Search

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study assessed the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe administered with lovastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia. After dietary stabilization, a 2- to 12-week washout period, and a 4-week single-blind placebo lead-in period, 548 patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or =145 mg/dl (3.75 mmol/L) and < or =250 mg/dl (6.47 mmol/L) and triglycerides < or =350 mg/dl (3.99 mmol/L) were randomized to one of the following, administered daily for 12 weeks: ezetimibe 10 mg; lovastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg; or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was percentage decrease in direct LDL cholesterol from baseline to end point for pooled ezetimibe plus lovastatin versus pooled lovastatin alone. Ezetimibe plus lovastatin significantly improved concentrations of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with lovastatin alone (p <0.01). The coadministration of ezetimibe provided an incremental 14% LDL cholesterol decrease, a 5% HDL cholesterol increase, and a 10% decrease in triglycerides compared with pooled lovastatin alone. Ezetimibe plus lovastatin provided mean LDL cholesterol decreases of 33% to 45%, median triglyceride decreases of 19% to 27%, and mean HDL cholesterol increases of 8% to 9%, depending on the statin dose. The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg plus the starting dose of lovastatin (10 mg) provided comparable efficacy to high-dose lovastatin (40 mg) across the lipid profile (LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides). Ezetimibe plus lovastatin was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to both lovastatin alone and placebo. The coadministration of ezetimibe and lovastatin may offer a new treatment option in lipid management of patients with hypercholesterolemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe administered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.Background: Despite the availability of statins, many patients do not achieve lipid targets. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering agents that act via a complementary pathway may allow additional patients to achieve recommended cholesterol goals.Methods: After dietary stabilization, a 2- to 12-week washout period, and a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =145 mg/dl to < or =250 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) < or =350 mg/dl were randomized to one of the following 10 groups administered daily for 12 consecutive weeks: ezetimibe 10 mg; simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was percentage reduction from baseline to end point in direct LDL-C for the pooled ezetimibe plus simvastatin groups versus pooled simvastatin groups.Results: Ezetimibe plus simvastatin significantly improved LDL-C (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p = 0.03), and TG (p < 0.01) compared with simvastatin alone. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin (pooled doses) provided an incremental 13.8% LDL-C reduction, 2.4% HDL-C increase, and 7.5% TG reduction compared with pooled simvastatin alone. Coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin provided LDL-C reductions of 44% to 57%, TG reductions of 20% to 28%, and HDL-C increases of 8% to 11%, depending on the simvastatin dose. Ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 80 mg alone each provided a 44% LDL-C reduction. The coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to those of simvastatin and of placebo.Conclusions: When coadministered with simvastatin, ezetimibe provided significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and TG, as well as increases in HDL-C. Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated and comparable to statin alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorption inhibitor, was evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 892 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. After > or =2 weeks on the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I or a stricter diet and a 4- to 8-week single-blind placebo lead-in, patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 130 to 250 mg/dl and triglycerides < or =350 mg/dl were randomized 3:1 to receive ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo orally each morning for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent reduction in direct plasma LDL cholesterol from baseline to end point. A total of 434 men and 458 women (ages 18 to 85 years) received randomized treatment (666 ezetimibe 10 mg, 226 placebo). Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Ezetimibe significantly reduced direct LDL cholesterol by a mean of 16.9%, compared with an increase of 0.4% with placebo (p <0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that response to ezetimibe was generally consistent across all subgroups, regardless of risk-factor status, gender, age, race, or baseline lipid profile. Ezetimibe effects on LDL cholesterol occurred early (2 weeks) and persisted throughout the 12-week treatment period. Compared with placebo, ezetimibe 10 mg also significantly improved calculated LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and HDL(3) cholesterol (p <0.01). Ezetimibe was well tolerated. There were no differences in laboratory or clinical safety parameters, or gastrointestinal, liver, or muscle side effects from that of placebo. Ezetimibe 10 mg/day is well tolerated, reduces LDL cholesterol approximately 17%, and improves other key lipid parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have suggested that desmoteplase, a novel plasminogen activator, has clinical benefit when given 3-9 h after the onset of the symptoms of stroke in patients with presumptive tissue at risk that is identified by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (PI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)., Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging study, patients with acute ischaemic stroke and tissue at risk seen on either MRI or CT imaging were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, or placebo within 3-9 h after the onset of symptoms of stroke. The primary endpoint was clinical response rates at day 90, defined as a composite of improvement in National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of 8 points or more or an NIHSS score of 1 point or less, a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 points, and a Barthel index of 75-100. Secondary endpoints included change in lesion volume between baseline and day 30, rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality rates. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00111852., Findings: Between June, 2005, and March, 2007, 193 patients were randomised, and 186 patients received treatment: 57 received 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 66 received 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 63 received placebo. 158 patients completed the study. The median baseline NIHSS score was 9 (IQR 6-14) points, and 30% (53 of 179) of the patients had a visible occlusion of a vessel at presentation. The core lesion and the mismatch volumes were small (median volumes were 10.6 cm(3) and 52.5 cm(3), respectively). The clinical response rates at day 90 were 47% (27 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 36% (24 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 46% (29 of 63) for placebo. The median changes in lesion volume were: 90 microg/kg desmoteplase 14.0% (0.5 cm(3)); 125 microg/kg desmoteplase 10.8% (0.3 cm(3)); placebo -10.0% (-0.9 cm(3)). The rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were 3.5% (2 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 4.5% (3 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 0% for placebo. The overall mortality rate was 11% (5% [3 of 57] for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 21% [14 of 66] for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 6% [4 of 63] for placebo)., Interpretation: The DIAS-2 study did not show a benefit of desmoteplase given 3-9 h after the onset of stroke. The high response rate in the placebo group could be explained by the mild strokes recorded (low baseline NIHSS scores, small core lesions, and small mismatch volumes that were associated with no vessel occlusions), which possibly reduced the potential to detect any effect of desmoteplase., Funding: PAION Deutschland GmbH; Forest Laboratories.

Background: Most patients with stage 2 hypertension require two or more antihypertensive agents in order to achieve the BP goals recommended in current treatment guidelines. Accordingly, combinations of two drugs with different mechanisms of antihypertensive action are widely used., Objective: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, multicenter 12-week study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a combination of olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with that of benazepril plus amlodipine besylate in patients with stage 2 hypertension., Methods: Patients were eligible for randomization following a 3- to 4-week placebo run-in period if they had either (i) mean seated DBP>or=90 mm Hg but<115 mm Hg and mean seated SBP>or=160 mm Hg but <200 mm Hg, or (ii) mean seated DBP>or=100 mm Hg but<115 mm Hg. The difference in mean seated SBP measured on two separate visits during the run-in period was required to beor=95 mm Hg and<115 mm Hg or SBP>145 mm Hg and

Long-term safety and tolerability of ezetimibe plus atorvastatin (EZE + ATV) coadministration therapy were compared to those of ATV monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Upon completion of a 12 week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing EZE 10 mg; ATV 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg; EZE + ATV 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg or placebo, 246 patients were enrolled in a 12-month extension, with reassignment to double-blind EZE 10 mg (n = 201) or matching placebo (n = 45) coadministered daily with open-label ATV 10 mg. At intervals of 6 weeks, patients not at National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goals were titrated to the next higher ATV dose. Safety evaluations included adverse event (AE) reports and laboratory test results. EZE + ATV and ATV monotherapy groups were similar with regard to incidence of all AEs (71 vs. 67%), treatment-related AEs (22 vs. 27%) and discontinuations due to AEs (9 vs. 7%) or treatment-related AEs (6 vs. 7%), respectively. Neither clinically significant elevations in hepatic transaminases or creatine kinase nor any cases of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis were observed in either group during the extension study. After 6 weeks, EZE + ATV 10mg produced greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -53 vs. -37%), total cholesterol (TC; -38.8 vs. -26.0%) and triglycerides (TG; -28 vs. -12%) and similar increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (4.6 vs. 4.5%) compared to ATV 10 mg, respectively, and these changes were maintained and significant at 1 year (p < 0.01 for LDL-C, TC and TG). More EZE + ATV patients achieved LDL-C goal than ATV patients at study endpoint (91 vs. 78%, respectively; p = 0.02). Thus, the coadministration of EZE + ATV for 12 months was well tolerated and more efficacious than ATV monotherapy.

