Search

There is an unmet clinical need to develop novel strategies to overcome resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with oncogene-driven lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to determine whether simvastatin could overcome TKI resistance using the in vitro and in vivo LUAD models. Human LUAD cell lines, tumor cells, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from TKI-resistant LUAD were treated with simvastatin, either alone or in combination with a matched TKI. Tumor growth inhibition was measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay and expression of molecular targets was assessed by immunoblots. Tumors were assessed by histopathology, IHC stain, immunoblots, and RNA sequencing. We found that simvastatin had a potent antitumor effect in tested LUAD cell lines and PDX tumors, regardless of tumor genotypes. Simvastatin and TKI combination did not have antagonistic cytotoxicity in these LUAD models. In an osimertinib-resistant LUAD PDX model, simvastatin and osimertinib combination resulted in a greater reduction in tumor volume than simvastatin alone (P < 0.001). Immunoblots and IHC stain also confirmed that simvastatin inhibited TKI targets. In addition to inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, RNA sequencing and Western blots identified the proliferation, migration, and invasion-related genes (such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, YAP/TAZ, focal adhesion, extracellular matrix receptor), proteasome-related genes, and integrin (α3β1, αvβ3) signaling pathways as the significantly downregulated targets in these PDX tumors treated with simvastatin and a TKI. The addition of simvastatin is a safe approach to overcome acquired resistance to TKIs in several oncogene-driven LUAD models, which deserve further investigation.

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) only benefit a subset of cancer patients, underlining the need for predictive biomarkers for patient selection. Given the limitations of tumor tissue availability, flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is considered a noninvasive method for immune monitoring. This study explores the use of spectrum flow cytometry, which allows a more comprehensive analysis of a greater number of markers using fewer immune cells, to identify potential blood immune biomarkers and monitor ICI treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsPBMCs were collected from 14 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and after ICI treatment and 4 healthy human donors. Using spectrum flow cytometry, 24 immune cell markers were simultaneously monitored using only 1 million PBMCs. The results were also compared with those from clinical flow cytometry and bulk RNA sequencing analysis.ResultsOur findings showed that the measurement of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by spectrum flow cytometry matched well with those by clinical flow cytometry (Pearson R ranging from 0.75 to 0.95) and bulk RNA sequencing analysis (R=0.80, P=1.3 x 10-4). A lower frequency of CD4+ central memory cells before treatment was associated with a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) [Not reached (NR) vs. 5 months; hazard ratio (HR)=8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-42, P=0.01]. A higher frequency of CD4-CD8- double-negative (DN) T cells was associated with a longer PFS (NR vs. 4.45 months; HR=11.1, 95% CI 2.2-55.0, P=0.003). ICIs significantly changed the frequency of cytotoxic CD8+PD1+ T cells, DN T cells, CD16+CD56dim and CD16+CD56- natural killer (NK) cells, and CD14+HLDRhigh and CD11c+HLADR + monocytes. Of these immune cell subtypes, an increase in the frequency of CD16+CD56dim NK cells and CD14+HLADRhigh monocytes after treatment compared to before treatment were associated with a longer PFS (NR vs. 5 months, HR=5.4, 95% CI 1.1-25.7, P=0.03; 7.8 vs. 3.8 months, HR=5.7, 95% CI 169 1.0-31.7, P=0.04), respectively.ConclusionOur preliminary findings suggest that the use of multicolor spectrum flow cytometry helps identify potential blood immune biomarkers for ICI treatment, which warrants further validation.

