Search

BackgroundThere are no approved pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine use disorder. Two preliminary phase 2 randomised controlled trials have found mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, to be effective in reducing methamphetamine use. The proposed Tina Trial is the first phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised trial to examine the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine as an outpatient pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder.MethodsThis is a multi-site phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either mirtazapine (30 mg/day for 12 weeks) or matched placebo, delivered as a take-home medication. The target population is 340 people aged 18-65 years who have moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder. The trial is being conducted through outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment clinics in Australia. The primary outcome is measured as self-reported days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at week 12. Secondary outcomes are methamphetamine-negative oral fluid samples, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, HIV risk behaviour and quality of life. Other outcomes include safety (adverse events), tolerability, and health service use. Medication adherence is being monitored using MEMS® Smart Caps fitted to medication bottles.DiscussionThis trial will provide information on the safety and effectiveness of mirtazapine as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder when delivered as an outpatient medication in routine clinical practice. If found to be safe and effective, this trial will support an application for methamphetamine use disorder to be included as a therapeutic indication for the prescription of mirtazapine.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000235707. Registered on February 9, 2022.

Neuroinflammation-related locomotor deficits and neuropathic pain are expected outcomes of spinal cord injury (SCI). The atypical antidepressant mirtazapine has exhibited potential neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. This research aims to investigate the impacts of mirtazapine on post-SCI neuropathic pain and locomotor recovery, with a particular focus on neuroinflammation. The study utilized 30 male Wistar rats divided into five groups: Sham, SCI with vehicle treatment, and SCI administered with mirtazapine (3, 10, and 30 mg/kg/day, ip, for one week). Locomotor activity was assessed using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale. Mechanical, thermal, and cold allodynia were assessed using von-Frey filaments, tail flick latency, and the acetone test, respectively. ELISA was utilized to measure cytokines, while Western blotting was used to determine TRPV1 channel, 5-HT2A receptor, NLRP3, and iNOS expression. Histopathological analyses were also examined, including hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Luxol fast blue (LFB) staining. Mirtazapine (10 and 30 mg/kg/day) significantly improved locomotor recovery according to BBB score. It attenuated mechanical, thermal, and cold allodynia post-SCI. Moreover, it decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18, while increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 and IL-10. Furthermore, it downregulated iNOS, NLRP3, and TRPV1 expression and upregulated the 5-HT2A receptor. H&E and LFB staining further revealed attenuated tissue damage and decreased demyelination. Our findings suggest that mirtazapine can alleviate neuropathic pain and reinforce locomotor recovery post-SCI by modulating neuroinflammatory responses, NLRP3, iNOS, TRPV1 channel, and 5-HT2A receptor expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Managing chronic, refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients is challenging, especially when unrelated to cancer treatment. Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, effectively alleviates these symptoms, improving quality of life. It offers a promising palliative care alternative, addressing multiple symptoms and reducing polypharmacy, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long‐term sample stability of five atypical antipsychoticdrugs risperidone, paliperidone, clozapine, quetiapine and olanzapine and the antidepressant drug mirtazapine in serum was studied by use of a newly developed and validated analytical method based on solid‐phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Ascorbic acid was used as an antioxidative agent to stabilize olanzapine during storage and sample preparation. We assessed analyte stability on long‐term storage in serum samples at 25°C, 5°C, −20°C and −80°C, and during five freeze–thaw cycles. Analytes were stable for 23 days at room temperature except for olanzapine and mirtazapine (17 days). All analytes were stable for at least 30 days at 5°C. All analytes were stable for 270 days at −20°C, except for paliperidone and mirtazapine with 60 days and 180 days, respectively. All analytes were stable for 270 days at −80°C. Furthermore, all analytes were stable for five freeze–thaw cycles. We recommend storage at −80°C when samples drawn for analysis of antipsychotic drugs are stored for more than 60 days, whereas a temperature of −20°C is sufficient for storage less than 60 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common and potentially