Tanya Trippett, Helen Toledano, Quentin Campbell Hewson, Arnauld Verschuur, Anne-Marie Langevin, Isabelle Aerts, Lisa Howell, Soledad Gallego, Claudia Rossig, Amy Smith, Darshak Patel, Leonardo R. Pereira, Sravanthi Cheeti, Luna Musib, Katherine E. Hutchinson, Clare Devlin, Ronald Bernardi, Birgit Geoerger, Institut Català de la Salut, [Trippett T] Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. [Toledano H] Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. [Campbell Hewson Q] Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, The Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. [Verschuur A] Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Pediatric Oncology, Timone Children’s Hospital, Marseille, France. [Langevin AM] Department of Pediatrics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. [Aerts I] Oncology Center SIREDO, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France. [Gallego S] Servei d’Oncologia i Hematologia Pediàtriques, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Cobimetinib; Pediatrics; Refractory Solid Tumors Cobimetinib; Pediatria; Tumors sòlids refractaris Cobimetinib; Pediatría; Tumores sólidos refractarios Background: The MAPK pathway is an emerging target across a number of adult and pediatric tumors. Targeting the downstream effector of MAPK, MEK1, is a proposed strategy to control the growth of MAPK-dependent tumors. Objective: iMATRIX-cobi assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of cobimetinib, a highly selective MEK inhibitor, in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Patients and methods: This multicenter Phase I/II study enrolled patients aged 6 months to < 30 years with solid tumors with known/expected MAPK pathway involvement. Patients received cobimetinib tablet or suspension formulation on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Dose escalation followed a rolling 6 design. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity. Results: Of 56 enrolled patients (median age 9 years [range 3-29]), 18 received cobimetinib tablets and 38 cobimetinib suspension. Most common diagnoses were low-grade glioma (LGG; n = 32, including n = 12 in the expansion cohort) and plexiform neurofibroma within neurofibromatosis type 1 (n = 12). Six patients (11 %) experienced dose-limiting toxicities (including five ocular toxicity events), which established a pediatric recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of 0.8 mg/kg tablet and 1.0 mg/kg suspension. Most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal and skin disorders. Steady state mean exposure (Cmax, AUC0-24) of cobimetinib at the RP2D (1.0 mg/kg suspension) was ~ 50 % lower than in adults receiving the approved 60 mg/day dose. Overall response rate was 5.4 % (3/56; all partial responses in patients with LGG). Conclusions: The safety profile of cobimetinib in pediatrics was similar to that reported in adults. Clinical activity was observed in LGG patients with known/suspected MAPK pathway activation. Cobimetinib combination regimens may be required to improve response rates in this pediatric population.