Search

To evaluate the influence of post-label delay times (PLDs) on the performance of 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) magnetic resonance imaging for characterizing parotid gland tumors and to explore the optimal PLDs for the differential diagnosis.Fifty-eight consecutive patients with parotid gland tumors were enrolled, including 33 patients with pleomorphic adenomas (PAs), 16 patients with Warthin's tumors (WTs), and 9 patients with malignant tumors (MTs). 3D pCASL was scanned for each patient five times, with PLDs of 1025 ms, 1525 ms, 2025 ms, 2525 ms, and 3025 ms. Tumor blood flow (TBF) was calculated, and compared among different PLDs and tumor groups. Performance of TBF at different PLDs was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.With an increasing PLD, TBF tended to gradually increase in PAs (p0.001), while TBF tended to slightly increase and then gradually decrease in WTs (p = 0.001), and PAs showed significantly lower TBF than WTs at all 5 PLDs (p0.05). PAs showed significantly lower TBF than MTs at 4 PLDs (p0.05), except at 3025 ms (p = 0.062). WTs showed higher TBF than MTs at all 5 PLDs; however, differences did not reach significance (p0.05). Setting a TBF of 64.350 mL/100g/min at a PLD of 1525 ms, or a TBF of 23.700 mL/100g/min at a PLD of 1025 ms as the cutoff values, optimal performance could be obtained for differentiating PAs from WTs (AUC = 0.905) or from MTs (AUC = 0.872).Short PLDs (1025 ms or 1525 ms) are suggested to be used in 3D pCASL for characterizing parotid gland tumors in clinical practice.• With 5 different PLDs, 3D pCASL can reflect the variation of blood flow in parotid gland tumors. • 3D pCASL is useful for characterizing PAs from WTs or MTs. • Short PLDs (1025 ms or 1525 ms) are suggested to be used in 3D pCASL for characterizing parotid gland tumors in clinical practice.

Background To evaluate the feasibility of using simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess parotid gland tumors, compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI. Methods From September 2018 to December 2018, 20 consecutive patients with parotid tumors who underwent MRI scan for pre-surgery evaluation were enrolled. SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI were scanned with matched imaging parameters, respectively. The scan time of two DWI sequences was recorded. Qualitative (anatomical structure differentiation, lesion display, artifact, and overall image quality) and quantitative (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC; ratio of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR ratio; ratio of contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR ratio) assessments of image quality were performed, and compared between SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI by using Paired t-test. Two-sided P value less than 0.05 indicated significant difference. Results The scan time was 3 min and 41 s for SMS-RESOLVE DWI, and 5 min and 46 s for conventional RESOLVE DWI. SMS-RESOLVE DWI produced similar qualitative image quality with RESOLVE DWI (anatomical structure differentiation, P = 0.164; lesion display, P = 0.193; artifact, P = 0.330; overall image quality, P = 0.083). Meanwhile, there were no significant difference on ADCLesion (P = 0.298), ADCMasseter (P = 0.122), SNR ratio (P = 0.584) and CNR ratio (P = 0.217) between two DWI sequences. Conclusion Compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI, SMS-RESOLVE DWI could provide comparable image quality using markedly reduced scan time. SMS could increase the clinical usability of RESOLVE technique for DWI of parotid gland.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using imaging parameters (D, β and μ) obtained from fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion model to differentiate salivary gland tumors. Methods: 15 b-value (0–2000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was scanned in 62 patients with salivary gland tumors (47 benign and 15 malignant). Diffusion coefficient D, fractional order parameter β (which correlates with tissue heterogeneity) and a microstructural quantity μ of the solid portion within the tumor were calculated, and compared between benign and malignant groups, or among pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin’s tumor (WT), and malignant tumor (MT) groups. Performance of FROC parameters for differentiation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: None of the FROC parameters exhibited significant differences between benign and malignant group (D, p = 0.150; β, p = 0.967; μ, p = 0.693). WT showed significantly lower D (p < 0.001) and β (p < 0.001), while higher μ (p = 0.001) than PA. Combination of D, β and μ showed optimal diagnostic performance (area under the curve, AUC, 0.998). MT showed significantly lower D (p = 0.001) and β (p = 0.025) than PA, while no significant difference was found on μ (p = 0.064). Combination of D and β showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC, 0.933). Significant difference was found on β (p = 0.027) between MT and WT, while not on D (p = 0.806) and μ (p = 0.789). Setting a βof 0.615 as the cut-off value, optimal diagnostic performance could be obtained (AUC = 0.806). Conclusion: A non-Gaussian FROC diffusion model can serve as a noninvasive and quantitative imaging technique for differentiating salivary gland tumors. Advances in knowledge: (1) PA showed higher D and β and lower μ than WT. (2) PA had higher D and β than MT. (3) WT demonstrated lower β than MT. (4) β, as a new FROC parameter, could offer an added value to the differentiation.

