Search

As qualitative data analysis becomes more frequently applied within the fields of medicine and surgery, it is beneficial to expand our knowledge of the utility, methodology, and interpretation of these techniques. While qualitative research serves a distinct purpose and differs from quantitative research, both can be approached with diligence, with careful techniques that are similarly maintained and respected. In advance of this installment in the Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology series, we presented a comparison between qualitative and quantitative methods. To provide additional understanding of the specifics of qualitative research, this article presents further insights into qualitative research applications, theories, data collection methods, sources of and approaches to bias, and methods which support rigorous results., (© 2025 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

One in three people with Alzheimer's or other dementias lives alone, without a spouse/partner or nearby children (i.e., is aging solo), yet most dementia caregiving research has focused solely on spouses or children. This study examined the experiences of friends, neighbors, siblings, and others providing unpaid care for someone with dementia. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 caregivers (100% female; age 54-85, mean 71; 93% white, 7% black; 29% friend, 29% sibling or in-law, 21% neighbor, 21% church congregant). Participants balanced three priorities: the person living with dementia's quality of life, the person's safety and well-being, and the caregiver's resources. Caregivers described tensions when these priorities conflicted, such as the person with dementia's goal to live alone versus risks to their physical safety. These findings and future research can inform policies and programs to support non-family dementia caregiving., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: People living with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience a high symptom burden. Due to the changing landscape of CF in the era of modulator therapy, we sought to examine the epidemiology of symptoms and their association with quality of life, to help CF clinicians improve symptom screening in clinic., Methods: Using baseline data from a trial of specialist palliative care in adults with CF, we examined symptom prevalence, distress, and association with quality of life (measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Total Score)., Results: Among 262 participants, median age was 33, and 78% were on modulator therapy. The most common symptoms were lack of energy (n = 194, 74%) and cough (190, 73%), whereas the most distressing were difficulty sleeping (range 0-4, mean 2.19, SD 1.15) and pain (mean 2.04, SD 1.1). The symptoms that impaired quality of life the most were extrapulmonary: lack of energy (average quality of life score -29.8, 95% CI -36.8 to -22.8), feeling sad (-29.8, 95% CI -35.6 to -23.9) and worrying (-28.7, 95% CI -34.9 to -22.5)., Conclusions: The symptoms that were associated with the lowest quality of life were extrapulmonary. CF clinicians may consider screening for common symptoms that affect quality of life the most (lack of energy, worrying, difficulty sleeping, feeling irritable, pain, and shortness of breath). These symptoms may identify people living with CF who are most at risk for a decreased quality of life and may benefit from additional support., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dio Kavalieratos, Elisabeth Dellon, and Alexandre Cammarata-Mouchtouris have research funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF). The remaining author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: People living with dementia need increasing care over time, but 1 in 3 adults with cognitive impairment lives alone. The goal of this study was to explore the self-identified strengths and resources for future care needs of adults aging solo with early dementia., Methods: Semistructured interviews with 15 adults not living with a partner and with no children in the same state, who self-identified as having early dementia or mild cognitive impairment; hybrid inductive/deductive reflexive thematic analysis using a successful aging framework., Results: Participants placed a high value on maintaining independence and expressed concerns about preserving selfhood and becoming a burden to others. These values influenced how participants appraised financial and social resources available to address future care needs and strategies to preempt or respond to needs such as transportation, help with finances, or activities of daily living., Discussion: Adults without close family are heterogeneous and have variable resources available to address care needs associated with dementia progression. Common values of retaining independence and minimizing burden to others may be helpful in motivating adults aging solo to undertake planning and help-seeking early., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Some individuals facing dementia contemplate hastening their own death: weighing the possibility of living longer with dementia against the alternative of dying sooner but avoiding the later stages of cognitive and functional impairment. This weighing resonates with an ethical and legal consensus in the United States that individuals can voluntarily choose to forgo life-sustaining interventions and also that medical professionals can support these choices even when they will result in an earlier death. For these reasons, whether and how a terminally ill individual can choose to control the timing of their death is a topic that cannot be avoided when considering the dementia trajectory. With a focus on the U.S. context, this landscape review considers the status of provisions that would legally permit people facing dementia to hasten death with appropriate support from medical professionals. This review can be used to plan and guide clinical and legal practitioner discussion and policy development concerning evolving questions not fully covered by existing medical decision-making provisions., (© 2024 The Hastings Center.)

