Search

Objectives: We sought to address concerns regarding recurring inpatient laboratory test order practices (daily laboratory tests) through a multifaceted approach to changing ordering patterns.Methods: We engaged in an interdepartmental collaboration to foster mindful test ordering through clinical policy creation, electronic clinical decision support, and continuous auditing and feedback.Results: Annualized daily order volumes decreased from approximately 25,000 to 10,000 during a 33-month postintervention review. This represented a significant change from preintervention order volumes (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.64; P < 10-16). Total inpatient test volumes were not affected.Conclusions: Durable changes to inpatient order practices can be achieved through a collaborative approach to utilization management that includes shared responsibility for establishing clinical guidelines and electronic decision support. Our experience suggests auditing and continued feedback are additional crucial components to changing ordering behavior. Curtailing daily orders alone may not be a sufficient strategy to reduce in-laboratory costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The way software for electronic health records and laboratory tests ordering systems are designed may influence physicians' prescription. A randomised controlled trial was performed to measure the impact of a diagnostic and laboratory tests ordering system software modification.Methods: Participants were family physicians working and prescribing diagnostic and laboratory tests. The intervention group had a modified software with a basic shortcut menu changes, where some tests were withdrawn or added, and with the implementation of an evidence-based decision support based on United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. This intervention group was compared with usual software (control group). The outcomes were the number of tests prescribed from those: withdrawn from the basic menu; added to the basic menu; marked with green dots (USPSTF's grade A and B); and marked with red dots (USPSTF's grade D).Results: Comparing the monthly average number of tests prescribed before and after the software modification, from those tests that were withdrawn from the basic menu, the control group prescribed 33.8 tests per 100 consultations before and 30.8 after (p = 0075); the intervention group prescribed 31.3 before and 13.9 after (p < 0001). Comparing the tests prescribed between both groups during the intervention, from those tests that were withdrawn from the basic menu, the intervention group prescribed a monthly average of 14.0 vs. 29.3 tests per 100 consultations in the control group (p < 0.001). From those tests that are USPSTF's grade A and B, intervention group prescribed 66.8 vs. 74.1 tests per 100 consultations in the control group (p = 0.070). From those tests categorised as USPSTF grade D, the intervention group prescribed an average of 9.8 vs. 11.8 tests per 100 consultations in the control group (p = 0.003).Conclusions: Removing unnecessary tests from a quick shortcut menu of the diagnosis and laboratory tests ordering system had a significant impact and reduced unnecessary prescription of tests. The fact that it was not possible to perform the randomization at the family physicians' level, but only of the computer servers is a limitation of our study. Future research should assess the impact of different tests ordering systems during longer periods.Trial Registration: ISRCTN45427977 , May 1st 2014 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Failure to adequately communicate a laboratory critical value (CV) is a potential cause of adverse events. The harmonization of CV reporting is increasingly recognized as a key issue in ensuring patient care and minimizing harm. With ongoing improvements in CV reporting, the patient's outcome should be audited to assess the effectiveness of CV notification. Design and methods We report the data audited throughout a six month-period during which an analysis was made of CVs, and we describe the approach of clinicians and general practitioners (GPs), and their decision making following CV reporting. Results CV notification led to a change of treatment in 98.0% of patients admitted to surgical and in 90.6% of those admitted to medical wards. Clinicians made a further evaluation of new complications in patients in 70.0% and 60.4% of cases, in surgical and medical wards respectively. In more than 40.0% of cases, CVs were unexpected findings. In the primary care setting, critical hyperkalemia was managed by GPs in 55% of patients, thus sparing patient's hospitalization. For all outpatients with critical INR (international normalized ratio), the GPs changed or stopped warfarin dosage. Twenty-four percent of patients were checked for an additional INR, whereas a further medical examination by a consultant in the hospital setting was requested for 5% of patients. Conclusions The laboratory plays a key role in ensuring patient safety, especially in CV reporting. An evaluation should be made of the patient's outcome and clinical decision making in order to assess the effectiveness of the CV process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In the last decade the radial access use in the catheterization laboratory has sensibly grown up worldwide. From an initial sporadic use as alternative but challenging vascular approach, radial artery is today utilized by default for percutaneous procedures in many centers. The tangible interest in the transradial approach is also testified by increasing presence of specific sessions in the main interventional meetings and by continuous development of dedicated catheters and ancillary devices by manufacturers. In this review we describe the anatomical characteristics and the technical aspects related to transradial procedure underlying its pros/cons in opposition to femoral access. We also point up practical instructions trying to resolve the main concerns related to an extensive use of radial approach in catheterization laboratory, such as increased operator''s discomfort, higher radiation exposure, safety and feasibility for complex high-risk procedures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Currently, primary care physicians will have to make the decision with history and physical examination as well as laboratory tests. Although some of the studies commenting on these tests, physicians need much more evidence-based approaches. In this article, we tried to keep focused on this topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Critical value reporting is considered an essential tool to ensure the quality of medical laboratory services. Important issues include defining cut-off values, assessing responsibility for communication and adopting information technology solutions to improve notification. Here, we report the state of critical value reporting in a large cohort of Italian laboratories and comparison with Q-Probes surveys from the College of American Pathologists as representatives of the US situation. Methods: To compare critical value policies and procedures, formulation of critical values list with critical values limits and monitoring tools, a web-based questionnaire was formulated for 389 institutions participating in the External Quality Assessment Schemes of Veneto Region, in Italy. Results: A total of 90 clinical laboratories submitted data. Accredited laboratories represented 82.2% of participants, but written procedures for reporting were indicated by 70.5% of participants. Relevant differences between US and Italian policies have been observed, particularly regarding who provides the notification and on the formulation of the cut-off threshold for critical values. Conclusions: Accreditation according to international standards can decrease differences regarding the management of critical values across laboratories of different countries. However, the issues concerning critical limits should be debated and a consensus critical values list should be considered. Automated systems could offer improvements regarding some issues, such as who makes the notification, reducing the time spent in notification of critical values. Surveys for comparing and improving existing policies regarding critical values should be promoted at an international level. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:461–8. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses one report within the issue on the costs and income of clinical laboratory testing in Taiwan.

