Punetha, Meeti, Saini, Sheetal, Choudhary, Suman, Sharma, Surabhi, Bala, Renu, Kumar, Pradeep, Sharma, R.K., Yadav, P.S., Datta, T.K., and Kumar, Dharmendra
Genome editing is recognized as a powerful tool in agriculture and research, enhancing our understanding of genetic function, diseases, and productivity. However, its progress in buffaloes has lagged behind other mammals due to several challenges, including long gestational periods, single pregnancies, and high raising costs. In this study, we aimed to generate MSTN-edited buffaloes, known for their distinctive double-muscling phenotype, as a proof of concept. To meet our goal, we used somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and zygotic electroporation (CRISPR-EP) technique. For this, we firstly identified the best transfection method for introduction of RNP complex into fibroblast which was further used for SCNT. For this, we compared the transfection, cleavage efficiency and cell viability of nucleofection and lipofection in adult fibroblasts. The cleavage, transfection efficiency and cell viability of nucleofection group was found to be significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher than lipofection group. Four MSTN edited colony were generated using nucleofection, out of which three colonies was found to be biallelic and one was monoallelic. Further, we compared the efficacy, embryonic developmental potential and subsequent pregnancy outcome of SCNT and zygotic electroporation. The blastocyst rate of electroporated group was found to be significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher than SCNT group. However, the zygotic electroporation group resulted into two pregnancies which were confirmed to be MSTN edited. Since, the zygotic electroporation does not require complex micromanipulation techniques associated with SCNT, it has potential for facilitating the genetic modification in large livestock such as buffaloes. The present study lays the basis for inducing genetic alternation with practical or biological significance. • Genome editing is a well-known method for introducing targeted genetic alterations into livestock genomes, however its progress in buffaloes has lagged behind. • In the present study, we aimed to generate MSTN-edited buffaloes using SCNT and Zygotic electroporation. • The best transfection method was identified for introduction of RNP complex into buffalo fibroblast which was further used for single cell isolation and generation of MSTN edited embryos via SCNT. • The embryonic developmental potential and subsequent pregnancy outcome of SCNT and zygotic electroporation were compared. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]