1. Comparison of endoscopic bilateral areolar and robotic-assisted bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study
- Author
-
Xiaokang Fu, Yunhan Ma, Yiqi Hou, Yuan Liu, and Luming Zheng
- Subjects
Differentiated thyroid carcinoma ,Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic-assisted thyroidectomy ,Endoscopic bilateral areolar approach ,Propensity score-matched ,Surgery ,RD1-811 - Abstract
Abstract Background Robot-assisted and endoscopic thyroidectomy are superior to conventional open thyroidectomy in improving cosmetic outcomes and postoperative quality of life. The procedure of these thyroidectomies was similar in terms of surgical view, feasibility, and invasiveness. However, it remains uncertain whether the robotic-assisted bilateral axilla-breast approach (BABA) was superior to the endoscopic bilateral areolar approach (BAA) thyroidectomy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of these two surgical procedures to evaluate the difference between these two surgical procedures by comparing the pathological and surgical outcomes of endoscopic BAA and robotic-assisted BABA thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Methods From November 2018 to September 2021, 278 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma underwent BABA robot-assisted, and 49 underwent BAA approach endoscopic thyroidectomy. Of these patients, we analyzed 42 and 135 patients of endoscopic and robotic matched pairs using 1:4 propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study methods. These two groups were retrospectively compared by surgical outcomes, clinicopathological characteristics, and postoperative complications. Results The mean operation time was significantly longer in the EG than in the RG (p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF