Search

The information about comorbidities (excluding lymphoma) in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is relatively scarce. Cardiovascular disease, infections, musculoskeletal conditions or malignancy are likely the most relevant comorbid conditions in pSS. Different infections (particularly oral candidal infections) and fibromyalgia are extremely frequent in the daily clinical practice. On the other hand, the incidence of cardiovascular events and cancer in pSS is low, so information about them comes from large epidemiological studies or meta-analysis. For this reason, preclinical vascular disease is investigated by different techniques, demonstrating the presence of early atherosclerosis in pSS patients. Coronary events could be slightly more frequent in pSS than in the general population. The overall risk of malignancy in pSS patients seems to be slightly increased, likely due to excess occurrence of lymphoma. An association between pSS and thyroid cancer might exist, although it should be confirmed by further investigations.

Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of infection risk in patients with SLE and evaluate the effect of general and SLE-related factors on infection risk. Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to July 2018, screening for observational studies that evaluated infection risk in patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls. Outcomes of interest included overall severe infection, herpes zoster infection/reactivation, opportunistic infections, pneumonia and tuberculosis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for each type of infection. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of removing studies with high risk of bias. Results Eleven retrospective or prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis: overall severe infection (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 6), tuberculosis (n = 3) and herpes zoster (n = 2). Pooled RRs for overall severe infection significantly increased for patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.96 (95% CI 1.28, 6.83)]. Pooled RRs for pneumonia, herpes zoster and tuberculosis showed significantly increased risk compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.58 (1.80, 3.70), 2.50 (2.36, 2.65) and 6.11 (3.61, 10.33), respectively]. Heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias were present for all analyses, except herpes zoster. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the results. Conclusion Patients with SLE have significantly higher risk of infection compared with the general population/healthy controls. Efforts to strengthen strategies aimed at preventing infections in SLE are needed. Protocol registration PROSPERO number: CRD42018109425.

Management of systemic autoimmune diseases is challenging for physicians in their clinical practice. Although not common, they affect thousands of patients in Spain. The family doctor faces patients with symptoms and non-specific cutaneous, mucous, joint, vascular signs or abnormal laboratory findings at the start of the disease process and has to determine when to refer patients to the specialist. To aid in disease detection and better referral, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology and the Spanish Society of Family Medicine has created a group of experts who selected 26 symptoms, key signs and abnormal laboratory findings which were organized by organ and apparatus. Family doctors and rheumatologists with an interest in autoimmune systemic diseases were selected and formed mixed groups of two that then elaborated algorithms for diagnostic guidelines and referral. The algorithms were then reviewed, homogenized and adapted to the algorithm format and application for cell phone (apps) download. The result is the current Referral document of systemic autoimmune diseases for the family doctor in paper format and app (download). It contains easy-to-use algorithms using data from anamnesis, physical examination and laboratory results usually available to primary care, that help diagnose and refer patients to rheumatology or other specialties if needed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatologia. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES: Medication persistence, defined as the duration of time from its initiation to its discontinuation, is a surrogate for treatment effectiveness. The aim of the study was to evaluate persistence and causes of biological therapy (BT) suspension in patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies: rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: Single institution, descriptive, retrospective cohort study. Adult patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies on BT between January 2009 and December 2016 were included. Persistence to BT was compared considering the type of pathology and treatment. The Kaplan–Meier test was used to analyse medication persistanence and factors associated with it. An analysis of reasons for therapy discontinuation was performed. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-two patients were included in the study, which comprised 478 BT lines. For all patients, the 12-month persistence rate was 71.3% (341 out of 478). At the end of the study, 45.2% of the patients continued on their initial BT. Median treatment persistence was 1489 days (CI 95% 1195 to 1783). Longer BT persistence was associated with naïve BT patients: 1945 days (95% CI 1523 to 2367; P

Introduction and Aims: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is one of the most significant complications after orthotopic heart transplantation. We aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of CAV in a large cohort of orthotopic heart transplantation patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on a prospective cohort of 233 patients who underwent transplantation between November 2003 and May 2014. Baseline clinical data and invasive coronary angiograms (n=712) performed as part of the follow-up program were analyzed by two independent investigators. Results: We included 157 male and 45 female patients with a median age of 66 years. A third of patients had previous ischemic heart disease, 30% peripheral arterial disease, 37% hypertension and 47% dyslipidemia, and 17% were smokers. Acute moderate or severe rejection occurred in 42 patients during the first year. Over a median follow-up of 2920 days, 18% were diagnosed with CAV, with an incidence of 2.91 cases per 100 person-years. Predictors of CAV were previous ischemic heart disease (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.21-4.45, p=0.01), carotid artery disease (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.27-4.71, p

Objectives: To analyze the prevalence, incidence, survival and contribution on mortality of major central nervous system (CNS) involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Patients fulfilling the SLE 1997 ACR classification criteria from the multicentre, retrospective RELESSER-TRANS (Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Register) were included. Prevalence, incidence and survival rates of major CNS neuropsychiatric (NP)-SLE as a group and the individual NP manifestations cere-brovascular disease (CVD), seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome and transverse myelitis were calculated. Furthermore, the contribution of these manifestations on mortality was analysed in Cox regression models adjusted for confounders. Results: A total of 3591 SLE patients were included. Of them, 412 (11.5%) developed a total of 522 major CNS NP-SLE manifestations. 61 patients (12%) with major CNS NP-SLE died. The annual mortality rate for patients with and without ever major CNS NP-SLE was 10.8% vs 3.8%, respectively. Individually, CVD (14%) and organic brain syndrome (15.5%) showed the highest mortality rates. The 10% mortality rate for patients with and without ever major CNS NP-SLE was reached after 12.3 vs 22.8 years, respectively. CVD (9.8 years) and organic brain syndrome (7.1 years) reached the 10% mortality rate earlier than other major CNS NP-SLE manifestations. Major CNS NP-SLE (HR 1.85, 1.29-2.67) and more specifically CVD (HR 2.17, 1.41-3.33) and organic brain syndrome (HR 2.11, 1.19-3.74) accounted as independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Conclusion: The presentation of major CNS NP-SLE during the disease course contributes to a higher mortality, which may differ depending on the individual NP manifestation. CVD and organic brain syndrome are associated with the highest mortality rates.

The Physician Global Assessment International Standardisation COnsensus in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PISCOS) study aimed to obtain an evidence-based and expert-based consensus standardisation of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scoring of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An international panel of 79 SLE experts participated in a three-round Delphi consensus process, in which 41 statements related to the PGA in SLE were rated, using a 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree) numerical rating scale. Statements with agreement of 75% or greater were selected and further validated by the expert panel. Consensus was reached on 27 statements, grouped in 14 recommendations, for the use of the PGA in SLE, design of the PGA scale, practical considerations for PGA scoring, and the relationship between PGA values and levels of disease activity. Among these recommendations, the expert panel agreed that the PGA should consist of a 0–3 visual analogue scale for measuring disease activity in patients with SLE in the preceding month. The PGA is intended to rate the overall disease activity, taking into account the severity of active manifestations and clinical laboratory results, but excluding organ damage, serology, and subjective findings unrelated to disease activity. The PGA scale ranges from “no disease activity” (0) to the “most severe disease activity” (3) and incorporates the values 1 and 2 as inner markers to categorise disease activity as mild (≥0·5 to 1), moderate (>1 and ≤2) and severe (>2 to 3). Only experienced physicians can rate the PGA, and it should be preferably scored by the same rater at each visit. The PISCOS results will allow for increased homogeneity and reliability of PGA ratings in routine clinical practice, definitions of remission and low disease activity, and future SLE trials.

