Search

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The purpose of this update was to determine differences in patient-reported chronic toxicity and disease outcomes with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with conventional pelvic radiation. Patients with cervical and endometrial cancers who received postoperative pelvic radiation were randomly assigned to conventional radiation therapy (CRT) or IMRT. Toxicity and quality of life were assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel and urinary domains, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General. Between 2012 and 2015, 279 eligible patients were enrolled to the study with a median follow-up of 37.8 months. There were no differences in overall survival ( P = .53), disease-free survival ( P = .21), or locoregional failure ( P = .81). One year after RT, patients in the CRT arm experienced more high-level diarrhea frequency (5.8% IMRT v 15.1% CRT, P = .042) and a greater number had to take antidiarrheal medication two or more times a day (1.2% IMRT v 8.6% CRT, P = .036). At 3 years, women in the CRT arm reported a decline in urinary function, whereas the IMRT arm continued to improve (mean change in EPIC urinary score = 0.5, standard deviation = 13.0, IMRT v –6.0, standard deviation = 14.3, CRT, P = .005). In conclusion, IMRT reduces patient-reported chronic GI and urinary toxicity with no difference in treatment efficacy at 3 years.

Ensuring high quality, evidence-based radiation therapy for patients with cancer is of the upmost importance. To address this need, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Radiation Oncology Program partnered with the American Society for Radiation Oncology and established the VA Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance program. As part of this ongoing effort to provide the highest quality of care for patients with rectal cancer, a blue-ribbon panel comprised of rectal cancer experts was formed to develop clinical quality measures.The Rectal Cancer Blue Ribbon panel developed quality, surveillance, and aspirational measures for (a) initial consultation and workup, (b) simulation, treatment planning, and treatment, and (c) follow-up. Twenty-two rectal cancer specific measures were developed (19 quality, 1 aspirational, and 2 surveillance). In addition, dose-volume histogram constraints for conventional and hypofractionated radiation therapy were created.The quality measures and dose-volume histogram for rectal cancer serves as a guideline to assess the quality of care for patients with rectal cancer receiving radiation therapy. These quality measures will be used for quality surveillance for veterans receiving care both inside and outside the VA system to improve the quality of care for these patients.

Surveillance pouchoscopy is recommended for patients with restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, with the surveillance interval depending on the risk of neoplasia. Neoplasia in patients with ileal pouches mainly have a glandular source and less often are of squamous cell origin. Various grades of neoplasia can occur in the prepouch ileum, pouch body, rectal cuff, anal transition zone, anus, or perianal skin. The main treatment modalities are endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic ablation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgical local excision, surgical circumferential resection and re-anastomosis, and pouch excision. The choice of the treatment modality is determined by the grade, location, size, and features of neoplastic lesions, along with patients' risk of neoplasia and comorbidities, and local endoscopic and surgical expertise.

This cohort study of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database examines the incidence of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of the breast in the US from 2000 to 2018.

ImportanceO6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT [OMIM 156569]) promoter methylation (mMGMT) is predictive of response to alkylating chemotherapy for glioblastomas and is routinely used to guide treatment decisions. However, the utility of MGMT promoter status for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas remains unclear due to molecular heterogeneity and the lack of sufficiently large data sets.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of mMGMT for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas with chemotherapy response.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study aggregated grade II and III primary glioma data from 3 prospective cohort studies with patient data collected from August 13, 1995, to August 3, 2022, comprising 411 patients: MSK-IMPACT, EORTC (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer) 26951, and Columbia University. Statistical analysis was performed from April 2022 to January 2023.ExposureMGMT promoter methylation status.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess the association of mMGMT status with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjusting for age, sex, molecular class, grade, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Subgroups were stratified by treatment status and World Health Organization 2016 molecular classification.ResultsA total of 411 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [14.5] years; 283 men [58%]) met the inclusion criteria, 288 of whom received alkylating chemotherapy. MGMT promoter methylation was observed in 42% of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–wild-type gliomas (56 of 135), 53% of IDH-mutant and non-codeleted gliomas (79 of 149), and 74% of IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas (94 of 127). Among patients who received chemotherapy, mMGMT was associated with improved PFS (median, 68 months [95% CI, 54-132 months] vs 30 months [95% CI, 15-54 months]; log-rank P MGMT, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.39-2.75]; P P P = .01). After adjusting for clinical factors, MGMT promoter status was associated with chemotherapy response in IDH–wild-type gliomas (aHR for PFS, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.26-3.66]; P = .005; aHR for OS, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.98-2.91]; P = .06) and IDH-mutant and codeleted gliomas (aHR for PFS, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.44-6.21]; P = .003; aHR for OS, 4.21 [95% CI, 1.25-14.2]; P = .02), but not IDH-mutant and non-codeleted gliomas (aHR for PFS, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.67-2.12]; P = .56; aHR for OS, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.54-2.12]; P = .85). Among patients who did not receive chemotherapy, mMGMT status was not associated with PFS or OS.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study suggests that mMGMT is associated with response to alkylating chemotherapy for low-grade and anaplastic gliomas and may be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trials of patients with IDH–wild-type and IDH-mutant and codeleted tumors.

