Search

Your search keyword '"MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Descriptor "MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods"
2 results on '"MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods"'

1. Immediate versus staged complete myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A post hoc analysis of the randomized FLOWER-MI trial

Author

Victoria Tea, Jean-François Morelle, Romain Gallet, Guillaume Cayla, Gilles Lemesle, Thibault Lhermusier, Jean-Guillaume Dillinger, Grégory Ducrocq, Denis Angouvant, Yves Cottin, Chekrallah Chamandi, Alicia le Bras, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Gilles Montalescot, Anaïs Charles Nelson, Tabassome Simon, Gilles Chatellier, Nicolas Danchin, Etienne Puymirat, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO), Hôpital privé Saint-Martin - Ramsay Santé, Service de Cardiologie [Henri Mondor], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor, IMRB - 'Biologie du système neuromusculaire' [Créteil] (U955 Inserm - UPEC), École nationale vétérinaire - Alfort (ENVA)-Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-IFR10-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-IFR10-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Alliance française pour les essais cliniques cardio-vasculaires - French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT), Pole Cardio-vasculaire et pulmonaire [CHU Lille], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), Récepteurs Nucléaires, Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires - U1011 (RNMCD), Institut Pasteur de Lille, Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur (RIIP)-Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur (RIIP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier - Faculté de médecine Purpan (UTPS), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), Service Cardiologie [CHU Toulouse], Pôle Cardiovasculaire et Métabolique [CHU Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Marqueurs cardiovasculaires en situation de stress (MASCOT (UMR_S_942 / U942)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Groupe Hospitalier Saint Louis - Lariboisière - Fernand Widal [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Vasculaire [Hôpital Bichat], AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Laboratoire de Recherche Vasculaire Translationnelle (LVTS (UMR_S_1148 / U1148)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, CHU Trousseau [Tours], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours), Physiopathologie et épidémiologie cérébro-cardiovasculaire [Dijon] (PEC2), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Service de Cardiologie [CHU de Dijon], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Groupe Action, Institut de cardiologie [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Cardiovasculaires, du Métabolisme et de la Nutrition = Research Unit on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (ICAN), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut de Cardiométabolisme et Nutrition = Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition [CHU Pitié Salpêtrière] (IHU ICAN), CIC - HEGP (CIC 1418), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Centre d'investigation clinique Paris Est [CHU Pitié Salpêtrière] (CIC Paris-Est), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Unité de recherche Phytopharmacie et Médiateurs Chimiques (UPMC), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Hémostase, bio-ingénierie et remodelage cardiovasculaires (LBPC), and Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Institut Galilée-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)

Subjects
Fractional flow reserve, Multivessel disease, MESH: Humans, MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods, Acute myocardial infarction, Coronary Artery Disease, General Medicine, MESH: Myocardial Revascularization / methods, MESH: Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, MESH: Coronary Artery Disease / surgery, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Treatment Outcome, [SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, Myocardial Revascularization, Humans, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, MESH: Coronary Artery Disease / diagnostic imaging, MESH: ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / diagnostic imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, MESH: ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / therapy, MESH: Treatment Outcome
Abstract

International audience; Background: in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention for non-culprit lesions is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. The optimal timing for non-infarct-related artery revascularization - immediate versus staged - has not been investigated adequately. Aim: we aimed to assess clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease using immediate versus staged non-infarct-related artery revascularization. Methods: outcomes were analysed in patients from the randomized FLOWER-MI trial, in whom, after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, non-culprit lesions were assessed using fractional flow reserve or angiography during the index procedure or during a staged procedure during the initial hospital stay, ≤5 days after the index procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization with urgent revascularization at 1 year. Results: among 1171 patients enrolled in this study, 1119 (96.2%) had complete revascularization performed during a staged procedure, and 44 (3.8%) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in one of the patients (2.3%) with an immediate strategy and in 55 patients (4.9%) with a staged strategy (adjusted hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.39-12.69; P=0.64). Conclusions: staged non-infarct-related artery complete revascularization was the strategy preferred by investigators in practice in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. This strategy was not superior to immediate revascularization, which, in the context of this trial, was used in a small proportion of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these observational findings.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Clinical evaluation of a dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with radiochromic films