Objective: Semaphorin 3B (Sema3B) decreases the migratory and invasive capacities of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and suppresses expression of matrix metalloproteinases. We undertook this study to examine the role of Sema3B in a mouse model of arthritis and its expression in RA patients. Methods: Clinical responses, histologic features, and FLS function were examined in wild-type (WT) and Sema3B−/− mice in a K/BxN serum transfer model of arthritis. Protein and messenger RNA expression of Sema3B in mouse joints and murine FLS, as well as in serum and synovial tissue from patients with arthralgia and patients with RA, was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and RNA sequencing. FLS migration was determined using a wound closure assay. Results: The clinical severity of serum-induced arthritis was significantly higher in Sema3B−/− mice compared to WT mice. This was associated with increased expression of inflammatory mediators and increased migratory capacity of murine FLS. Administration of recombinant mouse Sema3B reduced the clinical severity of serum-induced arthritis and the expression of inflammatory mediators. Sema3B expression was significantly lower in the synovial tissue and serum of patients with established RA compared to patients with arthralgia. Serum Sema3B levels were elevated in patients with arthralgia that later progressed to RA, but not in those who did not develop RA; however, these levels drastically decreased 1 and 2 years after RA development. Conclusion: Sema3B expression plays a protective role in a mouse model of arthritis. In RA patients, expression levels of Sema3B in the serum depend on the disease stage, suggesting different regulatory roles in disease onset and progression.

Objetivos Describir la metodología del Registro de pacientes con miopatía inflamatoria idiopática (MII) de España (Myo-Spain), así como sus fortalezas y limitaciones. El objetivo principal del proyecto es analizar la evolución y el manejo clínico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII. Material y método Estudio observacional, longitudinal, ambispectivo y multicéntrico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII atendidos en servicios de reumatología de España. Se incluirán todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de MII en seguimiento habitual por los centros participantes, sin tener en cuenta la edad de inicio del proceso. Los casos incidentes serán todos los pacientes que al inicio del estudio en cada centro estén diagnosticados desde hace menos de 12 meses y casos prevalentes desde hace más de 12 meses. Se construirá un registro en el que se incluirán los datos de la visita basal, del año y dos años. Se recogerán variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, analíticas, complicaciones, comorbilidad, asociación con otras enfermedades reumáticas, ingresos hospitalarios, mortalidad y tratamientos. Además, se determinarán índices, escalas y cuestionarios de actividad, afectación muscular, daño, discapacidad y calidad de vida. El periodo de reclutamiento será de 23 meses. El propósito es conseguir una cohorte de 400 pacientes con MII. Conclusiones El estudio Myo-Spain constituye la oportunidad para desarrollar una cohorte de pacientes incidentes y prevalentes con MII en España. Myo-Spain permitirá evaluar en detalle, las características clínicas de la enfermedad en diferentes momentos. Se espera que la información exhaustiva recogida en las visitas suponga una amplia fuente de datos para futuros análisis. Objectives: To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM. Methods: Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM. Conclusions: Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis. Sin financiación No data JCR 2021 0.311 SJR (2021) Q3, 44/61 Rheumatology No data IDR 2021 UEM

Background/objectives: Factors associated with chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have received little attention. Recent data on the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection have cast doubt on its cardiac safety. The factors associated with CHF, including therapy with antimalarials, were analyzed in a large multicenter SLE cohort. Methods: Cross-sectional study including all patients with SLE (ACR-1997 criteria) included in the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Register (RELESSER), based on historically gathered data. Patients with CHF prior to diagnosis of SLE were excluded. A multivariable analysis exploring factors associated with CHF was conducted. Results: The study population comprised 117 patients with SLE (ACR-97 criteria) and CHF and 3,506 SLE controls. Ninety percent were women. Patients with CHF were older and presented greater SLE severity, organ damage, and mortality than those without CHF. The multivariable model revealed the factors associated with CHF to be ischemic heart disease (7.96 [4.01-15.48], p < 0.0001), cardiac arrhythmia (7.38 [4.00-13.42], p < 0.0001), pulmonary hypertension (3.71 [1.84-7.25], p < 0.0002), valvulopathy (6.33 [3.41-11.62], p < 0.0001), non-cardiovascular damage (1.29 [1.16-1.44], p < 0.000) and calcium/vitamin D treatment (5.29 [2.07-16.86], p = 0.0015). Female sex (0.46 [0.25-0.88], p = 0.0147) and antimalarials (0.28 [0.17-0.45], p < 0.000) proved to be protective factors. Conclusions: Patients with SLE and CHF experience more severe SLE. Treatment with antimalarials appears to confer a cardioprotective effect. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Resumen Objetivos Analizar el riesgo de fractura calculado por FRAX® y la frecuencia de alto riesgo de fractura en la poblacion general en Espana. Metodos EPISER2016 es un estudio transversal multicentrico de base poblacional de la prevalencia de las enfermedades reumaticas en poblacion adulta en Espana. Un total de 3.154 sujetos de edad igual o superior a 40 anos (1.184 hombres y 1.970 mujeres) se seleccionaron mediante muestreo aleatorio estratificado. Las preguntas relacionadas con los factores de riesgo de fractura se realizaron mediante encuesta telefonica. El riesgo de fractura principal (RFP) y de cadera (RFC) se calcularon con la version espanola de la herramienta FRAX®, sin la inclusion de la densidad mineral osea. Para definir alto riesgo de fractura, se utilizaron los umbrales RFP ≥ 20%, RFP ≥ 10%, RFP ≥ 7,5% y RFC ≥ 3%. Resultados La mediana (rango intercuartilico) del RFP fue 2,61% (1,55-6,34%) en mujeres y 1,67% (1,15-2,87%) en hombres; la del RFC fue 0,39% (0,14-1,86%) y 0,18% (0,07-0,77%). El 3,83% de las mujeres y ningun hombre tenian un RFP ≥ 20%; el 15,71% y el 1,14% tenian un RFP ≥ 10%; el 20,62% y el 2,21%, un RFP ≥ 7,5%; y el 19,27% y el 8,05%, un RFC ≥ 3%. En las mujeres de 65 anos o mas, el RFC fue alto en el 58,09%. Conclusiones EPISER2016 nos ha permitido conocer el riesgo de fractura calculado por FRAX® y la prevalencia de alto riesgo de fractura en la poblacion general segun los diversos umbrales utilizados en Espana.

