Search

Aim: The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate in an oncological population the association risk of antiangiogenic (AA) agents to antiresorptive (AR) agents on the incidence and the severity of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we reviewed the medical records and clinical variables of 59 consecutive oncologic patients who developed MRONJ. For all patients, we retrieved the following variables: age, gender, alcohol and tobacco use, type of cancer, use of corticosteroids for >3 months, history of diabetes, MRONJ staging, combination of AR and AA agents, dental history (surgery, prosthesis) or spontaneous, site of MRONJ, delay between AR and AA first intake, and MRONJ development. Patients were divided into two groups according to drugs therapy they underwent: group 1 (G1) including patients treated with AR agents alone and group 2 (G2) including patients receiving antiresorptive–antiangiogenic drugs (AR+AA). The degree and the therapeutical success were defined as primary outcomes and the number, the localization, and the delay in onset of the lesions as secondary outcomes. In order to identify predictive factors of osteonecrosis-free interval time, univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed. Statistical tests were carried out using the IBM® SPSS® Statistics software. All reported P-values are two-tailed and were considered to be significant when less than 0.05. Results: Among the 47 patients who received AR agent alone (group 1), the mean treatment duration before diagnosis of MRONJ was 39.2 months. In the second group (n = 12), patients developed MRONJ with a comparable mean time of 55 months (P = 0.16). According to the staging of MRONJ at the time of diagnosis, no significant difference (P = 0.736) was observed between the two groups. Moreover, the treatment applied was not statistically different in both the groups and was successful in 36.17% of the patients in group 1 and 58.33% of the patients in group 2. No statistically difference was reported in both the groups (P = 0.16). After statistical analysis, no significant difference in terms of MRONJ localization (P = 0.13) was observed. Finally, the incidence of spontaneous MRONJ was comparable in both the groups. Statistical analysis revealed that total time of treatment was the only factor associated with poor osteonecrosis-free interval time (hazard ratio 0.99; P = 0.001). Interestingly, the combination of an AA and AR agent was not a significant predictor factor of the interval time before the diagnosis of osteonecrosis. Additionally, corticosteroid use, diabetes mellitus, and dental consultation before treatment were not statistically related to poorer osteonecrosis-free interval time rates. Conclusion: In our preliminary study, neither the mean treatment time duration before the diagnosis of MRONJ nor the dose delivered was different in both the groups (AR vs. AR+AA). Moreover, no significant difference was observed between both the groups regarding the localization and the staging of MRONJ at the time of diagnosis. Interestingly, our results demonstrated that the risk of spontaneous MRONJ is statistically comparable in the AR and AR–AA groups. Additionally, the addition of an AA agent did not influence the treatment applied in the two groups of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients developing lung metastasis. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: HNSCC patients with lung metastasis treated between 2001 and 2018 were included. Mean outcomes measures: Statistical analyses described the relationship between patient survival, treatment efficacy and pulmonary metastasis occurrence. Results: One hundred HNSCC patients were included in the study. The median overall survival (OS) was 21 months. The median recurrence‐free survival (RFS) was seven months. Patient survival with only lung metastases was significantly longer compared to patients with lung metastases and lymph nodes involvement or other metastases. Moreover, patients with a single metastasis had longer post‐RFS and OS than patients with multiple metastases. The local control of metastasis was better when patients presented only lung metastases, and it was more effective in single metastasis. The surgery allowed better metastases local control than supportive care or radio and/or chemotherapy. In case of specific therapy, pulmonary resection was associated with a longer post‐RFS and a longer OS compared to supportive care or radio and/or chemotherapy. Conclusions: We confirmed, in the current study, the significant survival benefit for HNSCC patients treated by surgery for their pulmonary metastasis. While treatment of multiple metastases required palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care in most of the cases, specific surgical treatment in selected HNSCC patients should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]