Search

Introduction Vascular infiltration in pancreatic cancer represents the main limitation for surgery in locally advanced disease. Therefore an accurate preoperative study is mandatory to plan the most adequate surgical strategy. In the latest years, medical image fusion and three dimensional reconstruction models have gained wider acceptance in general surgery, especially in the hepatic field. Also for what concernes the pancreatic surgery, 3D reconstruction may allow a better preoperative staging if compared to traditional imaging studies. The aim of this study is to compare 3D imaging reconstruction model with conventional CT scan, MRI and Ecoendoscopy performance in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with associated vascular resection. Materials and Methods Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery with vascular resection at the Sanchinarro University Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient a preoperative 3D reconstruction with 3D Cella Medical Solutions (3D-MSP®) model was realised and then compared with traditional imaging methods (CT, MRI and Eco endoscopy). Results We enrolled 10 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery with associated vascular resection. The diagnostic accuracy in detection of celiac trunk involvement was of 100%, 80%, 70% and 90% for 3D-reconstruction, CT Scan, MRI and Ecoendoscopy groups respectively. On the other hand, in relation to the portal-mesenteric trunk invasion, 3D-reconstruction has demonstrated a 100% rate of accuracy comparing with an accuracy of 25%, 50% and 30% of CT scan, MRI and Ecoendoscopy respectively. As concerning the precision in estabilishing the tumor size, 3D model was superior to the CT and MRI at the Bland–Altman comparison. Conclusion 3D imaging reconstruction technique is a helpful preoperatory tool in patients affected by pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement. More studies with larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the future liver remnant after major hepatectomy with 3D modelling treated, respectively, with associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Patients submitted to ALPPS at our centre were compared with a group of patents submitted to the PVE followed by major hepatectomy. 3D reconstruction was realised before and after surgical treatment, and anatomic future liver remnant (FRL) and functional future liver remnant (FRFx) were calculated and compared with clinical outcomes. Results: From May 2011 to October 2019, 11 ALPPS procedures were realised at Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid. They were compared to a control group composed of 13 patients who underwent PVE followed by hepatectomy. The increase of anatomical FRL (iFRL) was superior in the ALPPS group (120%) with respect to the PVE group (73%) (p=0,041), while the increase of functional FRFX (iFRFx) was 35% in the ALLPS group and 46% in the PVE group (p>0,05), showing no difference in the two groups. PHLF grade B and C occurred in 6 patients. The ROC curve showed a better AUC for FRFxVpost (74%) with respect to FRLVpost (54%) in prediction PHLF>B. Conclusion: The 3D reconstruction model can allow optimal surgical planning, and through the use of specific algorithms, can contribute to differential functioning liver parenchyma of the FLR.

Enucleation has widely spread as an alternative strategy in the treatment of small pancreatic tumours and cystic lesions. To date there are limited data on perioperative outcomes after pancreatic enucleation performed using a minimally invasive robotic technique, particularly regarding the risk factors associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). We perform a comparative study of robotic pancreatic enucleation (RPE) and open enucleation (OPE) with the aim of evaluating clinical and cost-effective outcomes.This is a case-matched analysis of patients who underwent robotic and open pancreatic enucleation performed at Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from October 2014 to December 2021. Patient data were obtained retrospectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analysed. Two groups of demographically similar patients were analysed: the robotic group (n = 20) and the open group (n = 20). The patient characteristics of the two groups have been compared. From February 2015, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are also included and prospectively recorded in the database and used to measure the effectiveness of the treatment.A total of 20 RPE and 20 OPE have been included. The incremental cost of the robotic approach versus open was €2617.85(CI 95% 1601.48; 3634.24) and the incremental utility was 0.0879 QALYs (CI 95% 0.0834; 0.0925). The estimated ICER for patients was €29,782.13 (CI 95% 17,313.29; 43,576.01) per QALY gained. Robotic resection resulted a shorter postoperative hospital stay, less wound infections, faster recovery diet and a similar operating time. The two groups had similar complication rates. Pathological data were similar for both procedures.RPE resulted in a shorter hospital stay and less blood loss and morbidity, comparable with the outcomes of open enucleation. RPE may also be acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (nCRT) is universally considered to be a valid treatment to achieve downstaging, improve local disease control and obtain better resectability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The aim of this study is to correlate the change in tumor 18F -FDG PET-CT standardized uptake value (SUV) before and after nCRT, in order to obtain an early prediction of pathologic response (pR) achieved in patients with LARC.Data description: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with LARC diagnosis who underwent curative resection. All patients received nCRT and surgical treatment was carried after 8/12th. All patients underwent a baseline 18F -FDG PET-CT scan within the week prior to the initiation of the treatment (PET-CT SUV1) and a second scan (PET-C T SUV2) within six weeks of the completion of nCRT. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of 18F -FDG PET-CT in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LARC.A total of 133 patients with LARC were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups according to the TRG (tumor regression grade): 107 (80%) as Responders group (TRG0-TRG1) and 26 (25%) as the No-Responders group (TRG2-TRG3). We obtained a significant difference in Δ%SUV between the two different groups responders vs no responders (p

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the role of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in the treatment of right-side colon cancer when compared with standard right-side hemicolectomy, focusing on oncological outcomes, mortality and morbidity rates. A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE archives, including studies on CME in right-side colon cancer. Primary outcomes were five-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes investigated were mortality and morbidity rates, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, day of postoperative flatus, pulmonary infection, duration of hospital stay and number of lymph nodes harvested. Seventeen studies have been included in this meta-analysis for a total of 3918 patients. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) results improved in the CME group with respect to conventional right-side colectomy with an OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.02–3.45) and OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.33–5.74), respectively. The incidence of mortality and morbidity was comparable between the two groups. Moreover, conventional surgery time was faster than CME (MD 33.69 min, 95% CI 12.79–54.59), while no significant differences were reported in mean blood loss and hospital stay. Furthermore, the CME group showed a higher mean number of harvested lymph nodes (MD 7.08 lymph nodes 95% CI 4.90–9.27). Complete mesocolic excision of the right-side colectomy improves oncological outcomes without increasing mortality and morbidity rates compared to standard right-side hemicolectomy. CME should therefore be routinely performed in the treatment of right-side colon cancer.

Aim There is no study in the literature that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). We performed a comparative study of RDP and LDP with the aim of evaluating clinical and cost-effective outcomes. Material and methods This is an observational, comparative prospective nonrandomized study. The primary end point was to compare the cost-effectiveness differences between both groups. A willingness to pay of €20 000 and €30 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used as a threshold to recognize which treatment was most cost-effective. Results A total of 31 RDP and 28 LDP have been included. The overall mean total cost was similar in both groups (RDP: €9712.15 versus LDP: €9424.68; P > .5). Mean QALYs for RDP (0.652) was higher than that associated with LDP (0.59) (P > .5). Conclusion This study seems to provide data of cost-effectiveness between RDP and LDP approaches, showing some benefits for RDP.

Objective The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and cost-effective outcomes of the open Lichtenstein repair (OL) and laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair for bilateral inguinal hernias. Summary background data A cost-effective analysis of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair is still not well addressed, especially regarding bilateral hernia. Methods This is a clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis within a randomized prospective study conducted at Sanchinarro University Hospital.Cases of primary, reducible bilateral inguinal hernia were included and randomized using a simple randomization program.The outcome parameters included surgical and postoperative costs, quality adjusted life years (QALY), and incremental cost per QALY gained or the incremental cost effectiveness ratio. Results Between March 2013 and January 2017, 165 patients were enrolled in this study (81 of them underwent TAPP and 84 OL).The TAPP procedure had less early postoperative pain (P = 0.037), a shorter length of stay (P = 0.001), and fewer postoperative complications (P = 0.002) when compared with the OL approach. The overall cost of TAPP procedure was higher compared with the OL cost (1,683.93O vs 1192.83O, P = 0.027). The mean QALYs at 1 year for TAPP (0.8094) was higher than that associated with OL (0.6765) (P = 0.018). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 O and 30,000 O, there was a 95.38% and 97.96% probability that TAPP was more cost-effective relative to OL. Conclusions The TAPP procedure for bilateral inguinal hernia appears to be more cost-effective compared with OL.

