Search

The World Bank will publish the nine volumes of Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition, in 2015-16. Volume 1 - Essential Surgery-identifies 44 surgical procedures as essential on the basis that they address substantial needs, are cost eff ective, and are feasible to implement. This report summarises and critically assesses the volume's five key findings. First, provision of essential surgical procedures would avert about 1.5 million deaths a year, or 6-7% of all avertable deaths in low-income and middle-income countries. Second, essential surgical procedures rank among the most cost eff ective of all health interventions. The surgical platform of the first-level hospital delivers 28 of the 44 essential procedures, making investment in this platform also highly cost eff ective. Third, measures to expand access to surgery, such as task sharing, have been shown to be safe and effective while countries make long-term investments in building surgical and anaesthesia workforces. Because emergency procedures constitute 23 of the 28 procedures provided at first-level hospitals, expansion of access requires that such facilities be widely geographically diffused. Fourth, substantial disparities remain in the safety of surgical care, driven by high perioperative mortality rates including anaesthesia-related deaths in low-income and middle-income countries. Feasible measures, such as WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist, have led to improvements in safety and quality. Fifth, the large burden of surgical disorders, cost-eff ectiveness of essential surgery, and strong public demand for surgical services suggest that universal coverage of essential surgery should be financed early on the path to universal health coverage. We point to estimates that full coverage of the component of universal coverage of essential surgery applicable to first-level hospitals would require just over US$3 billion annually of additional spending and yield a benefit-cost ratio of more than 10:1. It would efficiently and equitably provide health benefits, financial protection, and contributions to stronger health systems.

Background and Objectives: Historically, cholecystectomy was infrequently performed in children. Lifestyle changes, delays in health care access, and increases in childhood obesity occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of these shifts on need for cholecystectomy are poorly understood. We evaluate trends in cholecystectomy case volume among children during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted for children ages 18 years and younger who underwent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2016, to July 31, 2022, at 10 children's hospitals. Differences in cholecystectomy case mix and volume before and during the pandemic were identified using bivariate comparisons and interrupted time series analysis., Results: Overall, 4282 children were identified: 2122 before the pandemic and 2160 during the pandemic. Most were female (74.2%) with a median age of 15 years (IQR, 13.0-16.0 years). The proportion of Hispanic (55.0% vs 60.1%; P = .01) patients, body mass index (BMI) (26.0 vs 27.1; P < .001), and obesity (BMI > 30) (30.8% vs 37.4%; P < .001) increased during the pandemic. Predicted monthly case volume increased from 40 to 100 during the pandemic. Patients transferred from an outside hospital increased (21.3% vs 28.5%; P < .001). Significant increases in acute cholecystitis (12.2% vs 17.3%; P < .001), choledocholithiasis (12.8% vs 16.5%; P = .001), gallstone pancreatitis (10.6% vs 12.4%; P = .064), and chronic cholecystitis (1.4% vs 3.2%; P < .001) also occurred. On interrupted time series analysis, change in month-to-month case count significantly increased during the pandemic (Figure 1; P < .001), which persisted after exclusion of transferred patients., Conclusions: Pediatric cholecystectomy case volume and complexity increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings may be secondary to changes in childhood health, transfer patterns, and shifts in access, highlighting an increased health care burden on children's hospitals., (Copyright © 2025 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Objective: Data on the incidence of recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) following index admission for ASBO in children are limited. We sought to determine if operative management was associated with a lower rate of recurrence compared to non-operative management (NOM)., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of children with ASBO admitted to nine hospitals from 10/2020 to 12/2022 who underwent a trial of NOM. Children were followed for a year after admission. The primary outcome was readmission for recurrent ASBO. Adjusted comparisons were made between children successfully managed nonoperatively at the index admission and those who underwent surgery., Results: Among 136 children, 87 (63.9%) had successful NOM at the index admission. Within 1 year, twenty patients (14.7%; 17/87 NOM group; 3/49 operative group) had recurrent ASBO. On unadjusted analysis, there was a higher risk of recurrent ASBO in the NOM group (19.5 vs. 6.1%, P=0.04). However, after adjusting for age (HR 0.35, CI 0.10-1.23), there was no significant difference. Among patients with recurrent ASBO, 7/20 (35%) underwent an urgent or emergent operation at readmission; this rate was similar between initial