Search

Background: Although robotic surgery has gained popularity, safety concerns remain due to potential delay in addressing intraoperative hemorrhages since the surgeon is not at the bedside. This study aimed to test whether a training program for emergency robotic undocking protocols improved the performance of thoracic operating room (OR) teams., Methods: An emergency undocking protocol and checklists were created for massive hemorrhage during robotic thoracic surgery. In phase I, two OR teams participated in in-situ simulations of the scenarios in the OR without knowledge of the protocols. In phase II, the protocol and checklists were introduced to four different OR teams by either high-fidelity lab simulation or video-based didactic sessions. The teams' performances were tested with in-situ OR simulations. Performance assessments included the number of missed critical steps, participant-reported feedback, and timeliness of crucial steps., Results: All teams successfully converted from robot-assisted to open, with the attending at bedside within five minutes from the decision to convert, regardless of phase or education type. Phase I (control) teams had an average of 2.55 critical misses per team while the average was 0.25 for phase II teams (P=0.08). There was no significant difference between phases in time required for the surgeon to be at the bedside (average 132.2 seconds, P=0.64)., Conclusions: Targeted education can lead to improved team performance. This study shows that high-fidelity simulation and didactic sessions can both be used to effectively teach emergency undocking protocols., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, except for author Bryce Bludevich, who is deceased (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-291/coif). K.U. reports grant funding from the Intuitive Foundation to his institution. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: With the advancement of robotic surgery, some thoracic surgeons have been slow to adopt to this new operative approach, in part because they are un-scrubbed and away from the patient while operating. Aiming to allay surgeon concerns of intra-operative emergencies, an insitu simulation-based clinical system's test (SbCST) can be completed to test the current clinical system, and to practice low-frequency, high-stakes clinical scenarios with the entire operating room (OR) team., Methods: Six different OR teams completed an insitu SbCST of an intra-operative pulmonary artery injury during a robot-assisted thoracic surgery at a single tertiary care center. The OR team consisted of an attending thoracic surgeon, surgery resident, anesthesia attending, anesthesia resident, circulating nurse, and a scrub technician. This test was conducted with an entire OR team along with study observers and simulation center staff. Outcomes included the identified latent safety threats (LSTs) and possible solutions for each LST, culminating in a complete failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). A Risk Priority Number (RPN) was determined for each LST identified. Pre- and post-simulation surveys using Likert scales were also collected., Results: The six FMEAs identified 28 potential LSTs in four categories. Of these 28 LSTs, nine were considered high priority based on their Risk Priority Number (RPN) with seven of the nine being repeated multiple times. Pre- and post-simulation survey responses were similar, with the majority of participants (94%) agreeing that high fidelity simulation of intra-operative emergencies is helpful and provides an opportunity to train for high-stakes, low-frequency events. After completing the SbCST, more participants felt confident that they knew their role during an intra-operative emergency than their pre-simulation survey responses. All participants agreed that simulation is an important part of continuing education and is helpful for learning skills that are infrequently used. Following the SbCST, more participants agreed that they knew how to safely undock the da Vinci robot during an emergency., Conclusions: SbCSTs provide an opportunity to test the current clinical system with a low-frequency, high-stakes event and allow medical personnels to practice their skills and teamwork. By completing multiple SbCSTs, we were able to identify multiple LSTs within different OR teams, allowing for a broader review of the current clinical systems in place. The use of these SbCSTs in conjunction with debriefing sessions and FMEA completion allows for the most significant potential improvement of the current system. This study shows that SbCST with FMEA completion can be used to test current systems and create better systems for patient safety., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Expertise in airway management is a vital skill for any provider caring for critically ill patients. A growing body of literature has identified the stark difference in periprocedural outcomes of elective intubation in the operating room when compared with emergency intubation in the ICU. A number of strategies to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with airway management in the critically ill have been described. In this review, we provide an updated framework for airway assessment before direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy, and use of newer pharmacologic agents; comment on current concepts in tracheal intubation in the ICU; and address human factors around critical decision-making during ICU airway management., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Medical Education can be delivered in the traditional classroom or via novel technology including an online classroom., Objective: To test the hypothesis that learning in an online classroom would result in similar outcomes as learning in the traditional classroom when using a flipped classroom pedagogy., Design: Randomized controlled trial. A total of 274 subjects enrolled in a Neuro-otology training program for non-Neuro-otologists of 25 h held over a 3-day period. Subjects were randomized into a "control" group attending a traditional classroom and a "trial" group of equal numbers participating in an online synchronous Internet streaming classroom using the Adobe Connect e-learning platform., Interventions: Subjects were randomized into a "control" group attending a traditional classroom and a "treatment" group of equal numbers participating in an online synchronous Internet streaming classroom., Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-multiple choice examinations of VOR, Movement, Head Turns, Head Tremor, Neurodegeneration, Inferior Olivary Complex, Collateral Projections, Eye Movement Training, Visual Saccades, Head Saccades, Visual Impairment, Walking Speed, Neuroprotection, Autophagy, Hyperkinetic Movement, Eye and Head Stability, Oscilllatory Head Movements, Gaze Stability, Leaky Neural Integrator, Cervical Dystonia, INC and Head Tilts, Visual Pursuits, Optokinetic Stimulation, and Vestibular Rehabilitation., Methods: All candidates took a pretest examination of the subject material. The 2-9 h and 1-8 h sessions over three consecutive days were given live in the classroom and synchronously in the online classroom using the Adobe Connect e-learning platform. Subjects randomized to the online classroom attended the lectures in a location of their choice and viewed the sessions live on the Internet. A posttest examination was given to all candidates after completion of the course. Two sample unpaired t tests with equal variances were calculated for all pretests and posttests for all groups including gender differences., Results: All 274 subjects demonstrated statistically significant learning by comparison of their pre- and posttest scores. There were no statistically significant differences in the test scores between the two groups of 137 subjects each (0.8%, 95% CI 85.45917-86.67952; P  = 0.9195). A total of 101 males in the traditional classroom arm had statistically significant lower scores than 72 females (0.8%, 95% CI 84.65716-86.53096; P  = 0.0377) but not in the online arm (0.8%, 95% CI 85.46172-87.23135; P  = 0.2176) with a moderate effect size (Cohen's d  = -0.407)., Conclusion: The use of a synchronous online classroom in neuro-otology clinical training has demonstrated similar outcomes to the traditional classroom. The online classroom is a low cost and effective complement to medical specialty training in Neuro-Otology. The significant difference in outcomes between males and females who attended the traditional classroom suggests that women may do better than males in this learning environment, although the effect size is moderate., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03079349.