Background Minimally invasive surgery has achieved worldwide acceptance in various fields, however, pancreatic surgery remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. In fact, the indication for robotic surgery in pancreatic disease has been controversial. The present study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of robotic pancreatic resection. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our experience of robotic pancreatic resection done in Sanchinarro University Hospital. Clinicopathologic characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Results From October 2010 to April 2016, 50 patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery for different pancreatic pathologies. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Of the 50 patients, 26 were male and 24 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years. Operative time was 370 minutes. Among the procedures performed were 16 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 23 distal pan-createctomies (DP), 11 tumor enucleations (TE). The mean hospital stay was 17.6 days in PD group, 9.0 days in DP group and 8.4 days in TE group. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 10 cases (20%), 2 after PD, 3 after DP, and 5 after TE. Four patients had postoperative transfusion in PD group and one in DP group. Conversion to open laparotomy occurred in four patients (8%). No serious intraoperative complications were observed. Conclusions From our early experience, robotic pancreatic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure. Further experience and follow-up are required to confirm the role of robotic approach in pancreatic surgery.

Fibrovascular polyp of the cervical esophagus represents about 0.5% to 1% of all benign oesophageal tumours. Usually asymptomatic, when FP protrudes into the oesophageal lumen, this may cause respiratory obstruction and provoke dysphagia, vomiting, dyspnoea, and retrosternal pain. In this article, we describe a multimodal approach in the treatment of a complex recurrent FP, for which surgical resection represents the safer and less invasive procedure.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a highly malignant carcinoma with an extremely poor prognosis. Vascular venous invasion is a frequent finding in patients with pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the morbidity, mortality, and survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.We retrospectively reviewed our experience of 65 consecutive pancreatic surgeries with venous resection for pancreatic cancer in three hospitals: Ramon y Cajal (Madrid, Spain) from 2002 to 2004, Monteprincipe University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) from 2005 to 2006 and Sanchinarro University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) from 2007 to December 2017. Prognostic factors were analyzed by the log-rank test and a multivariate proportional hazard regression analysis.Major venous reconstruction was performed by primary lateral venorrhaphy in 11 patients (17%), primary end-to-end anastomosis in 46 (70.7%) and reconstruction with a Gore-Tex® patch (W.L. GoreAssociates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) in 8 (12.3%). In 58% of the patients, the pathological examination showed infiltration of the vascular specimen. About 85% of the procedures performed were R0. The perioperative morbidity rate with Dindo-Clavien classification = III was 21.5%. Tumor size and nodal status were the only prognostic variables, which significantly decreased survival by a multivariate analysis.Major vascular resection to achieve macroscopic tumor clearance can be performed safely with acceptable operative morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, it is justified only in carefully selected cases.

INTRODUCTION The use of robotic surgery in liver resection is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS It is a retrospective review of Sanchinarro University hospital experience of robotic liver resection performed from 2011 to 2014. Clinicopathologic characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-one procedures have been performed and 13 (65%) of them were for malignancy. There were 2 left hepatectomies, 1 right hepatectomy, 1 associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), 1 bisegmentectomy and 3 segmentectomies, 9 wedge resections, and 3 pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 minutes (range, 90 to 540 min). Overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7% and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range, 4 to 64 d). CONCLUSION From our early experience, robotic liver surgery is a safe and feasible procedure, especially for major hepatectomies.