Purpose: People living with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience impaired quality of life, but the extent to which pulmonary function is associated with quality of life in CF remains unclear METHODS: Using baseline data from a trial of specialist palliative care in adults with CF, we examined the association between pulmonary obstruction and quality of life (measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Total Score)., Results: Among 262 participants, median age was 33, and 78% were on modulator therapy. The median quality of life score was higher in those with mild obstruction (135, IQR 110-156) compared to moderate (125, IQR 109-146) and severe obstruction (120, IQR 106-136). In an unadjusted model, we observed a non-significant trend toward lower quality of life with increased obstruction-compared to participants with mild obstruction, those with moderate obstruction had quality of life score 7.46 points lower (95% CI -15.03 to 0.10) and those with severe obstruction had a score 9.98 points lower (95% CI -21.76 to 1.80). However, this association was no longer statistically significant in the adjusted model, which may reflect confounding due to sex, age, BMI, and modulator therapy. Comorbidities (depression and anxiety) and social determinants of health (financial insecurity and education) were also associated with quality of life., Conclusion: Advancing our understanding of patient-centered markers of quality of life, rather than focusing on pulmonary function alone, may help identify novel interventions to improve quality of life in this patient population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

People living with cystic fibrosis (PLwCF) experience high symptom burden. 146 clinicians completed online surveys regarding barriers and solutions to symptom management between September and October 2020. The surveys contained both closed-ended and free-text entries. The symptom management specialists that CF clinicians most wished to consult included mental health (88, 65%), palliative care (59, 41%), and pain specialists (48, 33%). Barriers to symptom management included concerns about controlled substances prescribed for symptom control causing addiction and precluding transplantation, a lack of trust and collaboration among clinical specialties, a lack of symptom management specialists with CF expertise, and a worry about the affordability of specialist-level symptom management care. Potential solutions included non-pharmacological approaches, expanding access to affordable specialist symptom management care, the creation of clinical care guidelines for symptom management in CF, and having CF clinicians and symptom management specialists work alongside each other in CF clinic to build interdisciplinary trust and education., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Elisabeth Dellon and Dio Kavalieratos have research funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF). The remaining author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Patients with advanced cancer face numerous decisions when diagnosed and often receive decision support from family caregivers. The CASCADE (CAre Supporters Coached to be Adept DEcision partners) factorial trial intervention aims to train caregivers in skills to provide effective decision support to patients and identify most effective intervention components., Methods: This is a 2-site, single-blind, 2 4 factorial trial to test components of the CASCADE decision support training intervention for family caregivers of patients with newly-diagnosed advanced cancer delivered by specially-trained, telehealth, palliative care lay coaches over 24 weeks. Family caregivers (target N = 352) are randomly assigned to one of 16 combinations of four components with two levels each: 1) psychoeducation on effective decision partnering principles (1 vs. 3 sessions); 2) decision support communication training (1 session vs. none); 3) Ottawa Decision Guide training (1 session vs. none) and 4) monthly follow-up (1 call vs. calls for 24 weeks). The primary outcome is patient-reported decisional conflict at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include patient distress, healthcare utilization, caregiver distress, and quality of life. Mediators and moderators (e.g., sociodemographics, decision self-efficacy, social support) will be explored between intervention components and outcomes. Results will be used to build two versions of CASCADE: one with only effective components (d ≥ 0.30) and another optimized for scalability and cost., Discussion: This protocol describes the first factorial trial, informed by the multiphase optimization strategy, of a palliative care decision-support intervention for advanced cancer family caregivers and will address the field's need to identify effective components that support serious illness decision-making., Trial Registration: NCT04803604., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH or federal government., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a progressive genetic disease characterized by multisystem symptom burden. Specialist palliative care (PC), as a model of care, has been shown to be effective in improving quality of life and reducing symptom burden in other conditions, but has not been tested in CF. Objectives: To develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of a specialist PC intervention embedded within an outpatient CF clinic. Design: Single-site, equal-allocation randomized pilot study comparing usual care with addition of four protocolized quarterly visits with a PC nurse practitioner. Participants: Adults with CF age ≥18 years with any of the following: FEV 1 % predicted ≤50, ≥2 CF-related hospitalizations in the past 12 months, supplemental oxygen use, or noninvasive mechanical ventilation use, and moderate-or-greater severity of any symptoms on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Measurements: Randomization rate, intervention visit completion, data completements, participant ratings of intervention acceptability and benefit, and intervention delivery fidelity. Results: We randomized 50 adults with CF of 65 approached (77% randomization rate) to intervention ( n  = 25) or usual care ( n  = 25), mean age 38, baseline mean FEV 1 % predicted 41.8 (usual care), and 41.2 (intervention). No participants withdrew, five were lost to follow-up, and two died (88% retention). In the intervention group, 23 of 25 completed all study visits; 94% stated the intervention was not burdensome, and 97.6% would recommend the intervention to others with CF. More than 90% of study visits addressed topics prescribed by intervention manual. Conclusions: Adding specialist PC to standard clinic visits for adults with CF is feasible and acceptable.