ImportanceSpine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control.ObjectiveTo assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020.InterventionsPatients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord.ResultsA total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, −19 percentage points; 95% CI, −32.9 to −5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974

This cohort study uses national surveillance data to describe the incidence and risk of squamous cell carcinoma after postmastectomy implant reconstruction in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE Because of the negative impact of cancer treatment on female sexual function, effective treatments are warranted. The purpose of this multisite study was to evaluate the ability of two dose levels of extended-release bupropion, a dopaminergic agent, to improve sexual desire more than placebo at 9 weeks, measured by the desire subscale of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and to evaluate associated toxicities. METHODS Postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast or gynecologic cancer and low baseline FSFI desire scores (< 3.3), who had completed definitive cancer therapy, were eligible. Women were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg or 300 mg once daily of extended-release bupropion or a matching placebo. t-tests were performed on the FSFI desire subscale to evaluate whether there was a significantly greater change from baseline to 9 weeks between placebo and each bupropion arm as the primary end point. Sixty-two patients per arm provided 80% power using a one-sided t-test. RESULTS Two hundred thirty women were randomly assigned from 72 institutions through the NRG Oncology NCORP network. At 9 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences in change of the desire subscale scores between groups; participants in all three arms reported improvement. The mean changes for each arm were placebo 0.62 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.18), 150-mg once daily bupropion 0.64 (SD = 0.95), and 300-mg once daily bupropion 0.60 (SD = 0.89). Total and subscale scores on the FSFI were low throughout the study, indicating dysfunction in all groups. CONCLUSION Bupropion was not more effective than placebo in improving the desire subscale of the FSFI. Subscale and total scores of the FSFI demonstrated dysfunction throughout the 9 weeks of the study. More research is needed to support sexual function in female cancer survivors.

Although rare, the rate of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is rising globally. Most patients present with nonmetastatic disease and are curable with appropriate treatment, which has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Before the 1970s, SCCA was managed with radical surgery, resulting in a permanent colostomy. Researchers found that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation could achieve a pathologic complete response. After this observation, definitive therapy shifted from radical surgery to sphincter-preserving chemoradiation. Investigations into the necessity of chemotherapy and the optimal regimen found that chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil is required for cure. Further studies evaluating the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or higher radiation doses have demonstrated no significant benefit to disease control. Advanced radiation delivery with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques is now considered the standard of care because of its prospectively determined, favorable acute toxicity profile compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiation. It is important to note that chemoradiation treatment response may be slow (up to 26 weeks) and should be assessed through serial clinical examinations. Today, surgical management of SCCA is reserved only for the lowest risk, early stage tumors or for recurrent/persistent disease. Current studies are evaluating radiation dose de-escalation in early stage disease and radiation dose escalation and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced cancers. In reviewing how and why modern-day treatment of SCCA was established, the objective of this report is to reenforce adherence to current treatment paradigms to assure the best possible outcomes for patients.

IMPORTANCE: Novel toxicity metrics that account for all AE grades and frequency of events within a grade may enhance toxicity reporting in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of using the Toxicity Index (TI) methodology in two prospective anal cancer trials, and to evaluate whether more conformal radiation (using IMRT) results in improved toxicity as measured by the TI. DESIGN: Ancillary analysis of two prospective trials SETTING: Data from 2 NRG multicenter trials PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stage II-III anal cancer treated with definitive 5-FU/MMC and concurrent IMRT as part of the NRG/RTOG 0529 trial (12/2006–3/2008) or nonconformal RT enrolled on NRG/RTOG 9811 (10/1998–6/2005). EXPOSURES: All patients received chemoradiation with 5-FU/Mitomycin using IMRT or nonconformal RT. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The TI for all adverse events and for combined Gastrointestinal (GI)/Genitourinary (GU)/Hematologic (Heme)/Dermatologic (Derm) events in patients treated with nonconformal RT on the 5-FU/MMC arm of NRG/RTOG 9811 were compared to patients treated with IMRT on NRG/RTOG 0529. Multi-variable probabilistic models controlling for demographic predictors of TI were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty one patients were treated with IMRT on NRG/RTOG 0529 and 324 on the standard 5-FU/MMC arm of NRG/RTOG 9811. Patients treated on NRG/RTOG 0529 had lower median TI compared to patients treated with nonconformal RT on NRG/RTOG 9811 for combined GI/GU/Heme/Derm events [3.935 vs 3.996, P=0.014]. Median TI in patients requiring a treatment break was higher than those patients not requiring a break [4.00 vs 3.937, P

This cohort study examines the risk of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) following postmastectomy implant reconstruction among US women with breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Definitive radiotherapy for locally-advanced node-positive cervical cancer confers significant toxicity to pelvic organs including small bowel. Gross nodal disease exhibits significant shrinkage during radiotherapy (RT), and yet conventional RT does not account for this change. We evaluated the reduction in absorbed bowel dose using various adaptive radiotherapy (ART) schedules.We obtained 130 evaluable scans (computed tomography (CT) simulation and 25 cone beam CT scans per patient) of 5 patients who had received definitive external beam RT for lymph node positive cervical cancer over 5 weeks daily. Using a single universal volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan with predefined optimization priorities, we created adapted RT plans in 4 schedules: Daily, Weekly, Twice, and NoAdapt. The in silico (computer modeled) patients were treated to 45 Gy to primary cervical disease with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to involved lymph nodes to 55 Gy. We evaluated dose metrics including D2cc, D15cc, and V45 to determine the impact of adapted RT schedules on bowel sparing. Statistical tests included Student's t, ANOVA, and Spearman's rank correlation.The quantity of reduced bowel dose was significantly associated with the chosen planning schedule in all evaluated metrics, and was proportional to the frequency of adaptive RT with significant moderate-to-strong monotonicity. Both D2cc and D15cc were reduced an average of 2.7 Gy using Daily replanning compared to a non-adapted approach. A minimally-adapted strategy of only two replans also confers a significant dosimetric benefit over a non-adapted approach. Reduced standard deviations of D2cc and V45 bowel doses over the treatment courses were significantly associated with the choice of planning schedule with strong monotonicity.All adaptive RT schedules evaluated confer significant dosimetric advantages in bowel sparing over a conventional non-adapted technique, with greater sparing seen with more frequent replanning schedules. These findings warrant future trials of adaptive radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies.