Immunotherapy has become the central pillar of cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a major category of tumor immunotherapy, reactivate preexisting anticancer immunity. Initially, ICIs were approved only for advanced and metastatic cancers in the salvage setting after or concurrent with chemotherapy at a response rate of around 20-30% with a few exceptions. With significant progress over the decade, advances in immunotherapy have led to numerous clinical trials investigating ICIs as neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for resectable solid tumors. The promising results of these trials have led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and bladder cancer, and the list continues to grow. This therapy represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, as many early-stage cancer patients could be cured with the introduction of immunotherapy in the early stages of cancer. Therefore, this topic became one of the main themes at the 2021 China Cancer Immunotherapy Workshop co-organized by the Chinese American Hematologist and Oncologist Network, the China National Medical Products Administration and the Tsinghua University School of Medicine. This review article summarizes the current landscape of ICI-based immunotherapy, emphasizing the new clinical developments of ICIs as curative neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for early-stage disease.

Over the past decade, targeted therapy for oncogene-driven NSCLC and immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-oncogene-driven NSCLC, respectively, have greatly improved the survival and quality of life for patients with unresectable NSCLC. Increasingly, these biomarker-guided systemic therapies given before or after surgery have been used in patients with early-stage NSCLC. In March 2022, the US FDA granted the approval of neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy for patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Several phase II/III trials are evaluating the clinical efficacy of various neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for non-oncogene-driven NSCLC and neoadjuvant molecular targeted therapies for oncogene-driven NSCLC, respectively. However, clinical application of precision neoadjuvant treatment requires a paradigm shift in the biomarker testing and multidisciplinary collaboration at the diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current diagnosis and treatment landscape, recent advances, new challenges in biomarker testing and endpoint selections, practical considerations for a timely multidisciplinary collaboration at diagnosis, and perspectives in emerging neoadjuvant precision systemic therapy for patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC. These biomarker-guided neoadjuvant therapies hold the promise to improve surgical and pathological outcomes, reduce systemic recurrences, guide postoperative therapy, and improve cure rates in patients with resectable NSCLC.

To determine Labyrinthin (LAB) expression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we immunostained and scored for LAB immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression on sections of tissue microarrays (TMAs) prepared from 256 archival tissue blocks of NSCLC. Propensity-score-weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and weighted Cox models were used to associate LAB expression with overall survival. LAB mRNA expression was assessed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and correlated with clinical phenotype and outcome. Positive LAB IHC expression (>5% of tumor cells) was detected in 208/256 (81.3%) of NSCLC samples, and found in both lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and lung squamous cell cancer (LUSC). LAB positivity was associated with poor overall survival (HR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.3-5.4; p < 0.0001) and high tumor differentiation grade or metastasis compared with negative LAB expression. Univariant and multivariate survival analyses demonstrated LAB expression as an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC patients. LAB RNA expression in TCGA-LUAD was higher in primary and advanced-stage tumors than in normal tissue, and was associated with poorer overall survival. No significant differences or associations were found with LAB RNA expression in TCGA-LUSC. The LAB IHC assay is being used to identify candidate cancer patients for the first-in-human phase I trial evaluating the LAB vaccines (UCDCC#296, NCT051013560).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 have increased the survival and cure rates for patients with many cancer types in various disease settings. However, only 10-40% of cancer patients benefited from these ICIs, of whom ~ 20% have treatment interruption or discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events that can be severe and even fatal. Current efforts in precision immunotherapy are focused on improving biomarker-based patient selection for currently available ICIs and exploring rationale combination and novel strategies to expand the benefit of immunotherapy to more cancer patients. Neoantigens arise from ~ 10% of the non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells, are important targets of T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity for individual patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technology and computational bioinformatics have enable the identification of genomic alterations, putative neoantigens, and gene expression profiling in individual tumors for personal oncology in a rapid and cost-effective way. Among the genomic biomarkers, defective mismatch DNA repair (dMMR), microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and high tumor mutational burden (H-TMB) have received FDA approvals for selecting patients for ICI treatment. All these biomarkers measure high neoantigen load and tumor antigenicity, supporting the current development of neoantigen-based personalized cancer vaccines for patients with high TMB tumor. Several studies have shown neoantigen vaccines are feasible, safe and have promising clinical activity in patients with high TMB tumors in both metastatic and adjuvant settings. This review summarizes the emerging data and technologies for neoantigen-based personalized immunotherapy.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved survivals with a favorable toxicity profile in a variety of cancer patients. We hypothesized that hospitalized cancer patients who have acute or chronic comorbidities may have suppressed immune systems and poor clinical outcomes to ICIs. The objective of this study was to explore clinical outcomes and predictive factors of hospitalized cancer patients who received ICI therapy at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.MethodsA retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for adult cancer patients who received an FDA-approved ICI during admission from 08/2016 to 01/2022. For each patient we extracted demographics, cancer histology, comorbidities, reasons for hospitalization, ICI administered, time from treatment to discharge, time from treatment to progression or death, and complete blood counts. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The 95% confidence interval for survival was calculated using the exact binomial distribution. Statistical significance was defined as 2-sided p4 in hospitalized patients was associated with poor survival outcomes.