Background Robotic techniques are claimed to be an alternative to laparoscopic and open approaches for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treatment. Our aim is to present our single center experience and a literature review. Materials and methods From June 2012 to August 2014, six patients with preoperative diagnosis of GIST were treated by robotic surgery at Sanchinarro University Hospital. Results Two GIST tumors were localized in the second part of the duodenum, one in the first portion, two in the gastricantrum and another in the angular notch. Surgical procedures performed were two subtotal gastrectomies, one gastric wedge resection and three duodenal enucleations. None of the interventions needed conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time was 245 min (150–540). Mean hospital stay was 10.5 days (6–24). All lesions had microscopically negative resection margins. Mean follow-up was 24 months (8–33) with a disease-free survival rate of 100%. Conclusions A robotic approach for GIST tumors is a safe and feasible procedure with a well-accepted oncological surgical result. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Interest in robotic pancreatectomy has been greatly increasing over the last decade. However, evidence supporting the benefits of robotic over open pancreatectomy is still outstanding. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robotic pancreatectomy compared with the conventional open surgical approach. Propensity score-matched (1:1) was used to balance age, sex, BMI, ASA, tumor size, and malignancy of 17 robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 12 pancreatic enucleations (PE), and 28 distal pancreatectomies (DP); and was compared with the open standard approach. Robotic PD was associated with longer operative time (594 vs. 413 min; p = 0.03) and decreased blood loss (190 vs. 394 ml; p = 0.001). Robotic PE showed a lower mean length of hospital stay (8.4 vs. 12.8 days; p = 0.04) and, in addition, robotic DP showed less blood loss (175 vs. 375 ml; p = 0.01), less severe morbidities (7.14 vs. 17.9%; p = 0.02), and a reduced mean length of hospital stay (8.9 vs. 15.1; p = 0.001). Overall, conversion rate was 4 (7%). Robotic pancreatectomy is as safe and effective as the standard open surgical approach with reduced blood loss in PD and DP, length of hospital stay in PE and DP, and severe morbidity in DP.

Hepatic resection of tumors invading the retrohepatic vena cava and hepatic veins are a challenge for surgeons, who consider them unresectable most of the time.1 , 2 Ex situ hepatectomy and liver autotransplantation has developed to improve resectability of these malignancies.3,4 The patient was a 51-year-old man who had jaundice secondary to a intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 7 cm in diameter in the right lobe of the liver and the caudate lobe. A volumetric scan showed a future liver remnant (segments 2 and 3) not sufficient according to the body weight. The patient was considered to be unresectable by conventional resection due to the critical invasion to the retrohepatic vena cava together with the three hepatic veins. Therefore, an ex vivo extended right hepatectomy and autotransplantation were indicated. The patient underwent biliary decompression through a percutaneous transhepatic catheter and right portal vein embolization for left lobe hypertrophy. During the surgery, the liver was removed with the retrohepatic vena cava, which was replaced by a prosthetic graft without a veno-venous bypass. Ex vivo extended right hepatectomy was performed, and a prosthetic graft was used to replace the vena cava where the remaining left hepatic vein was anastomosed. The surgery duration was 9 h, and the anhepatic time was 4.5 h. The postoperative hospital stay was 19 days, and at this writing, 3 years later, the patient is disease-free. Ex vivo hepatectomy without veno-venous bypass should be considered a valid therapeutic option for selected patients with cholangiocarcinoma invading the retrohepatic vena cava.

Background The robotic surgery cost presents a critical issue which has not been well addressed yet. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and cost differences of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Methods Data were abstracted prospectively from 2011 to 2017. An independent company performed the financial analysis. Results A total of 28 RDP and 26 LDP were included. The mean operative time was significantly lower in the LDP (294 vs 241 min; p = 0.02). The main intra and post-operative data were similar, except for the conversion rate (RDP: 3.6% vs LDP: 19.2%; p = 0.04) and hospital stay (RDP: 8.9 vs LDP 13.1 days; p = 0.04). The mean total costs were similar in both groups (RDP: 9198.64 € vs LDP: 9399.74 €; p > 0.5). Conclusions RDP showed lower conversion rate and shorter hospital stay than LDP at the price of longer operative time. RDP is financially comparable to LDP.