SWOG 0809 is the only prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation focusing on margin status in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA); however, the effects of adjuvant therapy by nodal status have never been reported in this population.Patients with resected EHCC and GBCA, stage pT2-4, node-positive (N+) or margin-positive (R1) who completed four cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy were included. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis by nodal status. DFS rates were compared with historical data via a one-sample t-test.Sixty-nine patients [EHCC, n = 46 (66%); GBCA, n = 23 (33%)] were evaluated, with a median age of 61.7 years and an R0 rate of 66.7% and R1 rate of 33.3%. EHCC versus GBCA was more likely to be N+ (73.9% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.03). Nodal status did not significantly impact OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-4.54, p = 0.11) or DFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.77-3.44, p = 0.20). Two-year OS was 70.6% for node-negative (N0) disease and 60.9% for N+ disease, while 2-year DFS was 62.5% for N0 tumors and 49.8% for N+ tumors. N+ versus N0 tumors showed higher rates of distant failure (42.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). The 2-year DFS rate in N+ tumors was significantly higher than in historical controls (49.8% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.004).Adjuvant therapy is associated with favorable outcome independent of nodal status and may impact local control in N+ patients. These data could serve as a benchmark for future adjuvant trials, including molecular-targeted agents.

There is considerable interest in very short (ultrahypofractionated) radiation therapy regimens to treat prostate cancer based on potential radiobiological advantages, patient convenience, and resource allocation benefits. Our objective is to demonstrate that detectable changes in health-related quality of life measured by the bowel and urinary domains of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-50) were not substantially worse than baseline scores.xxxx is a nonblinded randomized phase 2 study of National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk prostate cancer in which each arm is compared with a historical control. Patients were randomized to 5 fractions (7.25Gy in 2 week and a day - twice a week) or 12 fractions (4.3Gy in 2.5 weeks- five times a week). Secondary objectives assessed patient-reported toxicity at 5 years using the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC). Chi-square tests were used to assess the proportion of patients with a deterioration from baseline of5 points for bowel,2 points for urinary, and11 points for sexual score, RESULTS: The study enrolled 127 patients to 5 fractions (121 eligible) and 128 patients to 12 fractions (125 eligible). Median follow-up for all patients at the time of analysis was 5.38 years. The 5-year frequency for5 point change in bowel score were 38.4% (P=0.27) and 23.4% (= 0.98) for 5 and 12 fractions, respectively. The 5-year frequencies for2 point change in urinary score were 46.6% (P=0.15) and 36.4% (P=0.70) for 5 and 12 fractions, respectively. For 5 fractions, 49.3% (P=0.007) of patients had a drop in 5-year EPIC-50 sexual score of ≥11 points; for 12 fractions, 54% (P0.001) of patients had a drop in 5-year EPIC-50 sexual score of ≥11 points. Disease-free survival at 5 years is 89.6% (95% confidence interval:84.0-95.2) in the 5-fraction arm and 92.3% (95% confidence interval: 87.4- 97.1) in the 12-fraction arm. There was no late grade 4 or 5 treatment-related urinary or bowel toxicity.This study confirms that, based on long-term changes in bowel and urinary domains and toxicity, the 5- and 12-fraction regimens are well tolerated. These ultrahypofractionated approaches need to be compared with current standard radiation therapy regimens.

US physicians in multiple specialties who order or conduct radiological procedures lack formal radiation science education and thus sometimes order procedures of limited benefit or fail to order what is necessary. To this end, a multidisciplinary expert group proposed an introductory broad-based radiation science educational program for U.S. medical schools. Suggested preclinical elements of the curriculum include foundational education on ionizing and nonionizing radiation (eg, definitions, dose metrics, and risk measures) and short- and long-term radiation-related health effects as well as introduction to radiology, radiation therapy, and radiation protection concepts. Recommended clinical elements of the curriculum would impart knowledge and practical experience in radiology, fluoroscopically guided procedures, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and identification of patient subgroups requiring special considerations when selecting specific ionizing or nonionizing diagnostic or therapeutic radiation procedures. Critical components of the clinical program would also include educational material and direct experience with patient-centered communication on benefits of, risks of, and shared decision making about ionizing and nonionizing radiation procedures and on health effects and safety requirements for environmental and occupational exposure to ionizing and nonionizing radiation. Overarching is the introduction to evidence-based guidelines for procedures that maximize clinical benefit while limiting unnecessary risk. The content would be further developed, directed, and integrated within the curriculum by local faculties and would address multiple standard elements of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

PURPOSE In oncology trials, the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is the standard tool for reporting adverse events (AEs), but it may underreport symptoms experienced by patients. This analysis of the NRG Oncology RTOG 1203 compared symptom reporting by patients and clinicians during radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cervical or endometrial cancer requiring postoperative RT were randomly assigned to standard 4-field RT or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). Patients completed the 6-item patient-reported outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) for GI toxicity assessing abdominal pain, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence at various time points. Patients reported symptoms on a 5-point scale. Clinicians recorded these AEs as CTCAE grades 1 to 5. Clinician- and patient-reported AEs were compared using McNemar’s test for rates > 0%. RESULTS Of 278 eligible patients, 234 consented and completed the PRO-CTCAE. Patients reported high-grade abdominal pain 19.1% ( P < .0001), high-grade diarrhea 38.5% ( P < .0001), and fecal incontinence 6.8% more frequently than clinicians. Similar effects were seen between grade ≥ 1 CTCAE toxicity and any-grade patient-reported toxicity. Between-arm comparison of patient-reported high-grade AEs revealed that at 5 weeks of RT, patients who received IMRT experienced fewer GI AEs than patients who received 4-field pelvic RT with regard to frequency of diarrhea (18.2% difference; P = .01), frequency of fecal incontinence (8.2% difference; P = .01), and interference of fecal incontinence (8.5% difference; P = .04). CONCLUSION Patient-reported AEs showed a reduction in symptoms with IMRT compared with standard RT, whereas clinician-reported AEs revealed no difference. Clinicians also underreported symptomatic GI AEs compared with patients. This suggests that patient-reported symptomatic AEs are important to assess in this disease setting.