Aims Adalimumab is a biological therapy used to treat different chronic inflammatory diseases. At present, there is an increasing number of adalimumab biosimilars. To assume the acceptability of interchangeability between reference adalimumab and biosimilars, there should be evidence about efficacy and safety of this switching. Regulation of this practice falls under the authority of individual European Union Member States. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of switching between reference adalimumab and biosimilars in different chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Methods Studies presenting data about switching between reference adalimumab and biosimilars were identified by sensitive search strategies in Medline and EMBASE from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2021. Results A total of 471 references were obtained and 21 finally included in the analysis (total number of patients switching: 2802). Eight different adalimumab biosimilars were tested after receiving reference adalimumab. Eight articles included rheumatoid arthritis (RA), one miscellaneous rheumatic disease, six psoriasis (PSO) and six inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Overall, the efficacy results in the switching groups were comparable to those obtained in the arms of continuous biosimilar and continuous reference adalimumab. There were no significant differences in treatment emergent adverse events, anti-drug or neutralising antibodies among the three groups. Conclusions Switching between reference adalimumab and biosimilars has no impact on efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with RA, PSO and IBD. This finding was consistent for the different adalimumab biosimilars analysed. These conclusions could probably be extended to other rheumatic diseases such as psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Background/objectives The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus system showed high specificity, while attaining also high sensitivity. We hereby analysed the performance of the individual criteria items and their contribution to the overall performance of the criteria. Methods We combined the EULAR/ACR derivation and validation cohorts for a total of 1197 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and n=1074 non-SLE patients with a variety of conditions mimicking SLE, such as other autoimmune diseases, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and the 23 specific criteria items. We also tested performance omitting the EULAR/ACR criteria attribution rule, which defines that items are only counted if not more likely explained by a cause other than SLE. Results Positive ANA, the new entry criterion, was 99.5% sensitive, but only 19.4% specific, against a non-SLE population that included other inflammatory rheumatic, infectious, malignant and metabolic diseases. The specific criteria items were highly variable in sensitivity (from 0.42% for delirium and 1.84% for psychosis to 75.6% for antibodies to double-stranded DNA), but their specificity was uniformly high, with low C3 or C4 (83.0%) and leucopenia Conclusions Changing the position of the highly sensitive, non-specific ANA to an entry criterion and the attribution rule resulted in a specificity of >80% for all items, explaining the higher overall specificity of the criteria set.

Objective The aim of the present study was to describe the demographic, clinical and immunological characteristics of patients with late-onset (≥50 years) SLE vs patients with early-onset SLE ( Methods We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study of 3619 patients from the RELESSER database (National Register of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology). Results A total of 565 patients (15.6%) were classified as late-onset SLE and 3054 (84.4%) as early-onset SLE. The male-to-female ratio was 5:1. Mean (s.d.) age at diagnosis in the late-onset group was 57.4 (10.4) years. At diagnosis, patients with late-onset SLE had more comorbid conditions than patients with early-onset SLE; the most frequent was cardiovascular disease (P Conclusion Late-onset SLE is insidious, with unusual clinical manifestations that can lead to diagnostic errors. Clinical course is generally indolent. Compared with early-onset disease, activity is generally reduced and immunosuppressants are less commonly used. Long-term prospective studies are necessary to determine whether the causes of death are associated with clinical course or with age-associated comorbidities in this population.

ObjectivesTo analyse the effect of targeted therapies, either biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs and other factors (demographics, comorbidities or COVID-19 symptoms) on the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalisation in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.MethodsThe COVIDSER study is an observational cohort including 7782 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs of hospitalisation. Antirheumatic medication taken immediately prior to infection, demographic characteristics, rheumatic disease diagnosis, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms were analysed.ResultsA total of 426 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 from 1 March 2020 to 13 April 2021 were included in the analyses: 106 (24.9%) were hospitalised and 19 (4.4%) died. In multivariate-adjusted models, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs in combination were not associated with hospitalisation compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.25 of b/tsDMARDs, p=0.15). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-i) were associated with a reduced likelihood of hospitalisation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.82, p=0.018), whereas rituximab showed a tendency to an increased risk of hospitalisation (OR 4.85, 95% CI 0.86 to 27.2). Glucocorticoid use was not associated with hospitalisation (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.55). A mix of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms contribute to patients’ hospitalisation.ConclusionsThe use of targeted therapies as a group is not associated with COVID-19 severity, except for rituximab, which shows a trend towards an increased risk of hospitalisation, while TNF-i was associated with decreased odds of hospitalisation in patients with rheumatic disease. Other factors like age, male gender, comorbidities and COVID-19 symptoms do play a role.

Epidemiology of RMD Financiado para publicación en acceso aberto: Universidade da Coruña/CISUG [Abstract] Objective. Axial osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of back and neck pain, however, few studies have examined its prevalence. The aim was to estimate the prevalence and the characteristics of symptomatic axial OA in Spain. Methods. EPISER2016 is a cross-sectional multicenter population-based study of people aged 40 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to complete rheumatic disease screening questionnaires. Two phenotypes were analyzed, patients with Non-exclusive axial OA (NEA-OA) and Exclusive axial OA (EA-OA). To calculate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI), the sample design was considered and weighting was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin. Results. Prevalence of NEA-OA by clinical or clinical-radiographic criteria was 19.17% (95% CI: 17.82–20.59). The frequency of NEA-OA increased with age (being 3.6 times more likely in patients aged 80 s or more than in those between 40 and 49 years) and body mass index. It was significantly more frequent in women, as well as in the center of Spain. It was less frequent in those with a higher level of education. Lumbar OA was more frequent than cervical OA. This difference grew with increasing age and was not associated with gender. It was also greater in overweight and obese subjects. Conclusions. This is the first study on the prevalence of axial OA phenotypes in Europe describing the associated socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. EPISER2016 was supported by Celgene, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme in Spain, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis, none of whom had any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of this manuscript. MS was financed via the Rio Hortega Contract—Health Research Fund (CM17/00101), the Sanitary Research Fund integrated in the National Plan of Scientific Program, Technological Development and Innovation 2013–2016 and funded by the ISCIII-Subdirectorate General Evaluation and Promotion of Research-European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) "A way of making Europe"

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a broad spectrum of clinical presentations that can affect almost all organ systems. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication that affects approximately half of the systemic erythematosus lupus (SLE) patients, which significantly increases the morbidity and the mortality risk. LN is characterized by the accumulation of immune complexes, ultimately leading to renal failure. Aberrant activation of T cells plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of both SLE and LN and is involved in the production of inflammatory cytokines, the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the affected tissues and the co-stimulation of B cells. Calcineurin is a serine-threonine phosphatase that, as a consequence of the T cell hyperactivation, induces the production of inflammatory mediators. Moreover, calcineurin is also involved in the alterations of the podocyte phenotype, which contribute to proteinuria and kidney damage observed in LN patients. Therefore, calcineurin inhibitors have been postulated as a potential treatment strategy in LN, since they reduce T cell activation and promote podocyte cytoskeleton stabilization, both being key aspects in the development of LN. Here, we review the role of calcineurin in SLE and the latest findings about calcineurin inhibitors and their mechanisms of action in the treatment of LN.