To assess the added value of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the characterization of parotid gland tumors. Seventy-eight patients with pathologically confirmed parotid gland tumors, who underwent DWI and SWI for pre-surgery evaluation, were enrolled. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and degree of intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity (ITSS) were measured and compared between benign and malignant groups, and among pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin tumor (WT) and malignant tumor (MT). Independent sample t test, one-way analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for statistical analyses. Benign parotid gland tumor showed a significantly higher mean ADC value than malignant tumors (0.836 ± 0.350 vs 0.592 ± 0.163, p = 0.001). Setting an average ADC value of 0.679 as the cut-off value, optimal differentiating performance could be obtained (AUC, 0.700; sensitivity, 62.69%; specificity, 81.82%) for differentiating malignant from benign tumors. PA showed significantly higher mean ADC and less ITSS than WT (ADC, p

OBJECTIVE To compare and correlate the findings of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging in characterizing parotid gland tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with parotid gland tumors evaluated by MR imaging. The true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and fraction of perfusion (f) values of IVIM imaging and tumor-to-parotid gland signal intensity ratio (SIR) on ASL imaging were calculated. Spearman rank correlation coefficient, chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests with the post-hoc Dunn-Bonferroni method and receiver operating characteristic curve assessments were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Malignant parotid gland tumors showed significantly lower D than benign tumors (p = 0.019). Within subgroup analyses, pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) showed significantly higher D than malignant tumors (MTs) and Warthin's tumors (WTs) (p < 0.001). The D* of WTs was significantly higher than that of PAs (p = 0.031). The f and SIR on ASL imaging of WTs were significantly higher than those of MTs and PAs (p < 0.05). Significantly positive correlation was found between SIR on ASL imaging and f (r = 0.446, p = 0.001). In comparison with f, SIR on ASL imaging showed a higher area under curve (0.853 vs. 0.891) in discriminating MTs from WTs, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.720). CONCLUSION IVIM and ASL imaging could help differentiate parotid gland tumors. SIR on ASL imaging showed a significantly positive correlation with f. ASL imaging might hold potential to improve the ability to discriminate MTs from WTs.

BackgroundDiffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is a technique based on the theory that the diffusion of water follows non-Gaussian distribution; until now, few studies have explored the usefulness of D...

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of histogram parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant from benign parotid gland tumors compared with that of hotspot region of interest (ROI)-based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement. Our study retrospectively enrolled 60 patients with parotid gland tumors who had undergone DWI scan for pre-treatment evaluation. ADC measurements were performed using hotspot ROI (ADCHS-ROI)-based and histogram-based approach. Histogram parameters included mean (ADCmean), median (ADCmedian), 10th (ADC10), 90th (ADC90) percentiles, skewness and kurtosis of ADC. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc Dunn–Bonferroni method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used for statistical analyses. ADCHS-ROI and ADC histogram parameters showed no significant differences between malignant and benign parotid gland tumors (All Ps > 0.05). Within the sub-group analyses, Warthin’s tumors showed the lowest ADCHS-ROI, ADCmean, ADCmedian, ADC10 and ADC90 value, followed by malignant tumors and pleomorphic adenomas (All Ps