modifiable contributor to excess disability, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Clinical trials of medications for IBS have largely been in younger adults. Yet, a growing number of adults aged 65 and older are living with IBS. No data exist to guide clinicians in the safe and effective use of medications (e.g., anticholinergics, anti-spasmodics, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCA)) for IBS in the geriatric population. These medications—especially anticholinergics and TCAs—carry a high risk of adverse effects (ADE) in older adults because of age-associated decline in drug metabolism and the high prevalence of multiple chronic conditions. Five or more medications (polypharmacy) are frequently used to treat common psychiatric and medical comorbidities of IBS: anxiety, depression, insomnia, migraine headache, diarrhea, nausea, poor appetite, pruritus/skin atopy, and fibromyalgia. These neurological and psychiatric comorbidities reflect shared pathogenic mechanisms and bidirectional crosstalk of high inflammation, alteration of gut microbiota, and dysregulation of multiple gastrointestinal and central nervous system-active neurotransmitters (e.g., serotonin, neuropeptides). Currently, these IBS-associated conditions are treated with multiple medications—which increase the risk of adverse drug–drug interactions. One way to reduce the number of medications used for IBS-associated conditions is the use of one medication that treats many or all of these conditions—Mirtazapine. In this perspective article, we present evidence from basic science, case series, observational and epidemiological studies, clinical studies, and clinical trials supporting mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic receptor antagonist—with 5-hydroxytryptamine-2 and 3 antagonism, as a potential pharmacotherapeutic intervention for the myriad symptoms and conditions associated with IBS. Specifically, we found evidence of mirtazapine’s role in treating diarrhea, insomnia, migraine headache, nausea, and poor appetite. We propose a large randomized controlled trial to study mirtazapine as a potential one-stop treatment for multiple IBS symptoms, with the potential to reduce polypharmacy and ADEs, especially in the geriatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Depression is a mental illness that affects patients' behavior, and it impacts approximately 264 million people globally. Tetracyclic antidepressants (TeCAs) are one class of medication that is available for the treatment of depression. These medications work by modifying hormones such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. TeCAs, such as setiptiline, amoxapine, mianserin, maprotiline, and mirtazapine, are four ring‐based compounds that assist in preventing the brain from reabsorbing the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and serotonin. Each of these medications interacts with adrenergic (α1 and α2) and serotonin (5HT1 and 5HT2) receptors independently. Using biological samples (plasma, blood, and urine) and pharmaceutical formulations, this review focuses on providing a complete overview of the various analytical conditions maintained for the medications in the above class and their metabolites. Major analytical methods such as mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, and high‐performance liquid chromatography are used to quantify and determine the drugs. This review provides a thorough understanding of impurity identification, pharmacokinetic and stability evaluations, and structural degradation quantification. It provides valuable and reliable information for research, enhancing their understanding of the subject matter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breathlessness frequently becomes severe among people with respiratory disease. Mirtazapine, a widely used antidepressant, has shown promise in the modulation of respiratory sensation and the response to it, as well as reducing feelings of panic, which often accompanies breathlessness. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of mirtazapine to alleviate severe persisting breathlessness. This international, multicentre, phase 3, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial across 16 centres in seven countries (Australia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, and the UK), recruited adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung diseases, or both, and grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale. Consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral mirtazapine or matching placebo for 56 days. Randomisation was by minimisation. The initial mirtazapine dose was 15 mg, escalating to a maximum of 45 mg per day, tapered at treatment end. Participants, caregivers, assessors, and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was worst breathlessness in the preceding 24 h measured on a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS), at 56 days post-treatment start, with follow-up to 180 days. The primary analysis was performed in the modified intention-to-treat population using multivariable multi-level repeated measures model. This trial was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN10487976 and ISRCTN15751764 [Australia and New Zealand]) and EudraCT (2019–002001–21) and is complete. Between Feb 4, 2021 and March 28, 2023, we enrolled 225 eligible participants (148 men and 77 women, 113 to the mirtazapine group and 112 to the placebo group). The median age was 74 years (IQR 67–78). No evidence of a difference was found in worst breathlessness at day 56 between mirtazapine and placebo (difference in adjusted mean NRS score was 0·105 [95% CI –0·407 to 0·618]; p=0·69). Although the study was underpowered, the primary endpoint effect did not reach the pre-specified treatment effect of 0·55 for worst breathlessness score reduction that the study was powered to detect for the primary analysis. There were 215 adverse reactions in 72 (64%) of 113 participants in the mirtazapine group versus 116 in 44 (40%) of 110 participants in the placebo group; 11 serious adverse events in six (5%) participants in the mirtazapine group versus eight in seven (6%) participants in the placebo group; and one (1%) suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction in the mirtazapine group. At day 56, there were three deaths in the mirtazapine group and two deaths in the placebo group. At day 180, there were seven deaths in the mirtazapine group and 11 deaths in the placebo group. Our findings suggested that mirtazapine of doses 15 to 45 mg daily over 56 days does not improve severe breathlessness among patients with COPD or interstitial lung diseases and might cause adverse reactions. Based on these findings, we do not recommend mirtazapine as a treatment to alleviate severe breathlessness. EU Horizon 2020 (grant agreement No. 825319); Cicely Saunders International Breathlessness Programme; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South London; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council—EU (application ID: APP1170731). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression is the most common mental illness in the world, found in nearly three in ten adolescents globally. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of antidepressant prescriptions and the types of antidepressant therapy administered among adolescents diagnosed with depression in Germany. Methods: This retrospective cohort study, based on data provided by 30 child and adolescent psychiatrists, included adolescents aged 13–17 years with an initial diagnosis of depression between 2010 and 2022 (index date) documented in the IQVIATM Disease Analyzer database. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to investigate the one-year cumulative incidence of antidepressant prescriptions stratified by age, sex, and depression severity. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association between age, sex, depression severity, co-diagnoses, and antidepressant drug prescription. Results: A total of 6338 adolescents (mean age: 16 years, 67% female, 59% with moderate depression) were available. The cumulative incidence of antidepressant prescriptions was 61% and increased with age from 13 years old to 17 years old. Fluoxetine was the most prescribed drug, followed by Sertraline, Escitalopram, Serotonin and Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, herbal medications, and Mirtazapine. Obsessive–compulsive disorder and eating disorders were found to be significantly associated with antidepressant prescriptions within the spectrum of co-diagnosed conditions. Conclusions: Higher age, depression severity, and a co-diagnosis of an obsessive–compulsive disorder or eating disorder were significantly positively associated with antidepressant prescriptions in adolescents. Fluoxetine was the most frequently prescribed drug for depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decreased appetite is a common clinical problem in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant originally developed for humans, has shown promise as a safe and effective promoter of weight gain and appetite in several veterinary species including rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. Although mirtazapine is available as oral formulations, transdermal delivery in macaques with reduced appetite would allow quick, painless, topical application. Here we describe the pharmacokinetics of a single application of a widely available veterinary transdermal mirtazapine formulation in 6 rhesus macaques. A dose of 0.5 mg/kg of transdermal mirtazapine ointment that has proven to be effective in rhesus was applied to the caudal pinnae of 3 female and 3 male young adult macaques. Serum was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after administration. Our data indicate transdermal mirtazapine is absorbed at a lower level in rhesus as compared with published values in domestic cats (rhesus peak serum concentration: 1.2 ± 0.3 ng/mL), while drug half-life is longer than that reported in cats (rhesus: 33 ± 7 h). Mirtazapine reaches peak plasma concentrations in rhesus at 16 ± 10 h after administration; our model indicates that up to 5 d of serial dosing may be necessary to reach steady state. Our preliminary data also suggest that sex differences may contribute to efficacy and/or indicate sex-based differences, as male macaques reached Tmax more quickly than females (19 ± 2 h in females and 8 ± 3 h in males) and showed higher variation in half-life (33 ± 4 h in females and 34 ± 11 h in males). While previous work indicates clinical efficacy of the 0.5-mg/kg dosage in macaques, further investigation is warranted to determine if rhesus may benefit from higher recommended doses than companion animal species.

