SUMMARY 1) Pulmonary resection has a definite place in the surgical therapy of pulmonary tuberculosis in salvaging otherwise hopeless cases. 2) With the exceptions cited, we prefer thoracoplasty to lobectomy and pneumonectomy in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. This point of view is based on the fact that the mortality from thoracoplasty is considerably lower than pulmonary resection and to date, the late results of resection seem to offer no better chance of permanent cure. 3) When thoracoplasty fails, the following measures are considered before performing pulmonary resection: (1)Revision thoracoplasty. (2)Creation of extrapleural space and packing. (3)Cavity drainage. (4)In some cases, no further surgery. 4) Primary pulmonary resection is preferred to thoracoplasty for: (1)Lower and middle lobe cavities. (2)Tuberculomata and blocked cavities. (3)Persistent bronchostenosis. (4)Symptomatic bronchiectasis. 5) From the point of view of the pathological pulmonary changes, the type of disease most amenable to lobectomy and pneumonectomy is that characterized by fibroid and caesating lesions of the lung in which the mode of spread is principally by way of the bronchus. Since the prognosis following thoracoplasty in this type of lesion is also good, it is unusual that the surgeon is confronted with the problem of primary pulmonary resection. 6) Primarily, hematogenous or lymphogenous disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis is a contra-indication to resection, as these types of disease are progressive and removal of one part of the lung does not alter the course of the lesions in the remaining part of the lung. 7) If thoracoplasty is unsuccessful, then revision thoracoplasty, plombage, and cavity drainage should be considered before lobectomy or pneumonectomy is performed. Pulmonary resection is to be preferred to cavity drainage, if the pulmonary capacity of the patient permits. 8) In selecting any case for lobectomy or pneumonectomy, the surgeon must be certain that the patient has sufficient pulmonary reserve. Contralateral pleural thickening and diaphragmatic paralysis, along with fibrosis, calcification, and emphysema of the lung are the most important conditions in lowering the patient's breathing capacity. 9) In the surgical management of over 1,000 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, we have performed lobectomy and pneumonectomy in 40 cases with early and late mortality of 27.5 per cent. In approximately an equal number of cases, resection was indicated but not performed for various reasons. This represents a very hopeless group of cases where for the most part, thoracoplasty had failed, and no other treatment would cure. 10) Lobectomy and pneumonectomy are indicated in many patients where thoracoplasty has failed or obviously will not succeed. The actual number of patients upon whom it is possible to perform pulmonary resection is greatly reduced because of these factors: (1) contralateral tuberculosis; (2) instability of the contralateral lesion, and (3) low pulmonary reserve. 11) We are by no means satisfied that the indications we have presented will stand the test of time. Our point of view lies somewhere between the eager advocates for pulmonary resection, whose enthusiasm has not yet been supported by satisfactory long-time results, and those who roundly condemn lobectomy and pneumonectomy for pulmonary tuberculosis. 12) It is becoming steadily more evident that it is not technical skill alone that will lead to a higher percentage of permanent arrests in pulmonary tuberculosis. The basic tendency of the disease in each particular case is variable. Thus, the more able we become in recognizing the type of pulmonary involvement, the more accurately we will place lobectomy and pneumonectomy in their proper relationship with other therapeutic procedures.