Search

In the context of fluid-induced seismicity, various injection parameters have been shown to affect fault behaviour differently, although existing studies about their effects sometimes show contradictory results. Aseismic slip is also known to affect seismicity, but its exact contribution remains elusive. To address these, we perform numerical modelling to understand the effects of injection volume and rate on long-term seismic and aseismic fault slip behavior. Our results suggest that both parameters can affect various aspects of fault behaviour to different extents, and, in some cases, their roles are interdependent, thus they should be examined simultaneously in order to fully characterize their effects on triggered fault responses. Within the model space, we observe the fault predominantly releasing aseismic energy, which plays a significant role in altering the timing of triggered earthquakes that follow and exhibits lasting impacts in subsequent seismic cycles. In terms of seismic responses, increasing injection rate enhances the size of the triggered cluster, while increasing injection volume increases seismicity rate of the sequence. Detailed characterization of the patterns of earthquake occurrence and moment release with respect to different injection parameters can offer insights into establishing safe bounds of injection operation and potentially mitigate seismic hazard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerous studies have reported the occurrence of aseismic slip or slow slip events along faults induced by fluid injection. However, the underlying physical mechanism and its impact on induced seismicity remain unclear. In this study, we develop a numerical model that incorporates fluid injection on a fault governed by rate‐and‐state friction to simulate the coupled processes of pore‐pressure diffusion, aseismic slip, and dynamic rupture. We establish a field‐scale model to emulate the source characteristics of induced seismicity near the Dallas‐Fort Worth Airport (DFWA), Texas, where events with lower‐stress drops have been observed. Our numerical calculations reveal that the diffusion of fluid pressure modifies fault criticality and induces aseismic slip with lower stress drop values (<1 MPa), which further influence the timing and source properties of subsequent seismic ruptures. We observe that the level of pore‐pressure perturbation exhibits a positive correlation with aseismic‐stress drops but a reversed trend with seismic‐stress drops. Simulations encompassing diverse injection operations and fault frictional parameters generate a wide spectrum of slip modes, with the scaling relationship of moment (M0) with ruptured radius (r0) following an unusual trend, M0∝r04.4 ${M}_{0}\propto {r}_{0}^{4.4}$, similar to M0∝r04.7 ${M}_{0}\propto {r}_{0}^{4.7}$ observed in the DFWA sequence. Based on the consistent scaling, we hypothesize that the lower‐stress‐drop events in the DFWA may imply less dynamic ruptures in the transition from aseismic to seismic slip, located in the middle of the broad slip spectrum, as illustrated in our simulations. Plain Language Summary: Injection‐induced earthquakes have presented significant obstacles to developing energy resources related to fluid injection, such as enhanced geothermal systems and shale gas development. Despite their prevalence, the causes and impact of these earthquakes are not fully understood. Aseismic slip, characterized by slower velocities and longer durations than typical earthquakes, has been observed in induced earthquake studies. In this study, we use a numerical model to investigate how fluid pressures influence the slip properties of induced seismicity near the Dallas‐Fort Worth airport (DFWA), Texas. Our model shows that elevated fluid pressure induces aseismic slip and advances or delays fast slip (i.e., earthquakes). The pore‐pressure perturbation alters the source characteristics of both aseismic‐slip events and seismic ruptures, enhancing aseismic‐stress release while diminishing seismic‐stress release. Simulations involving various fault frictional properties reveal a wide spectrum of slip modes, ranging from slow to rapid slip, which are different from the stress‐release processes that drive globally observed natural earthquakes, but exhibit similarities to observations in the DFWA. Consequently, we infer that the DFWA events may exhibit reduced dynamic characteristics akin to slow slip events positioned in the middle of the broad spectrum generated in our modeling. Key Points: Pore‐pressure change induces aseismic slip with lower stress drops, either advancing or delaying seismic rupturesPore‐pressure perturbation exhibits a positive correlation with aseismic‐stress drops but a reversed trend with seismic‐stress dropsSimulations show a wide spectrum of induced‐slip behavior, exhibiting a similar source scaling to observations [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Repeating earthquake sequences have been actively investigated to clarify many aspects of earthquake physics. The two particularly well‐studied sequences, known as the Los Angeles and San Francisco repeaters, have several intriguing observations, including their long (for the seismic moment) recurrence times that would suggest stress drops of 300 MPa based on typical assumptions, near‐syncronized timing prior to 2004, and higher than typical inferred stress drops (of 25 to 65 MPa, up to 90 MPa locally), but not as high as the recurrence times suggest. Here we show that all these observations are self‐consistent, in the sense that they can be reproduced in a single fault model. The suitable models build on the standard rate‐and‐state fault models, with velocity‐weakening patches imbedded into a velocity‐strengthening region, by adding either enhanced dynamic weakening during seismic slip or elevated normal stress on the patches, or both, to allow for the higher stress drops. Such models are able to match the observed average properties of the San Francisco and Los Angeles repeaters, as well as the overall nontrivial scaling between the recurrence time and seismic moment exhibited by many repeating sequences as a whole, for reasonable parameter choices based on experiments and theoretical studies. These models are characterized by the occurrence of substantial and variable aseismic slip at the locations of the repeating sources, which explains their atypical relation between recurrence interval and seismic moment, induces variability in the repeating source properties as observed, and results in their neither slip‐ nor time‐predictable behavior. Key Points: Enhanced dynamic weakening and/or elevated normal stress are used to reproduce observationsHigh stress drops, interaction, and repeat times of SF/LA repeaters are simultaneously reproducedAseismic slip between repeating events is key to explaining their source properties and variability [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]