1. Sensorineural hearing loss impairs sensitivity but spares temporal integration for detection of frequency modulation
- Author
-
Christian Lorenzi, Léo Varnet, Nicolas Wallaert, Brian C. J. Moore, Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs (LSP), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, and University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM)
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Acoustics and Ultrasonics ,Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ,Audiology ,01 natural sciences ,Speech Acoustics ,Amplitude modulation ,Pitch Discrimination ,03 medical and health sciences ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,0302 clinical medicine ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,0103 physical sciences ,Modulation (music) ,medicine ,Humans ,MESH: Pitch Discrimination ,MESH: Speech Acoustics ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,010301 acoustics ,Mathematics ,MESH: Humans ,MESH: Middle Aged ,Auditory Threshold ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,MESH: Male ,MESH: Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ,Decision strategy ,Sensorineural hearing loss ,Female ,Decision process ,Sensitivity (electronics) ,Frequency modulation ,MESH: Female ,MESH: Auditory Threshold - Abstract
The effect of the number of modulation cycles (N) on frequency-modulation (FM) detection thresholds (FMDTs) was measured with and without interfering amplitude modulation (AM) for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners, using a 500-Hz sinusoidal carrier and FM rates of 2 and 20 Hz. The data were compared with FMDTs for normal-hearing (NH) listeners and AM detection thresholds (AMDTs) for NH and HI listeners [Wallaert, Moore, and Lorenzi (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. 139, 3088–3096; Wallaert, Moore, Ewert, and Lorenzi (2017). J. Acoust. Soc. 141, 971–980]. FMDTs were higher for HI than for NH listeners, but the effect of increasing N was similar across groups. In contrast, AMDTs were lower and the effect of increasing N was greater for HI listeners than for NH listeners. A model of temporal-envelope processing based on a modulation filter-bank and a template-matching decision strategy accounted better for the FMDTs at 20 Hz than at 2 Hz for young NH listeners and predicted greater temporal integration of FM than observed for all groups. These results suggest that different mechanisms underlie AM and FM detection at low rates and that hearing loss impairs FM-detection mechanisms, but preserves the memory and decision processes responsible for temporal integration of FM.The effect of the number of modulation cycles (N) on frequency-modulation (FM) detection thresholds (FMDTs) was measured with and without interfering amplitude modulation (AM) for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners, using a 500-Hz sinusoidal carrier and FM rates of 2 and 20 Hz. The data were compared with FMDTs for normal-hearing (NH) listeners and AM detection thresholds (AMDTs) for NH and HI listeners [Wallaert, Moore, and Lorenzi (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. 139, 3088–3096; Wallaert, Moore, Ewert, and Lorenzi (2017). J. Acoust. Soc. 141, 971–980]. FMDTs were higher for HI than for NH listeners, but the effect of increasing N was similar across groups. In contrast, AMDTs were lower and the effect of increasing N was greater for HI listeners than for NH listeners. A model of temporal-envelope processing based on a modulation filter-bank and a template-matching decision strategy accounted better for the FMDTs at 20 Hz than at 2 Hz for young NH listeners and predicted greater temporal integration of FM than observ...
- Published
- 2018