BackgroundLack of biomarkers and in vitro models has contributed to inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying the inferior clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThe effect of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in 34 patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC (cohort A) was compared with those from 35 NSCLC patients without oncogene-driven mutations received ICI (cohort B) or from 22 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients (cohort C). Data for each blood biomarker were summarized by mean and standard deviation and compared by Wilcoxon rank sum tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests with significance at 2-sided p value

Patients with refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and symptomatic brain metastases have poor prognosis and are challenging to treat. The addition of an programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab) to first line chemotherapy has prolonged survivals in mTNBC patients with PD-L1-positive tumor and/or tumor-infiltrating immune cells. The clinical efficacy of the chemoimmunotherapy combination in patients with refractory mTNBC, especially brain metastasis, is unknown. Co-amplification of PD-L1, PD-L2, and Janus kinase 2 (PD-L1/PD-L2/JAK2) genes (PDJ amplification) is associated with high PD-L1 protein expression and a 65-87% response rate to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with lymphomas. But the utility of PDJ amplification as a biomarker predictive of response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is unknown for mTNBC patients. Here, we report a 46-year-old woman who had rapid tumor progression in the brain and lung within 3 months after chemotherapy, neurosurgery, and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis. Next-generation sequencing of her brain metastasis specimen revealed 9 copies of PDJ amplification and a tumor mutational burden of 5 mutations per megabase. Although high PDJ mRNA expression levels were detected, PD-L1 protein expression was negative on tumor cells and 10% on tumor-associated immune cells. After the debulking brain tumor resection, she received pembrolizumab monotherapy, whole brain radiation, and then atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel with good intracranial and extracranial responses for >16 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that PDJ amplification is associated with durable clinical response to the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-containing, multidisciplinary management in a patient with refractory, PD-L1 protein-negative, PDJ-amplified mTNBC. Further study is warranted to understand the underlying mechanism and validate PDJ amplification as a biomarker for clinical response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-containing therapy in patients with mTNBC.