Objective SLE can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. GI symptoms are reported to occur in >50% of SLE patients. To describe the GI manifestations of SLE in the RELESSER (Registry of SLE Patients of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology) cohort and to determine whether these are associated with a more severe disease, damage accrual and a worse prognosis. Methods We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of 3658 SLE patients who fulfil ≥4 ACR-97 criteria. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, activity (SLEDAI-2K or BILAG), damage (SLICC/ACR/DI) and therapies were collected. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between lupus patients with and without GI damage to establish whether GI damage is associated with a more severe disease. Results From 3654 lupus patients, 3.7% developed GI damage. Patients in this group (group 1) were older, they had longer disease duration, and were more likely to have vasculitis, renal disease and serositis than patients without GI damage (group 2). Hospitalizations and mortality were significantly higher in group 1. Patients in group 1 had higher modified SDI (SLICC Damage Index). The presence of oral ulcers reduced the risk of developing damage in 33% of patients. Conclusion Having GI damage is associated with a worse prognosis. Patients on a high dose of glucocorticoids are at higher risk of developing GI damage which reinforces the strategy of minimizing glucocorticoids. Oral ulcers appear to decrease the risk of GI damage.

Objectives To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM. Methods Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM. Conclusions Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis.

Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a ligand of the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2, is essential for vascular development and blood vessel stability and is also involved in monocyte activation. Here, we examined the role of Ang-2 on monocyte activation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Ang-2 levels were measured in serum and skin of healthy controls (HCs) and SSc patients by ELISA and array profiling, respectively. mRNA expression of ANG2 was analyzed in monocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and human pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (HPAECs) by quantitative PCR. Monocytes were stimulated with Ang-2, or with serum from SSc patients in the presence of a Tie2 inhibitor or an anti-Ang2 neutralizing antibody. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 production was analyzed by ELISA. Ang-2 levels were elevated in the serum and skin of SSc patients compared to HCs. Importantly, serum Ang-2 levels correlated with clinical disease parameters, such as skin involvement. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) LPS, R848, and interferon alpha2a (IFN-&alpha, ) stimulation up-regulated the mRNA expression of ANG2 in monocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and HPAECs. Finally, Ang-2 induced the production of IL-6 and IL-8 in monocytes of SSc patients, while the inhibition of Tie2 or the neutralization of Ang-2 reduced the production of both cytokines in HC monocytes stimulated with the serum of SSc patients. Therefore, Ang-2 induces inflammatory activation of SSc monocytes and neutralization of Ang-2 might be a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of SSc.

Funder: American College of Rheumatology Research and Education Foundation; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000960, Funder: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000069, Funder: European League Against Rheumatism; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008741, OBJECTIVES: The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria. METHODS: Twenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to

Semaphorin (Sema)4A is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is elevated in several autoimmune diseases such as systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Sema4A has a key role in the regulation of Thelper Th1 and Th2 differentiation and we recently demonstrated that CD4+ T cell activation induces the expression of Sema4A. However, the autocrine role of Sema4A on Th cell differentiation remains unknown. Na&iuml, ve Th cells from healthy controls were cell sorted and differentiated into Th1, Th2 and Th17 in the presence or absence of a neutralizing antibody against the Sema4A receptor PlexinD1. Gene expression was determined by quantitative PCR and protein expression by ELISA and flow cytometry. We found that the expression of Sema4A is induced during Th1, Th2 and Th17 differentiation. PlexinD1 neutralization induced the differentiation of Th1 cells, while reduced the Th2 and Th17 skewing. These effects were associated with an upregulation of the transcription factor T-bet by Th1 cells, and to downregulation of GATA3 and ROR&gamma, t in Th2 cells and Th17 cells, respectively. Finally, PlexinD1 neutralization regulates the systemic sclerosis patients serum-induced cytokine production by CD4+ T cells. Therefore, the autocrine Sema4A-PlexinD1 signaling acts as a negative regulator of Th1 skewing but is a key mediator on Th2 and Th17 differentiation, suggesting that dysregulation of this axis might be implicated in the pathogenesis of CD4+ T cell-mediated diseases.

Resumen Objetivos Describir la metodologia del estudio de prevalencia de las enfermedades reumaticas en la poblacion adulta en Espana, EPISER 2016, asi como sus fortalezas y limitaciones. El objetivo del proyecto es estimar la prevalencia de artritis reumatoide (AR), artropatia psoriasica (APs), espondilitis anquilosante (EA), lupus eritematoso sistemico (LES), sindrome de Sjogren (SS), artrosis (de rodilla, cadera, manos, columna cervical y lumbar), fibromialgia, gota y fractura osteoporotica clinica. Material y metodo Estudio transversal multicentrico de base poblacional en el que participan 45 municipios de las 17 comunidades autonomas. La poblacion de referencia esta compuesta por adultos de 20 o mas anos residentes en Espana. La recogida de informacion se llevara a cabo mediante encuesta telefonica empleando el sistema Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI). Las sospechas diagnosticas y los diagnosticos autorreferidos seran estudiadas por reumatologos del hospital de referencia de los municipios seleccionados. Analisis estadistico: se calcularan las prevalencias de enfermedades reumaticas mediante estimadores y sus IC del 95%. Se calcularan factores de ponderacion en funcion de la probabilidad de seleccion en cada una de las etapas del muestreo. Se tendra en cuenta la distribucion de la poblacion en Espana segun datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadistica. Conclusiones Los cambios sociodemograficos y en habitos de vida durante los ultimos 16 anos justifican la realizacion de EPISER 2016. El estudio ofrecera datos actualizados de prevalencia en AR, EA, APs, LES, SS, artrosis, fibromialgia, gota y fractura osteoporotica clinica. Los resultados permitiran comparar los datos con estudios de otros paises y con el EPISER 2000.

BackgroundEvidence shows that around half of the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop irreversible organ damage due to the disease itself or to other factors (e.g., steroid treatment). It is essential to have a comprehensive understanding of factors that predict organ damage progression to identify at-risk patients and inform clinical decision making.ObjectivesTo develop an algorithm, using machine learning (ML) methodology, that predicts organ damage progression in SLE patients.MethodsThe Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with patient records from 45 Rheumatology Units across Spain was used. RELESSER data were collected from 2011 to 2021 and captured demographic and comprehensive clinical information. In this analysis, a sample of 2,676 patients was used. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) was used to measure organ damage progression between 2015 (start of the prospective data collection in RELESSER) and 2020.To predict the risk of an increase in the SDI, 102 variables were identified as potential predictors. A ML model (gradient boosting trees) was developed and validated by a simple logistic regression (LG) model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) was used to quantify the improvement over random chance (an AUCROC of 0.5). Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were used in the ML model to identify predictors and their contribution to damage progression.ResultsOf all patients, 13% experienced organ damage progression, with 2-year patient follow-up. The ML algorithm was better at identifying these patients (AUCROC 0.68) than the LG model (AUCROC 0.63) (Figure 1). ML model performance can be contextualized using a random sample of 100 SLE patients of whom 13 suffered organ damage progression, the model would successfully identify 12. However, 66 additional patients would be incorrectly identified (True Positive 90%; False Positive 79%). The top 5 predictors of damage progression, across all patients, were patient age >49 years,Figure 1.ROC AUC plotCreatinine > 0.9 mg/dl, cardiovascular-related disease complications (> 3 complications), low hematocrit level recorded recently ( 81.5 mg/dl. At the patient level, the 5 patients with the highest predicted risk had strong predictors of progression, with key predictors being patient age at study entry >49 years, age at diagnosis >40 years, cardiovascular-related disease complications, and increased creatinine >0.9 mg/dl. The 5 patients with the lowest predicted risk had strong predictors of no change with key predictors being not having a low hematocrit level recorded recently, triglycerides ConclusionWe developed a machine learning model, using an exhaustive set of variables in RELESSER which successfully predicted short-term organ damage progression in SLE patients, and outperformed a standard regression model. If the model were to be used as a clinical tool, only light-touch interventions should be carried out due to high false positive rate. Further model optimizations, including exposing the model to longer follow-up data and testing it in non-Spanish patients is needed.Disclosure of InterestsJose M Pego-Reigosa Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, GSK, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: The RELESSER registry was funded by grants from GSK, UCB, Roche and Novartis, WALID FAKHOURI Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Silvia Díaz-Cerezo Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Aidan Cooper Consultant of: Salaried employee of IQVIA while conducting the analyses for this study, Anne-Marie Saunders Consultant of: Salaried employee of IQVIA while conducting the analyses for this study, Grace Segall Consultant of: Salaried employee of IQVIA throughout conceptualization, design and execution of analysis for this study, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company throughout finalization of analysis and abstract development for this study, Christophe Sapin Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Sebastian Moyano Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa Grant/research support from: The RELESSER registry was funded by grants from GSK, UCB, Roche and Novartis

