1. Ultrasound in the Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Literature Review by the OMERACT Ultrasound Group
- Author
-
Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, George Arthur Willem Bruyn, Alfonso Alfaro-Rodriguez, Marwin Gutierrez, Andrea Delle Sedie, Lene Terslev, Annamaria Iagnocco, Chiara Bertolazzi, Carlos Pineda, Carina Soto-Fajardo, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion, Copenhagen University Hospital, MC Groep Hospitals, Lelystad, Università degli studi di Torino (UNITO), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), and University of Pisa - Università di Pisa
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Settore MED/16 - REUMATOLOGIA ,FEASIBILITY ,Immunology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Rheumatology ,medicine ,Criterion validity ,Content validity ,Immunology and Allergy ,Humans ,Medical physics ,Clinical significance ,030212 general & internal medicine ,VALIDITY ,Lung ,Reliability (statistics) ,Ultrasonography ,030203 arthritis & rheumatology ,INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE ,Scleroderma, Systemic ,business.industry ,Ultrasound ,Interstitial lung disease ,Reproducibility of Results ,OMERACT ,medicine.disease ,3. Good health ,Lung ultrasound ,Systemic sclerosis pulmonary ultrasound feasibility interstitial lung disease validity reliability ,Systematic review ,[SDV.MHEP.RSOA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Rhumatology and musculoskeletal system ,RELIABILITY ,SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS ,PULMONARY ULTRASOUND ,business ,Lung Diseases, Interstitial - Abstract
Objective.To provide an overview of the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the assessment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to discuss the state of validation supporting its clinical relevance and application in daily clinical practice.Methods.Original articles published between January 1997 and October 2017 were included. To identify all available studies, a detailed search pertaining to the topic of review was conducted according to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. The quality assessment of retrieved articles was performed according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool.Results.From 300 papers identified, 12 were included for the analysis. LUS passed the filter of face, content validity, and feasibility. However, there is insufficient evidence to support criterion validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change.Conclusion.Despite a great deal of work supporting the potential role of LUS for the assessment of ILD-SSc, much remains to be done before validating its use as an outcome measure in ILD-SSc.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF