Search

The deployment of the front drilling rig requires a significant amount of time before and after water exploration and drainage operations. Loading advanced drilling equipment on the anchor excavator can reduce equipment deployment time and improve drilling efficiency. At present, research on anchor excavator units that integrate excavation, anchoring, and exploration mostly focuses on the structural design of equipment and the design of hydraulic control systems. There is relatively little research on the interference features between different structures. The paper analyzes the interference situation during the attitude adjustment process of the airborne drilling rig. A mathematical model for the interference between the anchor excavator and the airborne drilling rig is established based on the geometric position relationship during the attitude adjustment. The formula for calculating the maximum rotation angle is derived when the anchor excavator interferes with the airborne drilling rig. The maximum angle of interference between the anchor excavator and the airborne drilling rig is taken as the indicator. The influence of various size parameters of the anchor excavator and airborne drilling rig on the maximum angle of the airborne drilling rig in various directions is studied. The results show the following points. ① The larger the inclination angle of the anchor excavator keel, the greater the pitch adjustment angle of the airborne drilling rig. By adjusting the inclination angle of anchor excavator keel, the adjustment range of the elevation angle during the operation of the water exploration drilling rig can be effectively changed. ② The variation of the keel height has little effect on the pitch angle. The variation of the keel height does not affect the variation of the pitch angle, but has a greater impact on the pitch angle, which is proportional. The increase in the length of the keel connecting the twisted ear to the tail of the keel increases the pitch angle, but the effect on the pitch angle is not significant. To change the elevation angle, the value of the keel height can be changed firstly. To change the depression angle, the value of the length of the keel connecting the hinge to the tail of the keel can be changed firstly. ③ When the spacing between the anchor excavator keel protection plates is larger, the maximum horizontal rotation angle of the airborne drilling rig is larger. When it increases to a certain extent, the maximum horizontal rotation angle is no longer affected by the increase in spacing between the anchor excavator keel protection plates. When the distance between the keel protection plates of the anchor excavator is greater than a certain value, the larger the center distance of the support oil cylinder of the anchor excavator, the greater the maximum horizontal rotation angle of the airborne drilling rig. The influence of the spacing between the keel protection plates of the anchor excavator on the maximum horizontal rotation angle of the airborne drilling rig is greater than the center distance of the support oil cylinder of the anchor excavator. ④ When the width of the rear end of the airborne drilling bit is small, it does not affect the maximum horizontal angle. When the width of the rear end of the airborne drilling bit increases to a certain value, the larger the width of the rear end of the airborne drilling bit, the smaller the maximum horizontal angle. When the width of the rear end of the airborne drilling bit is less than a certain value, the larger the width of the front end of the airborne drilling bit, the smaller the maximum horizontal angle. The example verification results show that increasing the inclination angle of the keel, the height of the keel connecting bolts, the height of the keel, and the length of the keel connecting ear to the tail of the keel, while reducing the height difference between the upper edge of the drill bit and the connecting ear of the drill frame, and the length of the keel upper protective plate, effectively increases the maximum pitch angle of the airborne drilling rig.

In response to the difficulties in practical application, susceptibility to signal interference, high cost, and complex implementation of existing coal rock recognition technologies, this paper theoretically analyzes the relationship between coal rock cutting heat production and coal rock hardness. The paper proves the rationality of using infrared thermal imaging to obtain cutting temperature changes for coal rock recognition. A coal rock cutting test bench is built for roadheader. Long-term cutting tests are conducted on ordinary coal seams, coal rock interfaces, and sandstone layers with different hardness. The cutting temperature and vibration signals of the cutting head are obtained through infrared thermal imaging and vibration sensors, and their change patterns are analyzed. The research results indicate the following points. ① As the cutting time increases, the cutting temperature gradually increases. The higher the hardness of coal rock, the higher the cutting temperature, and the faster the rate of increase in cutting temperature. At the initial stage of cutting, coal and rock cannot be recognized by cutting temperature, but during stable cutting, coal and rock can be recognized based on cutting temperature features. ② The vibration intensity of the cutting head increases with the increase of coal rock hardness, but does not show a significant change with the increase of cutting time. Therefore, it can compensate for the lack of recognition of coal rock through cutting temperature at the beginning stage of cutting.③ Accurate recognition of coal and rock cannot be achieved through a single cutting temperature or vibration intensity. Therefore, coal and rock can be recognized through vibration intensity during the initial cutting stage and frequent flash temperatures. In the stable cutting stage, coal and rock can be recognized through temperature obtained from infrared thermal imaging.

Monosynaptic viral tracers are essential tools for dissecting neuronal connectomes and for targeted delivery of molecular sensors and effectors. Viral toxicity and complex multi-injection protocols are major limiting application barriers. To overcome these barriers, we developed an anterograde monosynaptic H129Amp tracer system based on HSV-1 strain H129. The H129Amp tracer system consists of two components: an H129-dTK-T2-pacFlox helper which assists H129Amp tracer's propagation and transneuronal monosynaptic transmission. The shared viral features of tracer/helper allow for simultaneous single-injection and subsequent high expression efficiency from multiple-copy of expression cassettes in H129Amp tracer. These improvements of H129Amp tracer system shorten experiment duration from 28-day to 5-day for fast-bright monosynaptic tracing. The lack of toxic viral genes in the H129Amp tracer minimizes toxicity in postsynaptic neurons, thus offering the potential for functional anterograde mapping and long-term tracer delivery of genetic payloads. The H129Amp tracer system is a powerful tracing tool for revealing neuronal connectomes.