Search

Purpose: Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Peripheral T cell Lymphomas (PTCL) have a poor prognosis. Bendamustine (B) and Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv) have shown interesting results in this setting. However, little information is available about their efficacy in combination. Patients and Methods: This multicenter and retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of BBv in patients with non-cutaneous R/R PTCL among 21 LYSA centers in France and Belgium. The primary objective was the overall response rate. Results: Eighty-two patients with R/R PTCL were included. The best ORR was 68%, with 49% of patients in CR. In multivariable analysis, only the relapse status after the last regimen (relapse vs refractory) was associated with the response with an ORR of 83% vs 57% (OR=3.70 (95%CI:1.3-10.5); p=0.014). Median DoR was 15.4 (0.6-50.2) months for patients in CR. With a median follow-up of 22 (0-52) months, the median PFS and OS were 8.3 and 26.3 months respectively. Moreover, patients in CR, who underwent an allogeneic transplant, had a better outcome than patients who did not with a median PFS and OS of 19.3 versus 4.8 months (p=0.0005) and NR versus 12.4 months (p=0.0013) respectively. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events which were mainly hematologic. Conclusion: BBv is highly active in patients with R/R PTCL and should be considered as a one of the best option of immunochemotherapy salvage combination in this setting and particularly as a bridge to allogeneic transplant for eligible patients.

Bone marrow biopsies are largely used for the diagnosis and prognostic of various hematological diseases. Complications are rare but can be as serious as hemorrhage. However, little is known about management of patients deemed at high hemorrhagic risk like thrombocytopenic patients or patients receiving antithrombotic drugs. The aim of the study was to describe the management of patients regarding their laboratory profile and antithrombotic treatment prior to bone marrow biopsy and the short-term outcomes, notably hemorrhage. We conducted a retrospective observational study between February 2007 and March 2018. A standardized form was used to collect data from patients' records, blood tests results, management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment before biopsy and complications including bleeding and thromboembolic events until 3 months after the biopsy. A total of 524 bone marrow biopsies were performed. No major bleeding events were reported. The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 0.19% (CI 95% 0.00-1.20) and was linked to low platelets counts (p = 0.002) and not to abnormal coagulation profile or antithrombotic therapy, whether or not a bridging therapy has been used. Anticoagulants were temporarily stopped before biopsy in most cases without subsequent thrombotic complications. Our data suggest that thrombocytopenic patients have a non-negligible bleeding risk. Coagulation profiling seems irrelevant. We propose an algorithm to assist the management of those patients, notably when receiving antithrombotic drugs.

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) are extramedullary tumors of myeloid precursors, generally occurring in a setting of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MD...

Methods : This multicentric retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the combination of BBV in patients with non-cutaneous R/R PTCL among 21 LYSA centers in France and Belgium. The primary objective was to evaluate the best overall response rate (ORR) (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)). Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), impact of transplantation on outcome, and safety. Patients treated between January 2013 and October 2020 were reviewed and all the data were collected through an electronic questionnaire sent to all the physicians. Results : Eighty two patients with R/R PTCL (40 angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL), 2 T-cell lymphoma with TFH phenotype ,13 PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL NOS), 5 Alk+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 17 Alk- ALCL, , 1 Extranodal NK-/T-cell lymphoma, 3 Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL), 1 subcutaneous panniculitis) were included. Median age at beginning of BBV was 60 years, most of patients were male (61%), had advanced stage (88%) and an IPI ≥ 2 (79%). Half of patients were refractory to their last treatment. Median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1 to 6). The best ORR was 71%, with 51% of patients in CR. In multivariable analysis, only the relapse status after the last regimen (relapse vs refractory) was associated with ORR, relapsed patients having a better ORR (83% vs 57% in refractory patients, p=.014, OR=3.70 (95%CI:1.3-10.5)). Median DoR was 15.4 months in patients with CR but differed significantly whether patients were transplanted or not (Not reached vs 8.4 months, p=.0055). Twenty-two patients (30% of patients ≤ 70 years of age) were transplanted (6 autologous and 16 allogenic). With a median follow-up of 9 months, the median PFS and OS were 8.3 and 26.3 months respectively. In multivariable analysis, only 2 factors had a significant impact on PFS and OS: best response (CR/PR vs SD/PD with a median PFS of 17.4 vs 1.9 months, p Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced a grade 3 to 4 adverse event which was mainly hematologic toxicity. Treatment had to be stopped in 11% of patients. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the combination of BBV in the treatment of R/R PTCL in such a large cohort. The results are very encouraging with a high response rate, long DoR in responding patients and a very good outcome. Furthermore, patients in CR who are eligible for transplant have the best outcome, making this combination a good candidate as salvage therapy before transplant consolidation in these high-risk lymphomas with limited treatment options. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bouabdallah: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Herbaux: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brice: MSD: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Takeda: Research Funding. Sibon: Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; iQone: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding. Damaj: roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Brentuximab Vedotin and Bendamustine

Deciphering the mutational patterns and/or the biomarkers that might predict clinical response in patients with myelofibrosis is primordial to make treatment decisions. In this report, we discuss the clinical history, pathological evaluation, and genomics findings in a patient with JAK2-positive myelofibrosis who developed a secondary myelodysplasia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and JAK1/2 inhibitor treatment. Using next-generation sequencing, a paired comparison of relapse-specific versus primary tumour mutations highlighted the dynamic clonal evolution at relapse, showing concurrently the complete eradication of the JAK2-positive clone and the expansion of a second JAK2-negative clone with additional mutations. Importantly, another unexpected finding was that myelodysplasia was not secondary to allogeneic transplantation as relapse was driven by the overgrowth of a preexisting mutated clone, probably fostered by initial treatment options. This case underlines the fact that determining the genetic changes associated with the primary disease and its evolution is crucial to accurately correlate variants frequency to treatment decision and/or treatment response.