Search

Resumen La Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Interna ha desarrollado a lo largo de 2018-2019 el proyecto «El hospital del futuro». El hospital del futuro pretende trasladar al contexto del sistema sanitario espanol la reflexion que abordo el Royal College of Physicians en el Reino Unido sobre la organizacion de la asistencia en los hospitales del futuro, desde el conocimiento acumulado sobre el Sistema Nacional de Salud. En el proyecto participaron asimismo numerosas sociedades cientifico-medicas y entidades profesionales del sector salud y asociaciones de pacientes. Este articulo tiene por objeto destacar en 10 puntos las previsiones que consideramos mas relevantes derivadas de este proyecto, dedicando el ultimo a los retos que para la Medicina Interna se deducen de estas propuestas.

Over the course of 2018 and 2019, the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine carried out a project called "The Future Hospital." Based on cumulative knowledge on the Spanish National Health System, this project seeks to transfer the observations on the organization of healthcare in future hospitals made by the Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom to the context of the Spanish healthcare system. The project's participants included numerous scientific and medical societies, professional associations in the health sector, and patient associations. This aim of this article is to highlight, in 10 points, predictions that arose from this project that we consider to be the most relevant, reserving the last point for the challenges for the field of internal medicine that can be surmised from these proposals.

Summary Background The most commonly used second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens are bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, both offering suboptimal results. Combining bismuth and levofloxacin may enhance the efficacy of rescue eradication regimens. Aims To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a second-line quadruple regimen containing levofloxacin and bismuth in patients whose previous H. pylori eradication treatment failed. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study including patients in whom a standard triple therapy (PPI–clarithromycin–amoxicillin) or a non-bismuth quadruple therapy (PPI–clarithromycin–amoxicillin–metronidazole, either sequential or concomitant) had failed. Esomeprazole (40 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d.), levofloxacin (500 mg o.d.) and bismuth (240 mg b.d.) was prescribed for 14 days. Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Compliance was determined through questioning and recovery of empty medication envelopes. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by questionnaires. Results 200 patients were included consecutively (mean age 47 years, 67% women, 13% ulcer). Previous failed therapy included: standard clarithromycin triple therapy (131 patients), sequential (32) and concomitant (37). A total of 96% took all medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 91.1% (95%CI = 87–95%) and 90% (95%CI = 86–94%). Cure rates were similar regardless of previous (failed) treatment or country of origin. Adverse effects were reported in 46% of patients, most commonly nausea (17%) and diarrhoea (16%); 3% were intense but none was serious. Conclusions Fourteen-day bismuth- and levofloxacin-containing quadruple therapy is an effective (≥90% cure rate), simple and safe second-line strategy in patients whose previous standard triple or non-bismuth quadruple (sequential or concomitant) therapies have failed.