Search

Aims Patients with atrial fibrillation who despite taking oral anti-coagulant therapy (OAT) suffer a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) without vascular cause or who develop left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus (LAAT) should be considered as having malignant LAA. The optimal treatment strategy to reduce SSE risk in such patients is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for malignant LAA practiced in European cardiac centres. Methods and results An 18-item online questionnaire on malignant LAA was disseminated by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee. A total of 196 physicians participated in the survey. There seems to be high confidence in transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging, considering LAAT diagnosis. Switching to another direct oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) is the preferred initial step for the treatment of malignant LAA followed by a switch to vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular-weight heparin, or continued/optimized DOAC dosage, whereas LAA closure is the last option. Left atrial appendage closure is a viable option in patients with embolic stroke despite OAT and no evidence of thrombus at TEE (empty LAA) after comprehensive diagnostic measures to exclude other sources of embolism. Conclusion This EHRA survey provides a snapshot of the contemporary management of patients diagnosed with malignant LAA. Currently, the majority of patients are treated on an outpatient basis with either shifting from VKA to DOAC or from one DOAC to another. Left atrial appendage closure in this population seems to be reserved for patients with higher bleeding risk or complications of malignant LAA, such as stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising treatment for atrial fibrillation. We report 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia outcomes using monopolar PFA delivered through 3 commercial, contact force–sensing focal catheters. METHODS: ECLIPSE AF (Safety & Clinical Performance Study of Catheter Ablation With the Centauri System for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation; NCT04523545) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study evaluating acute and chronic safety and performance using the CENTAURI system to deliver focal PFA with TactiCath SE, StablePoint, and ThermoCool ST. Patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under deep sedation or general anesthesia and returned for remapping at 90 days to evaluate chronic durability. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia was evaluated continuously through 12 months using standard rhythm monitoring for symptomatic episodes and 24-hour Holter at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (74% male, 51.2% paroxysmal, and 58.5% deep sedation) were treated. PV isolation was achieved in 100% of targeted veins (322/322) with first-pass isolation in 92.2% (297/322). There were 4 primary safety events in 4 patients (4.9%, 4/82); 1 nonembolic stroke due to exacerbated cardiac tamponade secondary to catheter perforation and 3 hemorrhagic vascular access complications. There were no incidences of adverse event fistula, diaphragmatic paralysis, myocardial infarction, pericarditis, thromboembolism, PV stenosis, transient ischemic attack, or death. Eighty patients (98%) underwent remapping. Optimized PFA cohorts 3, 4, and 5 showed per-patient isolation rates of 60%, 73%, and 81% and per-PV isolation rates of 84%, 90%, and 92%, respectively. One-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 80.2% (95% CI, 69.7%–87.4%) for the entire patient sample, including 41 patients who underwent repeat focal PFA with the CENTAURI system at remapping. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that optimization of focal PFA with 3 contact force–sensing, solid-tip ablation catheters resulted in the progressive improvement of PV isolation durability at 3-month remapping and high freedom from atrial arrhythmia survival rates, providing a promising focal PFA treatment option integrated with current ablation workflows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the preventable risk factors for embolic ischemic stroke. The high prevalence and the possibility of stroke prevention suggest the need for effective screening for AF. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of and methods for diagnosing AF in patients with ischemic stroke, compare their clinical characteristics, and subsequently outcomes in the AF and non-AF group. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Medical history of patients with ischemic stroke in 2019 was collected and analyzed. Results: Out of the total number of the patients with ischemic stroke, 39% had AF, which was newly discovered in 50.3% of all patients with AF. Almost three-quarters (73%) of patients with known AF in their medical history were not receiving adequate anticoagulation therapy. Most of the patients with newly discovered AF (87%) were diagnosed using a standard 12-lead ECG, while the rest was diagnosed using 24-hour Holter monitoring (12.5%). AF was associated with mortality as well as with a higher CHA2DS2 -VASc score. Conclusion: As many as half of patients with AF in our cohort were diagnosed with AF only after suffering a stroke. In addition, most of the previously diagnosed patients with AF were not receiving adequate anticoagulation therapy. Outcomes were worse in patients with stroke who had concomitant AF, especially those with higher CHA2DS2 -VASc scores. Therefore, more frequent screening of patients is encouraged, with continuous monitoring as an ideal solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Patients with atrial fibrillation who despite taking oral anti-coagulant therapy (OAT) suffer a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) without vascular cause or who develop left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus (LAAT) should be considered as having malignant LAA. The optimal treatment strategy to reduce SSE risk in such patients is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for malignant LAA practiced in European cardiac centres., Methods and Results: An 18-item online questionnaire on malignant LAA was disseminated by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee. A total of 196 physicians participated in the survey. There seems to be high confidence in transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging, considering LAAT diagnosis. Switching to another direct oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) is the preferred initial step for the treatment of malignant LAA followed by a switch to vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular-weight heparin, or continued/optimized DOAC dosage, whereas LAA closure is the last option. Left atrial appendage closure is a viable option in patients with embolic stroke despite OAT and no evidence of thrombus at TEE (empty LAA) after comprehensive diagnostic measures to exclude other sources of embolism., Conclusion: This EHRA survey provides a snapshot of the contemporary management of patients diagnosed with malignant LAA. Currently, the majority of patients are treated on an outpatient basis with either shifting from VKA to DOAC or from one DOAC to another. Left atrial appendage closure in this population seems to be reserved for patients with higher bleeding risk or complications of malignant LAA, such as stroke., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)