PURPOSE Radiation dose to the neuroregenerative zone of the hippocampus has been found to be associated with cognitive toxicity. Hippocampal avoidance (HA) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is hypothesized to preserve cognition. METHODS This phase III trial enrolled adult patients with brain metastases to HA-WBRT plus memantine or WBRT plus memantine. The primary end point was time to cognitive function failure, defined as decline using the reliable change index on at least one of the cognitive tests. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patient-reported symptom burden. RESULTS Between July 2015 and March 2018, 518 patients were randomly assigned. Median follow-up for alive patients was 7.9 months. Risk of cognitive failure was significantly lower after HA-WBRT plus memantine versus WBRT plus memantine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.95; P = .02). This difference was attributable to less deterioration in executive function at 4 months (23.3% v 40.4%; P = .01) and learning and memory at 6 months (11.5% v 24.7% [ P = .049] and 16.4% v 33.3% [ P = .02], respectively). Treatment arms did not differ significantly in OS, intracranial PFS, or toxicity. At 6 months, using all data, patients who received HA-WBRT plus memantine reported less fatigue ( P = .04), less difficulty with remembering things ( P = .01), and less difficulty with speaking ( P = .049) and using imputed data, less interference of neurologic symptoms in daily activities ( P = .008) and fewer cognitive symptoms ( P = .01). CONCLUSION HA-WBRT plus memantine better preserves cognitive function and patient-reported symptoms, with no difference in intracranial PFS and OS, and should be considered a standard of care for patients with good performance status who plan to receive WBRT for brain metastases with no metastases in the HA region.

187 Background: Intraprostatic radiation dose escalation is an area of clinical interest. Dose escalation within the prostate must be balanced with maintaining acceptable dose to the organs at risk, OAR (bladder, rectum, and urethra). Treatment planning therefore requires simultaneous consideration of multiple competing plan optimization goals, for which iterative, interdisciplinary treatment planning tasks may take significant physician, physicist, and dosimetrist time. Semi-automated treatment planning using artificial intelligence has the potential to significantly reduce treatment planning time for technically complex treatments. Methods: A prostate SBRT planning template was created using the Varian ETHOS treatment planning system (TPS) combined with an in-house RapidPlan SBRT prostate model. Prostate dose was prescribed to 36.25 Gy over 5 fractions with 95% coverage to the PTV. To respect standard SBRT normal tissue toxicity constraints while simultaneously escalating intraprostatic dose, the TPS automatically created an intraprostatic boost structure (PTV_SIB), derived from the PTV by excluding OARs with a pre-determined margin. Physicians were trained to perform treatment planning using the prostate SBRT planning template. Treatment planning was performed on 5 unique patients. The time spent from initiation to end of treatment planning and dosimetric parameters were recorded. Results: For each patient, the ETHOS TPS generated two SBRT plans (9 field static IMRT and 3 VMAT arc) with intraprostatic dose escalation in an average of 9.3 minutes [range 8.4-11.8]. Static field and VMAT plans were comparable. PTV_SIB was escalated to above 50 Gy in all cases. Relevant dosimetry for each patient’s static IMRT plan is shown. Conclusions: Physician-driven ETHOS treatment planning was able to produce boosted internal PTV doses using autosegmented volumes. The ETHOS TPS was able to generate dose-escalated plans that reconciled complex OAR and PTV goals within 8-12 minutes. Hence, the ETHOS TPS opens the possibility of rapid physician-driven treatment planning throughput. [Table: see text]

489 Background: To determine if SBRT followed by sorafenib (SBRT/S) improves overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QOL) vs. sorafenib alone (S), in patients (pts) with HCC. Methods: Eligible pts had new or recurrent HCC, unsuitable for surgery, ablation or TACE, with Zubrod performance status (PS) 0-2, Child-Pugh (CP) A, BCLC stage B or C, ≤ 5 HCCs, sum of hepatic HCCs ≤ 20 cm, and distant metastases ≤ 3 cm. Pts were randomized 1:1 to S 400 mg BID vs. SBRT (27.5-50 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by S 200 mg BID, increased to 400 mg BID after 28 days. Primary endpoint was OS; reported secondary endpoints - PFS, adverse events (AEs - CTCAEv4), and QOL (improvement in FACT-Hep score by ≥ 5 points from baseline to 6 months). Planned sample size was 292 pts (238 OS events, HR=0.72, 80% power, 1-sided α=0.05). Accrual closed early, due to a change in HCC standard of care. Statistics were amended to report as of 7/1/2022, projecting 155 OS events, with 65% power and the same α. OS and PFS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and arms compared using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze treatment effect. Secondary endpoints were tested with 2-sided α=0.05. Results: Of 193 pts accrued from April 2013 to March 2021 from 23 sites, 177 eligible pts were randomized to S (n=92) vs. SBRT/S (n=85). Median age was 66 yrs (27-84); 41% had Hep. C; 19% had Hep. B or B/C. 82% were BCLC stage C. 74% had macrovascular invasion (MVI), 63% with VP3 or VP4 MVI. 4% had metastases. Median sum of max diameter of HCCs was 8.2 cm for S and 6.7 cm for SBRT/S; 40% had a single HCC. Median follow-up for all and alive pts was 13.2 and 33.7 mo. 22% of S pts received SBRT after discontinuing S. With 153 OS events, median OS was improved from 12.3 mo. (90% CI 10.6, 14.3) with S to 15.8 mo. (90% CI 11.4-19.2) with SBRT/S (HR=0.77, 1-sided p=0.0554). After adjusting for PS, M stage, CP A5 vs. 6, and degree of MVI, OS was statistically significantly improved for SBRT/S (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, 2-sided Cox p=0.042). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 mo. (95% CI 3.4-6.3) with S to 9.2 months (95% CI 7.5-11.9) with SBRT/S (HR=0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.75, 2-sided p=0.0001). 8 grade (G) 3+ bleeds were seen: 5 in S arm (1 G3 variceal, 2 G3 upper GI, 1 G3 hepatic, and 1 G4 abdominal) and 3 post SBRT/S (2 G3 upper GI, 1 G3 lower GI). Treatment-related G3+ AEs were not significantly different (S - 42%; SBRT/S - 47%; p=0.52), with 3 G5 AEs (S - 1 hepatic failure, 1 death NOS; SBRT/S - 1 lung infection). 83 (47%) pts consented to QoL. Of 20 S and 17 SBRT/S pts with QoL assessments at baseline and 6 months, 10% on S improved in FACT-Hep score vs 35% on SBRT/S. Conclusions: Compared to S alone, SBRT improved OS & PFS in patients with HCC, with no observed increase in AEs, and a strong suggestion for QOL benefit at 6 months. Supported by U10CA180868 (NRG Onc. Op., U10CA180822 (NRG Onc. SDMC), UG1CA189867 (NCORP), and U24CA180803 (IROC) from the NCI. Clinical trial information: NCT01730937 .