Oncogenic mutations and amplifications in the erythroblastic oncogene B (ERBB2), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), have emerged as distinct oncogenic drivers and drug targets in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Each genomic alteration occurs in 2-4% of NSCLC by next generation sequencing and is associated with constitutive HER2 activation. The most common HER2 mutations in NSCLC are exon 20 mutation A775_G776insYVMA mutation in the kinase domain and S310F mutation in the extracellular domain. Unlike in breast and gastric cancer, HER2 protein overexpression in NSCLC is not validated to be a biomarker predictive of clinical response to HER2-targeted agents. High HER2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (3+) only occurs in 2-4% of NSCLC. Until now HER2-targeted agents (such as afatinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine) only demonstrate modest clinical activity in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC. Retrospective studies show concern for inferior clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HER2-mutated NSCLC. Therefore, platinum-based chemotherapy with or without an anti-angiogenesis inhibitor remains the first line standard treatment for this patient population. In May 2020 trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) received the U.S. Food and Drug Administration breakthrough therapy designation for HER2-mutant metastatic NSCLC, and was added as an option for HER2-mutant NSCLC to the NCCN guidelines V1.2021. A global phase III study of pyrotinib compared to docetaxel as a second line therapy for advanced NSCLC harboring HER2 exon 20 mutations was just opened for enrollment in September 2020. In this review, we highlight the current knowledge and perspectives on targeting-HER2 genomic alterations in NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 have increased the survival and cure rates for patients with many cancer types in various disease settings. However, only 10-40% of cancer patients benefited from these ICIs, of whom ~ 20% have treatment interruption or discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events that can be severe and even fatal. Current efforts in precision immunotherapy are focused on improving biomarker-based patient selection for currently available ICIs and exploring rationale combination and novel strategies to expand the benefit of immunotherapy to more cancer patients. Neoantigens arise from ~ 10% of the non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells, are important targets of T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity for individual patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technology and computational bioinformatics have enable the identification of genomic alterations, putative neoantigens, and gene expression profiling in individual tumors for personal oncology in a rapid and cost-effective way. Among the genomic biomarkers, defective mismatch DNA repair (dMMR), microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and high tumor mutational burden (H-TMB) have received FDA approvals for selecting patients for ICI treatment. All these biomarkers measure high neoantigen load and tumor antigenicity, supporting the current development of neoantigen-based personalized cancer vaccines for patients with high TMB tumor. Several studies have shown neoantigen vaccines are feasible, safe and have promising clinical activity in patients with high TMB tumors in both metastatic and adjuvant settings. This review summarizes the emerging data and technologies for neoantigen-based personalized immunotherapy.

BackgroundWe previously showed that α3β1 integrin is a novel cancer biomarker and drug target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study characterized the integrin α3 (ITGA3) expression on patient specimens.MethodsTissue microarrays (TMAs) were prepared from archival tissue blocks containing 161 patients, which included 91 adenocarcinoma (LUAD), 46 squamous carcinomas (LUSC), and 24 other histology types. TMA sections were stained and scored for ITGA3 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) between IHC score groups. Propensity-score-weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and weighted Cox models were used to adjust for covariate imbalance between IHC score groups. Logistic regression was used to determine ITGA3 transcriptome expression in NSCLC in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).ResultsITGA3 IHC expression (1+ to 3+) was detected in 107/161 (66.5%) of the NSCLC samples, and was associated with poor prognosis at the edge of significance (HR =1.30, 95% CI: 0.99-1.71, P=0.056), but significant (P

Backgroundα3β1 integrin is a promising cancer biomarker and drug target. We previously identified a 9-amino-acid cyclic peptide LXY30 for detecting α3β1 integrin on the surface of live tumor cells. This study was undertaken to characterize LXY30 in the detection, cellular function, imaging, and targeted delivery of in vitro and in vivo non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models.MethodsThe whole-cell binding assay was performed by incubating NSCLC cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with TentaGel resin beads coated with LXY30. In this study, we defined the nanosize EVs as exosomes, which were characterized by flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and Western blots. The function of LXY30 was determined by modulating the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway by growth inhibition and Western blots. For in vivo biodistribution, mice bearing subcutaneous and intracranial NSCLC xenograft tumors were administrated intraveneously with LXY30-biotin/streptavidin-Cy5.5 complex and then analyzed for in vivo and ex vivo optical imaging and histopathology.ResultsWe showed that LXY30 specifically and sensitively detected α3β1 integrin-expressing NSCLC cells and tumor-derived exosomes. Tumor DNA isolated from LXY30-enriched plasma exosomes might be used to detect driver oncogenic mutations in patients with metastatic NSCLC. LXY30 only enriches tumor cells but not neutrophils, macrophages, or monocytes in the malignant pleural effusion of NSCLC patients for detecting genomic alterations by next-generation sequencing. LXY30 detected increased α3β1 integrin expression on the EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells with acquired resistance to erlotinib compared to parental erlotinib-sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells. We further showed that LXY30 modulated the EGFR signaling pathway independently from another peptide ligand LXW64 targeting αvβ3 integrin in erlotinib-resistant, EGFR-mutant H1975 cells. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed high α3 integrin expression was associated with poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma. LXY30-biotin/streptavidin-Cy5.5 complex had higher uptakes in the subcutaneous and intracranial xenografts of various α3β1 integrin-expressing lung adenocarcinoma and patient-derived lung squamous cell carcinoma xenografts while sparing the surrounding normal tissues.ConclusionLXY30 is a promising peptide for the cancer diagnosis and in vivo targeted delivery of imaging agents and cancer drugs in NSCLC, independent of histology and tumor genotype.