Introduction: Peripartum depression is common and treatment with mirtazapine may be indicated. However, evidence on its safety in pregnancy and lactation is fragmented. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature on the safety of mirtazapine in pregnancy and lactation. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for 'antidepressants' or 'mirtazapine' in combination with 'pregnancy', 'lactation' or 'offspring'. No restrictions on type of study were applied and selection was performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence. Two reviewers extracted data and performed risk of bias assessment and evidence synthesis was performed for each outcome individually. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021275127). Results: The initial search yielded 15,380 articles after removal of duplicates. After screening based on title and abstract, 431 articles remained for full text review. Of these, 41 studies were included (15 cohort studies, one case–control study, 11 case series, and 14 case reports). In most studies, the outcomes in mirtazapine‐exposed pregnancies were comparable to controls. However, results on congenital malformations and spontaneous abortion were conflicting. Neonatal adaptation syndrome was reported after mirtazapine exposure in late pregnancy. Data on mirtazapine exposure during lactation were scarce. Conclusions: We identified no substantial evidence indicating that mirtazapine exposure is associated with adverse outcomes in pregnancy or in offspring, other than neonatal adaptation syndrome. However, overall quality of evidence was low, and results on congenital malformations and spontaneous abortions were conflicting. Data on mirtazapine exposure through breastfeeding were limited and did not allow for conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment with mirtazapine is reported to cause weight gain and adverse metabolic profile in several populations. Limited information is available regarding the metabolic adverse effects of mirtazapine in the Indian population. This study aims to compare the weight and metabolic profile of patients on mirtazapine at baseline and after six months of treatment in a tertiary care Indian setting. Methodology: This hospital-based, observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching institute in South India. Forty patients prescribed mirtazapine for various psychiatric disorders were included. Weight, body mass index, lipid profile, blood sugar, and HbA1c values were compared at baseline and after six months of treatment. Descriptive statistics used included mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: Statistically significant increase in mean weight (0.97 kg, SD - 2.2; p = 0.008), mean BMI, mean HbA1C (0.1, SD - 0.21; p = 0.007), and mean total cholesterol (6.6 mg/dl, SD - 13.5; p = 0.005) was observed after six months of treatment with mirtazapine. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the importance of close monitoring of patients who are started on mirtazapine to identify and treat metabolic deregulation promptly. Long-term, controlled studies in larger samples are needed to arrive at meaningful conclusions.

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusions\nKEY POINTSTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool for treatment optimisation. Its usefulness has recently been demonstrated for some first-line antidepressants; however, few studies have been reported on the relationship between blood levels of mirtazapine and its antidepressant effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between blood concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response.59 outpatients treated with mirtazapine for depression were recruited and followed up for three months in a naturalistic setting. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HAMD-21) was administered at baseline, month 1, and month 3 to assess antidepressant response. Mirtazapine serum concentration was measured at steady state. Linear regression analysis and nonlinear least-squares regression were used to estimate association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and antidepressant response.Our results showed no overall association between serum concentration of mirtazapine and symptom improvement at month 1 and month 3. A marginally significantly higher serum concentration of mirtazapine was found in responders vs non-responders at month 3.The study suggests that serum concentration of mirtazapine is not strongly associated with the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine. This is probably attributed to its pharmacodynamic profile, even though higher blood levels seem to be marginally more effective.Mirtazapine plasma levels association with response is mild and do not follow the same curve of other antidepressantsMirtazapine higher plasma levels may show some benefit in a subgroup of patientsTherapeutic drug monitoring may help during antidepressant treatment [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective • To observe the effects of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) five-element music therapy combined with mirtazapine on depression and limb function recovery after ischemic stroke. Methods • A total of 110 patients treated in the Departments of Geriatrics, Cardiology, and Psychology of three hospitals in Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China from October 2022 to August 2023 were selected. Based on the scores of 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24), Barthel (BL) index, and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) before enrollment, the patients were randomly divided into control group (n = 58) and experimental group (n = 52). The patients in control group were treated with limb rehabilitation, while those in experimental group underwent limb rehabilitation combined with five-element music therapy and mirtazapine. Results • After 12 weeks of treatment and observation, 11 patients in control group and 9 patients in experimental group withdrew from this trail. As for the proportions of score changes, experimental group had higher decline proportions of HAMD-24 score and NIHSS score as well as an increased proportion of BL index score than control group, which were 43.97%, 69.32%, and 44.12%, respectively. Conclusion • TCM five-element music therapy combined with mirtazapine significantly improves depression and limb function recovery after ischemic stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medication utilization has been increasing in the U.S. year‐over‐year for several decades. As older adults take more medications, there is a higher risk of them being exposed to drug–drug or drug‐disease interactions. The American Geriatrics Society in 2019 updated their Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) Use in Older Adults. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of utilization of medications included in the 2019 Beers Criteria. Methods: An analysis was conducted using the Medicare Part D Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use File for calendar‐year 2020. Medications identified in the 2019 Beers Criteria were applied to the analysis. Two categories of medications were assessed: (1) "Avoid" and (2) "Use With Caution." Results: In 2020, 56 million prescriptions were dispensed to Medicare patients 65 years and older that are recommended to be avoided without exception (4.7% of all prescriptions) totaling $957 million in medication costs. The most utilized medication classes in this category were benzodiazepines (25,949,994 prescriptions), "Z‐drugs" (6,204,909 prescriptions), long‐acting sulfonylureas (5,306,577 prescriptions), 1st‐generation antihistamines (5,049,289 prescriptions), and tricyclic antidepressants (4,190,062 prescriptions). Additionally, 135 million prescriptions were dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older for medications which the Beers Criteria states to use caution (11.3% of all prescriptions) exceeding $2.85 billion in medication costs. The most utilized medications for this category were diuretics (74,599,126 prescriptions), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (30,033,121 prescriptions), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (11,858,968 prescriptions), tramadol (11,450,878 prescriptions), and mirtazapine (5,737,304 prescriptions). Conclusion: Even with the existence of the AGS Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults and its continued updated versions, 16% of medications dispensed to Medicare Part D were potentially inappropriate. Future studies are needed to assess if this has led to worsened outcomes among older adults who utilized these PIM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mirtazapine (MZPc) is an antidepressant drug which is approved by the FDA. It has low bioavailability, which is only 50%, in spite of its rapid absorption when orally administered owing to high first-pass metabolism. This study was oriented towards delivering intranasal (IN) mirtazapine by a direct route to the brain by means of preparing lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) as a targeted drug delivery system. MZP-LNCs were constructed by solvent-free phase inversion temperature technique applying D-Optimal mixture design to study the impact of 3 formulation variables on the characterization of the formulated nanocapsules. Independent variables were percentage of Labrafac oil, percentage of Solutol and percentage of water. Dependent variables were particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), Zeta potential and solubilization capacity. Nanocapsules of the optimized formula loaded with MZP were of spherical shape as confirmed by transmission electron microscopy with particle diameter of 20.59 nm, zeta potential of − 5.71, PDI of 0.223 and solubilization capacity of 7.21 mg/g. The in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior of intranasal MZP-LNCs in brain and blood was correlated to MZP solution after intravenous (IV) and intranasal administration in mice. In vivo biodistribution of the drug in mice was assessed by a radiolabeling technique using radioiodinated mirtazapine (131I-MZP). Results showed that intranasal MZP-LNCs were able to deliver higher amount of MZP to the brain with less drug levels in blood when compared to the MZP solution after IV and IN administration. Moreover, the percentage of drug targeting efficiency (%DTE) of the optimized MZP-LNCs was 332.2 which indicated more effective brain targeting by the intranasal route. It also had a direct transport percentage (%DTP) of 90.68 that revealed a paramount contribution of the nose to brain pathway in the drug delivery to the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major depression is a prevalent disorder characterized by sadness, lack of interest or pleasure, interrupted sleep or food, and impaired concentration. Mirtazapine (MTZ), a tetracyclic antidepressant drug, is commonly used to treat moderate to severe depression. MTZ is classified as a BCS class II drug that has shown bioavailability of 50% due to extensive first-pass metabolism. The aim of this research is to develop a delivery platform with enhanced solubility and oral bioavailability of MTZ through formulating polymeric micelles modeled in a rapid release tablet. Mirtazapine loaded polymeric micelles (MTZ-PMs) were formulated to enhance the solubility. Solutol® HS 15 and Brij 58 were used as combined surfactants in a ratio of (20:1) to MTZ in addition to Transcutol® P as a penetration enhancer. The following in vitro tests were performed: particle size, PDI, zeta potential, solubility factor, stability index, and transmission electron microscopes. Afterward, MTZ-PMs were converted to dry free flowable powder through loading on the adsorptive surface of Aerosil 200; then, the powder mixture was directly compressed (MTZ-PMs-RRT) into 13 mm tablets. MTZ-PMs-RRT was further investigated using in vitro evaluation tests of the tablets, namely, weight variation, thickness, diameter, hardness, friability, disintegration time, drug content, and in vitro dissolution test, which complied with the pharmacopeial limits. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MTZ-PMs-RRT compared to Remeron® tablet were further investigated in rabbits. The results showed enhanced solubility of MTZ with improved percentage relative bioavailability to 153%. The formulation of MTZ in the form of MTZ-PMs-RRT successfully improved the solubility, stability, and bioavailability of MTZ using a simple and scalable manufacturing process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mirtazapine is an antidepressant medication used to treat the major depressive disorder in adults. In this study, two different chromatographic methods were developed for the determination of mirtazapine in pharmaceutical products. In the first method, An Extend C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used and the temperature was kept constant at 25 °C. The mobile phase was determined as 0.1% formic acid solution and acetonitrile (80/20, v/v), and isocratic elution was applied. The flow rate of the mobile phase was determined as 1.0 mL min−1 and the injection volume was 20 µL. Detection was performed at 291 nm. using a UV detector. In the second method, ethanol was used as the organic modifier. The only difference between these methods was the organic modifier. All other conditions of the methods were the same. Both chromatographic methods were validated by ICH guidelines for various parameters such as selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, detection and quantification limit, and robustness. The determination coefficients of chromatographic methods were greater than 0.999 in the concentration range of 5–30 µg mL−1. of mirtazapine. Later, these chromatographic methods were applied to pharmaceutical formulations. Comparison of the obtained results in terms of means was made using Student's (t) test, and comparisons in terms of standard deviations were made using the Fischer (F) test. It was observed that there was no significant difference between these methods. These two methods were then evaluated using the AGREE-Analytical GREEnness metric software. The chromatographic method using ethanol as an organic modifier has been proposed as an excellent eco-friendly and analyst-friendly alternative for the determination of mirtazapine in pharmaceutical formulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Chronic cocaine exposure induces an increase in dopamine release and an increase in the expression of the Fos protein in the rat striatum. It has been suggested that both are necessary for the expression of cocaine-induced alterations in behavior and neural circuitry. Mirtazapine dosing attenuated the cocaine-induced psychomotor and reinforcer effects. Methods: The study evaluates the effect of chronic dosing of mirtazapine on cocaine-induced extracellular dopamine levels and Fos protein expression in rats. Male Wistar rats received cocaine (10 mg/Kg; i.p.) during the induction and expression of locomotor sensitization. The mirtazapine (30 mg/Kg; MIR), was administered 30 minutes before cocaine during the cocaine withdrawal. After each treatment, the locomotor activity was recorded for 30 minutes. Animals were sacrificed after treatment administration. Dopamine levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) in the ventral striatum, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in animals treated with mirtazapine and cocaine. The quantification of c-fos immunoreactive cells was carried out by stereology analysis. Results: Mirtazapine generated a decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity. In addition, mirtazapine decreased the amount of cocaine-induced dopamine and the number of cells immunoreactive to the Fos protein in the striatum, PFC, and VTA. Discussion: These data suggest that mirtazapine could prevent the consolidation of changes in behavior and the cocaine-induced reorganization of neuronal circuits. It would explain the mirtazapine-induced effects on cocaine behavioral sensitization. Thus, these data together could support its possible use for the treatment of patients with cocaine use disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present research emphasizes fabrication alongside the assessment of an innovative nano-vesicular membranous system known as invasomes (NVMs) laden with Mirtazapine for rectal administration. This system could circumvent the confines of orally administered counterparts regarding dose schedules and bioavailability. Mirtazapine invasomes were tailored by amalgamating phospholipid, cineole, and ethanol through a thin-film hydration approach rooted in the Box–Behnken layout. Optimization of composition parameters used to fabricate desired NVMs' physicochemical attributes was undertaken using the Design-Expert® program. The optimal MRZ-NVMs were subsequently transformed to a pH-triggered in situ rectal gel followed by animal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic investigations relative to rectal plain gel and oral suspension. The optimized NVMs revealed a diameter size of 201.3 nm, a z potential of −28.8 mV, an entrapment efficiency of 81.45%, a cumulative release within 12 h of 67.29%, and a cumulative daily permeated quantity of 468.68 µg/cm2. Compared to the oral suspension, pharmacokinetic studies revealed a 2.85- and 4.45-fold increase in calculated rectal bioavailability in circulation and brain, respectively. Pharmacodynamic and immunohistopathology evaluations exposed superior MRZ-NVMs attributed to the orally administered drug. Consequently, rectal MRZ-NVMs can potentially be regarded as a prospective nanoplatform with valuable pharmacokinetics and tolerability assets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a case of Painful Legs and Moving Toes Syndrome (PLMT) that initially resembled somatic symptom disorder. Topics include the clinical characteristics of PLMT, diagnostic challenges due to its rarity and varied symptomatology, and the differential diagnosis process involving neurophysiological studies to distinguish it from other conditions.

ABSTRACT Managing chronic, refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients is challenging, especially when unrelated to cancer treatment. Mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, effectively alleviates these symptoms, improving quality of life. It offers a promising palliative care alternative, addressing multiple symptoms and reducing polypharmacy, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction.