7 Background: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes TNT with parallel experimental arms (EAs) in LARC. EAs are not intended for direct comparison, but rather to concurrently randomized control arm (CA) patients. Primary endpoint (EP) and available secondary EPs (from EA1 using veliparib [V], PARPi; and EA2 using pembrolizumab [P], anti-PD-1) have been previously reported. We present long-term outcomes of all pts enrolled (NCT02921256). Methods: Stage II/III pts with MSS LARC (with any ONE of the following: distal location [cT3-4 ≤5cm from anal verge, any N]; bulky [any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of mesorectal fascia]; high risk for metastatic disease [cN2]; or not a sphincter-sparing surgery [SSS] candidate) were randomized to CA (neoadjuvant FOLFOX [x 4mo] → chemoRT [capecitabine with 50.4Gy] → surgery 8-12 wks later). EA1 added V (400mg PO BID) and EA2 added P (200mg IV Q3 wks x 6 doses) each concurrent with chemoRT. Primary EP: 4-point reduction in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score with a one-sided α=0.10, 80% power. NAR compared by linear model controlling for clinical T4 at entry (Y/N). Secondary EPs: OS, DFS. p-values are two-sided. Results: From 10/2016-2/2018, 178 pts were randomized (88 CA, 90 EA1). From 8/2018-5/2019, 185 pts were randomized (95 CA, 90 EA2). Baseline characteristics were previously reported. Median follow-up is 3.50 yrs for the 1st comparison. Median follow-up is 3.15 yrs for the 2nd comparison. Updated primary and long-term secondary outcomes are in the table. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, addition of V to TNT provided no significant differences in the NAR score or 3yr outcomes. The addition of P to TNT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 3yr OS, but not DFS. Correlative molecular analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1-189867; U24-196067; AbbVie; Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256 . [Table: see text]

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma.NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1-2 or T2-3N0-2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm]) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4-5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5-26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5-23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71-1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis).The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted.National Cancer Institute and Genentech.

Purpose: NRG Oncology's RTOG 0933 demonstrated benefits to memory preservation after hippocampal avoidant whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT), the avoidance of radiation dose to the hippocampus (using intensity modulated radiation planning and delivery techniques) during WBRT, supporting the hypothesis of hippocampal radiosensitivity and associated memory specificity. However, some patients demonstrated cognitive decline, suggesting mechanisms outside hippocampal radiosensitivity play a role. White matter injury (WMI) has been implicated in radiation therapy–induced neurocognitive decline. This secondary analysis explored the relationship between pretreatment WMI and memory after HA-WBRT. Methods and Materials: Volumetric analysis of metastatic disease burden and disease-unrelated WMI was conducted on the pretreatment magnetic resonance image. Correlational analyses were performed examining the relationship between pretreatment WMI and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) outcomes at baseline and 4 months after HA-WBRT. Results: In the study, 113 patients received HA-WBRT. Of 113 patients, 33 underwent pretreatment and 4-month posttreatment HVLT testing and pretreatment postcontrast volumetric T1 and axial T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. Correlation was found between larger volumes of pretreatment WMI and decline in HVLT-R recognition (r = 0.54, P

Objective Women with endometrial or cervical cancer at risk for recurrence receive postoperative radiation therapy (RT). A patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument to assess bowel and urinary toxicities is the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), which has been validated in men with prostate cancer. As this instrument specifically measures bowel toxicity and the degree to which this is a problem, it was used in NRG Oncology/RTOG 1203 to compare intensity modulated RT (IMRT) to standard RT. This paper reports on the expanded validation of EPIC for use in women receiving pelvic RT. Methods In addition to the EPIC bowel domain, urinary toxicity (EPIC urinary domain), patient reported bowel toxicities (PRO-CTCAE) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)) were completed before, during and after treatment. Sensitivity, reliability and concurrent validity were assessed. Results Mean bowel and urinary scores among 278 women enrolled were significantly worse during treatment and differed between groups. Acceptable to good reliability for bowel and urinary domain scores were obtained at all time points with the exception of one at baseline. Correlations between function and bother scores within the bowel and urinary domains were consistently stronger than those across domains. Correlations between bowel domain scores and PRO-CTCAE during treatment were stronger than those with the FACT. Conclusion Correlations within and among the instruments indicate EPIC bowel and urinary domains are measuring conceptually discrete components of health. These EPIC domains are valid, reliable and sensitive instruments to measure PRO among women undergoing pelvic radiation.

