Search

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with impairments in functionality, affecting aspects such as physical capacity, independence, mental health, social and professional life. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a validated tool for assessing functional capacity in RA patients. A simple questionnaire with a score of 0 to 3 is applied, with an inverse relationship between grade and functionality. Previous studies have shown worse functional indexes in patients with high disease activity and established joint damage. Objectives To relate clinical, laboratory and therapeutic aspects with HAQ-DI in a large cohort of Brazilian patients. Methods A prospective, multicenter cohort study (“REAL” Study) involving 11 Brazilian centres specialised in the treatment of RA patients. All patients were submitted to at least 3 clinical evaluations in a 12 month period. Only patients older than 18 years and classified as RA according to 1987 (ACR) or 2010 (ACR/EULAR) criteria were evaluated. HAQ-DI was applied for assessing functional capacity, and the results were analysed for association with clinical, laboratory and therapeutic elements. Comparison between groups was performed using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results Overall, 1116 patients (89.43% females, mean age 58±11 years) took part in the study. Rheumatoid factor (RF) in high levels and bone erosion were both associated with higher HAQ-DI indexes (p: 0.0244 and p Conclusions In our prospective cohort, patients with high levels of RF, bone erosion, in use of any biologic DMARD or targeted-synthetic DMARD, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab had worse functional capacity indexes. When compared to non-use, the use of any conventional DMARD was associated with better rates of HAQ-DI. References [1] Drossaers-Bakker KW, de Buck M, van Zeben D, et al. Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: The effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time. Arthritis Rheum1999;42:1854. [2] Scott DL, Pugner K, Kaarela K, et al. The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford)2000;39:122. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease, characterised by inflammatory involvement of the synovial joints. The ”treat to target” concept is well established in the rheumatologic community, however, in many patients, especially in developing countries, its implementation is not feasible. Considering the high costs of treatment com of RA and the limited national epidemiological data available on this disease, we sought to describe the profile of use of biological drugs in Brazilian patients with RA to help the decision-making process by public health managers. Objectives To describe the frequency and time of use of biological drugs in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods The REAL – RA in real life in Brazil – is a multicenter prospective cohort study, with twelve-month follow-up period. To be included in this study, consecutive patients from 11 tertiary rheumatology centres had to meet the 1987 ACR or the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria. Data were collected during routine clinical care and previous medical records were used as secondary sources. The present study present data taken from the participants’ initial assessment. This research was approved by the Ethics Committees of each centre. Results A total of 1125 patients were analysed. 89% were women with a mean age of 56.6 years. The main clinic data were: DAS 28 (median)=3.52, HAQ (median)=0.87 and CDAI (median)=9. 1022 (90.84%) used synthetic DMARDs and 406 (36.09%) biologic therapy. The frequency of use of the biologic therapy was: abatacept (73 patients/6.49%), etanercept (66/5.87%), tocilizumab (60/5.33%), adalimumab (54/4.8%), infliximab (50/4.44%), rituximab (49/4.36%), golimumab (37/3.29%), certolizumab (17, 1.51%). The time of use of the biological drugs is presented in table 1. Conclusions The therapeutic profile of this cohort of Brazilian RA patients shows some interesting results. The relatively high number of patients on biologics, compared to other studies, may be related to fact that the centres involved were reference centres, probably dealing with more difficult cases. References [1] Azevedo AB, Ferraz MB, Ciconelli RM. Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Brazil. Value in Health2008;11(5):869–877. [2] Boonen A, Severens JL. The burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol2011;30(Suppl 1):S3–S8. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Early diagnosis and immediate treatment are critical in achieving optimal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, anecdotal evidence suggests that in Brazil there is still a significant delay in patient referral, RA diagnosis and DMARD initiation. The lack of national data hinders effective advocacy for proper public health policies, which led the RA commission of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology to create a nationally-representative multicenter RA cohort to provide the necessary data. Objectives To describe the development process and baseline characteristics of a large, nationally-representative multicenter cohort of RA patients in Brazil. Methods Eleven public rheumatology centers from all of the 5 regions of Brazil enrolled ∼100 consecutive RA patients each (1987 ARA or 2010 ACR-EULAR). This cohort is being followed prospectively for 1 year, with systematic data collection at time 0, 6±1 months and 12±1 months, and registration of all other visits during this 1-year period. Data collection began in 08–2015, using a single online electronic medical record, and included demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, lab, radiographic and therapeutic characteristics, along with functional status, quality of life and adherence to treatment information. Results 1125 patients were enrolled (Table), ∼90% were female, with a mean age of 56 years and median disease duration of 13 years. Median BMI was 27 kg/m2, with 64% of the patients classified as overweight or obese. The interval between symptoms and diagnosis varied from 1 to 457 months (median 12 months). Almost half of the patients were on glucocorticoids, 96% on DMARDs, with 36% on biologics. Only 7% were seronegative for both rheumatoid factor and ACPA. Median HAQ-DI was 0.875 and median DAS28-ESR was 3.5, with 58.6% of patients presenting moderate or high disease activity. Conclusions The delay in diagnosis may explain the high percentage of patients with moderate or high disease activity and erosive disease. The low level of physical dysfunction observed in this established, predominantly seropositive RA population may be explained by the large proportion of patients on glucocorticoid and biologic therapy. Our findings suggest that, despite current treatment concepts being well known and accepted by Brazilian rheumatologists, there is still a gap in early diagnosis and management of RA. Disclosure of Interest None declared