An elderly man was hospitalized after a fall following an episode of dizziness. During the initial examination, he was found to have a distended bladder, caused by urinary retention. Moreover, he was diagnosed with severe hypoosmotic hyponatremia. After the urinary retention was resolved, the patient developed severe diuresis, and the hyponatremia corrected rapidly and spontaneously.

Background Chronic pain is common and costly. Antidepressants are prescribed to reduce pain. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions, so effectiveness and safety for most antidepressants for pain conditions remain unknown. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events and withdrawal. Design This was a systematic review with a network meta-analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171855), and the protocol was published in the Cochrane Library (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014682). Setting We analysed trials from all settings. Participants We included trials in which participants had chronic pain, defined as longer than 3 months, from any condition excluding headache. Interventions We included all antidepressants. Main outcome measures Our primary outcome was substantial pain relief, defined as a reduction ˃ 50%. We also measured pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Secondary measures included moderate pain relief (above 30% reduction), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events, and withdrawal from trial. Results We identified 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. Most studies were placebo-controlled (n = 83) and parallel armed (n = 141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies), neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of randomised controlled trials was 10 weeks. Most studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. Standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that for duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Limitations The evidence for antidepressants other than duloxetine is poor. For duloxetine, it is not clear whether the effect applies to groups with both pain and low mood, since these groups were excluded from trials. There is also insufficient evidence on long-term outcomes and on adverse effects. Conclusions There is only reliable evidence for duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. However, the findings should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. Future work There is a need for large, methodologically sound trials testing the effectiveness of antidepressants for chronic pain. These trials should examine long-term outcomes (> 6 months) and include people with low mood. There should also be better reporting of adverse events, tolerance of drugs, and long-term compliance. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 62. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary What was the question? Chronic pain is pain that lasts for more than 3 months. Over one-third of people across the world experience chronic pain. This often has a detrimental impact on people’s mood, disability and well-being. Antidepressants are often prescribed to reduce pain, but we are not sure which antidepressants work best for different types of pain, or whether they are safe. We wanted to find out whether antidepressants were effective and safe for management of chronic pain. What did we do? We searched for studies that had compared any antidepressant with any other treatment for any type of chronic pain (except headache). We compared all the treatments against each other using a statistical method called network meta-analysis. This method allows us to rank the treatments in order of best to worst for each outcome. What did we find? We found 176 studies that included a total of 28,664 people with chronic pain. Most of the studies (83/176) compared an antidepressant with a placebo (which looks like the real medicine but does not have any medicine in it). The evidence from our analysis suggests that: Duloxetine is the antidepressant that we have the most confidence in. It was the best antidepressant for reducing pain and improving physical function. A standard dose of duloxetine was equally as effective for reducing pain as a high dose of duloxetine. Milnacipran was also effective at reducing pain, but we are not as confident in this result as in the one for duloxetine because there were fewer studies with fewer people involved. Aside from duloxetine and milnacipran, we do not have confidence in the results from any other antidepressant included in this review, and even for duloxetine and milnacipran, we do not know the long-term effects. It is important to recognise that the lack of evidence for the majority of antidepressants in this review does not necessarily equal a lack of benefit. Rather, this means that the large, high-quality trials required for us to be certain of an antidepressant’s effectiveness have not been undertaken. Altogether, although duloxetine and milnacipran are effective, the results of this review should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. These conclusions were informed by our patient and public involvement group. Scientific summary Background Chronic pain is common in adults, and often has a detrimental impact upon physical ability, well-being, and quality of life. Previous reviews have shown that certain antidepressants may be effective in reducing pain with some benefit in improving patients’ global impression of change for certain chronic pain conditions. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions. Objectives Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), serious adverse events and withdrawal. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. Selection criteria We included RCTs that examined antidepressants for chronic pain against any comparator. If the comparator was placebo, another medication, another antidepressant or the same antidepressant at different doses, then the study was required to be double-blind. RCTs with active comparators that were unable to be double-blinded (e.g. psychotherapy) were included but rated as at high risk of bias. We excluded RCTs where the follow-up was < 2 weeks and those with < 10 participants in each trial arm. We included any antidepressant at any dose, for any indication but used primarily for treatment of people with chronic pain and compared to placebo or active intervention. Participants We included adults (aged 18 years or older) reporting primary or secondary pain in any part of their body (except headache) as their primary complaint, that matched the International Association for the Study of Pain definition of chronic pain (i.e. at least 3 months’ duration). We included all trials regardless of the severity of participants’ chronic pain, although we extracted whether severity was part of the inclusion criteria of the individual studies. We excluded studies where the participants’ primary pain condition was headache or migraine. Data collection and analysis Two authors separately screened, extracted data and judged risk of bias. We synthesised the data using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analyses for each outcome and ranked the antidepressants in terms of their effectiveness using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. We primarily used the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework and ‘Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis’ (ROB-MEN) tool to assess the certainty of the evidence. Where it was not possible to use CINeMA and ROB-MEN due to the complexity of the networks, we used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence. Main results This review and NMA included 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. The majority of studies were placebo-controlled (n = 83) and parallel-armed (n = 141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies), neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of RCTs was 10 weeks; seven studies provided no useable data and were omitted from the NMAs. The majority of studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. In duloxetine trials, standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that of duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Primary efficacy outcomes For pain relief, duloxetine standard dose showed a small to moderate effect for substantial pain relief [odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.84] and continuous pain intensity [standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.31, 95% CI −0.39 to −0.24]. For pain intensity, milnacipran standard dose also showed a small effect (SMD −0.22, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.06) with moderate-certainty evidence. For mood, mirtazapine had a moderate effect (SMD −0.5, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.22), while duloxetine showed a small effect (−0.16, 95% CI −0.22 to −0.1); however, it is important to note that most trials excluded participants with mental health conditions, and so average anxiety and depression scores tended to be in the ‘normal’ or ‘subclinical’ ranges at baseline already. Secondary efficacy outcomes Across all secondary efficacy outcomes (moderate pain relief, physical function, sleep, quality of life and PGIC), duloxetine and milnacipran were the highest-ranked antidepressants with moderate-certainty evidence, although effects were small. For both duloxetine and milnacipran, standard doses were equally as efficacious as high doses. Safety There was very low-certainty evidence for all safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events and withdrawal) across all antidepressants. We cannot draw any reliable conclusions from the NMAs for these outcomes. Authors’ conclusions Our review and NMAs show that despite studies investigating 25 different antidepressants, there is reliable evidence for only duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. As RCTs excluded people with low mood, we were unable to establish the effects of antidepressants for people with chronic pain and depression. There is currently no reliable evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of any antidepressant. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 62. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and Restless legs syndrome (RLS) present complex clinical challenges, often coexisting and complicating treatment strategies. While the relationship between MDD and RLS remains somewhat elusive, emerging evidence suggests a potential interplay between antidepressant medications and the worsening of RLS symptoms. This case report illuminates an instance where mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant commonly used in MDD, precipitated a resurgence of RLS symptoms in a patient with a previously controlled presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a case of a 40-year-old woman who developed melasma as a rare side effect of mirtazapine, an antidepressant prescribed for her severe depressive episode. Topics include the patient's psychiatric history and treatment, the timeline of the appearance and resolution of facial pigmentation, and the diagnosis and management of her melasma by dermatologists.

Abstract Background There are no approved pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine use disorder. Two preliminary phase 2 randomised controlled trials have found mirtazapine, a tetracyclic antidepressant, to be effective in reducing methamphetamine use. The proposed Tina Trial is the first phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised trial to examine the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine as an outpatient pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder. Methods This is a multi-site phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either mirtazapine (30 mg/day for 12 weeks) or matched placebo, delivered as a take-home medication. The target population is 340 people aged 18–65 years who have moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder. The trial is being conducted through outpatient alcohol and other drug treatment clinics in Australia. The primary outcome is measured as self-reported days of methamphetamine use in the past 4 weeks at week 12. Secondary outcomes are methamphetamine-negative oral fluid samples, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, HIV risk behaviour and quality of life. Other outcomes include safety (adverse events), tolerability, and health service use. Medication adherence is being monitored using MEMS® Smart Caps fitted to medication bottles. Discussion This trial will provide information on the safety and effectiveness of mirtazapine as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder when delivered as an outpatient medication in routine clinical practice. If found to be safe and effective, this trial will support an application for methamphetamine use disorder to be included as a therapeutic indication for the prescription of mirtazapine. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000235707. Registered on February 9, 2022.