The original article [1] contains an error in Fig. 2 whereby Fig. 2D has mistakenly been omitted. Fig. 2 can be viewed in its entirety - including Fig. 2D - in this Correction article.

Histologic transformation from adenocarcinoma to squamous cell carcinoma in lung cancer has not been reported as a mechanism of resistance to ALK inhibition. This report describes the clinical course of a female former light smoker with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma whose tumor underwent histologic transformation from a well-differentiated lung adenocarcinoma to a well-differentiated lung squamous cell carcinoma in the same location at the left mainstem bronchus while maintaining the ALK fusion oncogene without any resistance mutations. After experiencing disease progression while on crizotinib, the patient participated in clinical trials that provided early access to the novel ALK inhibitors ceritinib and alectinib before they were commercially available. Tumor recurrence occurred at the primary and metastatic central nervous system sites (ie, brain and spine). At tumor progression, liquid biopsy and tumor genomic profiling of plasma cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) provided an accurate diagnosis with a short turnaround time compared with the tissue-based targeted capture NGS. The patient received several courses of radiation primarily to the brain and spine during her disease course. Her disease did not respond to the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, and she died on home hospice approximately 4 years after diagnosis. This case supports the importance of both histopathologic assessment and comprehensive genomic profiling in selecting appropriate treatment for patients with refractory, metastatic, ALK oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Use of symptom-directed radiation in tandem with ALK inhibitors contributed to the disease and symptomatic control and prolonged survival in this patient.

BackgroundThis retrospective study was undertaken to determine if the plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) level and tumor biological features in patients with advanced solid tumors affected the detection of genomic alterations (GAs) by a plasma ctDNA assay.MethodCell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from frozen plasma (N = 35) or fresh whole blood (N = 90) samples were subjected to a 62-gene hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing assay FoundationACT. Concordance was analyzed for 51 matched FoundationACT and FoundationOne (tissue) cases. The maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) was used to estimate the amount of tumor fraction of cfDNA in each sample. The detection of GAs was correlated with the amount of cfDNA, MSAF, total tumor anatomic burden (dimensional sum), and total tumor metabolic burden (SUVmax sum) of the largest ten tumor lesions on PET/CT scans.ResultsFoundationACT detected GAs in 69 of 81 (85%) cases with MSAF > 0. Forty-two of 51 (82%) cases had ≥ 1 concordance GAs matched with FoundationOne, and 22 (52%) matched to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended molecular targets. FoundationACT also detected 8 unique molecular targets, which changed the therapy in 7 (88%) patients who did not have tumor rebiopsy or sufficient tumor DNA for genomic profiling assay. In all samples (N = 81), GAs were detected in plasma cfDNA from cancer patients with high MSAF quantity (P = 0.0006) or high tumor metabolic burden (P = 0.0006) regardless of cfDNA quantity (P = 0.2362).ConclusionThis study supports the utility of using plasma-based genomic assays in cancer patients with high plasma MSAF level or high tumor metabolic burden.