Significant numbers of patients at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) fail to reach National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)-designated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in spite of the wide range of currently available treatments, including combination therapies. Ezetimibe, the first in a class of novel cholesterol absorption inhibitors, demonstrated lipid-lowering and antiatherosclerotic activity in experimental and clinical hypercholesterolemia. Studies in hypercholesterolemic dogs showed that ezetimibe coadministered with statins caused greater lipid-lowering effects compared to either drug alone. These effects were confirmed in clinical studies of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia where initiation of treatment with ezetimibe plus a statin, or addition of ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy, produced significant incremental reductions in LDL-C, as well as incremental increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and reductions in triglyceride levels. Combination therapy also significantly increased the number of patients attaining LDL-C goal at the end of treatment, compared to statin monotherapy. In studies using simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin, addition of ezetimibe to low dose statin was as effective as a 2- to 3-fold upward titration of the corresponding statin dose. Ezetimibe-statin combination therapy provided similar improvements in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, as well as with heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Ezetimibe monotherapy effectively reduced plasma campesterol and sitosterol in patients with homozygous sitosterolemia. Clinical studies showed that ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to placebo when administered as monotherapy and comparable to statin alone when coadministered with a statin. These data provide strong evidence that, through their complementary lipid-lowering mechanisms, ezetimibe coadministered with a statin offers an effective combination treatment option for patients with hypercholesterolemia, including those with genetically inherited disease.

Aims: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ezetimibe 10 mg/day in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia., Methods and Results: Following dietary stabilization, a 2-12-week washout period, and a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 827 patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/l (130 mg/dl) to < or =6.47 mmol/l (250 mg/dl) and triglycerides < or =3.95 mmol/l (350 mg/dl) were randomized 3:1 to receive ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo orally once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage reduction in direct plasma LDL-C. Ezetimibe reduced direct LDL-C by a mean of 17.7% from baseline to endpoint, compared with an increase of 0.8% with placebo (P<0.01). Response to ezetimibe was generally consistent across all subgroups analyzed. Ezetimibe also significantly improved levels of plasma total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, high-density lipoprotein(2)-cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), and elicited a trend toward lower triglyceride levels. Ezetimibe did not alter the serum concentrations of lipid-soluble vitamins or significantly affect baseline or stimulated cortisol production. Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo., Conclusions: Ezetimibe, which significantly reduces LDL-C and favorably affects other lipid variables, may provide a well tolerated and effective new option for lipid management in the future.

Background: Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) is a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor that selectively and potently blocks intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol., Objective: Data from 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, 12-week studies of ezetimibe were pooled to evaluate the drug's effect on lipid parameters in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia., Methods: After dietary stabilization (National Cholesterol Education Program Step I diet or a stricter diet), washout of lipid-altering drugs, and a 6-week placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 and < or = 250 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride (TG) levels < or = 300 mg/dL were randomized to receive either ezetimibe 0.25, 1, 5, or 10 mg, or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal in study A (dose-response study) or ezetimibe 5 or 10 mg or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal or at bedtime in study B (dose-regimen study)., Results: A total of 432 patients were included in this pooled analysis, 243 in study A and 189 in study B. The 5- and 10-mg doses of ezetimibe significantly reduced LDL-C levels by 15.7% and 18.5%, respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hDL-C) levels by 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively (P < 0.05 vs placebo). A reduction in plasma TG levels was observed (P = NS). With the 10-mg dose of ezetimibe, 67.8% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 22.0% achieved > or = 25% reduction. With the 5-mg dose, 54.0% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 15.3% achieved > or = 25% reduction. The decrease in plasma LDL-C levels was significantly greater with ezetimibe 10 mg compared with ezetimibe 5 mg (P < 0.05). Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo., Conclusions: In these two 12-week studies, ezetimibe significantly decreased plasma LDL-C levels and increased plasma HDL-C levels, with a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo.

