for on-off partners (e.g., the association between growth belief and disillusionment was strong and negative for non-cyclical partners but nonsignificant for on-off partners). Although it was theoretically and practically important to investigate individual differences, interaction dynamics within dyads could be a more prominent factor in explaining on-off relationships.

People who stutter (PWS) suffer from stereotypes portraying them as timid and anxious, which may affect their relationships and careers. One of the mechanisms for this stereotyping is the anchoring and adjustment heuristic, whereby individuals make judgements about PWS by using previous experiences for the initial judgement and then adjust accordingly. In the current study (n = 309) we replicate previous findings that individuals stereotype PWS by anchoring to experiences with episodic stuttering and adjusting toward typical non-stuttering individuals, although insufficiently. We extend this finding by testing whether trait perspective-taking and need for cognition moderate this relationship. The results show that trait perspective-taking decreases stereotyping of non-PWS, while having no effect on PWS stereotyping. However, need for cognition exhibited no consistent moderating effect on stereotyping.

Receiving a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) result is quite common for individuals who undergo genetic testing. Because VUS results are often unexpected and necessarily complex, they are challenging for genetic counselors to deliver. The current research sought to examine how three specific message features (risk estimate formats, establishment of a future plan, and linguistic agency), and message receivers' intolerance of uncertainty, influenced the effectiveness of genetic counselors' communication of a VUS result. A series of MANCOVAs and multiple regressions suggested that these message features affected message receivers' perception of a genetic counselor's credibility and receivers' uncertainty appraisal and information-seeking intentions. Specifically, establishing a future plan and assigning agency to a VUS result enhanced perceived counselor credibility. When results were presented in a numeric format, assigning agency to counselors resulted in heightened danger appraisal and greater information-seeking intentions. Individuals' intolerance of uncertainty moderated the association between risk formats and uncertainty appraisal. These results have both theoretical and practical implications for communication of uncertainty in the context of genetic counseling.

JSPR-19-331.R2_Supplementary_Materials for Post-dissolution ambivalence, breakup adjustment, and relationship reconciliation by René M. Dailey, Lingzi Zhong, Rudy Pett and Sarah Varga in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Within a meaning-centered framework that integrates theories of strategic communication, political myth and the Encoding-Decoding model, this research examines the Chinese government’s rhetoric and English news media’s interpretations surrounding the Chinese Dream campaign. Findings show that English news media made largely oppositional readings, in contrast to the meanings encoded by the Chinese government. The research proposes that this was caused by the inherent tensions in China’s rhetoric, the top-down approach of propaganda, and the anticommunism ideology of the Western media, among others. This research provides an empirical case to illustrate Hallahan et al.’s (2007) proposition that meaning and influence are two fundamental emphases of strategic communication. It also provides an operational framework for analysis of political myth, which consists of four constructs, namely ways meaning is created, meaning created, meaning interpreted, and power relations manifested.