Introduction Neoadjuvant treatment has been reported to prolong survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). However, there are currently limited clinical results available using nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in PA. This paper compares the oncological results of patients affected by potentially resectable PA who underwent surgery first (SF) versus surgery following neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Methods This is an observational, comparative study whereby data were abstracted from a prospective database of patients affected by PA from 2007 to 2016. Results We included a total of 81 patients (36 SF and 45 NAT) which resulted in being preoperatively similar. Among the NAT patients, treatment was well tolerated and the resection rate was 68.8% (31/45 patients). There was a trend towards a higher R1 resection rate in the SF group compared with the NAT (13.8% vs 3.2%; p = 0.1). Median overall survival in the resected NAT group was higher (30.6 vs 22.1 months; p = 0.04). In the borderline resectable group, overall survival was found to be four times higher compared with SF (43.6 versus 13.5 months; p = 0.001). Conclusions These data suggest that neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is a safe and effective option for potentially resectable PA compared with the SF approach.

Background In literature, only a few studies have prospectively compared the results of laparoscopic with open inguinal hernia repair yet none have compared bilateral inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to compare the open Lichtenstein repair (OLR) with laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair in patients undergoing surgery for bilateral inguinal hernia. Methods Patients were prospectively randomized between March 2013 and March 2015. Outcome parameters included hospital stay, operation time, postoperative complications, immediate postoperative pain and chronic pain, recurrence and quality of life. Results Sixty-one patients underwent TAPP repair and 73 underwent OLR. TAPP procedure had less early post-operative pain up to 7 days from surgery (p = 0.003), a shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.001), less postoperative complications (p = 0.012) and less chronic pain (0.04) when compared with the OLR approach. Conclusions TAPP procedure for bilateral inguinal hernia effectively reduces early postoperative pain, hospital stay and postoperative complications.

The treatment of gastric cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach in which surgery plays the main role. The diffusion of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer treatment is limited by the complexity of performing an extended lymphadenectomy. This surgical step can be facilitated through the use of a robot-assisted system. To date, there are few published articles discussing a full robotic approach that precisely show the different surgical steps. The aim of this study is to describe our experience, surgical techniques and the short-term results of a consecutive series of full robotic gastrectomies using the Da Vinci Surgical System. From November 2011 to January 2015, 17 patients with gastric cancer underwent curative resection by robotic approach for locally advanced tumors. In summary, there were 15 total gastrectomies with a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy, one total gastrectomy with transverse colectomy and one sub-total gastrectomy. Resection margins were negative in all cases. Conversions occurred in two patients. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is a safe technique and successfully allows an adequate lymph node harvest and optimal R0-resection rates with low postoperative morbidity. The learning curve appears to be shorter than in laparoscopic surgery. Further follow-up and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the role of a robotic approach in gastric cancer surgery.

The use of robotic surgery in the hepatobilio-pancreatic (HBP) field is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. A retrospective review of robotic pancreatic and liver resection was performed at Sanchinarro University hospital from October 2010 to April 2016. Since the beginning of the robotic program in our center, 22 hepatic procedures and 45 pancreatic robotic procedures have been performed. Of the 21 patients subjected to liver resection, 13 (65%) were for malignancy. There were two left hepatectomies, one right hepatectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), three bisegmentectomies and three segmentectomies, eight wedge resections, and three pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 min. The overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7 and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range 4-64 days). Of the 45 patients subjected to pancreatic resection, 22 were male and 23 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years (range 31-82 years). The mean operating room (OR) time was 370 min (120-780 min). Among the procedures performed were 15 pancreatico-duodenectomies, 19 distal pancreatectomies, and 11 enucleations. All procedures in the HBP area were R0. Our early experience shows that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in the HBP area. The complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery, but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.