Background Resection of T4 colon cancer remains challenging compared to lower T stages. Data on the effect of neoadjuvant radiation to improve resectability and survival are lacking. The purpose of this study is to describe the use and outcomes of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in clinical T4 colon cancer. Methods Adults with clinical evidence of T4 locally advanced colon cancer were included from the National Cancer Database (2004–2014). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to examine the association between neoadjuvant radiation therapy and R 0 resection rate, multivisceral resection, and overall survival. Results Fifteen thousand two hundred and seven patients with clinical T4 disease who underwent resection were identified over the study period. One hundred ninety-five (1.3%) underwent neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant radiation therapy included younger age, male sex, private insurance, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and treatment at an academic research program. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy was associated with superior R 0 resection rates (87.2% neoadjuvant radiation therapy vs 79.8% no neoadjuvant radiation therapy; P = .009). Five-year overall survival was increased in the neoadjuvant radiation therapy group (62.0% neoadjuvant radiation therapy vs 45.7% no neoadjuvant radiation therapy; P P = .01). In a subgroup analysis of T4b patients, there was an even greater size effect in adjusted overall survival (odds ratio 1.71; 95% confidence interval 1.07–2.72; P = .02). Conclusion Although radiation is rarely used in locally advanced colon cancer, this National Cancer Database analysis suggests that the use of neoadjuvant radiation for clinical T4 disease may be associated with superior R 0 resection rates and improved overall survival. Patients with clinical T4b disease may benefit the most from treatment. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy should be considered on a case-by-case basis in locally advanced colon cancer.

TPS3631 Background: Adenomatous polyps are the acknowledged precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC). Identification and removal of adenomas is the mechanism by which screening is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. Patients with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas ( < 1 cm with neither villous components nor high grade dysplasia) are recommended to return at a timing ranging from 5-10 yrs. However, evidence for the benefit, optimal timing, and recommended frequency of surveillance colonoscopy is not available. A randomized, clinical trial to demonstrate the difference in results between 5- or 10-yr surveillance for participants with non-advanced adenoma can guide clinical practice. Methods: NRG-CC005/FORTE is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing CRC incidence in participants randomized to recommendation for a 5- and 10-yr vs. a 10-yr only surveillance colonoscopy exam schedule. Other pre-defined exploratory endpoints include incidence of advanced adenomas, CRC mortality, and incidence of stage III-IV CRCs. Stratification factors include age, gender, and time from qualifying colonoscopy to randomization. Participants ≥50 and < 70 yrs of age at the time of randomization with a first-time diagnosis of 1-2 non-advanced tubular adenomas from the qualifying colonoscopy within 4 yrs prior to randomization will be eligible. Participants with a clinical diagnosis of a significant genetic risk for CRC or with a family history of CRC diagnosed at ≤60 yrs in a first degree relative or in two first degree relatives diagnosed at any age are ineligible. Other ineligibility criteria include prior history of CRC or colorectal adenomas, a hyperplastic polyp measuring ≥1 cm or traditional serrated adenomas, or life expectancy < 10 yrs due to comorbid conditions. Collection of blood, stool, and tissue samples is planned. Statistics: The primary endpoint for the trial is CRC incidence. The trial is focused on CRCs diagnosed between year 5 and year 10. By incorporating a window of +/- 1 yr to allow for somewhat earlier and later procedures, as typically occurs in clinical medicine, the primary endpoint will include incident cancers identified in years 4 through 11. A crude 4- to 11-yr incidence rate of 0.387% is assumed for the 5- and 10-yr schedule arm. The study is powered at 90% to detect a non-inferiority margin difference of 0.387% at alpha 5% in CRC incidence rate between two schedules. 9,500 participants are to be enrolled. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067 Clinical trial information: NCT05080673.

Purpose A multi-institutional phase 2 trial assessed long-term outcomes of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for anal canal cancer. Methods and Materials T2-4N0-3M0 anal cancers received 5FU (1000 mg/m2/d, 96-hour infusion) and MMC (10 mg/m2 bolus) on days 1 and 29 of dose-painted IMRT prescribed as follows: T2N0 = 42 Gy elective nodal and 50.4 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 28 fractions; T3-4N0-3 = 45Gy elective nodal, 50.4 Gy ≤3 cm and 54 Gy >3cm metastatic nodal and 54 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 30 fractions. Local-regional failures, distant metastases, and colostomy failures were assessed using the cumulative incidence method, and disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Late effects were scored using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3. Results Of 52 patients, 54% were stage II, 25% were stage IIIA, and 21% were stage IIIB. Median follow-up was 7.9 years (min-max, 0.02-9.2 years). Local-regional failure, colostomy failures, distant metastases, overall survival, disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival at 5 years are 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%), 10% (95% CI, 4%-20%), 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 76% (95% CI, 61%-86%), 70% (95% CI, 56%-81%), and 74% (95% CI, 59%-84%); and at 8 years they are 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%), 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%), 68% (95% CI, 53%-79%), 62% (95% CI, 47%-74%) and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%), respectively. Eight patients experienced local-regional failure, with 5 patients having persistent disease at 12 weeks. No isolated nodal failures occurred in the microscopic elective nodal volumes. Six patients required colostomy—5 for local-regional salvage and 1 for a temporary ostomy for anorectal dysfunction. Rates of late adverse events included: 28 patients (55%) with grade 2, 8 patients (16%) with grade 3, 0 patients with grade 4, and 2 patients (4%) with grade 5 events (sinus bradycardia and myelodysplasia, possibly owing to chemotherapy). Only 11 patients reported grade 1 to 3 sexual dysfunction. Conclusions Dose-painted IMRT with 5FU/MMC for the treatment of anal canal cancer yields comparable long-term efficacy as conventional radiation cohorts. Enhanced normal tissue protection lowered rates of grade 3 and higher late effects without compromising pelvic tumor control.