This study evaluates help sources for personal and health tasks of adults living in the community without a spouse or nearby children. Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and over, we conducted a population-based study of 2998 community-dwelling adults who received assistance with personal, household, or medical tasks in the past month. Using ANOVA, we compared adults aging solo to those with spouses at home and/or children in the same state. Adults aging solo were significantly more likely to identify non-child/spouse family, friends, neighbors and paid aides as part of their social networks. Their sources of unpaid help included siblings (33%), friends (32%), and non-family (e.g., neighbors (23%)). Adults aging solo were more likely to use paid caregivers, despite having lower incomes than married peers. Interventions to support adults aging solo should incorporate diverse social/help networks.

Background: Although people living with CF (PLwCF) commonly report pain and other symptoms, little is known regarding their experiences of living with and accessing treatment for burdensome symptoms., Methods: PLwCF completed online questionnaires assessing symptom prevalence and distress and were also asked about experiences accessing pain and symptom treatment, using both closed-ended and free-text entries., Results: Pain was the most prevalent symptom experienced among the 55 participants (76%) and the symptom that most commonly caused distress (64%). PLwCF not on CFTR modulator therapy were likelier to endorse pain as distressing (p = 0.007). Respondents expressed that their pain was commonly underrecognized and undermanaged, they desired a multi-modal approach to treatment, and noted concerns about disease progression affecting their symptom management options., Conclusions: Our study suggests that PLwCF often have unmet symptom management needs that may impair quality of life., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The per diem financial structure of hospice care may lead agencies to consider patient-level factors when weighing admissions., Objective: To investigate if treatment cost, disease complexity, and diagnosis are associated with hospice willingness to accept patients., Design: In this 2019 online survey study, individuals involved in hospice admissions decisions were randomized to view one of six hypothetical patient vignettes: "high-cost, high-complexity," "low-cost, high-complexity," and "low-cost, low-complexity" within two diseases: heart failure and cystic fibrosis. Vignettes included demographics, prognoses, goals, and medications with costs. Respondents indicated their perceived likelihood of acceptance to their hospice; if likelihood was <100%, respondents were asked the barriers to acceptance. We used bivariate tests to examine associations between demographic, clinical, and organizational factors and likelihood of acceptance., Participants: Individuals involved in hospice admissions decisions MAIN MEASURES: Likelihood of acceptance to hospice care KEY RESULTS: N=495 (76% female, 53% age 45-64). Likelihoods of acceptance in cystic fibrosis were 79.8% (high-cost, high-complexity), 92.4% (low-cost, high-complexity), and 91.5% (low-cost, low-complexity), and in heart failure were 65.9% (high-cost, high-complexity), 87.3% (low-cost, high-complexity), and 96.6% (low-cost, low-complexity). For both heart failure and cystic fibrosis, respondents were less likely to accept the high-cost, high-complexity patient than the low-cost, high-complexity patient (65.9% vs. 87.3%, 79.8% vs. 92.4%, both p<0.001). For heart failure, respondents were less likely to accept the low-cost, high-complexity patient than the low-cost, low-complexity patient (87.3% vs. 96.6%, p=0.004). Treatment cost was the most common barrier for 5 of 6 vignettes., Conclusions: This study suggests that patients receiving expensive and/or complex treatments for palliation may have difficulty accessing hospice., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Background: Heart failure is characterized by physical and emotional symptoms and decreased quality of life (QoL). Palliative care can reduce burdens of serious illness but often is limited to inpatient or academic settings., Objectives: To develop and test the Primary Education for Nurses in Palliative care-HF (PENPal-HF) intervention, training outpatient cardiology nurses to address symptom burden, patient priorities for care and QoL, and advance care planning as part of quarterly HF visits., Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized clinical trial for adults with NYHA Stage III or IV HF and ≥ 2 hospitalizations in the past 12 months, recruited from a community-based cardiology clinic. Participants were randomized 2:1, PENPal-HF plus usual care versus usual care alone. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability., Results: We randomized 30 adults with Stage III HF - 20 to PENPal-HF and 10 to usual care. Most in the intervention group (71%) and in the control group (62%) completed the study through the final outcome assessment in week 56; 5 participants died. Of 20 participants in the intervention, 14 (70%) remained in the study through the end of intervention visits; 11 (55%) completed all visits. Most intervention participants (93.75%) agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their care, and 87.5% agreed or strongly agreed that all people with HF should receive the intervention. Most intervention group participants (93.75%) reported a perceived improvement in physical symptoms, mood, and/or QoL., Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that nurse-led primary palliative care in outpatient cardiology settings is promising. Research is warranted to determine efficacy and effectiveness., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Dio Kavalieratos reports financial support was provided by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Dio Kavalieratos reports a relationship with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation that includes: funding grants. Larry Allen reports a relationship with American Heart Association Inc that includes: funding grants. Larry Allen reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Larry Allen reports a relationship with Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute that includes: funding grants. Larry Allen reports a relationship with Boston Scientific Corp that includes: consulting or advisory. Larry Allen reports a relationship with Cytokinetics Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Larry Allen reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory. Larry Allen reports a relationship with UptoDate Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Larry Allen reports a relationship with WCG that includes: consulting or advisory, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting genetic disorder estimated to affect more than 160 000 individuals and their families worldwide. People living with CF commonly experience significant physical and emotional symptom burdens, disruptions to social roles and complex treatment decision making. While palliative care (PC) interventions have been shown to relieve many such burdens in other serious illnesses, no rigorous evidence exists for palliative care in CF. Thus, this study aims to compare the effect of specialist palliative care plus usual CF care vs usual CF care alone on patient quality of life., Methods and Analysis: This is a five-site, two-arm, partially masked, randomised superiority clinical trial. 264 adults with CF will be randomly assigned to usual CF care or usual CF care plus a longitudinal palliative care intervention delivered by a palliative care specialist. The trial's primary outcome is patient quality of life (measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care instrument). Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, satisfaction with care and healthcare utilisation. Outcomes will be measured at 12 months (primary endpoint) and 15 months (secondary endpoint). In addition, we will conduct qualitative interviews with patient participants, caregivers, and palliative care and CF care team members to explore perceptions of the intervention's impact and barriers and facilitators to dissemination., Ethics and Dissemination: Human subjects research ethics approval was obtained from all participating sites, and all study participants gave informed consent. We will publish the results of this trial in a peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN53323164., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Plain language translation may facilitate the public's ability to understand and use results of scientific research. Brief description of activity: This article describes the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) approach to and lessons learned from developing plain language summaries of PCORI-funded research for the lay public., Implementation: We developed and tested a standard template for the summaries, incorporating feedback in the template design from focus groups with members of the public. Between February 2017 and March 2020, we completed translation of 272 plain language summaries of PCORI-funded studies, covering topics including cardiovascular disease, obesity, cancer, mental health, asthma, HIV/AIDS, and comparative effectiveness research methods., Results: Templates use a question-and-answer format, with sections on the rationale, methods, results, limitations, and how the research will help inform decisions. In addition to feedback on template heading wording and order, focus group participants stressed the importance of establishing relevance and conveying credibility and limitations., Lessons Learned: Lessons learned relate to supporting consistency across individual summaries, carefully prioritizing content to include in the summaries, and balancing plain language and reading level with precision. These lessons learned from template development and implementation may be useful to other organizations or publishers contemplating similar efforts to make scientific research results more accessible. [ HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice . 2021;5(2):e155-e161.] Plain Language Summary: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) funds comparative effectiveness research. This research compares the benefits and harms of two or more health care choices. In this article, we describe lessons learned from PCORI's efforts to develop plain language summaries of results from the research it funds. These lessons may help other organizations that want to share research results in plain language.

Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking is a means of hastening death. Unlike euthanasia or medical aid in dying, which are available only in certain jurisdictions and with assistance from health care professionals, the ability to die by voluntarily stopping eating and drinking is determined by ongoing patient choice, although clinical and caregiver support is recommended. Few studies have examined the incidence of patients choosing to stop eating and drinking; studies in the Netherlands and United States suggest patients choosing this route have concerns about both physical and existential suffering. This article presents an overview of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, including guidance for clinicians, legal permissibility, and ethical discussions about whether the act constitutes suicide and how clinicians might respond to requests for information or support.

Background: Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED) is an ongoing voluntary choice to forego food and hydration in an effort to hasten death. Ongoing caregiving is necessary as patients become weak and lose focus as a result of dehydration, but little is known about the process of supporting a patient through VSED. Objective: To explore the experiences of caregivers who supported a patient through VSED. Methods: Qualitative study with t hematic analysis of transcripts of semistructured interviews with 24 U.S. caregivers for 20 individuals who had attempted VSED. Results: Analysis produced four themes: (1) Caregivers believe that VSED is the best death available to the patient. (2) Caregivers act as advocates and worry that the patient's goals will be challenged by health care professionals, the community, or legal authorities; obtaining support from a hospice is an important way to legitimize VSED. (3) Through the VSED process itself, caregivers carry the responsibility for the patient's success as the patient becomes weaker and loses focus. (4) Because there is no social script to guide the VSED process, caregivers choose what roles to play during VSED, such as focusing on physical care or being emotionally present as the patient's spouse or child. Conclusions: Caregivers face unique challenges in helping patients undertake VSED. Many are uncertain about whether they will receive support from clinicians or the community. Support from health professionals may improve caregiver confidence and reduce worry.

Background: End-of-life caregiving frequently is managed by friends and family. Studies on hastened death, including aid in dying or assisted suicide, indicate friends and family also play essential roles before, during, and after death. No studies have compared the experiences of caregivers in hastened and non-hastened death. The study aim is to compare end-of-life and hastened death caregiving experience using Hudson's modified stress-coping model for palliative caregiving., Method: Narrative synthesis of qualitative studies for caregivers at end of life and in hastened death, with 9946 end-of life and 1414 hastened death qualitative, peer-reviewed research articles extracted from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, published between January 1998 and April 2020., Results: Forty-two end-of-life caregiving and 12 hastened death caregiving articles met inclusion criteria. In both end-of-life and hastened death contexts, caregivers are motivated to ease patient suffering and may put their own needs or feelings aside to focus on that priority. Hastened death caregivers' expectation of impending death and the short duration of caregiving may result in less caregiver burden. Acceptance of the patient's condition, social support, and support from healthcare professionals all appear to improve caregiver experience. However, data on hastened death are limited., Conclusion: Caregivers in both groups sought closeness with the patient and reported satisfaction at having done their best to care for the patient in a critical time. Awareness of anticipated death and support from healthcare professionals appear to reduce caregiver stress. The modified stress-coping framework is an effective lens for interpreting caregivers' experiences at end of life and in the context of hastened death.

Healthcare organizations that have successfully implemented pain management programs started by unifying their care policies and building pain management into standing orders, protocols and patient charts. The greatest challenge, however, belongs to staff, pharmacists and physicians, who must measure pain routinely and seek effective treatment, see that the most appropriate and effective treatments are ordered and used, and incorporate pain management into the plan for each patient's recovery.

State-of-the-art hospitals feature private rooms, tree-filled courtyards, fountains, family lounges and more--all in an effort to make patients and visitors more comfortable with their surroundings in a time of stress. A soothing atmosphere doesn't take a complete renovation: Many changes can be made for little investment. Such an environment does take a philosophical commitment by the entire institution, however, and that can't be changed with paint alone.

What care a patient receives reflects not only best practices and available technology but also geography, provider experience and patient preference. Spurred on by payers and a growing body of evidence-based methodology, providers are seeking to make patient care more consistently reflect best practices.

The debate continues over the use of mammography to screen women ages 40-49 for breast cancer. The question: What determines appropriate healthcare--cost savings, lives saved or the most lives saved most cost-effectively.