BackgroundTreat to Target strategies are necessary in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). They are difficult to establish due to the heterogeneity of the disease. The current definitions of Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) according to the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) and remission according to Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) 2021 are difficult to achieve and maintain over time.ObjectivesTo evaluate the concordance between the LLDAS and the clinical status according to the rheumatologist opinion and reasons of disagreement. To explore modifications in LLDAS definition that best fit with the expert´s opinion.MethodsProspective multicenter study of SLE patients (ACR 1997 Classification Criteria or clinical diagnosis by the physician) from seven Spanish Rheumatology Departments. Statistical analysis: descriptive cross-sectional (at the time of recruitment) analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics, treatments; remission and LLDAS and the subjective evaluations of SLE activity by the rheumatologist. Analysis of the level of agreement between expert opinion and the definition of LLDAS and its modification were evaluated using Cohen’s kappa.ResultsDEMOGRAPHIC, DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENTS. Five hundred and eight were included (92% women; mean age (±SD): 50.4 years (±13.7)). Mean SLEDAI-2K (±SD) was 2.84 (±3.31). A total of 406 (79.9%) patients presented SLEDAI-2K≤4. A total of 317 (74.1%) patients were on antimalarial treatment. Two hundred and twenty-two (43.7%) patients were on some type of immunosuppressive or biological therapy. More than half of patients were not taking glucocorticoids (n=310, 61%). A total of 38 patients (7.5%) were taking doses of prednisone higher than 7.5mg/day.REMISSION/LLDAS 267 (54.4%) patients were in remission and 304 (62.7%) patients were in LLDAS. According to the expert opinion of the rheumatologist, remission was the most frequent state considered (n=206, 41.6%); followed by low activity (n=153, 30.9%); serologically active (n=71, 14.3%); moderate activity (n=55, 11.1%) and high activity (n=10, 2%).AGREEMENT Overall agreement between expert opinion and the definition of LLDAS was 71.4 % with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.3. The majority of the cases (96.1%) that fulfilled the definition of LLDAS, were classified by the expert as remission, serologically active or low activity. Only 12 (3,9%) patients were classified by the expert as moderate or high activity. Of the patients that did not fulfill the definition of LLDAS, 126 out of 179 (70.4%) patients were classified by the expert as remission/low disease activity (Figure 1). The main reasons for discordance in the group that did not fulfill the definition of LLDAS were the presence of new clinical features compared to previous visit and a SLEDAI 2-K >4, in 74 (58.7%) and 59 (46.8%) patients, respectively. The LLDAS adjustment that meant a significant increase in the agreement was the exclusion of the comparative features with the previous visit, with an increase in the agreement to 82.6% (95% CI: 81.61-83.96%). The modification of prednisone to 5mg/daily dose, did not represent a significant change in agreement from the original definition.Figure 1.Comparison of LLDAS and expert opinionConclusionAt a given point in time, almost two thirds of SLE patients were in remission or in LLDAS. There is a good correlation between LLDAS and the physician’s opinion, particularly for those patients who fulfill LLDAS definition. However, the agreement is not so good for patients who don’t, these being excessively classified by the physician as remission or low activity. The main LLDAS items causing this disagreement were a SLEDAI-2K >4 and the appearance of different clinical manifestations from the previous evaluation. On the contrary, physician assessment by the PGA adequately fits the LLDAS definition. The modification of the LLDAS definition excluding the comparison with previous assessment increases the agreement with the expert opinion to 82.6%.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared

Background:Factors associated with the development of chronic heart failure (CHF) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have received little attention. On the other hand, recent data from the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID19 pandemic have cast some doubts on its cardiological safety.Objectives:To identify factors associated to CHF in SLE.Methods:Retrospective cross-sectional study, including all patients with SLE (≥4 ACR-1997 criteria) recruited in RELESSER registry. The objectives and methodology of the registry have been described previously (1). CHF was defined according to the Charlson index item. Patients with CHF before diagnosis of SLE were excluded. Cumulative damage was measured with the SLICC/ACR index, excluding cardiovascular (CV) items (mSDI). Multivariate analysis exploring factors associated with CHF was carried out.Results:117 patients (3% of the entire cohort) with SLE and CHF and 3,506 controls with SLE without CHF were included. 90% were women. Disease duration: mean (SD), 120.2 (87.7) months. CHF appeared after a median (P25-P75) of 9.40 (4.2-18.3) years from SLE diagnosis. Patients with CHF were older (59.8 ± 18.2 vs. 46.2 ± 4.3). In the bivariate analysis, the association of CHF with greater severity [Katz severity index: median (IQR): 4 (3-5) vs. 2 (1-3)], damage [mSDI: 3 (2-4) vs 0 (0-1)], comorbidity [modified Charlson- excluding CV items: 4 (3-6) vs 1(1-3)] and both CV (37.5% vs 6.7%) and overall mortality (43.2% vs 4.7%) (pTable 1.Congestive heart failure associated factors (multivariable analysis)Odds Ratio95% CIP-valueSex (female)0.460.25 - 0.880.0147Ischaemic cardiopathy7.964.01 - 15.48Cardiac arrhythmia7.384.00 - 13.42Pulmonary hypertension3.711.84 - 7.250.0002Cardiac valvulopathy6.333.41 - 11.62Hospitalization (due to SLE)3.741.81 - 8.650.0008Calcium or vitamin D5.292.07 - 16.860.0015Antimalarials0.280.17 - 0.45mSDI *1.291.16 - 1.44*mSDI = modified SLICC/ACR damage index (without cardiovascular items)Conclusion:- CHF is a rather late complication of SLE.- Patients with SLE and CHF have more severe SLE, with greater refractoriness to SLE treatments and higher overall mortality.- Treatment with antimalarials, as routinely used in SLE patients, is not only safe to heart, but even appears to have a cardioprotective effect.References:[1]Rúa-Figueroa I, López-Longo FJ, Calvo-Alén J, et al. National registry of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology: objectives and methodology. Reumatol Clin. 2014;10(1):17-24.Acknowledgements:Research Unit of Spanish Society of RheumatologyDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Objectives Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients show low serum levels of the Ag dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV/CD26), both soluble CD26 (sCD26) concentration and its DPP-IV activity. The aim of this study was to test if anti-DPP-IV/CD26 Abs (Anti-CD26) cleared sCD26. Design & methods Serum Anti-CD26 and Total titers (as comparison) of isotypes IgA, IgM and IgG as well as sCD26 concentration and DPP-IV activity were measured in a cohort of RA patients undergoing different biological and non-biological therapies (n = 105) and controls (n = 50). Results Anti-CD26 levels were increased approximately two-fold for each isotype in RA, were not related to the sCD26 clearance, showed several correlations with disease activity parameters, were significantly higher in smokers and they were not ACPA. Anti-CD26 Igs showed high diagnostic power (82% sensitivity and 96% specificity) and their levels differed amongst the different groups of patients stratified by the type of therapy. Conclusions As DPP-IV/CD26 is associated to factors triggering RA in the lung and periodontal tissue, these results suggest that Anti-CD26 isotypes may participate in pathogenesis and may be useful as biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and/or precision medicine This work was supported by an unrestricted medical grant from Pfizer Spain (WS1541122). Dr. Pego has support from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/REGPOT-2012-2013.1] under grant agreement no 316265, BIOCAPS. The funding organization (s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication. SI

Background/Purpose Ultraviolet radiations act by modifying DNA in sun-exposed skin of lupus patients. We develop a study to analyze the association between climatological conditions and cutaneous manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients data from Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) cohort were retrospectively analyzed for presence of cutaneous lesions (alopecia, photosensitivity, malar rash, discoid lesions, oral ulcers and subacute lesions). We included patients who were assessed in rheumatology services from January 2011 to December 2012. Data of climatological conditions throughout the Spanish geography were provided by the Spanish Meteorological Agency. Results A total of 2919 patients were included, 87.3% female. Others biological and clinical data are showed in table 1. In the multivariable model, positive associations were observed between coastal regions OR 1.470 (95% CI:1.080–2.001 p=0,014), anti-DNA OR 1.806 (95% CI:1.276–2.556, p=0.001), antiphospholipids antibodies OR 1.428 (95% CI:1.093–1.864 p=0.009), serositis OR 1.557 (95% CI:1.181–2.053 p=0.002) and arthritis OR 1.804 (95% CI:1.258–2.587 p=0,001). Negative associations were observed between females OR 0.412 (95% CI:0.284–0.599, p=0.000) and antimalarial drugs OR 0.469 (95% CI:0.327–0.671, p=0.000). Conclusion Although the influence of global and ultraviolet radiations on the development of cutaneous lesions in SLE have been suggested, the results of our study does not support an association between the diverse climatological conditions and cutaneous manifestations in SLE. However we observed an independent association with living in coastal areas.

Background Supported by both the ACR and EULAR, the EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria for SLE employ positive ANA (ever) as an entry criterion and use a weighted scheme with values ranging from 2 to 10, for a classification cut-off of 10. Criteria items are attributed to SLE only if there is no more likely alternative diagnosis in the individual patients. Items are organized in domains, and only the highest ranking item within a domain is counted. These criteria have been validated in a cohort of 696 SLE patients and 574 non-SLE patients from a total of 21 centers, reaching an overall sensitivity of 96.1% and a specificity of 93.4%. To at least estimate the performance in groups underrepresented in the validation cohort of this transatlantic project, we analyzed this cohort for patient subsets with regard to sex, ethnicity, and disease duration. Methods The full EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria validation cohort was analyzed for female (n=1,098) and male (n=172) patients, Asian (n=118), Black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and White (n=941) patients, and patients with an SLE duration of less than 1 year (n=34), one to less than 3 years (n=196), 3 to less than 5 years (n=157), and 5 or more years (n=879). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, the SLICC 2012 criteria and the ACR 1997 criteria each. Results As shown in table 1, most of the point estimates for sensitivity and specificity in subsets lay within the 95% confidence intervals of the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria validation. In particular, sensitivity and specificity for all ethnic groups were within the confidence intervals or even higher. Formally, the sensitivity was slightly lower for male patients, corresponding to a higher specificity, but the male 95% confidence intervals (0.86–0.98 for sensitivity, 0.90–0.99 for specificity) overlapped. While sensitivity appeared independent of disease duration from year 1 on, sensitivity was only 89% in the first year of disease, identical to the SLICC criteria (89%) and numerically higher than the ACR criteria (56%), but all confidence intervals overlapped. Conclusion While not all subgroups of SLE patients in the validation cohort are of adequate size to fully explore the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria in the respective subsets, the point estimates of sensitivity and specificity suggest that the new criteria perform at least reasonably well in all ethnic groups, in men and in early disease. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity should be independently validated in larger groups of Asian, Black and Hispanic patients, male patients and in early disease.

OBJECTIVE: The marketing of biological therapies transformed the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. But there is still concern about patient safety and management in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to estimate risk factors of the adverse effects in a cohort of Spanish patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: A single institution, descriptive, retrospective, cohort study was developed from January 2009 to December 2016. Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis on biological therapies were included. Undesirable events affecting patients during biological therapy, their clinical implications and the use of health resources related to adverse effects were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-two patients corresponding to 478 biological therapy lines were analysed. It implied 1192 years of monitoring. There were 57 adverse effects per 100 biological patient-years and 4.8 serious adverse effects per 100 biological patient-years. The only significant factor for a likely serious adverse effect was having a Charlson Index ≥10, OR of 6.2 (CI 95%: 3.4–11.1, p

El diagnóstico y tratamiento de las enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas (EAS) constituye un reto. Aunque infrecuentes, afectan a cientos de miles de pacientes en España. El médico de familia (MF) se enfrenta a síntomas o signos inespecíficos que hacen sospechar EAS al inicio del proceso, y tiene que decidir a quiénes debería derivar. Para facilitar su reconocimiento y mejorar su derivación, expertos de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología seleccionaron 26 síntomas/signos-guía y alteraciones analíticas. Se escogieron parejas de MF y reumatólogo para elaborar algoritmos diagnósticos y de derivación. Posteriormente se revisaron y adaptaron al formato de aplicación para móviles (app) descargable. El resultado es el presente documento de derivación de EAS para MF en formato de papel y app. Contiene algoritmos de fácil manejo utilizando datos de la anamnesis, exploración física y pruebas analíticas accesibles en atención primaria para orientar el diagnóstico y facilitar la derivación a reumatología o a otras especialidades. Management of systemic autoimmune diseases is challenging for physicians in their clinical practice. Although not common, they affect thousands of patients in Spain. The family doctor faces patients with symptoms and non-specific cutaneous, mucous, joint, vascular signs or abnormal laboratory findings at the start of the disease process and has to determine when to refer patients to the specialist. To aid in disease detection and better referral, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology and the Spanish Society of Family Medicine has created a group of experts who selected 26 symptoms, key signs and abnormal laboratory findings which were organized by organ and apparatus. Family doctors and rheumatologists with an interest in autoimmune systemic diseases were selected and formed mixed groups of two that then elaborated algorithms for diagnostic guidelines and referral. The algorithms were then reviewed, homogenized and adapted to the algorithm format and application for cell phone (apps) download. The result is the current Referral document of systemic autoimmune diseases for the family doctor in paper format and app (download). It contains easy-to-use algorithms using data from anamnesis, physical examination and laboratory results usually available to primary care, that help diagnose and refer patients to rheumatology or other specialties if needed. Sin financiación No data JCR 2020 0.271 SJR (2020) Q4, 50/58 Rheumatology No data IDR 2020 UEM