AIMS: To identify priorities for improving effective use of laboratory services in a district hospital in Malawi. METHODS: A prospective observational study of clinician–patient interactions to analyse laboratory test requesting practices and utilisation of laboratory results. The proportion of tests that was appropriately ordered, processed and ultimately influenced clinical management was used to assess effectiveness of utilisation. RESULTS: 420 clinical consultations between health professionals and patients were observed. 92% of tests were ordered appropriately, 84% were processed by the laboratory and 64% of results influenced patient management. 73–79% of high-volume tests (haemoglobin, microscopy for malaria and tuberculosis) and 32% of low-volume tests influenced management. CONCLUSIONS: 25% of commonly requested laboratory tests were not utilised effectively; because of the high volume, interventions to improve their use are likely to be cost effective. Although 68% of low-volume tests were not used efficiently, the cost of providing support for these tests in a resource-poor setting needs to be balanced against their clinical usefulness. In contrast to published information, this study shows significant under-requesting of laboratory tests that were available. Measures to increase appropriate test requests will have implications for clinician education as well as laboratory space, budgets and staffing levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In terms of testing, modern laboratory medicine can be divided into centralized testing in central laboratories and point-of-care testing (POCT). Centralized laboratory medicine offers high-quality results, as guaranteed by the use of quality management programs and the excellence of the staff. POCT is performed by clinical staff, and so such testing has moved back closer to the patient. POCT has the advantage of shortening the turnaround time, which potentially benefits the patient. However, the clinical laboratory testing expertise of clinical staff is limited. Consequently, when deciding which components of laboratory testing must be conducted in central laboratories and which components as POCT (in relation to quality and timeliness), it will be medical necessity, medical utility, technological capabilities and costs that will have to be ascertained. Provided adequate quality can be guaranteed, POCT is preferable, considering its timeliness, when testing vital parameters. It is also preferred when the central laboratory cannot guarantee the delivery of results of short turn-around-time (STAT) markers within 60 or (even better) 30 min. POCT should not replace centralized medical laboratory testing in general, but it should be used in cases where positive effects on patient care have been clearly demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A portfolio assessment system has been introduced into a biomedical science programme to promote both continuous learning and deep approaches to learning. Attention has been focused on creating harmony between the assessment system and the PBL curriculum of the programme. Biomedicine and laboratory work are central in the curriculum. The portfolio included evidence of laboratory work, personal reflections and certificates from the PBL tutor. The portfolio was assessed on three occasions over 20 weeks. The grades were ‘pass’ or ‘fail’. The tutor certificate appeared to be a crucial part of the portfolio since a ‘fail’ in this part usually led to an overall ‘fail’. Both students and teachers were concerned about ensuring that enough factual knowledge, as measured by a traditional test, had been achieved. The agreement was good enough for the pass or fail level but some expected differences were found at the detailed level. The course, including the portfolio, was evaluated orally during weekly whole-group meetings and using a questionnaire at the end. The students felt comfortable with the portfolio system and preferred it to a traditional test. The teachers felt that they needed to develop their teacher–student discussion skills and to improve their feedback on the reflections. Peer assessment between students is proposed as a line of action to enhance the credibility of the crucial tutor certificate. The portfolio might be an efficient tool for the students to concentrate their efforts on the most central concepts of medical laboratory work. The model will be developed through further discussions and better consensus among faculty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Background Laboratory services play an important part in screening, diagnosis, and management of patients within primary care. However, unnecessary use of laboratory tests is increasing. Our aim was to assess the effect of two interventions on the number of laboratory tests requested by primary-care physicians. Methods We did a cluster randomised controlled trial using a 2×2 factorial design, involving 85 primary-care practices (370 family practitioners) that request all laboratory tests from one regional centre. The interventions were quarterly feedback of practice requesting rates for nine laboratory tests, enhanced with educational messages, and brief educational reminder messages added to the test result reports for nine laboratory tests. The primary outcome was the number of targeted tests requested by primary-care practices during the 12 months of the intervention. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN06490422. Findings Practices that received either or both the enhanced feedback and the reminder messages were significantly less likely than the control group to request the targeted tests in total (enhanced feedback odds ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·81-0·94; reminder messages 0·89, 0·83-0·93). The effect of the interventions varied across the targeted tests individually, although the number of tests requested for both interventions was generally reduced. Neither intervention was consistently better than the other. Interpretation Enhanced feedback of requesting rates and brief educational reminder messages, alone and in combination, are effective strategies for reducing test requesting in primary care. Both strategies are feasible within most laboratory settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the impact of a computerised pathology order entry system on laboratory turnaround times and test ordering within a teaching hospital. Methods: A controlled before and after study compared test assays ordered from 11 wards two months before (n = 97 851) and after (n = 113 762) the implementation of a computerised pathology order entry system (Cerner Millennium Powerchart). Comparisons were made of laboratory turnaround times, frequency of tests ordered and specimens taken, proportions of patients having tests, average number per patient, and percentage of gentamicin and vancomycin specimens labelled as random. Results: Intervention wards experienced an average decrease in turnaround of 15.5 minutes/test assay (range 73.8 to 58.3 minutes; p<0.001). Reductions were significant for prioritised and non-prioritised tests, and for those done within and outside business hours. There was no significant change in the average number of tests (p=0.228), or specimens per patient (p=0.324), and no change in turnaround time for the control ward (p=0.218). Use of structured order screens enhanced data provided to laboratories. Removing three test assays from the liver function order set resulted in significantly fewer of these tests being done. Conclusions: Computerised order entry systems are an important element in achieving faster test results. These systems can influence test ordering patterns through structured order screens, manipulation of order sets, and analysis of real time data to assess the impact of such changes, not possible with paper based systems. The extent to which improvements translate into improved patient outcomes remains to be determined. A potentially limiting factor is clinicians' capacity to respond to, and make use of, faster test results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a study which examined the impact of a geriatric population on clinical laboratory utilization in the U.S. Factors which influence physicians for ordering laboratory tests on patients; Diagnosis categories used in the research; Type of statistics applied for data analysis; Difference in the patients' length of stay between private and public hospitals.