management groups., Conclusion: Although the rate of recurrent ASBO in children is nearly 15% within one year, this rate does not differ based on the initial management strategy. Among children with recurrent ASBO, one-third underwent an urgent or emergent operation at readmission. NOM appears to be as effective in preventing recurrent ASBO as surgery., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding: None, (Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our aim was to better understand attitudes towards parental leave from the perspective of both surgeon faculty and current surgical trainees. We hypothesized that support for trainees to take parental leave would vary by year of residency graduation and by parental status., Design: We conducted a web-based survey regarding opinions on trainee parental leave. Quantitative and conventional content qualitative analyses were performed., Participants: Surveys were sent to surgeon faculty and current trainees from 5 large academic surgical residency programs., Results: Survey response rates were 11.5% for surgeon faculty (68/589), and 17.7% for trainees (50/281). There were 80/118 (67.8%) respondents who reported they had or were currently expecting children, 40/80 (50%) of whom were the gestational carrier. Most thought that 6-12 weeks of parental leave should be given to child-bearing trainees (62/118, 52.5%); another 32.2% (38/118) thought >12 weeks should be given. Responses were similar amongst surgeon faculty and trainees, parents and nonparents, and respondents who identified as men and women. Qualitative analysis revealed that most respondents felt parental leave did not put unreasonable strain on other trainees and felt support could be shown both informally and with formal written policies facilitating patient care coverage. Current surgeon faculty were less likely to feel moderately/extremely supported by their faculty compared to trainees (39% vs 77%, p = 0.004). Less than a third (37/117, 31.6%) of respondents knew the current leave policies., Conclusions: Amongst survey respondents, there was broad support for parental leave for surgical trainees of at least 6 weeks amongst trainees and faculty, and those with and without children. Current trainees felt more supported than current surgical faculty, suggesting that parental leave is increasingly more accepted. Support can be shown both informally and through easily accessible written policies and procedures that facilitate patient care coverage., (Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Clinical clearance of a child's cervical spine after trauma is often challenging because of impaired mental status or an unreliable neurologic examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the criterion standard for excluding ligamentous injury in children but is constrained by long image acquisition times and frequent need for anesthesia. Limited-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (LSMRI) is used in evaluating the evolution of traumatic brain injury and may also be useful for cervical spine clearance while potentially avoiding the need for anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and negative predictive value of LSMRI as compared with criterion standard full-sequence MRI as a screening tool to rule out clinically significant ligamentous cervical spine injury., Methods: We conducted a 10-center, 5-year retrospective cohort study (2017-2021) of all children (0-18 years) with a cervical spine MRI after blunt trauma. Magnetic resonance imaging images were rereviewed by a study pediatric radiologist at each site to determine if the presence of an injury could be identified on limited sequences alone. Unstable cervical spine injury was determined by study neurosurgeon review at each site., Results: We identified 2,663 children younger than 18 years who underwent an MRI of the cervical spine with 1,008 injuries detected on full-sequence studies. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of LSMRI were both >99% for detecting any injury and 100% for detecting any unstable injury. Young children (younger than 5 years) were more likely to be electively intubated or sedated for cervical spine MRI., Conclusion: Limited-sequence magnetic resonance imaging is reliably detects clinically significant ligamentous injury in children after blunt trauma. To decrease anesthesia use and minimize MRI time, trauma centers should develop LSMRI screening protocols for children without a reliable neurologic examination., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Healthcare-associated pressure injuries (HAPI) are known to be associated with medical devices and are preventable. Cervical spine immobilization is commonly utilized in injured children prior to clinical clearance or for treatment of an unstable cervical spinal injury. The frequency of HAPI has been quantified in adults with cervical spine immobilization but has not been well-described in children. The aim of this study was to describe characteristics of children who developed HAPI associated with cervical immobilization., Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of children (0-18 years) who developed a stage two or greater cervical HAPI. This cohort was drawn from an overall sample of 49,218 registry patients treated over a five-year period (2017-2021) at ten pediatric trauma centers. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and cervical immobilization were tabulated to describe the population., Results: The cohort included 32 children with stage two or greater cervical HAPI. The median age was 5 years (IQR 2-13) and 78% (n = 25) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The median (IQR) time to diagnosis of HAPI was 11 (7-21) days post-injury. The majority of cervical HAPI (78%, 25/32) occurred in children requiring immobilization for cervical injuries, with only four children developing HAPI after wearing a prophylactic cervical collar in the absence of a cervical spine injury., Conclusion: Advanced-stage HAPI associated with cervical collar use in pediatric trauma patients is rare and usually occurs in patients with cervical spine injuries requiring immobilization for treatment. More expedient cervical spine clearance with MRI is unlikely to substantially reduce cervical HAPI in injured children., Level of Evidence: Level III (Epidemiologic and Prognostic)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None of the authors have any personal or financial conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Our objective was to determine the utility of enteral contrast-based protocols in the diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) for children., Background: Enteral contrast-based protocols for adults with ASBO are associated with decreased need for surgery and shorter hospitalization. Pediatric-specific data are limited., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study between October 2020 and December 2022 at nine children's hospitals who are members of the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium. Inclusion criteria were children aged 1-20 years diagnosed with ASBO who underwent a trial of nonoperative management (NOM) at hospital admission. Comparisons were made between those children who received an enteral contrast challenge and those who did not. The primary outcome was need for surgery., Results: We enrolled 136 children (71% male; median age: 12 y); 84 (62%) received an enteral contrast challenge. There was no difference in rate of operative intervention between the no contrast (34.6%) and contrast groups (36.9%; P=0.93). Eighty-seven (64%) were successfully managed nonoperatively with no difference in median length of stay (P=0.10) or rate of unplanned readmission (P=0.14). Among the 49 children who required an operation, there was no significant difference in time from admission to surgery or rate of small bowel resection based on prior contrast administration., Conclusions: The addition of enteral contrast-based protocols for management of pediatric ASBO does not decrease the likelihood of surgery or shorten hospitalization. Larger randomized studies may be needed to further define the role of radiologic contrast in the management of ASBO in children., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted timely access to care for children, including patients with appendicitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on management of appendicitis and patient outcomes., Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was performed including 19 children's hospitals from April 2019-October 2020 of children (age≤18 years) diagnosed with appendicitis. Groups were defined by each hospital's city/state stay-at-home orders (SAHO), designating patients as Pre-COVID (Pre-SAHO) or COVID (Post-SAHO). Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were obtained, and univariate and multivariable analysis was performed., Results: Of 6,014 patients, 2,413 (40.1%) presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. More patients were managed non-operatively during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (147 (6.1%) vs 144 (4.0%), p < 0.001). Despite this change, there was no difference in the proportion of complicated appendicitis between groups (1,247 (34.6%) vs 849 (35.2%), p = 0.12). COVID era non-operative patients received fewer additional procedures, including interventional radiology (IR) drain placements, compared to pre-COVID non-operative patients (29 (19.7%) vs 69 (47.9%), p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, factors associated with increased odds of receiving non-operative management included: increasing duration of symptoms (OR=1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.012), African American race (OR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.6), and testing positive for COVID-19 (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.4-21.6)., Conclusion: Non-operative management of appendicitis increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, fewer COVID era cases required IR procedures. These changes in the management of pediatric appendicitis during the COVID pandemic demonstrates the potential for future utilization of non-operative management., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is wide variation in opioid prescribing after appendectomy in children and adolescents, with recent increases noted in opioid-related pediatric deaths from prescription and illicit opioids. The goal of this project was to minimize opioid prescribing at the time of discharge for children undergoing appendectomy by using Quality Improvement (QI) methodology., Study Design: Children (18 years of age or less) who underwent appendectomy were evaluated from January to December 2019 using NSQIP-Pediatric at 10 children's hospitals within