This study aimed at determining socio-demographic and clinical factors of primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) associated with osteoporosis (OP) and fragility fracture. SJOGRENSER is a cross-sectional study of patients with pSS, classified according to American European consensus criteria developed in 33 Spanish rheumatology departments. Epidemiological, clinical, serological and treatment data were collected and a descriptive analysis was conducted. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a binomial logistic regression to study the factors associated with OP and fragility fracture in pSS. 437 patients were included (95% women, with a median age of 58.6 years). 300 women were menopausal (76.4%). Prevalence of OP was 18.5% [in men (N = 21) this measured 19%]. A total of 37 fragility fractures were recorded. In the multivariate analysis, there was an association between OP and age: in the 51-64 age range (menopausal women), the OR measured 9.993 (95% CI 2301-43,399, p = 0.002); In the age 64 years group, OR was 20.610 (4.679-90.774, p 0.001); between OP and disease duration, OR was 1.046 (1.008-1085, p = 0.017); past treatment with corticosteroids, OR 2.548 (1.271-5.105, p = 0.008). Similarly, an association was found between fragility fractures and age: in the 51-64 age group, OR measured 5.068 (1.117-22,995, p = 0.035), age 64 years, OR was 7.674 (1.675-35,151, p 0.009); disease duration, OR 1.049 (CI 1.003-1097, p 0.036) and the ESSDAI index, OR 1.080 (1.029-1134, p = 0.002). Patients with pSS can develop osteoporosis and fragility fractures over the course of the disease. Age, corticosteroids treatment and disease duration were associated with the development of OP. Disease duration and ESSDAI were associated with the development of fractures in patients with pSS.

Objective: To describe the incidence of bacteremia in a large multicentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and their clinical characteristics and to identify risk factors. Methods: All bacteremic episodes from the Spanish RELESSER registry were included. Clinical and laboratory characteristics concerning bacteremia and SLE status, as well as comorbidities at the time of infection, were retrospectively collected. A comparison with sex- and age-matched SLE controls without bacteremia was made. A logistic regression was conducted. Results: The study included 114 episodes of bacteremia in 83 patients. The incidence rate was 2.7/1000 patient-years. At the time of bacteremia, the median age was 40.5 (range: 8-90) years, and 88.6% of patients were female. The Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index was 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 8]; 41% had an SLE flare (66% severe); Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index was 3 (IQR 4). A comorbidity was recorded in 64% of cases. At the time of bacteremia, 88.6% received corticosteroids (68.6% > 10 mg/day) and 57% immunosuppressors. Gram-negative bacilli, most frequently Escherichia coli (29.8%), caused 52.6% of the episodes. The bacteremia-related mortality was 14% and bacteremia was recurrent in 27.2% of cases. A dose-response relationship was found between corticosteroids and bacteremia risk. In the multivariate analysis, these factors were associated with bacteremia: elevated creatinine (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.70; p = 0.045), diabetes (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.26-15.95; p < 0.001), cancer (OR 5.32, 95% CI 2.23-12.70; p < 0.001), immunosuppressors (OR 6.35, 95% CI 3.42-11.77; p < 0.001), and damage (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.31-2.09; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Bacteremia occurred mostly in patients with active SLE and was frequently associated with severe flares and corticosteroid use. Recurrence and mortality were high. Immunosuppressors, comorbidities, and disease-related damage were associated with bacteremia. This work was supported by the Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology. JMPR is supported by grant 316265 (BIOCAPS) from the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7/ REGPOT-2012-2013.1) and FIS/ISCIII-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo regional (FEDER) (Grant number PI11/02857).

Introduction Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with organ damage and certain features in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) patients. Our aim was to investigate the differences between SLE patients according to the presence of aPL and/or clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Materials and methods Patients from the RELESSER-T registry were included. RELESSER-T is a Spanish multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective, SLE registry. Results We included 2398 SLE patients, 1372 of whom were positive for aPL. Overall 1026 patients were classified as SLE, 555 as SLE-APS and817 as SLE-aPL. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, SLE-APS patients had higher rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes than those with SLE-aPL and SLE ( p Conclusions SLE-APS patients exhibited more severe clinical profiles with higher frequencies of major organ involvement, greater damage accrual and higher mortality than SLE-aPL and SLE patients.

[Resumen] Introducción. La Sociedad Española de Reumatología elaboró en el año 2000 el estudio EPISER2000 para conocer la prevalencia de la artrosis y otras enfermedades reumáticas en España. Los cambios sociodemográficos y en los hábitos de vida ocurridos en los últimos años en España justifican actualizar los datos de las enfermedades reumáticas (EPISER2016). Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática de columna cervical, columna lumbar, cadera, rodilla y mano, en población adulta en España. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado polietápico estratificado y por conglomerados. Los participantes fueron contactados por teléfono para cumplimentar un cuestionario de cribado de artrosis. El reumatólogo confirmaba o descartaba el diagnóstico. Se utilizaron los criterios-clínicos-ACR para diagnosticar artrosis de manos y los criterios clínico-radiológicos-ACR para diagnosticar la artrosis de rodilla y cadera. Resultados. La prevalencia de artrosis en España en una o más de las localizaciones estudiadas fue de 29,35%. La prevalencia de artrosis-cervical fue del 10,10% y de artrosis-lumbar del 15,52%. Ambas son más frecuentes en mujeres y a mayor edad, así como en personas con niveles de estudios bajos y obesidad. La prevalencia de artrosis de cadera fue del 5,13% y la de artrosis de rodilla del 13,83%; estas se asocian con el sexo femenino, sobrepeso y obesidad, menor frecuencia en nivel de estudios alto y con la edad. La prevalencia de la artrosis de mano fue del 7,73%. Es más frecuente en mujeres, obesas, con bajo nivel de estudios y mayor edad. Conclusiones. El estudio EPISER2016 es el primero que analiza la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática en 5 localizaciones (columna cervical, lumbar, rodilla, cadera y manos) en España. La artrosis de la columna lumbar es la más prevalente. [Abstract] Introduction. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). Objective. To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. Material and methods. Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. Results. The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. Conclusion. The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent.

[Resumen] Introducción. La Sociedad Española de Reumatología elaboró en el año 2000 el estudio EPISER2000 para conocer la prevalencia de la artrosis y otras enfermedades reumáticas en España. Los cambios sociodemográficos y en los hábitos de vida ocurridos en los últimos años en España justifican actualizar los datos de las enfermedades reumáticas (EPISER2016). Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática de columna cervical, columna lumbar, cadera, rodilla y mano, en población adulta en España. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado polietápico estratificado y por conglomerados. Los participantes fueron contactados por teléfono para cumplimentar un cuestionario de cribado de artrosis. El reumatólogo confirmaba o descartaba el diagnóstico. Se utilizaron los criterios-clínicos-ACR para diagnosticar artrosis de manos y los criterios clínico-radiológicos-ACR para diagnosticar la artrosis de rodilla y cadera. Resultados. La prevalencia de artrosis en España en una o más de las localizaciones estudiadas fue de 29,35%. La prevalencia de artrosis-cervical fue del 10,10% y de artrosis-lumbar del 15,52%. Ambas son más frecuentes en mujeres y a mayor edad, así como en personas con niveles de estudios bajos y obesidad. La prevalencia de artrosis de cadera fue del 5,13% y la de artrosis de rodilla del 13,83%; estas se asocian con el sexo femenino, sobrepeso y obesidad, menor frecuencia en nivel de estudios alto y con la edad. La prevalencia de la artrosis de mano fue del 7,73%. Es más frecuente en mujeres, obesas, con bajo nivel de estudios y mayor edad. Conclusiones. El estudio EPISER2016 es el primero que analiza la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática en 5 localizaciones (columna cervical, lumbar, rodilla, cadera y manos) en España. La artrosis de la columna lumbar es la más prevalente. [Abstract] Introduction. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). Objective. To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. Material and methods. Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. Results. The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. Conclusion. The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent. EPISER2016 ha sido financiado por Celgene, Laboratorios, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp and Dohme de España, Pfizer y Sanofi-Aventis. Los financiadores no han intervenido en el diseño del estudio, recogida ni análisis de datos, ni en la redacción de este artículo. IRP yMS fueron financiados con programas Miguel Servet II y Contrato Río Hortega-Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (CPII17/00026 y CM17/00101), respectivamente. El Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, integrado en el Plan Nacional de Programa Científico, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica 2013-2016, es financiado por el ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación y Promoción de la Investigación-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) «Una forma de hacer Europa»

Objectives Prevalence of SLE varies among studies, being influenced by study design, geographical area and ethnicity. Data about the prevalence of SLE in Spain are scarce. In the EPISER2016 study, promoted by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology, the prevalence estimate of SLE in the general adult population in Spain has been updated and its association with sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables has been explored. Methods Population-based multicentre cross-sectional study, with multistage stratified and cluster random sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to carry out a questionnaire for the screening of SLE. Investigating rheumatologists evaluated positive results (review of medical records and/or telephone interview, with medical visit if needed) to confirm the diagnosis. To calculate the prevalence and its 95% CI, the sample design was taken into account and weighing was calculated considering age, sex and geographic origin. Multivariate logistic regression models were defined to analyse which sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables included in the telephone questionnaire were associated with the presence of SLE. Results 4916 subjects aged 20 years or over were included. 16.52% (812/4916) had a positive screening result for SLE. 12 cases of SLE were detected. The estimated prevalence was 0.21% (95% CI: 0.11, 0.40). SLE was more prevalent in the rural municipalities, with an odds ratio (OR) = 4.041 (95% CI: 1.216, 13.424). Conclusion The estimated prevalence of SLE in Spain is higher than that described in most international epidemiological studies, but lower than that observed in ethnic minorities in the United States or the United Kingdom.

This guidance document was prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH), the aim of which is to provide hemostasis-related guidance documents for clinical laboratories. The current ICSH document was developed by an ad hoc committee, comprising an international collection of both clinical and laboratory experts. The purpose of this ICSH document is to provide laboratory guidance for (1) identifying hemostasis (coagulation) tests that have potential patient risk based on analysis, test result, and patient presentations, (2) critical result thresholds, (3) acceptable reporting and documenting mechanisms, and (4) developing laboratory policies. The basis for these recommendations was derived from published data, expert opinion, and good laboratory practice. The committee realizes that regional and local regulations, institutional stakeholders (e.g., physicians, laboratory personnel, hospital managers), and patient types (e.g., adults, pediatric, surgical) will be additional confounders for a given laboratory in generating a critical test list, critical value thresholds, and policy. Nevertheless, we expect this guidance document will be helpful as a framework for local practice.

Background Little is known about the patient related outcomes and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Damage and impact are issues that have not been associated with activity in lupus previously. Objectives In a large cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, to evaluate the association between a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and three different domains of the disease: activity, damage and impact of SLE on patients’ lives Methods Cross-sectional study of 1,364 SLE (ACR 97 Criteria) patients from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER). Patients were clinically assessed by the physicians, who collected data about demographics, clinical manifestations, laboratory features and therapies. SLE activity was assessed by using the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index). The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR DI) was used to measure damage accrual. The impact of SLE on patients’ lives was evaluated by using the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT). The PASS question “Considering all the different ways your disease is affecting you, if you would stay in this state for the next months, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?” was answered in a dichotomized way: yes/no. Measures of central tendency and spread were used to describe responses and T-test was used to evaluate the independence between PASS and the other questionnaires and indices. Results Mean age (years) ± S.D. of the 1,364 patients included in the study was 49.9 ± 13.3; 90.3% were female and 94.9% were Caucasian. In the total of patients, 979 (71.8%) were in PASS. Patients in PASS had significantly lower activity (SLEDAI Score) than those not in PASS (2.4 ± 3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 3.9, respectively; p=0.007). The SLICC/ACR DI was significantly lower in the group of patients in PASS compared to those without PASS (0.64 ± 1.1 vs. 0.81 ± 0.21, respectively; p=0.022). SLE had a significantly lower impact on patients in PASS in comparison to those without PASS (LIT Score: 8.47 ± 7.5 vs. 19.8 ± 8.34, respectively; p=0.001). Conclusion In the largest observational European Registry of SLE patients, PASS was associated with other domains of the disease: activity, damage and impact on patients’ life. PASS is a simple and reliable patient-reported outcome that can be a useful tool to evaluate patients’ well-being. Disclosure of Interests Tomas Vazquez Rodriguez: None declared, Inigo Rua Figueroa: None declared, Victor Del Campo Perez: None declared, J. Narvaez Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Francisco J Lopez-Longo: None declared, Maria Galindo-Izquierdo: None declared, Jaime Calvo-Alen: None declared, Antonio Fernandez-Nebro: None declared, Juan Ovalles: None declared, Pilar Rubio Munoz: None declared, Eva Tomero Muriel: None declared, Coral Mourino Rodriguez: None declared, Esther Uriarte Isacelaya: None declared, Angela Pecondon-Espanol: None declared, Mercedes Freire Gonzalez: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche, Consultant for: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Marian Gantes Mora: None declared, Monica Ibanez Barcelo: None declared, Carlos A. Montilla-Morales: None declared, Jose M Pego-Reigosa: None declared