SCH 48461, an inhibitor of gastrointestinal absorption of cholesterol, was evaluated for its effects on lipid parameters in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Following the baseline phase, which consisted of a 2- to 10-week drug washout and dietary stabilization phase and a 4-week placebo lead-in (placebo baseline phase), 190 patients were randomized to an 8-week double-blind active drug (SCH 48461 1, 6.25, 25, 100, 200, or 400 mg) or 40 mg lovastatin once daily each morning or placebo treatment phase. By week 2, patients who received SCH 48461 6.25 to 400 mg or lovastatin demonstrated greater reduction from baseline in directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels than patients in the placebo group (p < or = 0.03). Overall, the percent reductions in LDL-C from baseline increased as the dose of SCH 48461 increased, with 0.6% to 15.5% reductions from the minimum dose of 1 mg to the maximum dose of 400 mg. Lovastatin 40 mg/day reduced LDL-C by 30.7% (p < 0.01). Statistically significant decreases were also seen for total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (apo B) with doses of 25 mg to 400 mg of SCH 48461 and lovastatin. SCH 48461 was well tolerated. There was a similar incidence of adverse events in each SCH 48461- or lovastatin-treated group compared to placebo. This study demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant cholesterol-lowering effect of SCH 48461 in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction: We examined the effects of a nonspecific ion channel blocker, bupivacaine, on K channels encoded by hERG, rKv1.4, rKv4.3, and hKvLQT1 along with hIsK. Their native counterparts in the heart are important for the function of I(Kr), I(to) and I(Ks) and, thus, play an important role in repolarization., Methods and Results: To elucidate the mechanisms and sites of bupivacaine's actions, we correlated the voltage and time dependencies of drug effects with those of channel gating. We also studied the effects of altering the C-type (hERG) or N-type (rKv1.4) inactivation process or the subunit composition (hKvLQT1 with or without hIsK) on bupivacaine's actions. The results suggest that, except for hKvLQT1 co-expressed with hIsK, bupivacaine binding occurred at depolarized voltages coinciding with channel activation. With hKvLQT1 co-expressed with hIsK, bupivacaine bound preferentially at negative voltages when channels were in the closed state, and unbound at depolarized voltages when channels opened. The C-type inactivation of hERG enhanced, whereas the N-type inactivation of rKv1.4 hindered, bupivacaine's effects., Conclusion: We propose that bupivacaine's actions on these K channels can be described as a nonspecific pore blockade in the inner mouth region. However, the apparent binding affinity and voltage dependence of binding can be differentially influenced by the inactivation processes occurring at two ends of the pore (C-type inactivation at the outer end and N-type inactivation at the inner end), or by the interaction between hIsK and hKvLQT1 subunits.

During development, the voltage dependence of single rat ventricular sodium channels shifts to more negative potentials. This shift is mimicked by coculture of neonatal myocytes with sympathetic neurons or by a 96-h exposure to 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (CPT-cAMP). The prolonged exposure to CPT-cAMP suggests that this is not a short-term modulatory effect on the sodium channel, but rather may reflect a trophic action. Here we examine the effect of CPT-cAMP using whole cell recording to investigate further the time period required for the effect. Sodium current was measured in a 50 mM NaCl bath solution at 20 +/- 1 degree C using the whole cell patch-clamp technique after exposure of myocytes to CPT-cAMP (0.25 mM) for 0,0.5,20, or 24 h. The relationship between the time constant of decay (tauh) of the sodium current and test voltage (V1) showed a shift to more hyperpolarizing voltages after exposure to CPT-cAMP for 24 h. In addition, the midpoint of the steady-state inactivation curve (V 1/2) was shifted from -75.8 +/- 1.1 mV (0-h exposure) to -83.3 +/- 1.6 mV (24-h exposure) (P < 0.05). Exposure for 0.5 h to CPT-cAMP did not alter the tauh or V 1/2 of the sodium current. However, exposure to CPT-cAMP for 20 h, followed by a 4-h washout period, produced an effect similar to that of the 24-h exposure. Thus the lack of effect of acute (0.5 h) exposure to CPT-cAMP and the persistence of the effect after washout of CPT-cAMP for 4 h suggest that adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate may play a trophic role in sodium channel development.