The article presents abstracts related to medical topics including immunohistochemistry, effectiveness of an online medical laboratory sciences program and molecular testing of cancer specimens.

Clinical and neonatal screening methods using a tandem mass spectrometer are clearly a model for modern laboratory testing in the new Millennium. By the year 2000, more than 1 million blood and plasma samples will have been tested in laboratories throughout the world for a battery of metabolic disorders using a tandem mass spectrometer as the primary analytical device. A tandem mass spectrometer is considered the “ultimate” analytical detector in a variety of biochemical and clinical methods because of its very high accuracy, selectivity, precision, versatility and robust nature. The ability to achieve very high and reproducible sample throughput (∼600 samples/instrument/24 h) has made this technology cost-effective for newborn screening. In order to reliably measure markers of inborn errors of metabolism while maintaining low costs and high efficiency, accuracy and quality, much attention needs to be placed on monitoring and maintenance of all components of the entire testing system. These components include specimen collection and sample preparation methods, analysis by LC tandem mass spectrometry, conversion of raw mass spectra (data) into clinically meaningful results (concentration), expert interpretation of these results so that the clinician can be provided with information to facilitate a diagnose, and follow-up and education so that the maximum benefits of newborn screening translate into prevention of disease symptoms or more effective treatments. Addressing each part of the whole system will produce a quality screening program that will detect a battery of disorders using tandem mass spectrometry with a disease frequency of nearly 1 in 4000 infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article the author discusses aspects of medical research opportunities by general practitioners in 2011 as compared to the time of Nobel prize for Medicine laureate and Frederick Grant Banting. She says that Banting believes ideas can be generated through research and clinical work and emphasized the importance of keeping medical records and access to laboratories. However, medical researchers in 2011 has difficulty getting laboratory and medical record access to confirm their ideas.

The article offers information related to the urge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to the U.S. Congress to enforce its oversight over laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as of September 2014. It informs that the FDA is urging to regulate LDTs to reduce risk from rapid expansion of genotyping technology and widespread genomic testing. It also presents views of LDTs executive director Andrew Fish related to the issue.