Managing the airway in the intensive care unit (ICU) is complicated by a wide array of physiologic factors. Difficult airway may be a consequence of patient’s anatomy or airway edema developed during the ICU stay and mechanical ventilation. The incidence of failed airways and of cardiac arrest related to airway instrumentation in the ICU is much higher than that of elective intubations performed in the operating room. In this article, we will provide a framework for identifying a difficult airway, criteria for safe extubation, as well as review the devices that are available for airway management in the ICU. Proficiency in identifying a potentially difficult airway and thorough familiarity with strategies and techniques of securing the airway are necessary for safe practice of critical care medicine

Long-term complications from hospital-acquired acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) include recurrent VTE, postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We used a probability model to estimate the number of these events among hospitalised medical patients in the 2003 United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Of 8,077,919 hospitalised medical patients at risk for VTE, we calculate that 122,235 were stricken with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 32,654 with pulmonary embolism (PE). These events generated 49,843 VTE-related deaths, 28,052 recurrent DVTs, 6,680 recurrent PEs, 140,156 cases of PTS, and 5,288 cases of CTEPH over the ensuing 5 years, for a total of 180,176 patients afflicted with long-term complications of VTE. In our model, rates of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescribing varied across populations, ranging from 15.3% to 49.2%. When we modeled universal utilisation of pharmacological prophylaxis, the number of VTE-related deaths decreased from 49,843 to 20,739, recurrent DVT was reduced from 28,052 to 13,384, and recurrent PE was reduced from 6,680 to 3,187 events. Incident cases of PTS decreased from 140,156 to 54,651, and CTEPH decreased from 5,288 to 1,115 cases. The number of hospitalised medical patients with long-term VTE complications was reduced by 60% to 72,337. In conclusion, hospitalised medical patients are particularly vulnerable to the development of recurrent VTE, PTS, and CTEPH. These VTE complications would be reduced by more than half with universal thromboprophylaxis. Further efforts should focus on improving VTE prophylaxis utilisation.

The number of acutely ill hospitalised medical patients at risk for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been well defined. Therefore, we used the 2003 United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to estimate VTE events among hospitalised medical patients. We then modeled the potential reduction in VTE with universal utilisation of appropriate pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. We calculated that 8,077,919 acutely ill hospitalised medical patients were at risk for VTE. Heart failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and cancer were the most common medical diagnoses. We estimated that 196,134 VTE-related events occurred in 2003, afflicting two out of every 100 acutely ill hospitalised medical patients. These VTE-related events were comprised of 122,235 symptomatic deep venous thromboses, 32,654 symptomatic episodes of pulmonary embolism, and 41,245 deaths due to VTE. In our model, rates of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescription were low for various acute medical illnesses, ranging from 15.3% to 49.2%. However, with universal thromboprophylaxis, 114,174 VTE-related events would have been prevented. In conclusion, acutely ill medical patients represent a large population vulnerable to the development of VTE during hospitalisation. The number of VTE-related events would be halved with universal thromboprophylaxis. Further efforts focused on improving VTE prevention strategies in hospitalised medical patients are warranted.

Background: Information about the variation in the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in prophylaxis practices around the world is scarce. The ENDORSE (Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting) study is a multinational cross-sectional survey designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting, and to determine the proportion of at-risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis., Methods: All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward, or those aged 18 years or over admitted to a surgical ward, in 358 hospitals across 32 countries were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were receiving recommended prophylaxis., Findings: 68 183 patients were enrolled; 30 827 (45%) were categorised as surgical, and 37 356 (55%) as medical. On the basis of ACCP criteria, 35 329 (51.8%; 95% CI 51.4-52.2; between-country range 35.6-72.6) patients were judged to be at risk for VTE, including 19 842 (64.4%; 63.8-64.9; 44.1-80.2) surgical patients and 15 487 (41.5%; 41.0-42.0; 21.1-71.2) medical patients. Of the surgical patients at risk, 11 613 (58.5%; 57.8-59.2; 0.2-92.1) received ACCP-recommended VTE prophylaxis, compared with 6119 (39.5%; 38.7-40.3; 3.1-70.4) at-risk medical patients., Interpretation: A large proportion of hospitalised patients are at risk for VTE, but there is a low rate of appropriate prophylaxis. Our data reinforce the rationale for the use of hospital-wide strategies to assess patients' VTE risk and to implement measures that ensure that at-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major US health problem. However, the total number of US inpatients who are at risk for VTE is unknown. Our objective was to estimate the number of US acute-care hospital inpatients who were at risk for VTE according to criteria established by the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy guidelines for VTE prevention. Using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), patient diagnoses and procedures were examined to identify major surgery patients (age > or = 18 years, length of hospital stay > or = 2 days) and medical patients (age > or = 40 years, length of hospital stay > or = 2 days). ACCP guidelines were used to estimate the number of surgical and medical patients at risk of developing VTE. Of an estimated 38,220,659 discharges in 2003, 7,786,390 (20%) were surgical inpatients; 44% of which were at low risk for VTE, while 15%, 24%, and 17% were at moderate, high, and very high risk for VTE, respectively. Of the remaining 15,161,586 medical patients, 7,742,419 (51%) met ACCP VTE risk criteria. Over 12 million patients, comprising 31% of US hospital discharges in 2003, were at risk of VTE. Given the existence of internationally-accepted evidence-based guidelines for prevention of VTE, research is required to establish if this patient population is receiving recommended VTE prophylaxis., (2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc)

Objective: To analyze in-hospital mortality after pancreatectomy using a large national database., Summary and Background Data: Pancreatic resections, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and total pancreatectomy, remain the only potentially curative interventions for pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study was to define factors affecting outcomes after pancreatectomy for neoplasm., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using all patients undergoing pancreatic resections for neoplastic disease identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2003. Crude in-hospital mortality was analyzed by chi. A multivariable model was constructed to adjust for age, sex, hospital teaching status, hospital surgical volume, year of resection, payer status, and selected comorbid conditions., Results: In all, 279,445 patient discharges were identified with a primary diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm. A total of 39,463 (14%) patients underwent resection during that hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 5.9% with a significant decrease from 7.8% to 4.6% from 1998 to 2003 by trend analysis (P < 0.0001). Resections done at low (<5 procedures/year)- and medium (5-18/year)-volume centers had higher mortality compared with those at high (>18/year)-volume centers (low-volume odds ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.; medium-volume, odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.0). The proportion of procedures performed at high volume centers increased from 30% to 39% over the 6-year time period (P < 0.0001) by trend test., Conclusions: This large observational study demonstrates an improvement in operative mortality for patients undergoing pancreatectomy for neoplastic disease from 1998 to 2003. In addition, a greater proportion of pancreatectomies were performed at high-volume centers in 2003. The regionalization of pancreatic surgery may have partially contributed to the observed decrease in mortality rates.

Airway management in the ICU can be complicated due to many factors including the limited physiologic reserve of the patient. As a consequence, the likelihood of difficult mask ventilation and intubation increases. The incidence of failed airways and of cardiac arrest related to airway instrumentation in the ICU is much higher than that of elective intubations performed in the operating room. A thorough working knowledge of the devices available for the management of the difficult airway and recommended rescue strategies is paramount in avoiding bad patient outcomes. In this review, we will provide a conceptual framework for airway assessment, with an emphasis on assessment of the patient with limited cervical spine movement or injury and of morbidly obese patients. Furthermore, we will review the devices that are available for airway management in the ICU, and discuss controversies surrounding interventions like cricoid pressure and the use of muscle relaxants in the critically ill patient. Finally, strategies for the safe extubation of patients with known difficult airways will be provided.

Objectives: A consequence of delay in the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease limb loss. This study was undertaken to determine the correlation of low socioeconomic status and race on the severity of ischemic presentation and the subsequent amputation rate., Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2002 on patients from urban hospitals with the diagnosis of lower extremity ischemia were evaluated. The population was divided into two groups: the amputation group (AMP) and lower extremity revascularization group (LER). Comorbidities, age, gender, race, ischemic gangrene at presentation, insurance status (no/noncommercial or commercial), and income status at admission were determined. These variables were compared using multivariate logistic regression analyses of the data for risk adjustment., Results: Of 691,833 patients presenting with lower extremity ischemia, 363,193 underwent revascularization (66.3%) or amputation (33.7%). Univariate analysis correlated a statistically significant (P < .0001) higher rate of amputation and multivariate analysis associated significantly higher odds of amputation with the following variables: nonwhites (1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65, 2.20), low-income bracket (1.41, 95% CI, 1.18, 1.60), and Medicare & Medicaid (1.81, 95% CI, 1.66, 1.97). Adjusting for other variables of statistical significance, multivariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant risk for amputation based on the nonteaching status of the institution (odds ratio [OR], 1.17, 95% CI, 1.08, 1.30)., Conclusions: Primary amputation was performed with a higher frequency on patients with lower extremity ischemia who were nonwhite, low income, and without commercial insurance. The observed advanced ischemia among these economically disadvantaged patients suggests a delayed diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, probably due to lack of access to adequate primary care or vascular surgery providers, or both. Better education of the general population and primary care providers to the symptoms and consequences of PVD may reduce the amputation rate in this group.