7 results on '"Luelmo, S.A.C."'
Search Results
2. Surveillance for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals leads to improved outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis
- Author
-
Klatte, D.C.F., primary, Boekestijn, B., additional, Onnekink, Anke M., additional, Dekker, F.W., additional, van der Geest, L.G., additional, Wasser, M.N.J.M., additional, Feshtali, S.Shahbazi, additional, Mieog, J.S.D., additional, Luelmo, S.A.C., additional, Morreau, H., additional, Potjer, T.P., additional, Inderson, A., additional, Boonstra, J.J., additional, Vasen, H.F.A., additional, van Hooft, J.E., additional, Bonsing, B.A., additional, and van Leerdam, M.E., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
- Author
-
Versteijne, E., Dam, J.L. van, Suker, M., Janssen, Q.P., Groothuis, K., Akkermans-Vogelaar, J.M., Besselink, M.G., Bonsing, B.A., Buijsen, J., Busch, O.R., Creemers, G.J.M., Dam, R.M. van, Eskens, F.A.L.M., Festen, S., Groot, J.W.B. de, Koerkamp, B.G., Hingh, I.H. de, Homs, M.Y.V., Hooft, J.E. van, Kerver, E.D., Luelmo, S.A.C., Neelis, K.J., Nuyttens, J., Paardekooper, G.M.R.M., Patijn, G.A., Sangen, M.J.C. van der, Vos-Geelen, J. de, Wilmink, J.W., Zwinderman, A.H., Punt, C.J., Tienhoven, G. van, Eijck, C.H.J. van, Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp, Surgery, Medical Oncology, Radiotherapy, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oncology, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Methodology, Radiation Oncology, RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, Radiotherapie, MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9), Interne Geneeskunde, and MUMC+: MA Medische Oncologie (9)
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,MULTICENTER ,ADENOCARCINOMA ,Chemoradiotherapy ,OPEN-LABEL ,THERAPY ,TRENDS ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Survival Rate ,CHEMORADIATION ,ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY ,Oncology ,GEMCITABINE ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Humans - Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Initial results of the PREOPANC trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. The long-term results are reported. METHODS In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or upfront surgery in 16 Dutch centers. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine combined with 36 Gy radiotherapy in 15 fractions during the second cycle. After restaging, patients underwent surgery followed by four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery followed by six cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary outcome was OS by intention-to-treat. No safety data were collected beyond the initial report of the trial. RESULTS Between April 24, 2013, and July 25, 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 119) and upfront surgery (n = 127). At a median follow-up of 59 months, the OS was better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group than in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96; P = .025). Although the difference in median survival was only 1.4 months (15.7 months v 14.3 months), the 5-year OS rate was 20.5% (95% CI, 14.2 to 29.8) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.7) with upfront surgery. The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine improves OS compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Serum cytokine levels are associated with tumor progression during FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients
- Author
-
Sijde, F. van der, Dik, W.A., Mustafa, D.A.M., Vietsch, E.E., Besselink, M.G., Debets, R., Koerkamp, B.G., Haberkorn, B.C.M., Homs, M.Y.V., Janssen, Q.P., Luelmo, S.A.C., Mekenkamp, L.J.M., Oostvogels, A.A.M., Nijenhuis, M.A.W.S.T., Wilmink, J.W., Eijck, C.H.J. van, Surgery, Immunology, Pathology, Medical Oncology, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Oncology, and CCA - Cancer biology and immunology