Purpose/Objective(s) Standard of care for locally advanced anal carcinoma is definitive chemoradiation with IMRT. Currently, target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumes are created using a pre-treatment CT-simulation scan. However, during the course of radiotherapy, there is often change in the size and/or position of the tumor and surrounding normal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize that the implementation of an adaptive radiation therapy treatment protocol in anal cancer may reduce radiation dose to critical surrounding normal structures, such as the bowel, through the use of anatomy-adapted replanning. Materials/Methods Retrospective daily adaptive CTs were created for 4 patients (54 Gy, 30 fraction VMAT) in an oncology imaging informatics system using the Adaptive Calculation and Tracking for Offline Plan Review (ACTOR) toolkit. Each adaptive CT was created by deformable image registration (dir) of the planning CT to the daily CBCT. The structure sets from the planning CT were deformed onto each adaptive CT and ultimately corrected and revised by two qualified radiation oncologists. The adaptive CTs were transferred to a treatment planning system for recalculation. The original treatment plan was recalculated on each fraction adaptive CT to establish the real dose received during treatment. A two-sample t-test was used to compare the average real dose received dosimetric values to the values obtained on trigger-based adaptive planning. Results Using dose prescriptions for target volumes and normal tissue dose constraints as defined in RTOG 0529 (Kachnic et al 2013), normal bowel dose metrics, including bowel V45 20cc as trigger 1, there was a significant reduction in bowel V45 for each patient (table), with an average reduction in bowel V45 of 86.7% (P = 0.0001) across all patients. Adapting only the 5 fractions with the highest values for bowel V45 (trigger 2), we also found a significant reduction for each patient (table), with an average reduction of 20.8 % (P = 0.0011) across all patients. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that triggered adaptive re-planning using bowel V45 > 20cc could likely achieve reductions in normal tissue dose. Adaptive planning during radiation treatment of anal cancer may therefore be beneficial for reduction of treatment-related GI toxicity. These results can help inform a future randomized trial of adaptive therapy vs. standard planning.

Purpose/Objective(s) Approximately one in eight women in the United States is diagnosed with breast cancer and eligible for mastectomy with implant reconstruction. Although it has been suggested that patients with breast cancer or those who are at high risk for breast cancer may have an increased risk of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) after breast implantation, no studies have explored the association in this population. Our objective was to determine the relative and absolute risks of breast ALCL after post-mastectomy implant reconstruction for breast cancer compared with the general population. Materials/Methods This population-based study obtained incidence data on breast ALCL in the general population from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 – 2017. Patients who underwent post-mastectomy implant reconstruction for primary breast cancer from 2000 – 2016 were identified and followed through 2017. Because breast implant-associated ALCL has been documented as early as 2 months after implantation, patients with less than two months of follow-up were excluded. Observed-to-expected ratios for breast ALCL were derived from multiple primary – standardized incidence ratios in the study population versus the general U.S. population after adjusting for age, sex, race, anatomical site, and year of diagnosis. For external validation, we compared the number of cases of breast ALCL diagnosed in SEER with the estimated number of FDA-reported cases over a similar time period. Results The incidence rate of breast ALCL in the general U.S. female population was 0.08 – 0.12 per 1,000,000 persons per year and was rising. 52,882 women were identified that received post-mastectomy implant reconstruction for primary breast cancer and were followed for a median of 69 months, including 10,979 patients with follow-up time greater than or equal to 10 years (range 2 – 215 months). After adjusting for demographical characteristics of the cohort, the expected incidence rate of breast ALCL was 0.25 – 0.34 per 1,000,000 persons per year versus an observed rate of 5.8 – 8.7 per 1,000,000 persons per year (standardized incidence ratio 23.4 [95% confidence interval 2.8 – 84.7]). These findings corresponded well with FDA-reported cases; 353 SEER versus 333 FDA cases, respectively. Conclusion Although breast cancer patients who receive post-mastectomy implant reconstruction are at increased risk of breast ALCL, the absolute risk remains extremely low. Furthermore, the risk does not appear to be increased compared to patients that receive implantation (for cosmesis or reconstruction) in previously reported literature.

From the time of initial incorporation of the of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) in 1933, through the early 1990s, diplomates of 23 of its 24 member boards understood that their initial certification awards extended throughout the continuum of their careers. From the time of its founding in 1969, only the American Board of Family Medicine required continuous certification. As early as the post–World War II era, the appropriateness of this “once and done” certification process was questioned by medical educators, and more recently by legislators, regulators, and the public. To meet the demands of rapidly changing scientific and clinical advances, and to maintain the values accrued by hard-fought self-regulation, the ABMS and its member boards agreed to implement programs that required continuous elements of professionalism, attainment, and assessment of current medical skills and knowledge and elements of practice improvement, throughout the career of each certified physician. Each of the medical specialty boards was provided some flexibility to determine specifics of their program within the general framework of the ABMS core competencies and four defined maintenance of certification (MOC) foundational parts. Herein, we describe the programs in general and more specifically, as they relate to the field of radiation oncology.

A curriculum vitae (CV) serves an important role for any job seeker, whether a medical student applying for a residency position, an academic physician moving up the promotion and tenure ladder, or a physician transitioning to a field outside of clinical medicine. A properly crafted CV enables the radiation oncologist to tell a compelling story about his or her career path and goals. This chapter provides details of crafting a compelling CV for academic medicine, lab-based research, private practice, and industry-based jobs. Additionally highlighted are other essential documents—the cover letter, resume, and biosketch—which allow the radiation oncologist to emphasize one’s strengths, and convey to the reader that the candidate has the abilities to succeed at the requirements of the job to which one is applying.

Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 10-16 months. It is defined by tumor involvement of neighboring blood vessels that precludes resection. Standard doses of conventionally fractionated radiation have had little effect on overall survival in this setting, although they are associated with improved progression-free survival and time off chemotherapy. Evolving radiotherapy techniques have allowed for higher, ablative doses of radiotherapy to target tumor while also respecting normal tissue constraints of neighboring radiosensitive structures in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, advancements in image guidance, organ motion management, and the use of adaptive planning have enabled safe delivery of higher, ablative doses of radiation. This has resulted in improved survival. This review will summarize the expanding role of radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.

565 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis with a minority of patients (pts) eligible for curative resection. Currently, systemic treatment options for down-staging pts with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC is extrapolated from the metastatic setting and modified FOLFIRINOX (FFX) +/- radiation (RT) is the most widely used regimen. Herein, we report the outcomes of combination gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) +RT as compared to FFX +RT in the neoadjuvant (NA) setting via a single institution retrospective cohort review. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of pts with PDAC who underwent surgical resection at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) between 2011-2020. We evaluated demographics, treatment, clinical, surgical, and pathological outcomes. Statistical analysis includes Kaplan-Meier analysis and paired t-tests. Results: We reviewed 717 pts who underwent surgical resection at CUIMC of which 227 pts were confirmed to have received NA chemotherapy. Of those 227 patients, 133 pts also received RT. In total, 39 pts received GTX+RT and 42 pts received FFX+RT. Median age at diagnosis of pts who received NA GTX+RT or FFX+RT was 65 and 63 years, respectively. All pts were AJCC stage III at diagnosis and ECOG 0 or 1. There was a significantly greater percentage of pts who achieved R0 resection after GTX+RT as compared to FFX+RT, 35 (89.7%) vs 29 (69.0%), respectively (p=0.022). Significantly more pts achieved N0 lymph node status after GTX+RT as compared to FFX+RT, 29 (74.4%) vs 22 (52.4%), respectively (p=0.041). No statistically significant difference was detected in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or median overall survival (mOS) in pts who received GTX+RT and achieved R0 resection as compared to FFX+RT. See Table for summary. Conclusions: GTX appears to be a viable and active NA regimen in Stage III PDAC. In our small cohort study, more patients who received GTX+RT achieved R0 resection and N0 status as compared to FFX+RT. No difference in survival was detected but this may be due to inadequate power or choice of subsequent therapies. Larger prospective studies evaluating GTX+RT as an alternative treatment in the NA setting are warranted.[Table: see text]

BACKGROUND Chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin remains the standard of care for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal. A prolonged treatment time is associated with inferior disease-specific outcomes. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 0529 demonstrated decreased toxicity and fewer treatment breaks with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but this has not been assessed in a randomized trial. Using data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), this study evaluated the impact of IMRT on treatment time and survival in anal SCC. METHODS The NCDB was used to identify patients with anal cancer from 2004 to 2013. The included patients were those with stage I to III squamous cell cancer of the anal canal who had received definitive chemoradiation by IMRT or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Statistical analyses were performed with logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis, and propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS Of 6814 patients, 57.4% were treated with 3DCRT, whereas 42.6% received IMRT. Patients receiving IMRT had a reduced risk of a long treatment time in a multivariate analysis (P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates with IMRT and 3DCRT were 80.8% and 78.9%, respectively (P = .0036). According to a propensity analysis, patients receiving IMRT had improved OS (P = .039) and a reduced risk of a long treatment time (P < .0001) in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS IMRT use was associated with significantly reduced overall treatment time and improved survival in comparison with 3DCRT. It is important to note that NCDB data are not as robust as randomized data. However, these results further support the use of IMRT as part of sphincter-preserving therapy for the anal canal.

This prospective pilot study evaluated (1) the potential for collecting structured longitudinal data on patient-reported non-routine events (PNREs) (i.e., events that deviate from expected or optimal care) during pediatric and adult radiation cancer therapies and (2) the potential relationship between PNREs, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs), and unplanned treatment events (UTEs). Along with PNREs, data were collected on patient’s background, distress, quality of life, hospital system care experience rating, and treatment intensity, during a 3-month period; UTEs were retrospectively captured through review of patients’ records. Initial results suggest a relationship exists between both PNREs and safety-relevant PNREs with patient distress, quality of life, and care experience ratings. UTEs occurred more often in pediatric patients and were primarily related to patients’ underlying disease. This systems-safety approach to identifying at-risk points in treatment pathways has the potential to provide actionable information for the mitigation of shortcomings in cancer therapy.

Skeletal-related events (SREs), common sequelae of metastatic cancer, are reduced by bisphosphonates. In this study, it was postulated that radiopharmaceuticals, added to bisphosphonates, could further decrease the incidence of SREs. NRG Oncology RTOG 0517 randomized patients with breast, lung, and prostate cancer and blastic bone metastases to either zoledronic acid (ZA) alone or ZA plus radiopharmaceuticals (Sr-89 or Sm-153). The primary endpoint was time to development of SREs. Secondary objectives included quality of life (QOL), pain control, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. 261 patients (median age 68; 62% male; 55% prostate, 35% breast, 10% lung) were accrued between July 2006 and February 2011. The study closed early due to a lower than expected rate of SREs. 52 (42%) patients in the ZA arm and 49 (40%) in the radiopharmaceutical arm experienced an SRE. Median time free of SREs was 29.9 and 27.4 months, respectively (p = 0.84). Median OS in the ZA arm and radiopharmaceutical arms was 32.1 and 26.9 months, respectively (p = 0.37). Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that primary disease site (lung) and number of bone metastases (> 2) had a negative impact on OS (p