BackgroundProgrammed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have quickly become standard of care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and increasing numbers of other cancer types. In this report, we discuss the clinical history, pathological evaluation, and genomic findings in a patient with metastatic lung squamous cell cancer (SCC) who developed severe nivolumab-induced pneumonitis preceding durable clinical remission after three doses of nivolumab.Case presentationA patient with chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic lung SCC developed symptomatic pneumonitis by week 4 after nivolumab treatment, concurrently with onset of a potent antitumor response. Despite discontinuation of nivolumab after three doses and the use of high dose oral corticosteroids for grade 3 pneumonitis, continued tumor response to a complete remission by 3 months was evident by radiographic assessment. At the time of this submission, the patient has remained in clinical remission for 14 months. High PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry staining was seen in intra-alveolar macrophages and viable tumor cells in the pneumonitis and recurrent tumor specimens, respectively. Tumor genomic profiling by FoundationOne targeted exome sequencing revealed a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) corresponding to 95-96 percentile in lung SCC, i.e., 87.4-91.0 and 82.9 mut/Mb, respectively, in pre- and post-nivolumab tumor specimens. Except for one, the 13 functional genomic alterations remained the same in the diagnostic, recurrent, and post-treatment, relapsed tumor specimens, suggesting that nivolumab reset the patient's immune system against one or more preexisting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). One potential TAA candidate is telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) in which an oncogenic promoter -146C>T mutation was detected. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing revealed HLA-A*0201 homozygosity, which is the prevalent HLA class I allele that has been used to develop universal cancer vaccine targeting TERT-derived peptides.ConclusionsNivolumab could quickly reset and sustain host immunity against preexisting TAA(s) in this chemotherapy-refractory lung SCC patient. Further mechanistic studies are needed to characterize the effective immune cells and define the HLA-restricted TAA(s) and the specific T cell receptor clones responsible for the potent antitumor effect, with the aim of developing precision immunotherapy with improved effectiveness and safety.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global infectious threat, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB has become a major challenge in eradicating the disease that requires the discovery of new treatment strategies. This study aimed to elucidate the immune infiltration and molecular regulatory network of T cell-interacting activating receptors on myeloid cell 1 (TARM1)-related genes based on a bioinformatics analysis. The GSE114911 dataset was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and screened to identify 17 TARM1-related differentially expressed genes (TRDEGs). Genes interacting with the TRDEGs were analyzed using a Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. A gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to identify the biological pathways significantly associated with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. The key genes were obtained based on Cytoscape's cytoHubba plug-in. Furthermore, protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks were analyzed through STRING, while mRNA–RNA-binding protein (RBP) and mRNA–transcription factor (TF) interaction networks were developed utilizing the StarBase v3.0 and ChIPBase databases. In addition, the diagnostic significance of key genes was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the immune infiltration was analyzed using an ssGSEA and MCPCounter. The key genes identified in the GSE114911 dataset were confirmed in an independent GSE139825 dataset. A total of seventeen TRDEGs and eight key genes were obtained in a differential expression analysis using the cytoHubba plug-in. Through the GO and KEGG analysis, it was found that these were involved in the NF-κB, PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and other pathways related to inflammation and energy metabolism. Furthermore, the ssGSEA and MCPCounter analysis revealed a significant rise in activated T cells and T helper cells within the Mtb infection group, which were markedly associated with these key genes. This implies their potential significance in the anti-Mtb response. In summary, our results show that TRDEGs are linked to inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune cells, offering fresh insights into the mechanisms underlying TB pathogenesis and supporting further investigation into the possible molecular roles of TARM1 in TB, as well as assisting in the identification of prospective diagnostic biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Observational studies indicate that variations in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subsets are associated with an increased risk of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but causal validation is lacking. Here, we combined single-cell expression quantitative trait locus (sc-eQTL) and two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to elucidate the causal relationship between PBMC subsets and the occurrence of PTB and COVID-19 and verified by RT-qPCR. We observed an increase in the CD4+ Effective Memory T Cell (CD4+ TEM) cluster in both PTB and COVID-19 