- Subjects
Interleukin-7 ,pancreatic cancer ,Immunology ,Interleukin-18 ,Leucovorin ,treatment response ,Irinotecan ,Oxaliplatin ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein ,IL-1RA ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,cytokine ,Cytokines ,Humans ,biomarker ,Immunology and Allergy ,Fluorouracil ,Chemokine CCL4 ,Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - Abstract
BackgroundBiomarkers predicting treatment response may be used to stratify patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) for available therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of circulating cytokines with FOLFIRINOX response and with overall survival (OS).MethodsSerum samples were collected before start and after the first cycle of FOLFIRINOX from patients with PDAC (n=83) of all disease stages. Overall, 34 circulating cytokines were analyzed with a multiplex immunoassay. In addition, changes in peripheral blood immune cell counts were determined by flow cytometry to correlate with differences in cytokine levels. Chemotherapy response was determined by CT scans with the RECIST 1.1 criteria, as disease control (n=64) or progressive disease (n=19) within eight cycles of FOLFIRINOX.ResultsPatients with high serum IL-1RA concentrations after one cycle of chemotherapy were less likely to have tumor progression during FOLFIRINOX (OR 0.25,P=0.040). Increase of circulating IL-1RA concentrations correlated with increase of total, classical (CD14+CD16-), and non-classical monocytes (CD14-CD16+), and dendritic cells. In multivariable cox regression, including the variables chemotherapy response outcome and baseline CA19-9 level, serum concentrations of IL-7 (HR 2.14,P=0.010), IL-18 (HR 2.00,P=0.020), and MIP-1β (HR 0.51,P=0.025) after one cycle of FOLFIRINOX showed correlations with OS.ConclusionsCirculating IL-1RA, IL-7, IL-18, and MIP-1β concentrations are biomarkers associated with FOLFIRINOX response in PDAC patients, suggesting an important role for specific immune cells in chemotherapy response and PDAC progression. Cytokine-based treatment might improve patient outcome and should be evaluated in future studies.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
- Author
-
Versteijne, E., Suker, M., Groothuis, K., Akkermans-Vogelaar, J.M., Besselink, M.G., Bonsing, B.A., Buijsen, J., Busch, O.R., Creemers, G.J.M., Dam, R.M. van, Eskens, F.A.L.M., Festen, S., Groot, J.W.B. de, Koerkamp, B.G., Hingh, I.H. de, Homs, M.Y.V., Hooft, J.E. van, Kerver, E.D., Luelmo, S.A.C., Neelis, K.J., Nuyttens, J., Paardekooper, G.M.R.M., Patijn, G.A., Sangen, M.J.C. van der, Vos-Geelen, J. de, Wilmink, J.W., Zwinderman, A.H., Punt, C.J., Eijck, C.H. van, Tienhoven, G. van, Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp, Graduate School, Radiotherapy, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Surgery, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oncology, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Methodology, Radiotherapie, RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health, MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9), Interne Geneeskunde, MUMC+: MA Medische Oncologie (9), and Medical Oncology
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,FOLFIRINOX ,MULTICENTER ,DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA ,THERAPY ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Randomized controlled trial ,Borderline resectable ,law ,FULL-DOSE GEMCITABINE ,NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION ,Pancreatic cancer ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Humans ,business.industry ,Dose fractionation ,ORIGINAL REPORTS ,Chemoradiotherapy ,CONCURRENT RADIATION ,medicine.disease ,OPEN-LABEL ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Surgery ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Clinical trial ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,SURVIVAL ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business - Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve the radical resection rate for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but the overall benefit is unproven. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized phase III trial in 16 centers, patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, which consisted of 3 courses of gemcitabine, the second combined with 15 × 2.4 Gy radiotherapy, followed by surgery and 4 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine or to immediate surgery and 6 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary end point was overall survival by intention to treat. RESULTS Between April 2013 and July 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned; 119 were assigned to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 127 to immediate surgery. Median overall survival by intention to treat was 16.0 months with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 14.3 months with immediate surgery (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.05; P = .096). The resection rate was 61% and 72% ( P = .058). The R0 resection rate was 71% (51 of 72) in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 40% (37 of 92) in patients assigned to immediate surgery ( P < .001). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with significantly better disease-free survival and locoregional failure-free interval as well as with significantly lower rates of pathologic lymph nodes, perineural invasion, and venous invasion. Survival analysis of patients who underwent tumor resection and started adjuvant chemotherapy showed improved survival with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (35.2 v 19.8 months; P = .029). The proportion of patients who suffered serious adverse events was 52% versus 41% ( P = .096). CONCLUSION Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer did not show a significant overall survival benefit. Although the outcomes of the secondary end points and predefined subgroup analyses suggest an advantage of the neoadjuvant approach, additional evidence is required.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Mackay, T.M., Smits, F.J., Latenstein, A.E.J., Bogte, A., Bonsing, B.A., Bos, H., Bosscha, K., Brosens, L.A.A., Hol, L., Busch, O.R., Creemers, G.J., Curvers, W.L., Dulk, M den, Dieren, S. van, Driel, L. van, Festen, S., Geenen, E.J.M. van, Geest, L.G. van der, Groot, D.J.A. de, Groot, J.W.B. de, Mohammad, N. Haj, Haberkorn, B.C.M., Haver, J.T., Harst, E, Hemmink, G.J.M., Hingh, I.H. de, Hoge, C., Homs, M.Y.V., Huijgevoort, N.C. van, Jacobs, M.M.E., Kerver, E.D., Liem, M.S., Los, M., Lubbinge, H., Luelmo, S.A.C., Meijer, V.E. de, Mekenkamp, L., Molenaar, I.Q., Oijen, M.G. van, Patijn, G.A., Quispel, R., Rijssen, L.B. van, Romkens, T.E.H., Santvoort, H.C. van, Schreinemakers, J.M.J., Schut, H., Seerden, T., Stommel, M.W., Tije, A.J. Ten, Venneman, N.G., Verdonk, R.C., Verheij, J., Vilsteren, F.G.I. van, Vos-Geelen, J. de, Vulink, A., Wientjes, C., Wit, F., Wessels, F.J., Zonderhuis, B., Werkhoven, C.H. van, Hooft, Jeanin E. van, Eijck, C.H. van, Wilmink, J.W., Laarhoven, H.W. van, Besselink, M.G.H., Mackay, T.M., Smits, F.J., Latenstein, A.E.J., Bogte, A., Bonsing, B.A., Bos, H., Bosscha, K., Brosens, L.A.A., Hol, L., Busch, O.R., Creemers, G.J., Curvers, W.L., Dulk, M den, Dieren, S. van, Driel, L. van, Festen, S., Geenen, E.J.M. van, Geest, L.G. van der, Groot, D.J.A. de, Groot, J.W.B. de, Mohammad, N. Haj, Haberkorn, B.C.M., Haver, J.T., Harst, E, Hemmink, G.J.M., Hingh, I.H. de, Hoge, C., Homs, M.Y.V., Huijgevoort, N.C. van, Jacobs, M.M.E., Kerver, E.D., Liem, M.S., Los, M., Lubbinge, H., Luelmo, S.A.C., Meijer, V.E. de, Mekenkamp, L., Molenaar, I.Q., Oijen, M.G. van, Patijn, G.A., Quispel, R., Rijssen, L.B. van, Romkens, T.E.H., Santvoort, H.C. van, Schreinemakers, J.M.J., Schut, H., Seerden, T., Stommel, M.W., Tije, A.J. Ten, Venneman, N.G., Verdonk, R.C., Verheij, J., Vilsteren, F.G.I. van, Vos-Geelen, J. de, Vulink, A., Wientjes, C., Wit, F., Wessels, F.J., Zonderhuis, B., Werkhoven, C.H. van, Hooft, Jeanin E. van, Eijck, C.H. van, Wilmink, J.W., Laarhoven, H.W. van, and Besselink, M.G.H.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 225263.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% m
- Published
- 2020
7. Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): A multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Mackay, T.M. (Tara M.), Smits, F.J. (F. J.), Latenstein, A.E.J. (A. E.J.), Bogte, A. (A.), Bonsing, B.A. (Bert), Bos, H. (H.), Bosscha, K. (Koop), Brosens, L.A. (Lodewijk), Hol, L. (L.), Busch, O.R.C. (Olivier), Creemers, G.J.M. (Geert-Jan), Curvers, W.L. (W. L.), Dulk, M. (Marcel) den, Van Dieren, S. (Susan), Van Driel, L.M.J.W. (L. M.J.W.), Festen, S. (Sebastiaan), Geenen, E-J.M. (Erwin-Jan), van der Geest, L.G.M. (Lydia G.M.), De Groot, D.J.A. (D. J.A.), Groot, J.W.B. (Jan Willem) de, Haj Mohammad, N. (Nadia), Haberkorn, B. (Brigitte), Haver, J.T. (J. T.), Harst, E. (Erwin) van der, Hemmink, G.J.M. (G. J.M.), Hingh, I.H.J.T. (Ignace) de, Hoge, C. (C.), Homs, M.Y.V. (Marjolein), Van Huijgevoort, N.C. (N. C.), Jacobs, M.A.J.M. (Maarten), Kerver, E.D. (E. D.), Liem, M. (Marieke), Los, M., Lubbinge, H. (H.), Luelmo, S.A.C. (S. A.C.), Meijer, V.E. (Vincent) de, Mekenkamp, L. (L.), Molenaar, I.Q. (I. Quintus), Oijen, M.G.H. (Martijn) van, Patijn, G.A. (Gijs A.), Quispel, R. (Rutger), van Rijssen, L.B. (Lennart B.), Römkens, T.E.H., Santvoort, H.C. (Hjalmar) van, Schreinemakers, J.M.J. (Jennifer), Schut, H. (H.), Seerden, T.C.J. (Tom), Stommel, M.W.J. (M. W.J.), Tije, A.J. (Albert Jan) ten, Venneman, N.G. (Niels), Verdonk, R.C. (Robert), Verheij, J. (Joanne), Vilsteren, F.G.I. (Frederike) van, de Vos-Geelen, J. (Judith), Vulink, A. (A.), Wientjes, C. (C.), Wit, F. (F.), Wessels, F.J. (F. J.), Zonderhuis, B. (B.), Van Werkhoven, C.H. (C. H.), Hooft, J.E. (Jeanin) van, Eijck, C.H.J. (Casper) van, Wilmink, J.W. (J. W.), Laarhoven, H.W.M. (Hanneke) van, Besselink, M.G. (Marc), Mackay, T.M. (Tara M.), Smits, F.J. (F. J.), Latenstein, A.E.J. (A. E.J.), Bogte, A. (A.), Bonsing, B.A. (Bert), Bos, H. (H.), Bosscha, K. (Koop), Brosens, L.A. (Lodewijk), Hol, L. (L.), Busch, O.R.C. (Olivier), Creemers, G.J.M. (Geert-Jan), Curvers, W.L. (W. L.), Dulk, M. (Marcel) den, Van Dieren, S. (Susan), Van Driel, L.M.J.W. (L. M.J.W.), Festen, S. (Sebastiaan), Geenen, E-J.M. (Erwin-Jan), van der Geest, L.G.M. (Lydia G.M.), De Groot, D.J.A. (D. J.A.), Groot, J.W.B. (Jan Willem) de, Haj Mohammad, N. (Nadia), Haberkorn, B. (Brigitte), Haver, J.T. (J. T.), Harst, E. (Erwin) van der, Hemmink, G.J.M. (G. J.M.), Hingh, I.H.J.T. (Ignace) de, Hoge, C. (C.), Homs, M.Y.V. (Marjolein), Van Huijgevoort, N.C. (N. C.), Jacobs, M.A.J.M. (Maarten), Kerver, E.D. (E. D.), Liem, M. (Marieke), Los, M., Lubbinge, H. (H.), Luelmo, S.A.C. (S. A.C.), Meijer, V.E. (Vincent) de, Mekenkamp, L. (L.), Molenaar, I.Q. (I. Quintus), Oijen, M.G.H. (Martijn) van, Patijn, G.A. (Gijs A.), Quispel, R. (Rutger), van Rijssen, L.B. (Lennart B.), Römkens, T.E.H., Santvoort, H.C. (Hjalmar) van, Schreinemakers, J.M.J. (Jennifer), Schut, H. (H.), Seerden, T.C.J. (Tom), Stommel, M.W.J. (M. W.J.), Tije, A.J. (Albert Jan) ten, Venneman, N.G. (Niels), Verdonk, R.C. (Robert), Verheij, J. (Joanne), Vilsteren, F.G.I. (Frederike) van, de Vos-Geelen, J. (Judith), Vulink, A. (A.), Wientjes, C. (C.), Wit, F. (F.), Wessels, F.J. (F. J.), Zonderhuis, B. (B.), Van Werkhoven, C.H. (C. H.), Hooft, J.E. (Jeanin) van, Eijck, C.H.J. (Casper) van, Wilmink, J.W. (J. W.), Laarhoven, H.W.M. (Hanneke) van, and Besselink, M.G. (Marc)
- Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. Methods/design: PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% m
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.