Search

BACKGROUND: The utility of long-read genome sequencing platforms has been shown in many fields including whole genome assembly, metagenomics, and amplicon sequencing. Less clear is the applicability of long reads to reference-guided human genomics, which is the foundation of genomic medicine. Here, we benchmark available platform-agnostic alignment tools on datasets from nanopore and single-molecule real-time platforms to understand their suitability in producing a genome representation. RESULTS: For this study, we leveraged publicly-available data from sample NA12878 generated on Oxford Nanopore and sample NA24385 on Pacific Biosciences platforms. We employed state of the art sequence alignment tools including GraphMap2, long-read aligner (LRA), Minimap2, CoNvex Gap-cost alignMents for Long Reads (NGMLR), and Winnowmap2. Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 were computationally lightweight enough for use at scale, while GraphMap2 was not. NGMLR took a long time and required many resources, but produced alignments each time. LRA was fast, but only worked on Pacific Biosciences data. Each tool widely disagreed on which reads to leave unaligned, affecting the end genome coverage and the number of discoverable breakpoints. No alignment tool independently resolved all large structural variants (1,001-100,000 base pairs) present in the Database of Genome Variants (DGV) for sample NA12878 or the truthset for NA24385. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a combined approach is needed for LRS alignments for human genomics. Specifically, leveraging alignments from three tools will be more effective in generating a complete picture of genomic variability. It should be best practice to use an analysis pipeline that generates alignments with both Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 as they are lightweight and yield different views of the genome. Depending on the question at hand, the data available, and the time constraints, NGMLR and LRA are good options for a third tool. If computational resources and time are not a factor for a given case or experiment, NGMLR will provide another view, and another chance to resolve a case. LRA, while fast, did not work on the nanopore data for our cluster, but PacBio results were promising in that those computations completed faster than Minimap2. Due to its significant burden on computational resources and slow run time, Graphmap2 is not an ideal tool for exploration of a whole human genome generated on a long-read sequencing platform.

Background The utility of long-read genome sequencing platforms has been shown in many fields including whole genome assembly, metagenomics, and amplicon sequencing. Less clear is the applicability of long reads to reference-guided human genomics, which is the foundation of genomic medicine. Here, we benchmark available platform-agnostic alignment tools on datasets from nanopore and single-molecule real-time platforms to understand their suitability in producing a genome representation. Results For this study, we leveraged publicly-available data from sample NA12878 generated on Oxford Nanopore and sample NA24385 on Pacific Biosciences platforms. We employed state of the art sequence alignment tools including GraphMap2, long-read aligner (LRA), Minimap2, CoNvex Gap-cost alignMents for Long Reads (NGMLR), and Winnowmap2. Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 were computationally lightweight enough for use at scale, while GraphMap2 was not. NGMLR took a long time and required many resources, but produced alignments each time. LRA was fast, but only worked on Pacific Biosciences data. Each tool widely disagreed on which reads to leave unaligned, affecting the end genome coverage and the number of discoverable breakpoints. No alignment tool independently resolved all large structural variants (1,001–100,000 base pairs) present in the Database of Genome Variants (DGV) for sample NA12878 or the truthset for NA24385. Conclusions These results suggest a combined approach is needed for LRS alignments for human genomics. Specifically, leveraging alignments from three tools will be more effective in generating a complete picture of genomic variability. It should be best practice to use an analysis pipeline that generates alignments with both Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 as they are lightweight and yield different views of the genome. Depending on the question at hand, the data available, and the time constraints, NGMLR and LRA are good options for a third tool. If computational resources and time are not a factor for a given case or experiment, NGMLR will provide another view, and another chance to resolve a case. LRA, while fast, did not work on the nanopore data for our cluster, but PacBio results were promising in that those computations completed faster than Minimap2. Due to its significant burden on computational resources and slow run time, Graphmap2 is not an ideal tool for exploration of a whole human genome generated on a long-read sequencing platform.

Most chromosomal aberrations revealed by chromosomal microarray testing (CMA) are simple; however, very complex chromosomal structural rearrangements can also be found. Although the mechanism of structural rearrangements has been gradually revealed, not all mechanisms have been elucidated. We analyzed the breakpoint‐junctions (BJs) of two or more clustered copy number variations (CNVs) in the same chromosome arms to understand their conformation and the mechanism of complex structural rearrangements. Combining CMA with long‐read whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) analysis, we successfully determined all BJs for the clustered CNVs identified in four patients. Multiple CNVs were intricately intertwined with each other, and clustered CNVs in four patients were involved in global complex chromosomal rearrangements. The BJs of two clustered deletions identified in two patients showed microhomologies, and their characteristics were explained by chromothripsis. In contrast, the BJs in the other two patients, who showed clustered deletions and duplications, consisted of blunt‐end and nontemplated insertions. These findings could be explained only by alternative nonhomologous end‐joining, a mechanism related to polymerase theta. All the patients had at least one inverted segment. Three patients showed cryptic aberrations involving a disruption and a deletion/duplication, which were not detected by CMA but were first identified by WGS. This result suggested that complex rearrangements should be considered if clustered CNVs are observed in the same chromosome arms. Because CMA has potential limitations in genotype–phenotype correlation analysis, a more detailed analysis by whole genome examination is recommended in cases of suspected complex structural aberrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) of chromosomal origin is found in many eukaryotic species and cell types, including cancer, where eccDNAs with oncogenes drive tumorigenesis. Most studies of eccDNA employ short-read sequencing for their identification. However, short-read sequencing cannot resolve the complexity of genomic repeats, which can lead to missing eccDNA products. Long-read sequencing technologies provide an alternative to constructing complete eccDNA maps. We present a software suite, C onstruction-based R olling-circle-amplification for e ccDNA S equence I dentification and L ocation (CReSIL), to identify and characterize eccDNA from long-read sequences. CReSIL's performance in identifying eccDNA, with a minimum F1 score of 0.98, is superior to the other bioinformatic tools based on simulated data. CReSIL provides many useful features for genomic annotation, which can be used to infer eccDNA function and Circos visualization for eccDNA architecture investigation. We demonstrated CReSIL's capability in several long-read sequencing datasets, including datasets enriched for eccDNA and whole genome datasets from cells containing large eccDNA products. In conclusion, the CReSIL suite software is a versatile tool for investigating complex and simple eccDNA in eukaryotic cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The utility of long-read genome sequencing platforms has been shown in many fields including whole genome assembly, metagenomics, and amplicon sequencing. Less clear is the applicability of long reads to reference-guided human genomics, which is the foundation of genomic medicine. Here, we benchmark available platform-agnostic alignment tools on datasets from nanopore and single-molecule real-time platforms to understand their suitability in producing a genome representation., Results: For this study, we leveraged publicly-available data from sample NA12878 generated on Oxford Nanopore and sample NA24385 on Pacific Biosciences platforms. We employed state of the art sequence alignment tools including GraphMap2, long-read aligner (LRA), Minimap2, CoNvex Gap-cost alignMents for Long Reads (NGMLR), and Winnowmap2. Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 were computationally lightweight enough for use at scale, while GraphMap2 was not. NGMLR took a long time and required many resources, but produced alignments each time. LRA was fast, but only worked on Pacific Biosciences data. Each tool widely disagreed on which reads to leave unaligned, affecting the end genome coverage and the number of discoverable breakpoints. No alignment tool independently resolved all large structural variants (1,001-100,000 base pairs) present in the Database of Genome Variants (DGV) for sample NA12878 or the truthset for NA24385., Conclusions: These results suggest a combined approach is needed for LRS alignments for human genomics. Specifically, leveraging alignments from three tools will be more effective in generating a complete picture of genomic variability. It should be best practice to use an analysis pipeline that generates alignments with both Minimap2 and Winnowmap2 as they are lightweight and yield different views of the genome. Depending on the question at hand, the data available, and the time constraints, NGMLR and LRA are good options for a third tool. If computational resources and time are not a factor for a given case or experiment, NGMLR will provide another view, and another chance to resolve a case. LRA, while fast, did not work on the nanopore data for our cluster, but PacBio results were promising in that those computations completed faster than Minimap2. Due to its significant burden on computational resources and slow run time, Graphmap2 is not an ideal tool for exploration of a whole human genome generated on a long-read sequencing platform., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests., (©2023 LoTempio et al.)