patients according to the single-cell transcriptional landscape of PBMC. Through MR analysis using an inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, we found strong evidence of positive correlations between CD4+ TEM cell markers (GBP2, TRAV1-2, and ODF2L) and PTB, and between markers (LAG3 and SLFN5) and COVID-19, especially highlighted by lead eQTL-SNPs of GBP2 (rs2256752, p = 4.76321 × 10−15) and LAG3 (rs67706382, p = 6.16× 10−16). Similar results were observed in validation sets, and no pleiotropy was detected in sensitivity analyses including weighted median (WM), MR-Egger, MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, and leave-one-out analyses (all p > 0.05). We visualized the colocalization of marker-eQTLs and markers of PTB and COVID-19 genome-wide association study (GWAS) associations. Based on CellChat analyses, monocytes communicated predominantly with CD4+ TEM cells positively expressing PTB markers (GBP2, TRAV1-2, and ODF2L) and COVID-19 markers (LAG3 and SLFN5) in both PTB and COVID-19. Our data suggest a causal effect between two key CD4+ TEM cell markers (GBP2 and LAG3) and the risk for PTB and COVID-19 infection. Our findings provide novel insights into the biological mechanism for PTB and COVID-19 infection, but future single-cell studies are necessary to further enhance understanding of this find. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The armamentarium of first-line systemic therapy for patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been rapidly expanding over the past two decades. Currently, about 50% of patients with NSCLC do not need chemotherapy as first-line treatment. For these patients, molecularly targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy have significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival with favorable toxicity profiles. Patient demographics and clinical features are not sufficient for the selection of these treatments. An unmet need of precision oncology is to select the most appropriate therapeutic regimen with maximal efficacy and minimal unwanted toxicity for individual patients with NSCLC based on the assessment of their molecular and immune biomarkers at diagnosis. In this review, we summarize the current data and propose a practical algorithm for implementing precision biomarker testing at diagnosis and selecting the most appropriate first-line systemic therapy for patients with unresectable, advanced, or metastatic NSCLC. First-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly evolved over the past two decades. First, molecularly targeted therapy for a growing number of gain-of-function molecular targets has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with favorable toxicity profiles compared to platinum-containing chemotherapy and can be given as first-line systemic therapy in ~25% of patients with NSCLC. Actionable genetic alterations include EGFR, BRAF V600E, and MET exon 14 splicing site-sensitizing mutations, as well as ALK-, ROS1-, RET-, and NTRK-gene fusions. Secondly, inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or cemiplimab monotherapy have become a standard of care for ~25% of patients with NSCLC whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression (total proportion score (TPS) ≥50%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Lastly, for the remaining ~50% of patients who are fit and whose tumors have no or low PD-L1 expression (TPS of 0–49%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK aberrations, platinum-containing chemotherapy with the addition of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor alone or in combination of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor improves PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. The objectives of this review are to summarize the current data and perspectives on first-line systemic treatment in patients with unresectable NSCLC and propose a practical algorithm for implementing precision biomarker testing at diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modulating immune inhibitory pathways has been a major recent breakthrough in cancer treatment. Checkpoint blockade antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1) have demonstrated acceptable toxicity, promising clinical responses, durable disease control, and improved survival in some patients with advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other tumor types. About 20 % of advanced NSCLC patients and 30 % of advanced melanoma patients experience tumor responses from checkpoint blockade monotherapy, with better clinical responses seen with the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Given the power of these new therapies, it is important to understand the complex and dynamic nature of host immune responses and the regulation of additional molecules in the tumor microenvironment and normal organs in response to the checkpoint blockade therapies. In this era of precision oncology, there remains a largely unmet need to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy, to optimize the monitoring assays for tumor-specific immune responses, to develop strategies to improve clinical efficacy, and to identify biomarkers so that immune-related adverse events can be avoided. At this time, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining using 22C3 antibody is the only FDA-approved companion diagnostic for patients with NSCLC-treated pembrolizumab, but more are expected to come to market. We here summarize the current knowledge, clinical efficacy, potential immune biomarkers, and associated assays for immune checkpoint blockade therapies in advanced solid tumors.