Bupivacaine is more cardiotoxic than lidocaine and can produce fatal arrhythmias during accidental overdose or intravascular injection. Studies using Vmax in adult guinea pig myocytes suggest that this toxicity is due to the greater inhibition of sodium current by bupivacaine. Human neonates and cardiac tissue from neonatal animals show resistance to the cardiac effects of many local anesthetic and antiarrhythmic drugs, and a slower onset of use-dependent block. We used whole-cell patch clamp (20 degrees C, [Na]o = 50 mmol/L) to examine directly the kinetics of sodium current block by bupivacaine and lidocaine in ventricular myocytes from 1- to 2-day-old rats. We found that 1 microgram/mL bupivacaine and 5 micrograms/mL lidocaine produced equivalent amounts of use-dependent block for protocols corresponding to 30-200 depolarizations per minute (cell resting potential of -85 mV). Block due to bupivacaine surpassed that from lidocaine (37.6% +/- 3.4% vs 26.4% +/- 2.7%) (P < 0.01) only after the resting membrane potential was hyperpolarized to -110 mV and the length of depolarization and repolarization were increased to nonphysiologic durations (1 s and 0.5 s, respectively). Double-pulse protocols were used to measure the underlying rate of onset and recovery from block. At these concentrations, blockade development was more than seven times slower for bupivacaine (4.11 +/- 0.32 s vs 0.57 +/- 0.06 s) (P < 0.01, and recovery from block was five times slower (10.81 +/- 0.54 s vs 2.14 +/- 0.50 s) (P < 0.01). In these neonatal myocytes, bupivacaine does not produce more use-dependent block than lidocaine, and the effect of bupivacaine is limited by its slow binding to the sodium channel.

The influence of the central nervous system in the production of phenothiazine-induced arrhythmia and death was examined in this study. In a series of cats, spinal cords were transected at the atlanto-occipital junction prior to the 1 mg/kg/min, i.v. infusion of chlorpromazine or thioridazine. No protection against drug-induced arrhythmia or death was afforded by this procedure. In other cats, 6OH-dopamine was administered prior to intravenous injection of atropine and infusion of chlorpromazine, 1 mg/kg/min. In these in situ denervated heart preparations, there was no protection against chlorpromazine-induced arrhythmia or death. In alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats, 0.5 mg chlorpromazine administered intracerebroventricularly did not induce arrhythmia or death, although blood pressure decreased initially. Thus, chlorpromazine or thioridazine do not appear to produce arrhythmia or death via a central locus and may instead be acting directly on myocardial conduction to produce arrhythmia and death.

The writing of this review was initiated to answer the question of whether differences in the actions of the various digitalis glycosides exist and to discuss current controversies in the research area of the digitalis glycosides. Data obtained in our laboratory indicated that the effect of digoxin on postganglionic cardiac sympathetic neural discharge in the minute prior to the occurrence of arrhythmia differed from that of ouabain. This raised the question of whether data published in other laboratories would support the contention that differences in glycosides do exist. To answer this question, a review of the literature was begun. Our survey of these studies are cited in the tables of this review. These tables summarize the actions of glycosides in vivo and in vitro in different animal models. The reader should bear in mind that the data included within the tables do not represent an inclusive summary of all studies in the literature. For detailed review articles, the reader is referred to the following references: Gillis et al; Gillis and Quest; Roberts et al; Lathers and Roberts; Farah and Alousi; Benthe; Levitt et al; Smith and Haber; Somberg; Lee and Klaus; Mason; Schwartz. Furthermore the summary of the results for each particular study cited in the table may not, in all cases, include each finding of the published data. Nevertheless, the tables do provide a summary of data obtained in various species with different glycosides in several different areas of research, and as such, represent an abridged compendium for the research working in the field of digitalis glycosides. This review has been organized firstly to consider glycoside-induced alterations in the autonomic nervous system and, secondly, to examine their direct actions on the heart.