the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium. Before project initiation, 5 hospitals did not routinely prescribe opioids after appendectomy (protocol). At the remaining 5 hospitals, prescribing was not standardized and varied by surgeon (no-protocol). A prospective multi-institutional QI project was used to minimize outpatient opioid prescriptions for children after appendectomy. The proportion of children at each hospital receiving an opioid prescription at discharge was compared for 6 months before and after the intervention using chi-square analysis., Results: Overall, 1,524 children who underwent appendectomy were evaluated from January to December 2019. After the QI intervention, overall opioid prescribing decreased from 18.2% to 4.0% (p < 0.001), with significant decreases in protocol hospitals (2.7% vs 0.8%, p = 0.038) and no-protocol hospitals (37.9% vs 8.8%, p < 0.001). The proportion of 30-day emergency room visits did not change after the QI intervention (8.9% vs 9.9%, p = 0.54) and mean postintervention pain management satisfaction scores were high., Conclusion: Opioid prescribing can be minimized in children after appendectomy without increasing emergency room visits or decreasing patient satisfaction. Furthermore, NSQIP-Pediatric can be used as a platform for multi-institutional collaboration for successful implementation of QI projects., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pediatric surgeons are often asked to treat clinical problems for which little high-quality data exist. For adults with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), water soluble contrast-based protocols are used to guide management. Little is known about their utility in children. We aimed to better understand key factors in clinical decision-making processes and integration of adult based data in pediatric surgeon's approach to ASBO., Methods: We administered a web-based survey to practicing pediatric surgeons at institutions comprising the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium., Results: The response rate was 69% (78/113). Over half of respondents reported using contrast protocols to guide ASBO management either routinely or occasionally (n = 47, 60%). Common themes regarding the incorporation of adult-based data into clinical practice included the need to adapt protocols for pediatric patients, the dearth of pediatric specific data, and the quality of the published adult evidence., Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that pediatric surgeons use contrast-based protocols for the management of ASBO despite the paucity of pediatric specific data. Furthermore, our survey data help us understand how pediatric surgeons incorporate adult based evidence into their practice., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A protocol for laparoscopic gastrostomy placement was implemented which specified perioperative antibiotics, feeding regimens, and discharge criteria. Our hypothesis was that hospital cost could be decreased, whereas at the same time improving or maintaining patient outcomes., Methods: Data were collected on consecutive patients beginning 6 months after implementation of our protocol. We recorded surgeon compliance, patient outcomes (as defined by 30-day NSQIP complication rates), and cost of initial hospitalization, which was then compare to a 6-month historical control period., Results: Our control group n = 26 and protocol group n = 39. Length of stay was shorter in the protocol group (P ≤ .05 by nonparametric analysis). The complication rate was similar in both groups (23% control vs 15% protocol, P = .43). Initial hospital costs were not different. Surgeon compliance to protocol was 82%., Conclusions: A standard protocol is achievable for gastrostomy tube management. After implementation of our protocol, we were able to show a significant decrease in length of stay, whereas maintaining quality., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Neurological function in patients with myelomeningocele (MMC) is limited even after prenatal repair. Neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) can improve neurological function in models of spinal cord injury. We aimed to evaluate the survival, integration, and differentiation of human NCSCs derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-NCSCs) in the fetal lamb model of MMC., Methods: Human iPSCs derived from skin fibroblasts were differentiated into NCSCs in vitro, mixed with hydrogel, and seeded on nanofibrous scaffolds for surgical transplantation. Fetal lambs (n=2) underwent surgical MMC creation and repair with iPSC-NCSC seeded scaffolds. Gross necropsy and immunohistochemistry were performed at term., Results: IPSC-NCSCs expressed NCSC markers, maintained > 95% viability, and demonstrated neuronal differentiation in vitro. Immunohistochemical analysis of repaired spinal cords thirty days after transplantation demonstrated the co-localization of human nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) and Neurofilament M subunit (NFM) in the area of spinal cord injury. No gross tumors were identified., Conclusions: Human iPSC-NCSCs survived, integrated, and differentiated into neuronal lineage in the fetal lamb model of MMC. This is the first description of human stem cell engraftment in a model of fetal MMC and supports the concept of using NCSCs to address spinal cord damage in MMC., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)