Author

Bertrand Ledermann, J. Goupil, Jean Paul Beregi, Christophe Demattei, Nicolas Grussenmeyer-Mary, Aymeric Hamard, Guillaume Cayla, David E. Miller, J. Frandon, Joël Greffier, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Aide à la Décision pour une Médecine Personnalisé - Laboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie et Recherche Clinique - EA 2415 (AIDMP), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université de Montpellier (UM), GE Healthcare, Laboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie clinique, Santé Publique Innovation et Méthodologie [CHU Nîmes] (BESPIM), Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau [Nîmes] (CHU Nîmes), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes)

Subjects
Male, MESH: Radiation Dosimeters, interventional, Coronary Angiography, MESH: Embolization, Therapeutic / methods, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, MESH: Radiometry / methods, 0302 clinical medicine, MESH: Aged, 80 and over, Medicine, Fluoroscopy, Skin, Aged, 80 and over, medicine.diagnostic_test, Phantoms, Imaging, Physics, Ultrasound, Interventional radiology, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Skin dose, Embolization, Therapeutic, 3. Good health, [STAT]Statistics [stat], Concordance correlation coefficient, Quartile, Film dosimetry, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Female, Radiology, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, MESH: Radiation Dosage, Concordance, Radiation Dosage, Imaging phantom, 03 medical and health sciences, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, MESH: Skin, [SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, [INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Radiometry, Aged, Radiation Dosimeters, business.industry, MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods, MESH: Coronary Angiography, MESH: Phantoms, Imaging, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, business
Abstract

To validate the performance of an automatic tool to estimate a patient’s peak skin dose (PSD) and a skin dose map from data collected by a radiation dose management system (RDMS) during interventional procedures. In total, 288 eligible consecutive patients undergoing abdominopelvic embolisation or planned coronary angioplasty using radiochromic films were screened between June 2018 and March 2019. For 98 included patients, PSD was measured using radiochromic films (PSDFilm) and computed by RDMS (PSDRDMS) using one flat and two anthropomorphic phantoms. Statistical concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was computed with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and clinical concordance with the Bland and Altman graphic; values were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In total, 190/288 patients were excluded and 98 patients were analysed (69 men, mean age 66 ± 14 years). The PSDFilm median (1st; 3rd quartile) was 0.59 Gy (0.40; 1.08). PSDRDMS was 0.62 Gy (0.43; 1.22) for the flat phantom and 0.62 Gy (0.42; 1.19) for anthropomorphic phantoms. The concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was good for both phantoms (flat: 0.94 [0.91; 0.95]; anthropomorphic 0.94 [0.91; 0.96]). Compared with the values of PSDFilm, the values of PSDRDMS were significantly increased by 5% (− 4%; 16%) for flat phantom (p = 0.001) and 7% (− 6%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p = 0.002) for vascular procedures and 9% (− 4%; 26%, p = 0.01) and 6% (− 4%; 23%, p = 0.02) for cardiac procedures, respectively. Dose map representations matched for most patients. The gaps identified were due to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter. The RDMS skin dose map tool allowed the computation of the PSD and skin dose distribution for all patients with fewer constraints than radiochromic films. However, the computed PSD was overestimated, increasing the number of patients requiring follow-up. • A good concordance correlation was identified between the peak skin dose (PSD) values measured with radiochromic films and estimated with the radiation dose management system (RDMS) skin dose map tool. • Differences were related to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter, which are not accounted in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Radiation Dose Structured Reports. • For all procedures, the estimated PSDs were significantly higher than the measured PSDs by 5% (− 4%; 18%) for flat phantom (p

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results