The phenothiazine thioridazine 1 mg/kg/min was infused intravenously into three groups of cats: (1) thioridazine alone (N = 5), (2) after bilateral adrenal ligation (N = 4), and (3) after spinal cord section at the atlanto-occipital junction (C1; N = 6). The times to arrhythmia and death with thioridazine alone were 47.8 +/- 7.8 and 72.8 +/- 5.6 minutes respectively. After bilateral adrenal ligation, arrhythmia and death occurred at 41.1 +/- 5.2 and 53.1 +/- 5.8 minutes, respectively, which showed no increase (P greater than .05) from thioridazine alone. After spinal cord section, thioridazine-induced arrhythmia and death occurred at 74.0 +/- 13.7 and 85.7 +/- 13.8 minutes, respectively, which were not increased (P greater than .05) when compared with thioridazine alone. The results of this study suggest that neither adrenomedullary catecholamines nor the central sympathetic component above C1 plays a significant role in acute thioridazine-induced arrhythmia. The action of thioridazine to induce arrhythmia in spite of transection of the spinal cord or bilateral adrenal vein ligation suggests that its cardiotoxicity is a result of a direct myocardial effect. Thioridazine depressed blood pressure without producing the sustained reflex tachycardia normally seen with hypotension. This suggests that the agent may modify the baroreceptor reflex arc.

To determine the effect of chlorpromazine on ouabain-induced arrhythmia and death, dial-urethane anesthetized cats were pretreated with chlorpromazine (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 60 mg/kg, i.v.) and then administered ouabain (2 microgram/kg/min, i.v.). Blood pressure, heart rate and lead II electrocardiogram (ECG) were monitored. The dosages of ouabain necessary to induce premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia and death were determined. No significant correlation between the dose of chlorpromazine given and the dose of ouabain required to produce arrhythmia or death was found. These doses of chlorpromazine could, therefore, be considered neither arrhythmogenic nor antiarrhythmic in the ouabain model. To determine whether chlorpromazine produced arrhythmia in the dial-urethane anesthetized cat model, the drug was infused at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min, i.v. Chlorpromazine produced arrhythmia at 185 +/- 4.3 minutes and death via cardiovascular collapse at 128 +/- 4.7 minutes. Bilateral adrenal vein ligation, employed to eliminate the influence of adrenal catecholamines, decreased the dosage of chlorpromazine necessary to produce arrhythmia and death to 67.8 +/- 17.7 and 84.7 +/- 15.7 mg/kg, respectively. Thus, adrenal catecholamines did not appear to contribute to chlorpromazine-induced arrhythmia, although the procedure of bilateral adrenal vein ligation appeared to be deleterious in combination with chlorpromazine. In all experiments, chlorpromazine depressed blood pressure without producing the reflex tachycardia normally seen with hypotension. This suggests that the drug may be interfering with the baroreceptor reflex arc. As chlorpromazine modifies the autonomic parameters of blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac electrophysiology, sudden unexplained death in patients managed with this agent may be due to drug-induced arrhythmia.

Major tranquilizers as well as antidepressant agents have been associated with clinical seizures in patients administered these agents. The incidence of such seizures is generally low when these drugs are administered in therapeutic doses. However, administration of large doses of these agents has been associated with many cases of convulsion production. The effects that these drugs have on animal models of epilepsy have been examined. It appears that the phenothiazines act as convulsant agents at lower doses, whereas, at higher doses, they act as anticonvulsant drugs. Antidepressants, on the other hand, appear to exert an anticonvulsant effect at low doses and convulsant effects at high doses. The mechanism by which these agents alter the seizure threshold is not yet known. Clinically, drugs of lower seizure production potential should be substituted for those drugs with greater potential in treating epileptic patients for psychiatric ailments. The problem of sudden death in epileptic patients is one that must be confronted. Sudden death has most frequently been attributed to autonomic dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmia in these patients. The contribution of stress in sudden death production also must be taken into account. In addition, some psychoactive agents have been associated with sudden death as well as cardiac arrhythmia and seizure production. Thus, in light of the possible additivity of the factors involved in the production of sudden death, the administration of a psychoactive agent to an epileptic patient should be approached with caution. Those agents that do not alter cardiac rhythm or seizure threshold should be administered if a psychoactive agent is deemed necessary for the management of psychiatric illness in the epileptic patient.